Jatuporn tells red shirts not to rally May 7 at Constitutional Court

[Benmart]

I almost barfed when Jatuporn used the word 'honorable'!

Yes, the word is used freely by all camps but practiced by few.

[Benmart]

I almost barfed when Jatuporn used the word 'honorable'!

The man even does not know what honour means.

An moreover, he has no face also.

Remember, this is the man that covered by his parliamentary immunity called on the redshirts to burn things.

Remember, this is the man that covered by his parliamentary immunity called on the redshirts to burn things.

This is what happens when the sheer amount of BS posted on here and taken as gospel gets so distorted you end up with comments like the above. The sad thing is he probably thinks it's true....................................

I don't take any of this as gospel. I do take it as freedom to post whatever, regardless if it lacks truth or substance.

The alternative is repression of free speech. I'll take the former any day. I can always hit the power off button.

Live and Let Live.

[rabas]

I almost barfed when Jatuporn used the word 'honorable'!

The man even does not know what honour means.

An moreover, he has no face also.

Remember, this is the man that covered by his parliamentary immunity called on the redshirts to burn things.

Remember, this is the man that covered by his parliamentary immunity called on the redshirts to burn things.

This is what happens when the sheer amount of BS posted on here and taken as gospel gets so distorted you end up with comments like the above. The sad thing is he probably thinks it's true....................................

It is true. Do you speak good Thai? Go get the Nattawut videos where he instructs people to burn the city, even to the size and types of bottles to bring. Crystal clear meaning. He even suggests they will fill the bottles with petrol for them. Clear as vacuum. There are multiple examples, you can start here.

WHO : Nattawut Saikua (Red Shirt Leader)

WHEN : January 27, 2010

WHERE : Khao Soi Dao, Chunburi province, Thailand

WHAT : The Red Ordered to Burn Bangkok

quote: yooppadee bouthong:

I can not believe that he said to burn all of Bangkok, I hate him how can he said this go to hell Nuttawut.

Start here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvbUVCopKec

And, you just posted that you do admit when wrong, lets see if that is true.....wwww

Edited May 7, 2014 by rabas

[Cuchulainn]

Dubai: Right, she's out so I want a mass rally this Saturday

JP: OK boss. Just tell us where.

Dubai: Puttamonthon. Same as last time. OK?

JP: Will the drones get paid this time?

Dubai: Fraid not. The well's running dry. So, what kinda numbers are you expecting?

JP: 12 people, a few dogs and maybe a coupla cats.

**click**bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Nickymaster]

What has the UDD really done for THEIR red shirts the las 5 years or so besides telling them what to do?

[darren84310]

Five minutes of fame... TIME UP!

[fab4]

You never admit you were wrong in your fabrications so why should he. Jatuporn is not allowed to incite inrest or violence so i doubt he is in violation. However i do find it quite funny the excuses Jatuporn makes for his request not to protest at the CC. I think their lack of supporters is the real reason though. Regrouping means they are in too small numbers to make a difference and want all their supporters in one place to make a show of strength.

Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

I reply to criticism and have admitted I'm wrong - when I am. Check out scampers record for that before you blindly back him up.

What kind of English did you study if you equate telling the UDD to not go to the CC, but to attend a rally on Saturday instead, as inciting unrest or violence?

Probably the kind of English which interprets

"He urged the red shirts to join the mass rally on Saturday as earlier planned and said that the mass rally would continue until the red shirts win the battle."

as suggesting there would be a battle (one way or another) ?

Any mention in your additional "evidence" that includes inciting unrest or violence?

And don't even try to put foward "battle" as justification for your argument. Did they not teach you about figurative speech when you learnt English?

[fab4]

I almost barfed when Jatuporn used the word 'honorable'!

The man even does not know what honour means.

An moreover, he has no face also.

Remember, this is the man that covered by his parliamentary immunity called on the redshirts to burn things.

Remember, this is the man that covered by his parliamentary immunity called on the redshirts to burn things.

This is what happens when the sheer amount of BS posted on here and taken as gospel gets so distorted you end up with comments like the above. The sad thing is he probably thinks it's true....................................

I don't take any of this as gospel. I do take it as freedom to post whatever, regardless if it lacks truth or substance.

The alternative is repression of free speech. I'll take the former any day. I can always hit the power off button.

Live and Let Live.

There's free speech and there's just plain ignorance.

[fab4]

I almost barfed when Jatuporn used the word 'honorable'!

The man even does not know what honour means.

An moreover, he has no face also.

Remember, this is the man that covered by his parliamentary immunity called on the redshirts to burn things.

Remember, this is the man that covered by his parliamentary immunity called on the redshirts to burn things.

This is what happens when the sheer amount of BS posted on here and taken as gospel gets so distorted you end up with comments like the above. The sad thing is he probably thinks it's true....................................

It is true. Do you speak good Thai? Go get the Nattawut videos where he instructs people to burn the city, even to the size and types of bottles to bring. Crystal clear meaning. He even suggests they will fill the bottles with petrol for them. Clear as vacuum. There are multiple examples, you can start here.

WHO : Nattawut Saikua (Red Shirt Leader)

WHEN : January 27, 2010

WHERE : Khao Soi Dao, Chunburi province, Thailand

WHAT : The Red Ordered to Burn Bangkok

quote: yooppadee bouthong:

I can not believe that he said to burn all of Bangkok, I hate him how can he said this go to hell Nuttawut.

Start here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvbUVCopKec

And, you just posted that you do admit when wrong, lets see if that is true.....wwww

Did you even bother to read the post before replying?

If I am not mistaken this thread is about Jatuporn, hansni was referring to Jatuporn, I was replying about Jatuporn, but you, you have decided to bring Nattawut into the discussion. Why? We're not talking about Nattawut. We're talking about Jatuporn.

As I said before, I admit when I'm wrong - when I am wrong.

How about you? Do you apologise when you leap into posts without thinking and accuse others of being wrong?

Edited May 7, 2014 by fab4

[Jonmarleesco]

'... If there is no elected prime minister, there is no need to have a government and we will be the only country which has no prime minister just say for three years. Then we will see how devastating will be for our economy ...' Or not, as the case may well prove to be.

[thesetat2013]

You never admit you were wrong in your fabrications so why should he. Jatuporn is not allowed to incite inrest or violence so i doubt he is in violation. However i do find it quite funny the excuses Jatuporn makes for his request not to protest at the CC. I think their lack of supporters is the real reason though. Regrouping means they are in too small numbers to make a difference and want all their supporters in one place to make a show of strength.

Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

I reply to criticism and have admitted I'm wrong - when I am. Check out scampers record for that before you blindly back him up.

What kind of English did you study if you equate telling the UDD to not go to the CC, but to attend a rally on Saturday instead, as inciting unrest or violence?

Probably the kind of English which interprets

"He urged the red shirts to join the mass rally on Saturday as earlier planned and said that the mass rally would continue until the red shirts win the battle."

as suggesting there would be a battle (one way or another) ?

Any mention in your additional "evidence" that includes inciting unrest or violence?

And don't even try to put foward "battle" as justification for your argument. Did they not teach you about figurative speech when you learnt English?

Inciting unrest can be construed as calling people to gather to act out negatively against something. Also given the REDS history of violent acts it is a safer assumption that a call to battle would be more literal than figurative. Unless you have some proof that his call to ready for a battle was only spoken figuratively?

Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[geoman1976]

I understand their grief on how their votes were blocked and how a coup was held to overthrow an elected leader. But is there really a need to protest against everything? Will they accept the verdict of the court even if it is well cited with evidence and shows that the Shinawatra family is in fact in the wrong? I don't have a problem with the UDDs idelogy, but I do have a problem on who they are supporting and where they are getting their funding from.

Man, I hear ya'. FOr some reason, the idea of democracy revolves around the right of assembly to protest but really it is about the majority rule. If you lose, use education, campaigning, and debating to win the next...not block the economy and gov't until a coup happens. this is completely self defeating as we are seeing now with the economy in the crapper and the AEC right around the corner. If I were in the AEC, I would be thinking that Myanmar and other surrounding areas are looking better and better to be the center of our operations.

[rametindallas]

He urged the red shirts to join the mass rally on Saturday as earlier planned and said that the mass rally would continue until the red shirts win the battle.

Well, by Saturday the battle may well be over. In that case, just forget any more rallies and simply accept the court ruling. THAT would be the 'honorable' thing to do.

There's a good possibility that the Saturday rally will be canceled, or canceled early, due to low attendance. Thaksin is tired of throwing good money after bad and his UDD have probably been 'skimming' the funds he sends for rallies. Poor Dr. T is not sleeping well these nights, I imagine.

[Scott]

Off-topic, inflammatory posts and replies deleted.

[fab4]

Inciting unrest can be construed as calling people to gather to act out negatively against something. Also given the REDS history of violent acts it is a safer assumption that a call to battle would be more literal than figurative. Unless you have some proof that his call to ready for a battle was only spoken figuratively?

Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

OK lets go with your definition of inciting unrest as "calling people to gather to act out negatively against something" (though I'd love to see what dictionary you got that from ). How does that stand up to Jatuporn telling the UDD not to rally at the CC but to go to the previously organised rally on Saturday?

Oh I get it, by not going to the Constitution Court he's inciting them to act negatively, because they aren't going to go there. Right. I won't bother you any further on figurative speech except to ask have you proof that he wasn't speaking figuratively? The wishy washy "REDS history of violent acts" really doesn't help your cause. That's a figure of speech, I don't mean you have a cause that you support, but perhaps you do?

Anyway, I look forward to the Kaiser Chiefs reissue of "I predict a group of people acting negatively against something"

[northernjohn]

I almost barfed when Jatuporn used the word 'honorable'!

He is the poster child for watch what I do not what I say.

[bendejo]

He's gone from red shirt to red-plaid shirt, what political impact will this make?

[Ricardo]

He's gone from red shirt to red-plaid shirt, what political impact will this make?

Perhaps indicates a back-up career-plan, as a vote-fixer & rabble-rouser, for the S.N.P. with the upcoming vote on Scottish independence ?

[Ricardo]

He urged the red shirts to join the mass rally on Saturday as earlier planned and said that the mass rally would continue until the red shirts win the battle.

Well, by Saturday the battle may well be over. In that case, just forget any more rallies and simply accept the court ruling. THAT would be the 'honorable' thing to do.

There's a good possibility that the Saturday rally will be canceled, or canceled early, due to low attendance. Thaksin is tired of throwing good money after bad and his UDD have probably been 'skimming' the funds he sends for rallies. Poor Dr. T is not sleeping well these nights, I imagine.

"skimming the funds" ?

"Big Fleas have Little Fleas,

Upon their Backs to Bite them,

Little Fleas, have Smaller Fleas,

And So Ad-Infinitum" ?

I believe that some economists call this the 'trickle-down effect' of wealth ?

Or, "all UDD-leaders Thais will be rich after six months", perhaps ?

Edited May 8, 2014 by Ricardo

[Torkmada]

Another rally cancelled. Why not just cancel the UDD you are getting low on supporters anyway.

Why not hold an election if UDD support is so low?

Because everyone knows the truth - that's why.

Ain't reality a bitch.

[rubl]

You never admit you were wrong in your fabrications so why should he. Jatuporn is not allowed to incite inrest or violence so i doubt he is in violation. However i do find it quite funny the excuses Jatuporn makes for his request not to protest at the CC. I think their lack of supporters is the real reason though. Regrouping means they are in too small numbers to make a difference and want all their supporters in one place to make a show of strength.

Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

I reply to criticism and have admitted I'm wrong - when I am. Check out scampers record for that before you blindly back him up.

What kind of English did you study if you equate telling the UDD to not go to the CC, but to attend a rally on Saturday instead, as inciting unrest or violence?

Probably the kind of English which interprets

"He urged the red shirts to join the mass rally on Saturday as earlier planned and said that the mass rally would continue until the red shirts win the battle."

as suggesting there would be a battle (one way or another) ?

Any mention in your additional "evidence" that includes inciting unrest or violence?

And don't even try to put foward "battle" as justification for your argument. Did they not teach you about figurative speech when you learnt English?

Isn't the 'inciting of unrest' mostly a use of 'figure of speech' ?

Like 'we cannot stand by idle when those corrupted courts remove our government" ?

[thesetat2013]

You never admit you were wrong in your fabrications so why should he. Jatuporn is not allowed to incite inrest or violence so i doubt he is in violation. However i do find it quite funny the excuses Jatuporn makes for his request not to protest at the CC. I think their lack of supporters is the real reason though. Regrouping means they are in too small numbers to make a difference and want all their supporters in one place to make a show of strength.

Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

I reply to criticism and have admitted I'm wrong - when I am. Check out scampers record for that before you blindly back him up.

What kind of English did you study if you equate telling the UDD to not go to the CC, but to attend a rally on Saturday instead, as inciting unrest or violence?

Probably the kind of English which interprets

"He urged the red shirts to join the mass rally on Saturday as earlier planned and said that the mass rally would continue until the red shirts win the battle."

as suggesting there would be a battle (one way or another) ?

Any mention in your additional "evidence" that includes inciting unrest or violence?

And don't even try to put foward "battle" as justification for your argument. Did they not teach you about figurative speech when you learnt English?

Isn't the 'inciting of unrest' mostly a use of 'figure of speech' ?

Like 'we cannot stand by idle when those corrupted courts remove our government" ?

No is not! Google inciting. It means to cause someone to act in an angry, violent, or unlawful way. Incite is a verb and is an action word. Not a figure of speech

Sent from my GT-S5310 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app