Local Drunk Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 "The court eventually suspended the jail term on grounds that the person damaged by the eavesdropping sent a statement to the court, saying he understood why the two had listened in to the phone conversation." The person damaged was also perhaps gotten to...
khunken Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 These two bozo's should be, at minimum locked up for life, They both have enough blood on theirs hand to merit execution in my opinion. Actually having to keep their big mouths shut is a fate worse than death for these two mercenaries.
Halion Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Three years then reduced to two years for confession when caught in an undeniable situation ,then reduced further to suspended sentences. Nothing changes. Think this junta thinks that owing to it's superior position and manpower that a hearts and minds policy can be won with the caring approach. I am sure the two reds are laughing their heads of at the mouse that roared.
realenglish1 Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Go to the Gym together and just talk about the kids Huh
rametindallas Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 quote "But the court reasoned that since the two were never sentenced to serve prison terms in the past, and a plaintiff in the case did not wish to pursue the court case against them, the judge agreed to give them a two-year suspended sentence instead" Thats funny. Didn't Jatuporn get a 2 year prison sentence(suspended) in May for defaming Khun Abhisit? Rhetorical question, yes he did. As we all know, members of the establishment(even though some of them frantically deny being part of this elite) do not get punished. This would have been a perfect chance for the junta to prove neutrality and give Jatuporn a fair and long sentence, instead we continue to live in anarchy with red criminals getting away with crimes ranging from this one, to the hacking off of an old man's arm with a machete and then shooting him dead. Again, no need to serve your prison sentence. Sentences like these are probably why Dr. Thaksin is so butt-hurt. He got a two-year, non-suspended, sentence and he had never had so much as a traffic ticket. He was the highest, hi-so to ever be sentenced to real time in prison. Sentences like these just rub salt into the wound.
Cuchulainn Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 How many suspended sentences can one man accumulate before he sees the inside of a jail? This fat b#astard seems to enjoy a blessed existence. He can do whatever he wants and it is all whitewashed. I am simply speechless. That thing is an insult to fat bastards!! 2
city Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 They get a suspended sentence because the previous sentence was also suspended because the previous sentence was suspended and so on and so forth. Same way Thaksin's wife and her... brother, cousin, some other crook in her family? didn't get locked up for fraud, they didn't have a previous sentence so they were upstanding members of society, therefore suspended sentence. Just frikking brilliant system. Think Sondhi and his 23 years prison...not done a day on porridge yet. Red Bull, Porsche cuts Laos girl in half, Mercedes driver rams car in Bus stop, Chalerms boys, Suthep fraud over land and palm oil and your bitchin about a bit of wire tapping. if your born in the right bed you have a more compliant judiciary.
rubl Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 I don't doubt that at all , but to be seen to be punishing the , for want of a better word, losers , of the last political wrangle may not be the best of strategies if they want some kind of lasting accord True, oh so true. God forbid that the courts are seen to apply justice. Would be bad strategy, or as former CAPO head Pol. Capta'in Chalerm said "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided" 1
rubl Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 They get a suspended sentence because the previous sentence was also suspended because the previous sentence was suspended and so on and so forth. Same way Thaksin's wife and her... brother, cousin, some other crook in her family? didn't get locked up for fraud, they didn't have a previous sentence so they were upstanding members of society, therefore suspended sentence. Just frikking brilliant system. Think Sondhi and his 23 years prison...not done a day on porridge yet. Red Bull, Porsche cuts Laos girl in half, Mercedes driver rams car in Bus stop, Chalerms boys, Suthep fraud over land and palm oil and your bitchin about a bit of wire tapping. if your born in the right bed you have a more compliant judiciary. A truer word is seldomly spoken here on TVF. Lose 500 billion or 700++ billion and you're still allowed to leave the country to celebrate the birthday of your criminal fugitive brother. But let's return to the Jatuporn / Nattawut duo. I assume there are still many more crimes for which they are not accused, prosecuted and given suspended sentences for ?
fab4 Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 I don't doubt that at all , but to be seen to be punishing the , for want of a better word, losers , of the last political wrangle may not be the best of strategies if they want some kind of lasting accord True, oh so true. God forbid that the courts are seen to apply justice. Would be bad strategy, or as former CAPO head Pol. Capta'in Chalerm said "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided" I know it doesn't suit your agenda but Chalerm did not say "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided". This is how that particular comment was recorded by the media; "Labor Minister Pol Capt Chalerm Yoobamrung, who is also the CAPO director, expressed his fears that violence could break out if the premier was found guilty of her charges regarding the unfair transfer of former National Security Council (NSC) chief Thawin Pliensri and corruption in the government’s rice pledging scheme." Quite different to your version isn't it? There's a reason for that, the second version is not a lie.
Hatyaier Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 Of course wiretapping is not nearly as serious as picking mushrooms in a national park! 1
mrtoad Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 I would guess these two clowns have probably got further charges pending, but considering Jabba has already got a suspended sentence for another crime, in any logical system he'd be going to hail. Of course, according to The Red apologists they never get treated fairly, well this seems pretty good result for them, again.
JesseFrank Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 I'd love to know which stadium Want to join them ?
northernjohn Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 quote "But the court reasoned that since the two were never sentenced to serve prison terms in the past, and a plaintiff in the case did not wish to pursue the court case against them, the judge agreed to give them a two-year suspended sentence instead" Thats funny. Didn't Jatuporn get a 2 year prison sentence(suspended) in May for defaming Khun Abhisit? Rhetorical question, yes he did. As we all know, members of the establishment(even though some of them frantically deny being part of this elite) do not get punished. This would have been a perfect chance for the junta to prove neutrality and give Jatuporn a fair and long sentence, instead we continue to live in anarchy with red criminals getting away with crimes ranging from this one, to the hacking off of an old man's arm with a machete and then shooting him dead. Again, no need to serve your prison sentence. Well I am a strong supporter of the NCPO but I think they missed the boat on this one. Had to laugh at Both Jatuporn and Nattawut refused to give any comments to the media representatives as they emerged out of the court room after the sentence. Jatuporn speechless. Would be quite the sight to see. How many more charges has he got against him?
northernjohn Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 These two bozo's should be, at minimum locked up for life, They both have enough blood on theirs hand to merit execution in my opinion. Actually having to keep their big mouths shut is a fate worse than death for these two mercenaries. Well you have a good point there. But I still feel they should be doing it in prison.
Seastallion Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 quote "But the court reasoned that since the two were never sentenced to serve prison terms in the past, and a plaintiff in the case did not wish to pursue the court case against them, the judge agreed to give them a two-year suspended sentence instead" Thats funny. Didn't Jatuporn get a 2 year prison sentence(suspended) in May for defaming Khun Abhisit? Rhetorical question, yes he did. As we all know, members of the establishment(even though some of them frantically deny being part of this elite) do not get punished. This would have been a perfect chance for the junta to prove neutrality and give Jatuporn a fair and long sentence, instead we continue to live in anarchy with red criminals getting away with crimes ranging from this one, to the hacking off of an old man's arm with a machete and then shooting him dead. Again, no need to serve your prison sentence. You're quite right, except it was the court, not the junta, that passed down the sentence.
siampolee Posted July 22, 2014 Posted July 22, 2014 But their lawyer said currently all redshirt leaders have ceased their political activities but doing physical exercises every week together at a sports stadium. Like those old fashioned parlour games, Snakes and Ladders, certain members of the group were expert at nipping down ladders if my memory is correct Beat your neighbour out of doors being an old time favourite coupled with massed debate activities as well so as to relieve the pressure on these poor souls .
rubl Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 I don't doubt that at all , but to be seen to be punishing the , for want of a better word, losers , of the last political wrangle may not be the best of strategies if they want some kind of lasting accord True, oh so true. God forbid that the courts are seen to apply justice. Would be bad strategy, or as former CAPO head Pol. Capta'in Chalerm said "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided" I know it doesn't suit your agenda but Chalerm did not say "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided". This is how that particular comment was recorded by the media; "Labor Minister Pol Capt Chalerm Yoobamrung, who is also the CAPO director, expressed his fears that violence could break out if the premier was found guilty of her charges regarding the unfair transfer of former National Security Council (NSC) chief Thawin Pliensri and corruption in the government’s rice pledging scheme." Quite different to your version isn't it? There's a reason for that, the second version is not a lie. Correct, I should have said "something like" Mind you, k. Chalerm is so much better with words. The "if found guilty" is so much more ominous, don't you think
Andrew5 Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 I don't doubt that at all , but to be seen to be punishing the , for want of a better word, losers , of the last political wrangle may not be the best of strategies if they want some kind of lasting accord True, oh so true. God forbid that the courts are seen to apply justice. Would be bad strategy, or as former CAPO head Pol. Capta'in Chalerm said "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided" I know it doesn't suit your agenda but Chalerm did not say "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided". This is how that particular comment was recorded by the media; "Labor Minister Pol Capt Chalerm Yoobamrung, who is also the CAPO director, expressed his fears that violence could break out if the premier was found guilty of her charges regarding the unfair transfer of former National Security Council (NSC) chief Thawin Pliensri and corruption in the governments rice pledging scheme." Quite different to your version isn't it? There's a reason for that, the second version is not a lie. Correct, I should have said "something like" Mind you, k. Chalerm is so much better with words. The "if found guilty" is so much more ominous, don't you think Chalerm : Director of THREATS... 1
His Masters Voice Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 I know this is Thailand, but this just feels wrong to me.
Cuchulainn Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 I'd love to know which stadium Want to join them ? "Join" is not the word I had in mind, Jesse!!
siampolee Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 Can't you just visualize the comments of both Jutuporn and Nattawut when engaged in mass debate activities. ''Time to rest or stop chaps exercise time is '' coming to its end now.''
WitawatWatawit Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 One good thing - the jails won't get burned down. 1
Cuchulainn Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 One good thing - the jails won't get burned down. They'd set light to their whole families if it got Thaksin back. Dirty animals. 2
ginjag Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 One good thing - the jails won't get burned down. They'd set light to their whole families if it got Thaksin back. Dirty animals. Suspended sentences, ROPE comes to mind. 1
gemini81 Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 They'll get justice served to 'em sooner or later. Live by the mouth and sword.......
bkkstooge Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 I don't doubt that at all , but to be seen to be punishing the , for want of a better word, losers , of the last political wrangle may not be the best of strategies if they want some kind of lasting accord True, oh so true. God forbid that the courts are seen to apply justice. Would be bad strategy, or as former CAPO head Pol. Capta'in Chalerm said "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided" I know it doesn't suit your agenda but Chalerm did not say "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided". This is how that particular comment was recorded by the media; "Labor Minister Pol Capt Chalerm Yoobamrung, who is also the CAPO director, expressed his fears that violence could break out if the premier was found guilty of her charges regarding the unfair transfer of former National Security Council (NSC) chief Thawin Pliensri and corruption in the government’s rice pledging scheme." Quite different to your version isn't it? There's a reason for that, the second version is not a lie. Talk about semantics 1
jaidam Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 I don't doubt that at all , but to be seen to be punishing the , for want of a better word, losers , of the last political wrangle may not be the best of strategies if they want some kind of lasting accord True, oh so true. God forbid that the courts are seen to apply justice. Would be bad strategy, or as former CAPO head Pol. Capta'in Chalerm said "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided" I know it doesn't suit your agenda but Chalerm did not say "violence might break out if not the 'right' solution was provided". This is how that particular comment was recorded by the media; "Labor Minister Pol Capt Chalerm Yoobamrung, who is also the CAPO director, expressed his fears that violence could break out if the premier was found guilty of her charges regarding the unfair transfer of former National Security Council (NSC) chief Thawin Pliensri and corruption in the government’s rice pledging scheme." Quite different to your version isn't it? There's a reason for that, the second version is not a lie. Talk about semantics Our dear Fabby is known as being a stickler for details, even though he gets everything arse about face. In this instance I believe he is agreeing that what Chalerm said is a threat. Of course it is a threat. He is just pointing out the different words used, kind of like a distracting tactic I suppose. 2
mikemac Posted July 23, 2014 Posted July 23, 2014 Talk about semantics saai.gif.pagespeed.ce.f25DL0fHCd.gif Our dear Fabby is known as being a stickler for details, even though he gets everything arse about face. In this instance I believe he is agreeing that what Chalerm said is a threat. Of course it is a threat. He is just pointing out the different words used, kind of like a distracting tactic I suppose. Look how many posters refer to him as "the fabricator". There is good reason for that. Which is why he has no credibility. These two red terrorists are laughing their stupid heads off, making a mockery of Thai law. In a lot of other countries they would be locked away in tiny damp cells and the keys would have been thrown away. thumbsup.gif 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now