No Extension Of Stay For Business With Start-ups
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
50
Concerns Grow as Injured Foreigner Vanishes After Bar Brawl on Koh Lanta
Keep your smutty inuendo to yourself please. I was asking about your first hand knowledge, no pun intended, of Pattaya! -
15
DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress - Elon Musk
I wasn't aware of that. So ok, my argument is flawed then. -
10
DHS Tries To Deport A US Born, American Citizen - Not Clickbait - Can't Make This Stuff Up!
I hate when facts keep getting in the way of your fantasy life, don't you? Care to explain what you are claiming is a lie? I bet you cant and won't even try as usual. Keep on crying and whining like a 4 year old. -
123
Masks - Why still now?
I had radiotherapy middle of last year for throat cancer. It seems to have done the job but my throat is still recovering and the misses worries about the Bangkok air pollution so wearing one keeps her happy and might save me a problem. -
14
/Featured Quiz 21st March 2025 - Weekly featured - 1492 and Christopher Columbus
I just completed this quiz. My Score 50/100 My Time 93 seconds -
15
DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress - Elon Musk
Do you really believe no one has ever tried to cut federal spending before, or are you just trying to gaslight us? Not only did Clinton do it, he did it on a bigger scale. But wait, guess who suddenly decided at that time that cutting taxes and reducing the deficit was BAD??? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_policy_of_the_Bill_Clinton_administration In proposing a plan to cut the deficit, Clinton submitted a budget and corresponding tax legislation (the final, signed version was known as the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993) that would cut the deficit by $500 billion over five years by reducing $255 billion of spending and raising taxes on the wealthiest 1.2% of Americans.[5] It also imposed a new energy tax on all Americans and subjected about a quarter of those receiving Social Security payments to higher taxes on their benefits.[6] Republican Congressional leaders launched an aggressive opposition against the bill, claiming that the tax increase would only make matters worse. Republicans were united in this opposition, and every Republican in both houses of Congress voted against the proposal. In fact, it took Vice President Gore's tie-breaking vote in the Senate to pass the bill.[7] After extensive lobbying by the Clinton Administration, the House narrowly voted in favor of the bill by a vote of 218 to 216.[8] The budget package expanded the earned income tax credit (EITC) as relief to low-income families. It reduced the amount they paid in federal income and Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax (FICA), providing $21 billion in savings for 15 million low-income families.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now