Jump to content

Donald Trump Jr. adds to legal team - ABC News


webfact

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, texanaust said:

Three is too many when Mueller is supposed to be non-partisan and above reproach.  Surely there were enough qualified lawyers who did not make campaign contributions to either side that could have been chosen instead.  This is an unforced error by Mueller and hurts the perception of an independent counsel.

Are you kidding every high profile lawyer donates to both sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, webfact said:

The Senate Judiciary Committee said on Friday that Trump Jr. and Manafort had agreed to negotiate whether to be interviewed by the panel in its Russia investigation.

if he is afraid to be interviewed he is showing or appearing to show that he has something to hide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Donald Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner releases details of four meetings with Russian individuals

 

"Donald Trump's son-in-law has released a statement detailing four contacts with Russians during the presidential campaign hours before he faces congressional investigators probing Russia's meddling in the US election."

 

"Mr Kushner has attracted attention for a December meeting with a leading Russian diplomat."

 

"He oversaw digital strategy for the campaign, and some politicians have said they want more answers about whether Russian social media "trolls" were connected to Mr Trump's election efforts."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/24/donald-trumps-son-in-law-jared-kushner-face-grilling-us-congress/

 

The hits keep on coming. 4 of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

"My son Donald openly gave his e-mails to the media & authorities whereas Crooked Hillary Clinton deleted (& acid washed) her 33,000 e-mails!"

 

Says it all...:sleep:

The fact that you actually wrote that says it all ...:sleep:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

"My son Donald openly gave his e-mails to the media & authorities whereas Crooked Hillary Clinton deleted (& acid washed) her 33,000 e-mails!" Says it all...:sleep:

                                 If you believe that, then you're a died in the wool, Trump-believer, no matter how ridiculous the claims by the Sheister in Chief.

 

                      Don Jr would have released zero emails.  He only did it because the NY Times kindly notified him that they (the NY Times) had found them, and were about to release them. 

 

                       It's like the Pussy-Grabber tapes.  Pussy-Grabber in chief would have angrily denied he ever said that, except it was on tape, and clearly the Pussy-Grabber's voice.  He had to admit it was his words, and then came up with a locker-room-talk excuse that only his wife and fox whores globbed onto.  Every other of the 14 sexual attack accusations against Trump Sr, he's vehemently denied, because there is no video/audio proof (none that we know of, yet).   

 

                                    It's the same with sniveling Don Jr.  He only admits what can't be denied.  And even then, he blatantly lied to Sean Hannity on Fox News, when he said, "That's it.  There's nothing more."  .....and the next day, more was released by mainstream media, and then the following day, more still,  .....none of it was denied by any Trumpsters, because it was all provable.   Trumps will only deny things when there is no absolute proof backing it up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, texanaust said:

Three is too many when Mueller is supposed to be non-partisan and above reproach.  Surely there were enough qualified lawyers who did not make campaign contributions to either side that could have been chosen instead.  This is an unforced error by Mueller and hurts the perception of an independent counsel.

Really?   What other requirement will Trump's fascists insist upon?   If a lawyer has watched late night talk-show?   All talk show hosts skewer Trump daily, except for Fox's morning show.  

Or perhaps Trumpsters would like to disqualify lawyers (for Mueller's team) if they were ever convicted of fraud and had to pay $25 million in damages.  Oh wait, none of the lawyers had that problem, but Trump did.   

 

Or perhaps Trumpsters would disqualify any lawyers who got accused of roughly raping little girls.  Oh wait, can't do that, because none of the lawyers were accused of that, .....oh, but Trump is accused of that.   There was a court case supposed to start in December, but Trump supporters showed up and threatened the defendant with bodily harm, so she was hounded away from the court house.   That's the sort of justice Trumpsters like: threatening physical harm - in order to stifle legal proceedings against their infallible hero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, attrayant said:

Forgot the best one: monetary contributions are seen as a show of bias or allegiance, but Trump donated $100K to the Clinton Foundation.  Can we stop this silliness now?

But, but, if they stop the silliness, what else have they got left?

 

T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...