Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Alberta Sets Referendum on Canada Separation

Alberta will hold a referendum in October on whether the province should remain part of Canada, in a move that marks the most serious challenge to Canadian unity in decades.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

Premier Danielle Smith announced on Thursday that voters will decide whether Alberta should stay within Canada or begin the constitutional process that could eventually lead to a binding vote on independence.

The referendum is scheduled for 19 October and follows months of mounting pressure from separatist groups in the oil-rich western province.

A citizen-led petition supporting separation reportedly collected more than 300,000 signatures earlier this year, while another petition backing Alberta remaining in Canada drew more than 400,000.

Polls, however, continue to indicate that most Albertans oppose leaving the country.

Referendum question announced

In a televised address, Smith said voters would be asked: “Should Alberta remain a province of Canada or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?”

Smith said she personally supports Alberta staying within Canada.

“That is how I would vote on separation in a provincial referendum,” she said, adding that her government and caucus also back remaining in the federation.

At the same time, the premier criticised a recent court ruling that halted a petition seeking a separation referendum. An Alberta judge dismissed the petition process after Indigenous First Nations groups argued they had not been properly consulted, which they said violated their rights.

Smith said the decision unfairly blocked the voices of Albertans who supported the initiative.

“As Premier, I will not have a legal mistake by a single judge silence the voices of hundreds of thousands of Albertans,” she said.

She argued that delaying the issue would only intensify divisions and prolong debate over Alberta’s future.

Long-standing grievances with Ottawa

Support for greater autonomy — and in some cases outright independence — has grown in Alberta over concerns that the federal government in Ottawa does not adequately represent the province’s interests.

Many Albertans believe federal environmental and climate policies have harmed the province’s oil and gas sector, a major driver of the local economy.

There is also a long-standing perception that Alberta contributes more to the national economy through its resource wealth than it receives in return from the federal government.

Smith echoed some of those frustrations in her address, accusing Ottawa of moving toward a more centralised political system and interfering in provincial jurisdiction.

“I categorically reject Ottawa’s attempts to do so,” she said.

While separatist movements have historically remained on the political margins in Alberta, calls for greater provincial powers have become more prominent over the past year.

Legal hurdles remain

Even if voters support the proposal in October, Alberta would still face a lengthy and uncertain path toward separation.

Canada established legal rules for any province seeking independence after two referendums in Quebec, including a narrow 1995 vote in which 50.58% backed remaining in Canada.

Earlier this month, Prime Minister Mark Carney said any separation effort would need to comply with the federal Clarity Act, introduced after the Quebec referendums.

Under the law, any future independence vote would require a clear referendum question and a “clear majority” in favour of separation, with oversight from Canada’s House of Commons.

If those conditions were met, Alberta and the federal government would then enter negotiations over the terms of separation.

Carney has recently worked with Smith on energy and infrastructure issues, including plans for a possible new oil pipeline to the Pacific coast.

Federal ministers and opposition politicians also stressed support for national unity following Thursday’s announcement.

Dominic LeBlanc said the federal government believes Alberta’s interests are best served within a united Canada, while Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre said he would continue campaigning to keep the country united.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 23 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

metisdead Legendary Member

A post with negative comments on the news article has been removed @Cave Johnson :

  1. News articles are collected from recognised sources and may be consolidated or rewritten with AI assistance. Respectful discussion of the article content is welcome. Disrespectful comments about the articles, the use of AI, or the news team (e.g. “clickbait,” “slow news day,” mocking grammar, or AI taunts) are not permitted. Posts breaching this rule will be removed, and posting suspension or account closure may result. If you see an error in an article, please use the report function.

koolkarl Gold Member

koolkarl

Advanced Member

Short the loonie.

FlorC Platinum Member

FlorC

Advanced Member

Why is this impotant ?

Alberta holds nearly all of Canada's oil sands reserves, which account for the majority of the country's oil reserves.

They will never allow the separation.

While a lofty goal to get out , it has a stench of Trump admin behind it.

Thingamabob Diamond Member

Thingamabob

Advanced Member

No chance. Alberta has most of Canada's oil reserves. Central government in Ottowa will never let it go.

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member

My understanding is the referendum is only asking voters whether they want a SECOND referendum to ask a more direct question. This first referendum just asks them if they want the government of Alberta to pursue another referendum - or whether most people just want them to drop the whole idea.

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member

I'm from Alberta. I visit semiannually to keep my residency. Conveniently I will be there in October when the vote happens. Guess which way I'll be voting.

The support for this is maybe 25%. The two major cities (> 1 million) overwhelmingly support remain. Like the US, most of the noise comes from the rural and small cities which have nowhere near enough votes. The support would have been in the low 30% range before Trump started his 51st state nonsense and the referendum is now seen as being organized by Trump. There's even talk of treason charges against the politicians backing the exit that had meetings with Trump's representatives.

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member

I'm a hockey fan and was watching NHL finals the other year. I was suprised to see Edmonton Oilers home games full of fans wearing the Oilers' jersey but placing their hands over their hearts and singing the US national anthem. There are many Americans living in both Edmonton and Calgary because that's where Canada's oil patch is located, and maybe they can afford the season's tickets - still it was unusual to see. But it's also an indicator of the influence America has on Alberta in general.

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, gargamon said:

. Conveniently I will be there in October when the vote happens.

If you weren't planning to be there, would you (or other Albertans) be able to cast absentee/mail-in ballots?

Purdey Diamond Member

Purdey

Advanced Member

It will be interesting to learn which group invested most in the natural resources, Alberta itself or the government of Canada.

Canada may have a case to manage those resources in the event of Alberta's independence.

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, ronnie50 said:

If you weren't planning to be there, would you (or other Albertans) be able to cast absentee/mail-in ballots?

Don't know about that. Google?

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member
37 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

No chance. Alberta has most of Canada's oil reserves. Central government in Ottowa will never let it go.

Quite likely. The bigger threat from the USA to Canada (IMHO) is USA trying to get access to Canada's fresh water - of which Canada has a huge abundance. Canada has resisted most attempts by the US to access it (a couple of exceptions) because of a theory 'once you turn on the tap, you can never turn it off'. When the first Trump threats of '51st state' were uttered, Canada prepared some serious retaliation and push back, including a threat to shut off electricity to the northeastern US power grid by Hydro Quebec a major energy provider to both eastern Canada and northeastern US.

Thingamabob Diamond Member

Thingamabob

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, ronnie50 said:

Quite likely. The bigger threat from the USA to Canada (IMHO) is USA trying to get access to Canada's fresh water - of which Canada has a huge abundance. Canada has resisted most attempts by the US to access it (a couple of exceptions) because of a theory 'once you turn on the tap, you can never turn it off'. When the first Trump threats of '51st state' were uttered, Canada prepared some serious retaliation and push back, including a threat to shut off electricity to the northeastern US power grid by Hydro Quebec a major energy provider to both eastern Canada and northeastern US.

And to think I believed Canadians would be thrilled to be governed by the likes of Donald Trump....

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

And to think I believed Canadians would be thrilled to be governed by the likes of Donald Trump....

Some. The same 30% that's MAGA in the US has equivalents in Canada.

wEZnKJmhjcKIwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==.png

Thingamabob Diamond Member

Thingamabob

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Some. The same 30% that's MAGA in the US has equivalents in Canada.

wEZnKJmhjcKIwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==.png

Really ? Interesting.

shackleton Platinum Member

shackleton

Advanced Member

Can't understand why Canadians would want to break their great Country of Canada up

Know doubt the French Canadians in Quebec will be closely watching this situation unfold with interest

daveAustin Diamond Member

daveAustin

Advanced Member

Up to them. Do what you wanna do. If they’re pulling in a disproportionate amount of wealth, then why not? Just be aware of your defence needs and the rest of it. Not quite the same, but Scotland—holds most North Sea oil—should go for it again… give the English the vote this time and it’d be a sure thing. 😀

Just keep an eye on your coastline! But of course they know that’s not going to be a problem… much like Ireland that doesn’t need a military budget, what with the luxury of The England being next door. 😙

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member

With Trump at the WH, it's the best time for a referendum, in order to make sure it fails! 😃

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member
50 minutes ago, shackleton said:

Can't understand why Canadians would want to break their great Country of Canada up

Know doubt the French Canadians in Quebec will be closely watching this situation unfold with interest

As an Albertan I would have voted for Quebec to separate back when they voted decades ago. But they didn't give us non-Quebecers a choice. They are such a drain on the country.

Now that I'm older and wiser and got away (mostly) from redneck Alberta I would likely vote differently.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
37 minutes ago, daveAustin said:

Up to them. Do what you wanna do. If they’re pulling in a disproportionate amount of wealth, then why not? Just be aware of your defence needs and the rest of it. Not quite the same, but Scotland—holds most North Sea oil—should go for it again… give the English the vote this time and it’d be a sure thing. 😀

Just keep an eye on your coastline! But of course they know that’s not going to be a problem… much like Ireland that doesn’t need a military budget, what with the luxury of The England being next door. 😙

Ireland spends about 1.4 Billion on defence, .4% of GDP. So yes, considerably less than the UK both in amount and percentage.

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member

The Albertans have been complaining for decades that, since they have all the oil and share a percentage of profits with the rest of the country, that they get a raw deal from Canada's central government in return. But the reality is obscured. Canada is the second largest country by area in the world, yet with a population 8 times smaller than the US. Imagine the costs of such a large country with smaller tax collection - national security - its three seabound borders, patrolling its fisheries, coastguard, foreign affairs and Embassies abroad, national law enforcement (RCMP) international intelligence, overseeing national and international aviation and airports/seaports, maintain a central bank, print money, all the while letting each province collect their own taxes for healthcare, education and social services.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

BC and Saskatchewan have already funded a bridge. Those eco-terrorists were never real Canadians anyway.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
12 hours ago, gargamon said:

I'm from Alberta. I visit semiannually to keep my residency. Conveniently I will be there in October when the vote happens. Guess which way I'll be voting.

The support for this is maybe 25%. The two major cities (> 1 million) overwhelmingly support remain. Like the US, most of the noise comes from the rural and small cities which have nowhere near enough votes. The support would have been in the low 30% range before Trump started his 51st state nonsense and the referendum is now seen as being organized by Trump. There's even talk of treason charges against the politicians backing the exit that had meetings with Trump's representatives.

I finally figured out why you hate jews and americans so much. Thanks for the detail.

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, gargamon said:

Some. The same 30% that's MAGA in the US has equivalents in Canada.

wEZnKJmhjcKIwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==.png

I think the shaded area of the graph represents progressives.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member

Maggie Thatcher was right about Referendums. She was always right.

On that occasion the referendum was rejected. Speeches were made on the subject from both sides of the House, to which I shall refer. The hon. Gentleman's interruption does not alter the fact that the White Paper makes no attempt to discuss the constitutional position once we have had the first referendum, although members of the Government accept that once we have a first referendum things will be different and will never be the same again.

I quote from a letter which appeared in The Times of 11th April 1972 from the Home Secretary:

" It may be argued…that the EEC referendum would be a once-for-all operation. The device would never be used again. Who can possibly say that? Once the principle of the referendum has been introduced into British politics, it will not rest with any one party to put a convenient limit to its use. And most history shows, as Clem Attlee pointed out with terse force in 1945, that it is a splendid weapon for demagogues and dictators."

Referenda have ruined Britain. They enshrine the tyranny of the majority.

In a parliamentary democracy, referendums often cut directly across the logic of the system itself. Parliament exists to filter public opinion through deliberation, compromise, expertise, and accountability. A referendum bypasses that process and reduces complex governing questions to a binary emotional contest. This is why Hitler, Mussolini, Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, Franco and Pinochet were all fans of the referendum.

The Alberta vote might well vote against a vote for seperation. But it starts a process that never goes away, and will have unforeseen consequences.

Might as well forgot about elections if binary referendums are used to run the place.

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member
10 hours ago, TedG said:

I think the shaded area of the graph represents progressives.

That's why you're clearly in the shaded area.

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member

Alberta voter data found on website of US company linked to Centurion Project

https://www.nationalobserver.com/2026/05/20/investigations/alberta-voter-data-10x-votes-centurion-project

Investigators at Elections Alberta looking into the largest voter data scandal in the province’s history are following the evidence south of the border — after Canada’s National Observer found voter data on a US organization’s website.

The Centurion Project, led by the Albertan separatist David Parker, is under investigation for unauthorized use of the province’s electors list, a database with the personal information of almost three million voters. The list was easily searchable on the Centurion Project’s app, which Parker said was built with a group of US Republican operatives named 10XVotes.

Canada’s National Observer has found a similar app on 10XVotes’ website stocked exclusively with names and addresses of several thousand Albertans. The origins of the data are not yet known, and it did not include riding information or identifiers used in the electors list.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, gargamon said:

Alberta voter data found on website of US company linked to Centurion Project

https://www.nationalobserver.com/2026/05/20/investigations/alberta-voter-data-10x-votes-centurion-project

Investigators at Elections Alberta looking into the largest voter data scandal in the province’s history are following the evidence south of the border — after Canada’s National Observer found voter data on a US organization’s website.

The Centurion Project, led by the Albertan separatist David Parker, is under investigation for unauthorized use of the province’s electors list, a database with the personal information of almost three million voters. The list was easily searchable on the Centurion Project’s app, which Parker said was built with a group of US Republican operatives named 10XVotes.

Canada’s National Observer has found a similar app on 10XVotes’ website stocked exclusively with names and addresses of several thousand Albertans. The origins of the data are not yet known, and it did not include riding information or identifiers used in the electors list.

Looks like the referendum is more popular than the news lets out, already the authoritatians are starting their campaign against the result.

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member
29 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Looks like the referendum is more popular than the news lets out, already the authoritatians are starting their campaign against the result.

Actually they're looking to lock some people up for treason.

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
39 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Actually they're looking to lock some people up for treason.

Yep. Start the shooting.

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, gargamon said:

That's why you're clearly in the shaded area.

15 hours ago, gargamon said:

That's why you're clearly in the shaded area.

I'm not a progressive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.