Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Alec Baldwin to Stand Trial in Civil Lawsuit Over Fatal ‘Rust’ Set Shooting

A judge in California has ruled that actor Alec Baldwin must face a civil trial over claims that he acted negligently during the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film Rust.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The lawsuit was brought by Serge Svetnoy, a gaffer who worked on the production in New Mexico. He claims the 2021 shooting caused him significant emotional distress and that Baldwin’s actions on set were negligent.

On Friday, Maurice Leiter of the Los Angeles Superior Court ruled that two of Svetnoy’s claims—negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress—could proceed to trial.

Judge Allows Key Claims to Proceed

In his ruling, Judge Leiter wrote that a jury could reasonably conclude that Baldwin acted recklessly by pointing a firearm toward people on set with his finger on the trigger.

“A reasonable jury could find that Mr. Baldwin recklessly disregarded the probability that pointing a gun in the direction of someone, with his finger on the trigger, would cause emotional distress,” the judge said in his summary judgment.

Leiter also determined that although other crew members had responsibility for firearm safety on the set, that did not remove Baldwin’s own obligation to exercise care toward colleagues working nearby.

Svetnoy has argued that the bullet that killed Hutchins narrowly missed him, adding to his emotional trauma.

However, the judge dismissed a separate assault claim brought by Svetnoy. Leiter said there was no evidence that Baldwin intended to harm him or anyone else during the incident.

Background of the Fatal Shooting

Hutchins died on 21 October 2021 when she was shot during a rehearsal involving a Colt .45 revolver that Baldwin believed contained dummy rounds. The weapon instead discharged a live bullet.

The shot also injured director Joel Souza, who recovered from his wounds.

Baldwin has consistently denied pulling the trigger.

Several lawsuits were filed after the incident by crew members and by Hutchins’ husband. Many of those cases were later settled without admission of wrongdoing.

Criminal Case and Related Proceedings

The shooting also led to criminal proceedings. The film’s armorer, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in 2024. Prosecutors argued she introduced the live round to the set and failed to follow required safety procedures when handling firearms.

She was sentenced to 18 months in prison, the maximum penalty for the offence, and has since been released.

Baldwin himself was charged with involuntary manslaughter but pleaded not guilty. The case was dismissed during his 2024 trial by Mary Marlowe Sommer.

Judge Sommer ruled that prosecutors had violated discovery rules by failing to disclose a supplemental report related to ammunition evidence in a timely manner. She said the lapse caused unnecessary delays and was highly prejudicial to the defence.

The dismissal was issued with prejudice, meaning Baldwin cannot be retried on that charge.

Ongoing Legal Disputes

Following the collapse of the criminal case, Baldwin filed a lawsuit alleging malicious prosecution against those involved in bringing the charge.

The defendants in that case are seeking to have the suit dismissed, arguing in court filings that they are protected by prosecutorial immunity and that Baldwin has not established a valid legal claim.

Meanwhile, the civil case filed by Svetnoy will now move forward, where a jury will decide whether Baldwin bears legal responsibility for the emotional harm alleged in connection with the fatal shooting.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 April 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Dante99 Platinum Member

Dante99

Advanced Member

He should be locked up.

VillageIdiot Silver Member

VillageIdiot

Advanced Member

Criminal negligence on the set involving several people.

That slimebag Baldwin should have done some time along with the armourer, Gutierrez-Reed who was primarily responsible.

CMHomeboy78 Silver Member

CMHomeboy78

Advanced Member

@VillageIdiot

+1

Anybody who has ever worked on a film set knows that there are times when the whole lot of them are stoned.

Life in the fast lane - thanks for the memories.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member

Disgraceful that this slimeball has escaped justice so far.

Of course he's a big #bekind donor to the Dems.

Lets hope the civil suit gets him.

CallumWK Diamond Member

CallumWK

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Disgraceful that this slimeball has escaped justice so far.

Of course he's a big #bekind donor to the Dems.

Lets hope the civil suit gets him.

Democrats still living in your head rent-free, Jonny?

In my opinion, and that is just my opinion, the blame is with the armorer, and she has been sentenced already. She is responsible for checking the weapon.

On the other hand, I don't understand why Baldwin claims he didn't pull the trigger, since there is no way this can be denied as the weapon was in his hands only and was fired.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Democrats still living in your head rent-free, Jonny?

No thankfully that boil was lanced in 2024 when you ran with DEI Harris. Thanks Bro we owe you a solid 😃.

3 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

In my opinion, and that is just my opinion, the blame is with the armorer, and she has been sentenced already. She is responsible for checking the weapon.

He hired her and he pulled the trigger for no reason whatsoever. Many other examples of safety failures throughout filming.

3 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

On the other hand, I don't understand why Baldwin claims he didn't pull the trigger, since there is no way this can be denied as the weapon was in his hands only and was fired.

Because he is a lying piece of S like his "Spanish" wife 'Hilaria.

CallumWK Diamond Member

CallumWK

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

He hired her and he pulled the trigger for no reason whatsoever.

Since when does an actor hire an armorer? I think it's the movie producer who hires that person.

And didn't the accident happen during the filming of a scene, so there was reason to pull the trigger.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
21 hours ago, CallumWK said:

Since when does an actor hire an armorer? I think it's the movie producer who hires that person.

He was also the producer.

21 hours ago, CallumWK said:

And didn't the accident happen during the filming of a scene, so there was reason to pull the trigger.

No. He was practicing the scene. The cameras were not rolling. He was not required to pull the trigger.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.