Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Iran warns of wider attacks as Trump calls for international naval force in Hormuz

Iran signals further escalation in regional conflict

Iran has warned it may expand its military actions across the Middle East, threatening facilities linked to the United States after President Donald Trump suggested that several countries could send warships to support efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

The strategic waterway, through which a large share of global oil supplies normally passes, has been largely closed by Iran since the start of the current conflict. The fighting began nearly three weeks ago following coordinated attacks by the United States and Israel on Iranian targets.

Since then, Tehran has launched repeated strikes against oil and infrastructure sites around the Gulf as well as missile attacks on Israel.

Don’t miss the latest headlines from Thailand and around the world. Get the Asean Now Briefing newsletter, delivered daily. Sign up here.

On Saturday, Iranian forces fired additional projectiles at Israel while also launching ballistic missiles towards the United Arab Emirates.

Missile attacks affect Gulf energy hub

Some oil-loading operations in Fujairah in the UAE were halted after the latest strikes, according to industry and trade sources. The emirate is one of the world’s major refuelling centres for shipping.

Television footage showed dark smoke rising above the area following the missile barrage. An Iranian military spokesperson urged residents in the UAE to avoid ports, docks and locations described as “American hideouts”, claiming US forces had carried out attacks on Iranian islands from those sites.

The UAE condemned the strikes. Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to the country’s president, said the state had the right to defend itself against what he described as “terrorist aggression”.

Despite that, he said the UAE was still seeking restraint and a diplomatic path that could reduce tensions in the region.

US and Israeli strikes intensify

The United States continued air operations against Iran, targeting the country’s main oil export hub on Kharg Island. US aircraft bombed the facility on Friday and carried out further attacks on Saturday.

In an interview with NBC News, President Trump said the strikes had severely damaged much of the island’s infrastructure and indicated additional attacks were possible.

Trump also said negotiations with Iran were not currently possible because the conditions were “not good enough”.

Israeli aircraft meanwhile conducted dozens of air raids across Iran. Iranian media reported that at least 15 people were killed when a strike hit a refrigerator and heater factory in the city of Isfahan.

The Israeli military said its operations were aimed at weakening Iran’s missile-launching capabilities and targeting the security forces of the Iranian government.

Trump calls for international naval presence

In social media posts, Trump said several countries could join the United States in protecting shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

He specifically mentioned China, France, Japan, South Korea and the United Kingdom as nations that might deploy naval vessels to help ensure passage through the waterway.

The strait typically carries about a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied gas supplies. Iran’s closure of the route has already pushed energy prices sharply higher and raised concerns about global economic disruption.

The United States has not yet outlined a detailed plan for reopening the passage.

Earlier in the week, Trump warned that Iranian oil facilities could become targets if shipping continued to be blocked. He said he had so far chosen not to destroy key infrastructure on Kharg Island but could reconsider if Iran interfered with maritime traffic.

Iran targets regional partners

Iranian officials signalled they may broaden their response. Ebrahim Zolfaghari, spokesperson for Iran’s joint military command, said energy and economic infrastructure connected to companies with US ties across the region could become targets.

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, urged neighbouring states to remove US military forces from their territories, arguing that American security guarantees in the region had failed to prevent conflict.

Analysts say Tehran’s strategy appears aimed at putting pressure on Washington by targeting US partners and disrupting global energy markets.

Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group said Iran’s approach combines three objectives: ensuring the survival of the government, maintaining the ability to retaliate and prolonging the conflict long enough to negotiate from a stronger position.

Rising casualties and regional tensions

The fighting has caused significant casualties. Reports indicate between 1,400 and 1,800 people have been killed in Iran since the conflict began, while 13 people have died in Israel and around 20 in Gulf countries.

The US embassy in Baghdad has advised American citizens to leave Iraq immediately after a missile strike near the embassy compound.

The warning cited threats from Iran-aligned militia groups as well as the risk of further missile and drone attacks in Iraqi airspace.

President Trump has not provided a timeline for ending the conflict, saying the fighting would continue “as long as it’s necessary”.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 14.March 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Nick Carter icp Star Member

Nick Carter icp

Advanced Member
23 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I made no such denial.

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The two wrongs make a right doctrine.

Alleged crimes by Iran v actual ongoing war crimes by Israel and the U.S.

You quite clearly stated that it was just alleged that Iran were funding Hamas

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member

Can we stop this ' illegal war ' nonsense please.

War is war.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
31 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Today there was a march in London for Al-Quds day .

There was a group of pro Iranian regime/pro Palestine marches and there was a group of Iranians who oppose the regime and Israelis marching together

Which side would you be on ?

e45b79b0-2087-11f1-b048-c9424b2cf5fd.jpg (1).webp

Please don’t make bookings on my calendar, I spent the day cycling in the chilterns.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
25 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

You quite clearly stated that it was just alleged that Iran were funding Hamas

Yes, it’s an allegation.

I didn’t de y it did I Nick?!

Tell the truth now.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

Can we stop this ' illegal war ' nonsense please.

War is war.

It’s for Israel and the U.S. to stop their illegal war.

Refer the UN Charter Articles 2(4) and 51.

Nick Carter icp Star Member

Nick Carter icp

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Please don’t make bookings on my calendar, I spent the day cycling in the chilterns.

You don't want to answer. do you ?

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

You don't want to answer. do you ?

I did answer.

Stop making bookings on my calendar.

Nick Carter icp Star Member

Nick Carter icp

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I did answer.

Stop making bookings on my calendar.

Right , so your answer to the question of

"Today there was a march in London for Al-Quds day .

There was a group of pro Iranian regime/pro Palestine marches and there was a group of Iranians who oppose the regime and Israelis marching together

Which side would you be on ?"

Your answer would be that you would be on the "Stop making bookings on my calendar" side .

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
10 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s be clear, Israel are engaged in an illegal war of aggression against Iran.

It’s not some sports event.

And Iran funding and militarily supporting it's terrorist proxies that target civilians is legal is it? You have no problem with Iran building thousands of ICBM's and Uranium enriched to at least 60% is not a problem for you?

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Right , so your answer to the question of

"Today there was a march in London for Al-Quds day .

There was a group of pro Iranian regime/pro Palestine marches and there was a group of Iranians who oppose the regime and Israelis marching together

Which side would you be on ?"

Your answer would be that you would be on the "Stop making bookings on my calendar" side .

My answer is, there was a march in London today, I was cycling elsewhere.

Knock yourself out imaging why I might have joined the march I did not join.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

And Iran funding and militarily supporting it's terrorist proxies that target civilians is legal is it? You have no problem with Iran building thousands of ICBM's and Uranium enriched to at least 60% is not a problem for you?

I have never claimed Iran supporting or funding terrorists is legal, take that up with those who have.

Iran is no longer bound by any treaty not to produce nuclear weapons, and therefore has the sovereign right to do so. Take that up with the idiot that unilaterally withdrew from the nuclear weapons treaty that Iran was complying with.

Nick Carter icp Star Member

Nick Carter icp

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

My answer is, there was a march in London today, I was cycling elsewhere.

Knock yourself out imaging why I might have joined the march I did not join.

I did mean IF you went to the march .

I will re write the question to make it easier to understand :

"Today there was a march in London for Al-Quds day .

There was a group of pro Iranian regime/pro Palestine marches and there was a group of Iranians who oppose the regime and Israelis marching together

Which side would you have been on if you went to the march ?"

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
Just now, Nick Carter icp said:

I did mean IF you went to the march .

I will re write the question to make it easier to understand :

"Today there was a march in London for Al-Quds day .

There was a group of pro Iranian regime/pro Palestine marches and there was a group of Iranians who oppose the regime and Israelis marching together

Which side would you have been on if you went to the march ?"

But for all your ‘ifs’ Nick, I didn’t.

Stop trying to imagine stuff that includes me, it’s creepy.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Today there was a march in London for Al-Quds day .

There was a group of pro Iranian regime/pro Palestine marches and there was a group of Iranians who oppose the regime and Israelis marching together

Which side would you be on ?

e45b79b0-2087-11f1-b048-c9424b2cf5fd.jpg (1).webp

Sadly there are some on here whose hate for Trump has totally consumed them that if push comes to shove they would support the terrorist regime building huge stock piles of offensive weapons and enriching uranium to weapons grade levels.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Iran is no longer bound by any treaty not to produce nuclear weapons, and therefore has the sovereign right to do so.

So a terrorist regime that calls for death to America and death to Israel developing nukes and a delivery system in a country that will put you to death for marrying a non-Muslim is it a good thing or a bad thing for them to have nukes?

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

So a terrorist regime that calls for death to America and death to Israel developing nukes and a delivery system in a country that will put you to death for marrying a non-Muslim is it a good thing or a bad thing for them to have nukes?

It was a bad thing to withdraw from the nuclear weapons treaty Iran was complying with.

Take that up with the idiot who withdrew.

In the absence of that treaty Iran has the sovereign right to aquite nuclear weapons.

I had no part in any of it.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

And Iran funding and militarily supporting it's terrorist proxies that target civilians is legal is it? You have no problem with Iran building thousands of ICBM's and Uranium enriched to at least 60% is not a problem for you?

And trump getting into a forever war with terroist is not painting a target on every americans back !! what trump is doing is not the way to defet terrorism this is an illeigal WAR

you seem to have no problem with other terroist having nucular weapons for years !! and you have NO proof Iran was building ICBM's and every country has the sovereign right to develop Nucular fuel what gives america the right to stop that !! because trump says so !! go crawl back under your rock

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
12 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Sadly there are some on here whose hate for Trump has totally consumed them that if push comes to shove they would support the terrorist regime building huge stock piles of offensive weapons and enriching uranium to weapons grade levels.

NO PROOF

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

It was a bad thing to withdraw from the nuclear weapons treaty Iran was complying with.

They were complying with it by building enrichment facilities in bunkers deep under mountains?

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

NO PROOF

AI Overview

As of early 2026, the IAEA has reported that

Iran

continued to hold a significant stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% purity, estimated at over 400kg, which has raised severe international concerns. This high-level enrichment is a short technical step away from 90% weapons-grade material, with some reports suggesting they possessed enough material for multiple weapons, leading to calls for increased inspection access.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

They were complying with it by building enrichment facilities in bunkers deep under mountains?

After Trump withdrew from the treaty that Iran were complying with.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

AI Overview

As of early 2026, the IAEA has reported that

Iran

continued to hold a significant stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% purity, estimated at over 400kg, which has raised severe international concerns. This high-level enrichment is a short technical step away from 90% weapons-grade material, with some reports suggesting they possessed enough material for multiple weapons, leading to calls for increased inspection access.

A shame someone tore up the nuclear treaty Iran were complying with, do t you think?!

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
Just now, dinsdale said:

AI Overview

As of early 2026, the IAEA has reported that

Iran

continued to hold a significant stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% purity, estimated at over 400kg, which has raised severe international concerns. This high-level enrichment is a short technical step away from 90% weapons-grade material, with some reports suggesting they possessed enough material for multiple weapons, leading to calls for increased inspection access.

Which is there Right to do so !! There is NO PROOF they are using this to build a weapon or is it because trump has a feeling about it Thailand has 2 nucular reactors is thailand building a bomb !!!!! what about the other terost county who already has nucular weapons is trump going to invade them its a BS you post

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

A shame someone tore up the nuclear treaty Iran were complying with, do t you think?!

The treaty wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
41 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Which is there Right to do so !! There is NO PROOF they are using this to build a weapon or is it because trump has a feeling about it Thailand has 2 nucular reactors is thailand building a bomb !!!!! what about the other terost county who already has nucular weapons is trump going to invade them its a BS you post

Enrichment for power sits at around 3-5% not 60% and doesn't need to be done deep, deep underground. What do they need the estimated 450kg of 60% enriched uranium for?

AI Overview

As of March 2026,

Iran has signaled a willingness to reduce its 60% uranium enrichment to 3.6% in a potential nuclear proposal, ostensibly for power generation purposes. However, Iran insists on keeping its stockpile within the country, rejecting proposals to transfer the high-grade uranium to Russia or other nations, according to Kan News and Axios.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
45 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

The treaty wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

Again in your opinion if that is woth anything!!

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
Just now, MikeandDow said:

Again in your opinion if that is woth anything!!

Obviously not just my opinion.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Enrichment for power sits at around 3-5% not 60% and doesn't need to be done deep, deep underground. What do they need the estimated 450kg of 60% enriched uranium for?

AI Overview

As of March 2026,

Iran has signaled a willingness to reduce its 60% uranium enrichment to 3.6% in a potential nuclear proposal, ostensibly for power generation purposes. However, Iran insists on keeping its stockpile within the country, rejecting proposals to transfer the high-grade uranium to Russia or other nations, according to Kan News and Axios.

Iran is a sovereign nation which is in it's rights to do so, now are you saying its power generation iam confussed one post you are saying they are building Nuclear IBCM's the next post is its for power so which is it ??? and why should they tranfer THEIR uranium

koolkarl Gold Member

koolkarl

Advanced Member
14 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

For those not paying attention in class.

Write out 10,000 lines of:

‘This is an Illegal Israeli/US war of aggression’.

Repeat every day until this illegal Israeli / US war of aggression ends.

And could you sleep at night knowing that Iran had the nuclear bomb? After all, I assume you are an infidel who has been brainwashed by the media.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Iran is a sovereign nation which is in it's rights to do so, now are you saying its power generation iam confussed one post you are saying they are building Nuclear IBCM's the next post is its for power so which is it ??? and why should they tranfer THEIR uranium

Nope. Try reading again. I said and backed it up that they have uranium enriched to 60% when domestic nuclear power production only requires enrichment to 3-5%. I then asked why they have 450 kg of 60% enriched uranium and why they found it necessary to enrich uranium for "domestic energy" deep, deep underground. This you have failed to address.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.