Judge Delays Comey Trial Over Seashell Post

Former FBI director James Comey has won a request to delay his criminal trial over a social media post that prosecutors say threatened President Donald Trump.

Get today's headlines by email

A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that the trial will now begin on Oct. 21, several weeks later than originally expected. Comey is scheduled to appear for arraignment on Sept. 30.

Trial pushed back

U.S. District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan approved the delay request without publicly detailing the reasons behind the revised schedule.

The case centres on an Instagram post made by Comey showing seashells arranged on a beach to form the numbers “86 47”.

Supporters and allies of Trump argued that the image amounted to a coded threat against the president. They pointed to the slang meaning of “86”, which can mean to remove, reject or “get rid of” something. Trump is the 47th president of the United States.

Federal prosecutors later charged Comey with threatening the president.

Comey denies wrongdoing

Comey removed the post after criticism mounted online and said he had not intended the image to be interpreted as violent.

After the indictment was unsealed, he posted a video online rejecting the allegations and criticising the case against him.

“Well, they’re back. This time about a picture of seashells on a North Carolina beach a year ago,” Comey said.

“And this won’t be the end of it, but nothing has changed with me. I’m still innocent, I’m still not afraid, and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary, so let’s go.”

The former FBI director has not entered a formal plea. That is expected during his Sept. 30 arraignment hearing.

Political backlash grows

The prosecution has become politically charged, with critics of the Trump administration arguing the case reflects a broader effort to target perceived political opponents.

Some opponents also pointed to a separate case against Comey that was dismissed last year by a judge. That indictment involved unrelated allegations.

Trump allies, however, have defended the criminal charges and argued that threats against a sitting president must be treated seriously, regardless of who makes them.

Justice Department defends charges

At a press conference announcing the indictment last month, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the case was about enforcing federal law protecting the president.

“It’s not a very difficult line to look at,” Blanche said. “We cannot, you are not allowed to threaten the President of the United States of America.”

Blanche said the Justice Department regularly prosecutes similar cases and argued that Comey’s post crossed the line between constitutionally protected speech and criminal conduct.

The trial is expected to renew debate over free speech protections, political expression and how online posts are interpreted in criminal investigations involving public officials.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 27 May 2026