Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Kash Patel Agrees to Alcohol Test After Senate Clash

FBI Director Kash Patel said he would take an alcohol screening test after a tense exchange with Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen during a congressional hearing, provided the senator agreed to take the same test alongside him.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The confrontation unfolded as Van Hollen questioned Patel about reports concerning his conduct, including allegations of excessive drinking. Patel has denied the claims and is pursuing legal action over a report that raised the issue.

Dispute Over Allegations

Van Hollen referenced reporting that suggested Patel’s alcohol use had affected his ability to carry out official duties.

“When your private actions make it impossible for you to perform your public duties, we have a big problem,” the senator said during the hearing. He added that reports alleging episodes of heavy drinking and unexplained absences were “extremely alarming” if accurate.

Van Hollen said the allegations suggested a potential failure of responsibility and could undermine public trust in the leadership of the FBI.

The senator also asked Patel and other law enforcement officials present how they would respond if an employee appeared to have a problem with excessive alcohol use.

“I really don’t care about your personal life so long as you are able to perform your public responsibilities,” Van Hollen said. He cited multiple reports, including one published by The Atlantic, that described concerns raised by current and former officials in the FBI and the Department of Justice.

Patel Rejects Claims

Patel strongly rejected the allegations, calling the reporting “unequivocally, categorically false.” He has filed a defamation lawsuit related to the claims.

During the exchange, Patel countered with accusations of his own, alleging that Van Hollen drank margaritas while on an official trip to El Salvador to meet Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man who had been mistakenly deported and imprisoned there at the time.

“The only person who was slinging margaritas in El Salvador on the taxpayer dollar… was you,” Patel said.

Van Hollen dismissed the accusation, saying it was untrue and based on misinformation circulating in some media outlets. He argued that repeating such claims in a congressional hearing was troubling.

“The fact that you mentioned that indicates you don’t know what you are talking about,” Van Hollen said.

Margarita Claim Disputed

Van Hollen has previously addressed the margarita allegation, saying it stemmed from a publicity stunt by El Salvador’s president, Nayib Bukele.

After returning from the trip in April last year, Van Hollen told reporters that a Salvadoran official placed drinks on the table during the meeting but that neither he nor Abrego Garcia drank them.

“Neither of us touched the drinks that were in front of us,” the senator said at the time, adding that the salt around the rim of the glasses remained undisturbed.

Van Hollen said the display appeared designed to create the impression that alcohol had been consumed.

Challenge to Take Alcohol Test

The hearing concluded with a direct challenge from Van Hollen, who asked Patel whether he would take the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), a 10-question screening survey that had been proposed by House Judiciary Committee Democrats.

Patel agreed on the condition that Van Hollen also take the test.

“Let’s go,” Patel said. “Side by side.”

Van Hollen accepted the proposal.

Throughout the exchange, Van Hollen repeatedly asked Patel whether he understood that lying to Congress was a crime. Patel responded each time that he had not committed perjury during the hearing.

The confrontation highlighted rising tensions between the FBI director and some Democratic lawmakers over allegations about his conduct and leadership.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 13 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
14 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

And?

It was a lie, of course! 🤣🤣🤣

"Hours after the hearing, Patel attempted to reinforce his allegation by posting what appeared to be a Federal Election Commission expense entry linked to Van Hollen's campaign committee on his official government X account.

The document showed a payment of just over $7,000 to Washington's Lobby Bar.

But the filing itself undercut Patel's claim. The expenditure was listed as 'Catering for Event,' not alcohol purchases, and campaign-funded rather than taxpayer-funded."

https://www.ibtimes.com/kash-patel-accused-lying-claims-chris-van-hollen-7k-drank-taxpayer-dime-bar-tab-debunked-3802760

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

Yeah, you too, low IQ, typical for all you haters and losers. Besides being a jack ass, this low IQ muppet Van Hollen's opening move was to ask the FBI Director if he had a drinking problem, on the record, in a budget hearing, in front of cameras. That's not oversight. That's a political assassination attempt. Here's the part everyone is missing: Patel came prepared. He had Van Hollens FEC filing pulled up before the question was even finished. The filing showed a $7,128 bar tab at the Lobby Bar in December 2025 with 50 attendees. Patel turned around mid-hearing and offered to post it in real time and Van Hollen's defense was "it wasn't public money" which confirmed the bar tab existed. Only a dip<deleted> low IQ jack<deleted> attempts a maneuver like that on a superior and highly intelligent well prepared Patel. Van Hollens feeble minded numbingly amateur attempt at a "gotcha" failed revealing once again what a low IQ dip$hit he like all libtards are.

20260514_114124.jpg

Lol. In the FEC filling posted by Patel, it's written " catering for event", and paid by campaign funds. (See post above). 😁

https://www.ibtimes.com/kash-patel-accused-lying-claims-chris-van-hollen-7k-drank-taxpayer-dime-bar-tab-debunked-3802760

So Patel was lying. It wasn't paid by taxpayer money (of course, it's a FEC filling, one must be really stupid to believe it was paid by taxpayer money! 😆), and was about catering.

He knew he was lying, as he posted the filling on X, but didn't worry about it, as he also knew that the low IQ MAGA sheep would believe it and diffuse it! 🤣🤣🤣

https://x.com/FBIDirectorKash/status/2054294261986660537/photo/1

Screenshot_20260515_075247_Samsung Internet.jpg

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman

Patel guilty of drinking and diving

Patel.jpg

Kash Patel is under mounting fire after revelations he took part in a secretive underwater tour of the USS Arizona Memorial — one of America’s most sacred military gravesites.

The trip, described in internal Navy emails as a “VIP Snorkel”, has triggered anger from veterans and former federal officials who say the FBI chief crossed a line at a site where more than 900 American servicemen remain entombed.

A Secret Visit Beneath Hallowed Waters

The excursion took place during Patel’s August visit to Honolulu, according to records obtained through public information requests.

Snorkelling and diving at the USS Arizona wreck are heavily restricted. Access is typically limited to archaeologists, preservation teams and ceremonial divers connected to Pearl Harbor commemorations.

Veterans React With Fury

Critics say the issue is not simply access, but judgment.

One Marine veteran compared the visit to “having a bachelor party at a church”, arguing the site demands solemnity rather than VIP treatment. Former government divers also questioned why a sitting FBI director was granted unusual access at all.

Nobody Wants Ownership

The controversy deepened after multiple agencies appeared to distance themselves from the decision.

An FBI spokesman refused to directly answer questions about the snorkelling session. The US Navy confirmed the outing happened but said officials could not determine who authorised it. The National Park Service also declined substantive comment.

Another Distraction for a Controversial Director

The Pearl Harbor episode is the latest in a string of headlines surrounding Patel’s conduct since taking office.

He has already faced scrutiny over government jet travel, a high-profile appearance in the US Olympic hockey team’s locker room and diplomatic embarrassment in New Zealand after reportedly gifting replica firearms later deemed illegal under local law.

Questions Over Respect and Optics

Some relatives of Pearl Harbor survivors said they do not oppose rare official visits to the memorial. But several reportedly noted that ordinary families connected to the tragedy have never been afforded similar access.

For critics, the political damage may lie less in the snorkel itself than in what it symbolises: privilege, secrecy and poor judgment at one of the most emotionally charged sites in American military history.

Kash Patel took secret 'VIP snorkel' at America's hallowed WWII gravesite

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, boganJoe said:

Yeah, you too, low IQ, typical for all you haters and losers. Besides being a jack ass, this low IQ muppet Van Hollen's opening move was to ask the FBI Director if he had a drinking problem, on the record, in a budget hearing, in front of cameras. That's not oversight. That's a political assassination attempt. Here's the part everyone is missing: Patel came prepared. He had Van Hollens FEC filing pulled up before the question was even finished. The filing showed a $7,128 bar tab at the Lobby Bar in December 2025 with 50 attendees. Patel turned around mid-hearing and offered to post it in real time and Van Hollen's defense was "it wasn't public money" which confirmed the bar tab existed. Only a dip<deleted> low IQ jack<deleted> attempts a maneuver like that on a superior and highly intelligent well prepared Patel. Van Hollens feeble minded numbingly amateur attempt at a "gotcha" failed revealing once again what a low IQ dip$hit he like all libtards are.

20260514_114124.jpg

Thank you for confirming my post!

ukrules Star Member

ukrules

Advanced Member
On 5/14/2026 at 12:11 PM, cjinchiangrai said:

How about blowing a breathalyzer after lunch and after quitting time each day? Everyone else would do it.

Yeah perhaps they should make that a rule for all government employees.

How many beers are they allowed to drink at lunch time?

cjinchiangrai Platinum Member

cjinchiangrai

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, ukrules said:

Yeah perhaps they should make that a rule for all government employees.

How many beers are they allowed to drink at lunch time?

Certainly the ones that are suspected. I used to get regular random tests.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member

Obviously the tests the Director of the FBI should submit to, in the interests of building public confidence, are the following

  • Phosphatidylethanol

  • Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin (CDT)

  • Gamma Glutamyl Transpeptidase

  • Aspartate Aminotransferase/Alanine Aminotransferase ratio

More useful than a breathalyser test, which a functioning alcoholic can find easy to spoof.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
On 5/15/2026 at 12:33 PM, candide said:

It was a lie, of course! 🤣🤣🤣

"Hours after the hearing, Patel attempted to reinforce his allegation by posting what appeared to be a Federal Election Commission expense entry linked to Van Hollen's campaign committee on his official government X account.

The document showed a payment of just over $7,000 to Washington's Lobby Bar.

But the filing itself undercut Patel's claim. The expenditure was listed as 'Catering for Event,' not alcohol purchases, and campaign-funded rather than taxpayer-funded."

https://www.ibtimes.com/kash-patel-accused-lying-claims-chris-van-hollen-7k-drank-taxpayer-dime-bar-tab-debunked-3802760

So, was billed as "catering for event", at a bar, got it.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
On 5/15/2026 at 5:34 PM, cjinchiangrai said:

Certainly the ones that are suspected. I used to get regular random tests.

Who gets to decide who's suspected? Why not everyone?

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

So, was billed as "catering for event", at a bar, got it.

So a FEC filling of a campaign expense is a proof that it was paid by taxpayer money. and therefore Patel is not a liar. Got it! 😂

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
17 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Who gets to decide who's suspected? Why not everyone?

You obviously never managed a business before or had enough seniority to manage a team, or you were a lazy barsteward before you retired. Testing the entire workforce every day is frankly a stupid suggestion. The costs would drive most businesses to the wall, both because of the massive cost (legally defensible testing costs SEK1000-3000 per employee) and the loss of productivity. You evidently don't understand the reason why private industry needs to generate a profit. Similarly, a public sector employer has the responsibility to the taxpayer, but maybe you've been on the dole most of your life and believe there is a maic money tree.

Randomised testing ensures fairness, encourages good behaiviour, manages costs while achieving the objectives of improving safety and/or ensuring maintaining reputation. Employers have the right to test based on just cause; eg smelling alcohol on the breath of an employee. You evidently believe employees should turn up pissed as a newt. Perhaps its a situation you were familiar with; rocking up at 8 in the morning, with the DTs, needing the hair of the dog to get you through to lunch. But like Tony Adams, you appeared functional to all concerned.

Why else would you be picking a fight with a stranger over randomised workplace alcohol testing.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

You obviously never managed a business before or had enough seniority to manage a team, or you were a lazy barsteward before you retired. Testing the entire workforce every day is frankly a stupid suggestion. The costs would drive most businesses to the wall, both because of the massive cost (legally defensible testing costs SEK1000-3000 per employee) and the loss of productivity. You evidently don't understand the reason why private industry needs to generate a profit. Similarly, a public sector employer has the responsibility to the taxpayer, but maybe you've been on the dole most of your life and believe there is a maic money tree.

Randomised testing ensures fairness, encourages good behaiviour, manages costs while achieving the objectives of improving safety and/or ensuring maintaining reputation. Employers have the right to test based on just cause; eg smelling alcohol on the breath of an employee. You evidently believe employees should turn up pissed as a newt. Perhaps its a situation you were familiar with; rocking up at 8 in the morning, with the DTs, needing the hair of the dog to get you through to lunch. But like Tony Adams, you appeared functional to all concerned.

Why else would you be picking a fight with a stranger over randomised workplace alcohol testing.

You obvious know nothing about me, and less about what was being discussed. It was you that brought randomized testing the the discussion I was having.

worgeordie Star Member

worgeordie

Advanced Member

Patel must have gotten drunk then thought it was a good idea to snorkel

over the scared site in Pearl Harbour,which is an active war grave ,with

2300 sailors entombed there. where did Trump find these people ,

they seemed to have been chosen for their loyalty ,not their common

sense and been good at their job.

regards worgeordie

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

You obviously never managed a business before or had enough seniority to manage a team, or you were a lazy barsteward before you retired. Testing the entire workforce every day is frankly a stupid suggestion. The costs would drive most businesses to the wall, both because of the massive cost (legally defensible testing costs SEK1000-3000 per employee) and the loss of productivity. You evidently don't understand the reason why private industry needs to generate a profit. Similarly, a public sector employer has the responsibility to the taxpayer, but maybe you've been on the dole most of your life and believe there is a maic money tree.

Randomised testing ensures fairness, encourages good behaiviour, manages costs while achieving the objectives of improving safety and/or ensuring maintaining reputation. Employers have the right to test based on just cause; eg smelling alcohol on the breath of an employee. You evidently believe employees should turn up pissed as a newt. Perhaps its a situation you were familiar with; rocking up at 8 in the morning, with the DTs, needing the hair of the dog to get you through to lunch. But like Tony Adams, you appeared functional to all concerned.

Why else would you be picking a fight with a stranger over randomised workplace alcohol testing.

What a load of rubbish !! have you never worked underground or in the mining industries EVERY Employee is 100% tested per day BEFORE Start of Shift

Fitness-for-Duty (fatigue, alcohol, and drugs)

Regulators: Mining enterprises must adhere to occupational health and safety codes overseen by agencies such as Safe Work Australia or the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)

Companies that implement daily fitness-for-duty screening programs often see significant reductions in their Total Recordable Incident Rates

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, worgeordie said:

Patel must have gotten drunk then thought it was a good idea to snorkel

over the scared site in Pearl Harbour,which is an active war grave ,with

2300 sailors entombed there. where did Trump🤡 find these people ,

they seemed to have been chosen for their loyalty ,not their common

sense and been good at their job.

regards worgeordie

I hear the left howl and howl about Patal, but it's never about job performance, same with Hegseth.

weak

BLMFem Star Member

BLMFem

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I hear the left howl and howl about Patal, but it's never about job performance, same with Hegseth.

weak

That's because you have selective hearing, Yellow. And you might wanna pull your head out of the Fox bubble every once in a while.

It's amazing what a MAGA guy can learn just by doing that!thumbsup

MIke B Bad Silver Member

MIke B Bad

Advanced Member

So if not taken under oath....a total farce.

Why not a proper PEth blood screen or EtG hair follicle test?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
24 minutes ago, MIke B Bad said:

So if not taken under oath....a total farce.

Why not a proper PEth blood screen or EtG hair follicle test?

Why should he be compelled to take any test?

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.