Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Russia Warns UK Over Drones Used in Attacks on Russia

Russia has warned the United Kingdom of “consequences” after confirming that British-made drones were used in strikes on targets in Russia, accusing London of escalating the war.

Russian Embassy Accuses UK Of Escalation

The Russian Embassy in London said Britain had “deliberately opted for an escalation” following reports that the drones were employed in attacks inside Russian territory. In a statement, it said the UK was acting as an “accomplice and co-perpetrator” of what it described as “crimes and terrorist attacks”.

The embassy added that the UK would have to respond for its actions, warning that the more it became involved in the conflict, the higher the “price” it would face.

UK Says It Stands With Ukraine

Responding to the allegations, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) told BBC News that Britain would stand “shoulder to shoulder” with Ukraine. The spokesperson said Russia should have no doubt about the UK government’s determination to oppose Russian aggression both in Ukraine and against the UK and its allies.

The spokesperson also said the UK was committed to supplying Ukraine with the equipment it needs to defend itself against Vladimir Putin’s “illegal invasion”.

Drones Used Against Military And Industrial Targets

The drones cited by Russia were built by two separate British companies. They have been used inside Russia in what the text describes as widespread targeting of military and industrial sites, including refineries and warehouses linked to Wildberries, an online retailer.

Ukraine has said it repeatedly targeted the company, known as Russia’s version of Amazon. It claims that seven out of 10 of the largest Wildberries logistics centres have been “disabled”. A military source told the BBC that UK drones were used in the attacks, which are said to have caused more than £35bn in economic damage.

Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said drones using UK components and configurations were used to strike Russian territory, including a fuel depot in the Kamensky District of the Rostov Region.

Wave Of Strikes Follow Previous Attacks

The warning comes amid a period of Ukrainian strikes on Russia. In the latest overnight attacks, Russian officials said about 620 drones were launched towards the area around Moscow. They reported that air defences destroyed more than 180 of the devices, while some people were wounded.

Officials said an attack the previous night killed nine people and injured 23, including a child. On Saturday night, Ukraine fired about 822 drones towards Russia, according to a regional governor, who said around 600 were aimed at Moscow and that the capital suffered “one of the most massive drone attacks in recent memory”. Seven deaths were reported across Russia.

On the same night, Russian strikes on Ukraine killed at least seven people and injured more than 39.

MoD Announces Large Drone Supply To Ukraine

In April, the UK MoD said it would provide Ukraine with tens of thousands of drones, including long-range strike systems, as its biggest package to date.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

18 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
19 hours ago, candide said:

Putin said Ukraine was run by “far-right nationalists and neo-Nazis”. Who are those neo-nazis at the government?

So who are those pesky neo-nazis leading Ukraine?

No one wants to tell me! 😂

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
On 8/18/2026 at 1:16 PM, Jim Waldron said:

Russia’s outrage over UK drones is textbook hypocrisy.

Moscow cries “terrorism” when British units hit refineries, yet shrugs when Chinese drones that are transhipped through Thailand are funneled to its own war effort against Ukraine.

The double standard is glaring: condemnation when the West arms Kyiv, silence when Beijing’s exports prop up Kremlin strikes.

If escalation is the charge, Russia should first account for its own supply chains and use of North Korean equipment and soldiers before lecturing others. One hopes the UK tells Russia where to stick it's warning.

Hypocrisy or not, it would behoove Britain to pay attention to what Russia is saying. One of these days, Russia will move to defend itself.

Schoggibueb Gold Member

Schoggibueb

Advanced Member
(edited)
3 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Hypocrisy or not, it would behoove Britain to pay attention to what Russia is saying. One of these days, Russia will move to defend itself.

You mean Russia won't attack Ukraine anymore because they have to defend what they took?

Interesting idea...🧐

Edited by Schoggibueb
Typo

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, Schoggibueb said:

You mean Russia won't attack Ukraine anymore because they have to defend what they took?

Interesting idea...🧐

I don't know what you mean. What I mean is just what I said. Britain should pay attention. One day, the threats may well be more than threats.

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
18 hours ago, Schoggibueb said:

Russia is the aggressor and attacker. Has ZERO to do with "defending". We all know about these "threats" and "red lines" since 2022 when Ukraine got some helmets and blankets. Then the first tanks were delivered - oh - red line - we will nuke you if you continue. Then some the first planes - the same. etc.pp. The list is long of threats from putins Russia.

Same same - and no difference.

Don't you understand? None of that makes any difference. They are a participant in this war and they no doubt see things from their perspective. And perhaps, one day, one of those "red lines" will be a real red line and the consequences of crossing it will be very real for some Western country. And when that happens, you probably don't want to be anywhere around

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
18 hours ago, candide said:

Defend itself? 🤣

That's exactly what I mean. Or are those drones flying into Russia imaginary?

Schoggibueb Gold Member

Schoggibueb

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, jas007 said:

And perhaps, one day, one of those "red lines" will be a real red line and the consequences of crossing it will be very real for some Western country. And when that happens, you probably don't want to be anywhere around

You just repeat yourself saying: Let's do what the bully says, we have to be scared. The old repeating over and over again since 4 years.

Same same - and still no difference.

thaibreaker Gold Member

thaibreaker

Advanced Member
21 hours ago, jas007 said:

Britain should pay attention. One day, the threats may well be more than threats.

This, right there, is what Putin wants. To spread fear into all countries who are helping Ukraine.

If you or we fall for that trick, there is nothing stopping Russia to advance further.

We must stand up to the bully, if it's in a schoolyard, or like here, to Putin. And we see it's working. The threat isn't anything else than empty threats.

And, China would never let Russia start a nuclear war.

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
45 minutes ago, thaibreaker said:

This, right there, is what Putin wants. To spread fear into all countries who are helping Ukraine.

If you or we fall for that trick, there is nothing stopping Russia to advance further.

We must stand up to the bully, if it's in a schoolyard, or like here, to Putin. And we see it's working. The threat isn't anything else than empty threats.

And, China would never let Russia start a nuclear war.

Of course, China doesn't have anything to say about it. Things can happen very quickly.

As for what Putin wants? I think he just wants to secure Russia from external threats. Remember how this thing stated. Ukrainian units would not stop shelling the Russian speaking people in the Donbas. That and continued Western interference in Ukraine's politics. And I'm sure the last thing Putin wants to deal with at this point is the crumbling Western Europe.

Anyway, if think that Russia doesn't have a point beyond which they would retaliate with all the force they have, then you are delusional.

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Schoggibueb said:

You just repeat yourself saying: Let's do what the bully says, we have to be scared. The old repeating over and over again since 4 years.

Same same - and still no difference.

If I continue to repeat myself, it's because I continue to believe I'm right. As for the "bully" nonsense? You need to brush up on the history of the region.

thaibreaker Gold Member

thaibreaker

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Of course, China doesn't have anything to say about it. Things can happen very quickly.

As for what Putin wants? I think he just wants to secure Russia from external threats. Remember how this thing stated. Ukrainian units would not stop shelling the Russian speaking people in the Donbas. That and continued Western interference in Ukraine's politics. And I'm sure the last thing Putin wants to deal with at this point is the crumbling Western Europe.

Anyway, if think that Russia doesn't have a point beyond which they would retaliate with all the force they have, then you are delusional.

China absolutely have a say in this. Putin does what Xi advice him to do. Russia is depending heavily on China.

And Xi has made clear he doesn't want a nuclear war, he did so when they last met too. Since then, Putin hasn't used that threat as much as he did before.

Russia and Putin know very well what will happen if a nuclear war is started. Their own country will turn into dust too, there are no winners in a nuclear outburst. Only losers.

And please, stop using words like delusional etc. towards others on this forum. We are better than that. It's only making ourself look bad.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, jas007 said:

That's exactly what I mean. Or are those drones flying into Russia imaginary?

Defend itself after having bombed Ukraine for four years? 🤣🤣🤣

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, thaibreaker said:

This, right there, is what Putin wants. To spread fear into all countries who are helping Ukraine.

If you or we fall for that trick, there is nothing stopping Russia to advance further.

We must stand up to the bully, if it's in a schoolyard, or like here, to Putin. And we see it's working. The threat isn't anything else than empty threats.

And, China would never let Russia start a nuclear war.

It seems that Russian propaganda works better than its military! 😀

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
25 minutes ago, thaibreaker said:

China absolutely have a say in this. Putin does what Xi advice him to do. Russia is depending heavily on China.

And Xi has made clear he doesn't want a nuclear war, he did so when they last met too. Since then, Putin hasn't used that threat as much as he did before.

Russia and Putin know very well what will happen if a nuclear war is started. Their own country will turn into dust too, there are no winners in a nuclear outburst. Only losers.

And please, stop using words like delusional etc. towards others on this forum. We are better than that. It's only making ourself look bad.

What words would you have me use? I thought "delusional" was a polite way to put it.

I can understand that some people simply don't understand the issues. That much is obvious. I also understand that it's not their fault. Propaganda works well.

And yes, there would be no winner to a nuclear war. That's what many people don't understand. The concept of a "limited" nuclear was is a fiction. When the missiles start flying, no one waits around to see what happened during the first exchange. It's use them or lose them.

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, thaibreaker said:

We must stand up to the bully, if it's in a schoolyard, or like here, to Putin. And we see it's working. The threat isn't anything else than empty threats.

Here's the problem: Eastern Europe is not a schoolyard, and Putin isn't the only "bully" in the mix. And yes, I have experience in dealing with bullies.

One time, when I was in grade school, we were outside playing baseball. I must have been in the 6th or 7th grade. Anyway, there was a guy named John who was a few years older than me, taller than me, and about 50 pounds heavier than me. An offensive lineman type guy. Anyway, his favorite trick was to punch me in the stomach. He did that all the time. One time he did it when I happened to have a baseball bat in my hand. I lost my temper and clobbered the guy. I could have ruptured some of his internal organs. Anyway, from that day forward, never again did he even think about punching me in the stomach.

On another occasion, another kid, another bully, thought he could start a fight and win. That didn't work out too well for him.

The problem with the war in Ukraine is simple: it isn't a school yard. The consequences of a nuclear war would end civilization as we know it, with hundreds of millions if not billions of people dead. Risking that to stand up to the "bully" is a risk that should not be taken. We have diplomacy and diplomates for that reason.

thaibreaker Gold Member

thaibreaker

Advanced Member
(edited)
16 minutes ago, jas007 said:

What words would you have me use? I thought "delusional" was a polite way to put it.

I can understand that some people simply don't understand the issues. That much is obvious. I also understand that it's not their fault. Propaganda works well.

It's the third time in this thread alone, I'm accused of not understanding the war.. Seriously. Are you American too? Maga?

When the fact is that it's others (including you) who has grabbed the whole Russian propaganda, hook, line and sinker, thinking they understand the war better than us Europeans, many living it every day, AND know the Ukrainian history very well.

(You, with the Donbass claim).

I have many friends (and family) in Ukraine, I have family in Russia (I was born there), so please, give others some credit. I get reports every day, from people who actually are living it, and I have done so the last decade, and more.

Edited by thaibreaker

Schoggibueb Gold Member

Schoggibueb

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, jas007 said:

If I continue to repeat myself, it's because I continue to believe I'm right. As for the "bully" nonsense? You need to brush up on the history of the region.

So now you moved from the bully putin to "history of the region..."

Jeez, such kremlin propaganda already started 4 years ago in Reader comments in reputable newspapers in Europe. In the meanwhile the pro putin writers gave up, as history facts are easy to be found.

So maybe you want to try a different argumentation than the history and what Putin and Alexander Dugin - for sure you know who he is - are trying to sell. Nobody believes this who is just a little informed.

jas007 Platinum Member

jas007

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, thaibreaker said:

It's the third time in this thread alone, I'm accused of not understanding the war.. Seriously. Are you American too? Maga?

When the fact is that it's others (including you) who has grabbed the whole Russian propaganda, hook, line and sinker, thinking they understand the war better than us Europeans, many living it every day, AND know the Ukrainian history very well.

(You, with the Donbass claim).

I have many friends (and family) in Ukraine, I have family in Russia (I was born there), so please, give others some credit. I get reports every day, from people who actually are living it, and I have done so the last decade, and more.

I'm American, and I'm hardly MAGA. Trump is one of the nutcases behind all this nonsense. For example, there was a good treaty in place to limit intermediate range nuclear forces and Trump tore it up.

And I don't doubt you have personal experience. My overall view is that there's a lot of blame to go around for this war. Britain, for example, has a longstanding animosity towards Russia from back in the days of the East India Company. "The Great Game." You can look that up. More recently, we have Brzezinski bring the concept into the 20th century. Heartland geopolitics. The problem with that is that the concept no longer comports with reality. We no longer live in a Unipolar world.

The war in Ukraine is a conflict that has been years in the making.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.