Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Senate Rejects 7th Bid to Limit Trump’s Iran War Powers

The U.S. Senate has narrowly rejected another Democratic attempt to limit President Donald Trump’s authority to use military force against Iran, though the latest vote saw an additional Republican senator break ranks to support the measure.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

A procedural motion to discharge the resolution from committee failed by a vote of 49 to 50 on Wednesday. Republican Senators Rand Paul of Kentucky, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska joined most Democrats in backing the move. Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the only member of his party to oppose it.

The vote marked the seventh effort by Senate Democrats since the conflict with Iran began on Feb. 28 to advance a resolution under the War Powers framework aimed at restricting the president’s military authority.

New Republican Support

Murkowski’s vote represented a shift from her earlier position. She had previously opposed similar measures but said circumstances had changed after a key 60-day period outlined in the War Powers Resolution passed earlier this month.

Speaking to reporters, Murkowski said she had expected greater clarity from the administration about its legal position once that period ended but had not received it. She said this prompted her to support moving the resolution forward so lawmakers could examine Congress’s responsibilities under the law.

“We’re in a different place than we were last time we voted on this,” she said.

The resolution, introduced by Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon, would have required the president to withdraw U.S. armed forces from hostilities involving Iran unless Congress approved the action through a declaration of war or a specific authorization for the use of military force.

Debate Over War Powers Deadline

Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, presidents must inform Congress within 48 hours of deploying military forces into hostilities if there is no prior authorization. The law also limits such engagements to 60 days without congressional approval.

As that deadline approached, however, the Trump administration argued the requirement did not apply because active hostilities had ended with a ceasefire reached on April 7. In a letter to congressional leaders dated May 1, the president said fighting with Iran had “terminated.”

Some lawmakers have challenged that interpretation. Merkley told reporters before the vote that he did not accept the administration’s claim that the 60-day clock had effectively stopped.

He said the conflict may currently be at a different stage but could escalate again, making congressional oversight necessary.

Republicans Back Administration View

Republican Senator Jim Risch of Idaho, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defended the administration’s position during debate ahead of the vote.

Risch said the hostilities referenced in the War Powers law had ended with the April ceasefire and therefore the time limits imposed by the legislation were not applicable.

“The operations that began on Feb. 28 have been terminated,” he said. “The hostilities ended with the April 7 ceasefire. They’re over — full stop.”

Political Pressure Around the Vote

Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, who has led the Senate effort to invoke war powers restrictions, said the vote would test Republican willingness to assert Congress’s role in decisions over war.

Kaine said lawmakers were facing increasing questions from constituents about the economic impact of the conflict, including rising fuel costs.

He said he believed the Senate could eventually vote to halt the war, even if that outcome was not achieved this time.

Merkley also argued that some Republican lawmakers were growing more skeptical about the military operation but remained reluctant to oppose the president.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune urged colleagues to support the administration, noting that Trump was abroad in China at the time of the vote for talks covering trade and security matters.

Ongoing Questions Over Authority

Murkowski has indicated she intends to introduce legislation formally authorizing the use of military force against Iran.

During a Senate hearing on Tuesday, she questioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about whether congressional approval would strengthen the administration’s legal footing. Hegseth responded that the administration believes the president already possesses the necessary authority under Article II of the Constitution to carry out military action if required.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 14 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Paul Henry Silver Member

Paul Henry

Advanced Member

What happend to Fetterman. He seems like he has lost the plot or was elected under a false flag.

He should remember he as elected to represent his electorate and the people not his whims and fancies that may get him in Trumps dreams.

Thingamabob Diamond Member

Thingamabob

Advanced Member

A good result. The case for a war against the appalling regime in Iran is strong, far stronger than it was for the invasion and destruction of Iraq and Libya.

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Paul Henry said:

What happend to Fetterman. He seems like he has lost the plot or was elected under a false flag.

He should remember he as elected to represent his electorate and the people not his whims and fancies that may get him in Trumps dreams.

Fetterman received lots of financial support from pro-Israel donors. AIPAC remains a powerful lobbying force and has an iron-clad hold on US senators especially the Republican Senators. But they are now facing unprecedented challenges especially from the Democrats who vowed to reject or stop taking money from the group. 80% of Democrat Senators voted against armed sales to Israel. AIPAC backed GOP candidates are in more precarious position as the people are getting angrier to the war and the dire economic situation. I think the dam will finally break and will see the War Power Act get a positive vote in the Senate.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Paul Henry said:

What happend to Fetterman. He seems like he has lost the plot or was elected under a false flag.

He should remember he as elected to represent his electorate and the people not his whims and fancies that may get him in Trumps dreams.

I'll tell you what happened to Fetterman. He refused to get dragged to the woke, far left. He's still a Democrat, what Democrats used to be not the far left loons the party's morphed into.

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
18 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I'll tell you what happened to Fetterman. He refused to get dragged to the woke, far left. He's still a Democrat, what Democrats used to be not the far left loons the party's morphed into.

You not contributing anything new. We know that Fetterman is a centrist and distance himself from the term Woke similar to John Thune is anti Maga.

Rinato Senior Member

Rinato

Member

While wasting time discussing about who did what and why, or gop and democrats flexing muscles Trump will drive the world in mayhem

rudi49jr Platinum Member

rudi49jr

Advanced Member

Heaven forbid those @ss kissing GOP grovellers would deny Trump anything. They would happily give Trump the right to marry as many 12-year-old girls as he wants.

The party of law and order. Yeah, right.

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member

It is a quite bizarre " work around" to the War Piwers Act, that the Trump Administration can prosecute a war until the 60 day limit is reached, and then take a bit of a break, and then resume the war!

Srikcir Ruby Member

Srikcir

Advanced Member
45 minutes ago, JAG said:

resume the war!

"resume the excursion, there is no war" says Trump.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

A good result. The case for a war against the appalling regime in Iran is strong, far stronger than it was for the invasion and destruction of Iraq and Libya.

Whatever the merits of your argument, the case for restricting the festering white greedpolyp's (or any other president's) ability to take those kinds of decisions is far greater.

The world has now understood this is not about 'Trump' any more, as this disgraceful vote shows. The US as a whole ihas simply either lost its way and is out of its mind, or has no meaningful ability to prevent these travesties any more.

The rest of the world is taking the necessary steps to decouple on all levels. You're soon going to be very much out in the cold as more do less and less business with you. There are multiple alternatives. You'll be treated like we do Russia and a few other rogue and dangerous, unreliable and instable states.

The US regime is an appalling reflection of America in the 2020s, a mere 37 years after the fall of the Iron Curtain. Nothing to be proud of at all and historically a swift fall from grace. Rather like Russia in the nowties.

BusyB Platinum Member

BusyB

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

You not contributing anything new.

Surprise surprise.

Paul Henry Silver Member

Paul Henry

Advanced Member

Suggest a few people read Fettermans op ed and what his fellow reps have to say about his about face.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.