Trump Rejects Iran Proposal as "Totally Unacceptable"

1 minute ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Sorry, but it seems to me that you are, once again, not making much sense.

I know it is hard for you to accept because your head personality is harder than a rock reason you can't accept the fact you are a Jewish hater🤣. that is why it doesn't make sense to you except what you are it's ok!

1 minute ago, thailand49 said:

I know it is hard for you to accept because your head personality is harder than a rock reason you can't accept the fact you are a Jewish hater🤣. that is why it doesn't make sense to you except what you are it's ok!

Sorry, but have you watched this interesting video, which might not be exactly according to your point of view????

Or, do you refuse to consider all differing points of view, always?

One should always consider opposing points of view, before arriving at any conclusion.

This is the way Science works, too.

You have heard of Science, have you not?

11 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Thing is the Strait is both Iranian and Omani waters with a freedom of navigation passage in the middle. It's not Iran's to do what they like with.

I know you repeat this like a mantra as if that would make it true.

It is not. The Strait of Hormuz is ONLY a free passage waterway for those nations who have signed and ratified UNCLOS.

I think, this would be nice part of a peace agreement: if free navigation is so important to the USA, both they and Iran should ratify UNCLOS in full -- and implement it right away throughout all their own waterways. I am not holding my breath, the Americans actually have very, very little interest to do so.

So, what I would say to Trump if I were Iranian: STFU, you hypocrite.

3 hours ago, dinsdale said:

On the other hand if the regime was allowed to develop nukes then they could control the Strait anytime they wanted. Sea traffic was brought to a halt simply with the threat of mines.

There is no evidence that Iran was the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons. If Trump had not left the JCPOA in 2017 and the independent inspections had continued, they would be even further away of doing so.

13 hours ago, dinsdale said:

No it's not what I mean. If the US got rid of it's nukes and Russia, Nth Korea and China didn't the mutual part of Mutually Assured Destruction becomes meaningless. As for Iran if they are allowed to become nuclear armed then other Middle East countries will also want nukes for their own version of MAD.

And? Good for the Gosse but not the Gander?

4 minutes ago, RayC said:

There is no evidence that Iran was the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons. If Trump had not left the JCPOA in 2017 and the independent inspections had continued, they would be even further away of doing so.

Expert agree iran was 1.5 to 2 years away yes they had 60% enriched uranium as uranium hexafluoride gas that needs to reach 90% weapons grade thats not the hard part could take weeks the hard part is Weaponization which could take up to 2 years

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/iran-was-nowhere-close-to-a-nuclear-bomb-experts-say/

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12106

4 minutes ago, RayC said:

There is no evidence that Iran was the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons. If Trump had not left the JCPOA in 2017 and the independent inspections had continued, they would be even further away of doing so.

How do you know that Iran does not, at this very moment, possess a nuclear weapon which could be easily mounted on one of its ballistic missles?

Do you have any inside info?

And, if Iran does possess a few, then why would they declare it?

The cost of this war has been unacceptable, when one takes into account what the US has gotten in return. So far? Higher prices, and severely depleted munitions. The people are wondering for what?

“We’ve expended a lot of munitions. And that means the American people are less safe. Whether it’s a conflict in the western Pacific with China or somewhere else in the world, the munitions are depleted,”

Kelly, who sits on the Senate Armed Services and Intelligence committees, told CBS News’ Margaret Brennan. Kelly’s comments on weapons stockpiles come more than two months into the US’ war with Iran. CNN previously reported that the US military has significantly depleted its stockpile of key missiles during the war and created a “near-term risk” of running out of ammunition in a future conflict should one arise in the next few years, according to experts and three people familiar with recent internal Defense Department stockpile assessments.

As of April 21, the US military expended at least 45% of its stockpile of Precision Strike Missiles; at least half of its inventory of THAAD missiles, which are designed to intercept ballistic missiles; and nearly 50% of its stockpile of Patriot air defense interceptor missiles, according to an analysis conducted last month by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Those numbers closely align with classified Pentagon data about US stockpiles, according to the sources familiar with the assessment.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/10/politics/mark-kelly-pete-hegseth-pentagon-investigation

26 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Sorry, but have you watched this interesting video, which might not be exactly according to your point of view????

Or, do you refuse to consider all differing points of view, always?

One should always consider opposing points of view, before arriving at any conclusion.

This is the way Science works, too.

You have heard of Science, have you not?

Oh it's you again the Jewish hater!🤣 Asking others to be opened minded to different view🤣

1 minute ago, thailand49 said:

Oh it's you again the Jewish hater!🤣

Well, BUT......

I grew up in a completely Jewish neighborhood....and....

I was the TOKEN-GENTILE......

i LOVED my neighborhood, and my neighbors.

Also, Philip Roth is my all-time favorite author....!!!!!

His books have always deeply resonated with me.

How much more JEWISH can you get than Roth????

24 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

How much more JEWISH can you get than Roth????

Poor Philip......

If ONLY Philip had been JUST A BIT.....LESS Jewish....then....

The Swedes would have given him the Nobel for Literature.

Alas.....though....

Roth was just TOO Jewish for his books.....!!!!!

And, also, too Jewish for the Swedes.

55 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

How do you know that Iran does not, at this very moment, possess a nuclear weapon which could be easily mounted on one of its ballistic missles?

Do you have any inside info?

And, if Iran does possess a few, then why would they declare it?

It's not up to me to prove a negative. I can't 'prove' that God doesn't exist but that doesn't mean s/he/it does.

If you are suggesting that Iran possesses a nuclear weapon capability it's up you to produce evidence to support that contention.

2 minutes ago, RayC said:

It's not up to me to prove a negative. I can't 'prove' that God doesn't exist but that doesn't mean s/he/it does.

If you are suggesting that Iran possesses a nuclear weapon capability it's up you to produce evidence to support that contention.

Are you asking me to disclose classified/secret information?

Here on TV?

Give me a break, Dude....!!!!

This will never happen.

6 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Are you asking me to disclose classified/secret information?

Here on TV?

Give me a break, Dude....!!!!

This will never happen.

So you have proof about the existence of God? Oh,, go on . Do tell😁

18 minutes ago, RayC said:

So you have proof about the existence of God? Oh,, go on . Do tell😁

One must have nothing more than Blind Faith.

Is this not all the proof you need?

1 hour ago, thailand49 said:

Oh it's you again

Yes, it is I, once again.....

And, I am still waiting for you to ask me for a pound of my flesh.

Or, have you had enough....already....?

I find it somewhat perplexing that many on here (and in the press) seem to support a Jihadist dictatorship purely because of a total hate for Trump. The IRGC/Bajis are Islamic fundamentalists that would have no qualms about shooting each and everyone of us on this forum in the head and these nutters want nukes and ICBMs.

2 hours ago, RayC said:

If you are suggesting that Iran possesses a nuclear weapon capability it's up you to produce evidence to support that contention.

They have 60% enriched uranium.

19 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

They have 60% enriched uranium.

Israel has nuclear weapons, so what?

3 minutes ago, still kicking said:

Israel has nuclear weapons, so what?

False equivalence. Bit like saying the Brits or the French have nukes. Apart from this you asked for evidence. The regime itself has said it has >400 kg 60% enriched uranium. There is no domestic reason for this other than the production of nukes.

Iran will win so much they will tired of winning , so much so they will stop executing US/Isareli spies. That bigly.

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

They have 60% enriched uranium.

Good spin it up to 80 then the bomb - then test and then tell the ROW to eff the right off.

You see! Moscow was right to sympathize with Trump. The orange guy won't stop until he's wagered the Americans' last pants on military roulette.
Vlad supporters really love watching it.

8 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Yes, it is I, once again.....

And, I am still waiting for you to ask me for a pound of my flesh.

Or, have you had enough....already....?

Enough, pound of your flesh I can go all day with guys like you it is my pasr time.

6 hours ago, dinsdale said:

They have 60% enriched uranium.

I heard it to be 80%. regardless if it wasn't I too wonder why Iran refuse as part of negotiation for outside forces to remove it?

10 minutes ago, thailand49 said:

I heard it to be 80%. regardless if it wasn't I too wonder why Iran refuse as part of negotiation for outside forces to remove it?

60% is one step away.

20 minutes ago, thailand49 said:

I heard it to be 80%. regardless if it wasn't I too wonder why Iran refuse as part of negotiation for outside forces to remove it?

Why should they? It's theirs.

29 minutes ago, IsmeUno said:

Why should they? It's theirs.

Then when they enrich it you have no problem the nuts using as they claim they would hopefully when they do hit you and your family first and your country first why because it theirs to use numb nut! 🤣

30 minutes ago, IsmeUno said:

Why should they? It's theirs.

You obviously think Jihadists should have nukes. Nth Korea and China is bad enough but an Islamic Fundamentalist regime that sponsors proxy terrorist organizations and calls for the death of the US and Israel you're ok with?

8 hours ago, dinsdale said:

I find it somewhat perplexing that many on here (and in the press) seem to support a Jihadist dictatorship purely because of a total hate for Trump.

Without pointing fingers, which forum members have said they support Iran's jihadist dictatorship? What press are you referring to that actually supports Iran's jihadist dictatorship?

With your "seem to" comment, you're not doing that, "If you don't like Trump, you must love the Mullahs" nonsense again, are you?

8 hours ago, dinsdale said:

The regime itself has said it has >400 kg 60% enriched uranium. There is no domestic reason for this other than the production of nukes.

Which they do not have the capability of producing or weaponising.

They could sell it to North Korea of course.