Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump Reportedly Hid in Catering Truck During Plane Swap

Donald Trump made a covert change to his aircraft as he left a Nato summit in Turkey last month after US officials detected a credible Iranian threat, US media reported.

According to the Washington Post, the US president boarded Air Force One in view of television cameras before being transferred out of sight onto an elevated airport catering truck. He was then taken to a separate military aircraft without journalists and some White House staff on board knowing he had left.

The White House has not confirmed the account. Officials told CBS News, a US partner of the BBC, that the United States had identified a credible threat from Iran to fire a missile at the president’s plane.

Nato Summit Departure in Ankara

Trump had told the summit in Ankara that he was Iran’s “number one target”.

The reported manoeuvre occurred as US forces continued their heightened posture towards Tehran. It came a day after the US renewed strikes on Iran following a breakdown in negotiations between Washington and Tehran aimed at ending the war.

Trump arrived in Turkey aboard a newer Boeing 747-8 donated by Qatar. After the summit, he said he would depart on the older Air Force One “for old time’s sake”. Footage from 8 July showed him boarding the presidential jet at Ankara airport.

However, the Washington Post said that after he entered the aircraft, he was taken by catering truck to a smaller C-32A military plane on the opposite side of the runway. The C-32A is a modified Boeing 757 commonly used by the vice president.

C-32A Change and Staff Notices

The Washington Post reported that Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, boarded the C-32A separately using external stairs, a move intended to make the flight appear routine.

Journalists and some White House staff who were on Air Force One were reportedly told to close their window shades. They were unaware the president had been removed from the flight.

Trump then travelled onward to the UK, according to the reports, before returning to the US. He was seen leaving Air Force One after it landed at RAF Mildenhall. It was not clear, the Washington Post said, how he moved from the C-32A back to the legacy Air Force One before continuing his journey.

The president later transferred again to the new Qatari-donated Air Force One to fly back to Washington.

Statements on Security and Possible Upgrades

During the return flight, Trump spoke to reporters on board and referred to threats posed by Iran without mentioning the earlier aircraft switch, according to accounts of the exchange.

When asked why reporters had been told to lower their window shades on the plane during the Ankara departure, Trump said: “Because you’re probably on a dangerous flight because of the sleazebags we have to deal with.” He added that he had a “threat all the time” and that he is “number one” on Iran’s “list”. He also said: “But if I go, you go, right? … Perhaps someday you want to change professions.”

White House communications director Steven Cheung said he did not directly confirm or deny the reports, but told CBS News that the new Air Force One is a “state-of-the-art aircraft” with security measures designed to protect the president and his staff.

CBS News previously reported that US intelligence had warned of a specific threat of an attack on Trump or his aircraft. The New York Times had earlier described security concerns about the Qatari-gifted jet and said the Secret Service urged Trump to switch planes when leaving the Nato summit. The Times reported that several of its journalists were later summoned to testify under oath, and that the Justice Department told the BBC it was investigating illegal leaks.

The US has also spent months retrofitting the $400m Boeing 747-8 to prepare it for presidential use. CBS News reported that older Air Force One aircraft have laser systems intended to blind incoming missiles, while it is unclear what defences are fitted to the Qatari-donated jet. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the new Air Force One is safe, and that it would receive additional upgrades in the autumn taking about a month.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

11 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Wingate Gold Member

Wingate

Advanced Member
On 8/13/2026 at 7:21 AM, Smokey and the Bandit said:

No, you seem to have missed the point.

The suggestion that the White House should have disembarked the press pool to buy commercial tickets during an active security threat ignores basic military doctrine and operational security.

When the Secret Service and Department of Defense identify an imminent threat, their absolute priority is tactical deception and immediate extraction.

Instructing journalists to leave the aircraft and scatter into an international terminal would have alerted foreign intelligence services that a covert departure was underway, compromising the operation and placing the entire delegation at severe risk.

Air Force One operates under strict Department of Defense transport protocols, not commercial airline logistics.

In high-threat environments, security details routinely deploy decoy aircraft and immediate departure sequences to clear hostile airspace, a standard protocol utilized across administrations, including by Presidents Clinton, Obama, and Biden during covert travel to high-risk zones.

The Secret Service acts on military containment mandates to neutralize targeted threats, not retail travel arrangements.

By federal law (18 U.S.C. 3056), the Secret Service's top priority is absolute protection of the President of the United States.

When a credible threat emerges, operational protocol dictates that every action, including movement, timing, transport logistics, and communication, is subordinate to keeping the Commander-in-Chief safe and moving them out of danger immediately. Everyone else on board, including staff and press, is managed under that singular security mandate.

This priority is rooted in both statute (the protective mandate under 18 U.S.C. § 3056) and long-standing doctrine. In these moments, the POTUS is not treated as one passenger among many , he is the sole protectee whose safety overrides all other concerns.

A courageous and honorable President, which Trump is not, would have shown concern for the decoys.

Can anyone imagine JFK pulling a cowardly Trump retreat, even if the actual intel---not the Israeli lie---showed a truly credible threat (an operation to take out AFi would be sizeable, and either agency assets of NSA eavesdropping would have had some indication, or perhaps MI6, the Germans, the Aussies and other Five Eyes Members. Israel lied, as they need Trump ready to keep putting other Americans in harm's way). Even Bush II would likely have done it differently, as he is a man, not a childish coward. Reagan, too, would have done the honorable thing, telling the Secret Service to calm down.

Trump could have been whisked away, and once out of Turkish airspace, the passengers on the decoy plane could have been informed and allowed to make other arrangements. That would have been the decent thing to do, but Trump has no decency.

bannork Star Member

bannork

Newsman

Trump slipped away with a tiny inner circle

OIP-2463296178.jpg

Natalie Harp

According to The Washington Post, Trump was moved from the modified Boeing 747 onto a military C-32A, a Boeing 757 variant, for the flight to RAF Mildenhall. Only four staff members accompanied him: Dan Scavino, Walt Nauta, Natalie Harp and, according to the account, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.

Harp, 34, is a close aide nicknamed Trump’s “human printer” because she supplies him with large-format printouts of news stories and social media posts. Her brother, from whom she is estranged, has previously described her relationship with Trump as “unhealthy”.

Senior officials and reporters stayed behind

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other senior officials remained on the 747 alongside the 13-member White House press pool.

That aircraft continued under the Air Force One call sign while Trump’s smaller plane followed under the call sign “REACH 88”. The arrangement was reportedly designed to confuse potential attackers tracking the president.

The decoy was built around a terrifying threat

US intelligence had warned of potential Iranian attacks involving surface-to-air or shoulder-fired missiles. The security concerns were serious enough for Trump to avoid a newer aircraft that lacked missile-defence systems.

Yet the decision to move him onto another plane while leaving most officials and journalists behind has raised an uncomfortable question: was the larger aircraft deliberately made a target?

Trump says he was at greater risk

Trump rejected the suggestion that others had been placed in greater danger. He said the aircraft he travelled on was actually more likely to be targeted and insisted the Secret Service had directed the switch.

“I just follow what they like to do,” Trump said, arguing that both aircraft offered equivalent protection.

Trump took aide whose kin called relationship 'unhealthy' on jet swap

SiSePuede419 Ruby Member

SiSePuede419

Advanced Member

Only four staff members accompanied him

That's a 25% chance of having to change the Boss's diapers. Not good.

Smokey and the Bandit Gold Member

Smokey and the Bandit

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Wingate said:

A courageous and honorable President, which Trump is not, would have shown concern for the decoys.

Can anyone imagine JFK pulling a cowardly Trump retreat, even if the actual intel---not the Israeli lie---showed a truly credible threat (an operation to take out AFi would be sizeable, and either agency assets of NSA eavesdropping would have had some indication, or perhaps MI6, the Germans, the Aussies and other Five Eyes Members. Israel lied, as they need Trump ready to keep putting other Americans in harm's way). Even Bush II would likely have done it differently, as he is a man, not a childish coward. Reagan, too, would have done the honorable thing, telling the Secret Service to calm down.

Trump could have been whisked away, and once out of Turkish airspace, the passengers on the decoy plane could have been informed and allowed to make other arrangements. That would have been the decent thing to do, but Trump has no decency.

Again, you are showing your complete lack of understanding of how things work, regarding the security of the President.

Do you really think the Secret Service are there for show and President Trump can do anything he wants regarding security?

Arguing or even suggesting that a President should override Secret Service directives out of chivalry completely misinterprets executive security doctrine, which prioritizes Continuity of Government over personal safety.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3056, the Secret Service holds non-negotiable, statutory authority over the physical safety of the Commander-in-Chief.

In an active threat scenario, tactical maneuvers—including mid-air diversions and the operational use of decoy aircraft—are executed unilaterally by the Special Agent in Charge to safeguard executive authority and protect nuclear command structures.

Expecting a President to overrule these protocols to prevent logistical inconvenience for support staff or media/press pool on a decoy flight is an operational impossibility that would severely compromise national security.

Historical precedent confirms that past presidents consistently deferred to protective details during active security events.

On September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush was repeatedly denied an immediate return to Washington by security officials, while President Ronald Reagan strictly adhered to heightened Secret Service protocols following his 1981 assassination attempt.

Multiple Prersidents, Bill Clinton (2000), George W. Bush (2003), Barack Obama (2010), Joe Biden (2023), have faced tensions with security details over travel constraints, and every modern administration relies on identical decoy and secrecy protocols when facing threats.

Decoy transports and tactical shadow flights remain SOP's across all administrations to obscure the principal asset's movements.

Criticizing compliance with emergency extractions confuses personal bravado with the precise, non-negotiable logic required to secure the executive branch.

I know you dislike President Trump and that's fine, but do try and show a modicum of common sense!

Tug Star Member

Tug

Advanced Member
On 8/13/2026 at 4:22 PM, mikeymike100 said:

Indeed and its their number one priority to make sure he remains safe!

I don't understand why some of the posters on this thread don't understand that!

I think most do understand the mission of the secret service to protect a president were folks are having issues is he obviously didn’t give a rats behind about the others safety…..trump being what he is it’s not surprising.it’s also not an excuse.

mikeymike100 Platinum Member

mikeymike100

Advanced Member
14 hours ago, Tug said:

I think most do understand the mission of the secret service to protect a president were folks are having issues is he obviously didn’t give a rats behind about the others safety…..trump being what he is it’s not surprising.it’s also not an excuse.

When a threat occurs the President doesn't get to choose what happens, it's taken out of his hands.

He doesn't have a say in who does what, the secret service control everything!

mikeymike100 Platinum Member

mikeymike100

Advanced Member
16 hours ago, SiSePuede419 said:

Only four staff members accompanied him

That's a 25% chance of having to change the Boss's diapers. Not good.

Grow up!

Reporting confirmed that the key civilian staff who boarded the catering vehicle with Trump included White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino, Executive Assistant Natalie Harp, and Director of Oval Office Operations Walt Nauta. The military aide carrying the satchel/football moved as part of the essential Secret Service/military protective detail accompanying the President across the tarmac.

mikeymike100 Platinum Member

mikeymike100

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Again, you are showing your complete lack of understanding of how things work, regarding the security of the President.

Do you really think the Secret Service are there for show and President Trump can do anything he wants regarding security?

Arguing or even suggesting that a President should override Secret Service directives out of chivalry completely misinterprets executive security doctrine, which prioritizes Continuity of Government over personal safety.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3056, the Secret Service holds non-negotiable, statutory authority over the physical safety of the Commander-in-Chief.

In an active threat scenario, tactical maneuvers—including mid-air diversions and the operational use of decoy aircraft—are executed unilaterally by the Special Agent in Charge to safeguard executive authority and protect nuclear command structures.

Expecting a President to overrule these protocols to prevent logistical inconvenience for support staff or media/press pool on a decoy flight is an operational impossibility that would severely compromise national security.

Historical precedent confirms that past presidents consistently deferred to protective details during active security events.

On September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush was repeatedly denied an immediate return to Washington by security officials, while President Ronald Reagan strictly adhered to heightened Secret Service protocols following his 1981 assassination attempt.

Multiple Prersidents, Bill Clinton (2000), George W. Bush (2003), Barack Obama (2010), Joe Biden (2023), have faced tensions with security details over travel constraints, and every modern administration relies on identical decoy and secrecy protocols when facing threats.

Decoy transports and tactical shadow flights remain SOP's across all administrations to obscure the principal asset's movements.

Criticizing compliance with emergency extractions confuses personal bravado with the precise, non-negotiable logic required to secure the executive branch.

I know you dislike President Trump and that's fine, but do try and show a modicum of common sense!

Well said and clear as crystal!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.