Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump Threatens to Block Bills Until Congress Passes Strict Voter ID Law

Trump Pushes Congress on Voting Bill

Donald Trump has threatened to refuse signing new legislation unless Congress approves a strict voting reform bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote.

Speaking at a Republican event in Miami, the US president renewed his push for the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, often called the SAVE Act or “Save America Act”.

“All voters must show proof of citizenship in order to vote,” Trump said. “No mail-in ballots, except for illness, disability, military or travel.”

Get the latest headlines in your email subscribe-orange.png

The president said the bill should take priority over other legislative business, repeating a warning he posted on the social media platform Truth Social.

“MUST GO TO THE FRONT OF THE LINE,” he wrote, adding that he would not sign other bills until the measure is passed in its strongest form.

Trump also claimed that stricter voting rules could dramatically shift the political landscape.

“If this passes, Democrats probably won’t win an election for 50 years,” he said.

What the Proposed Law Would Do

The legislation has circulated in Congress for more than two years and aims to tighten requirements for voter registration and ballot casting in federal elections.

Among its main provisions are mandatory documentary proof of US citizenship — such as a passport or birth certificate — in order to register to vote, as well as photo identification requirements when casting ballots.

The bill would also require states to ensure only US citizens are on voter rolls and allow private individuals to sue election officials if someone is registered without proper documentation.

Another provision directs states to share voter registration lists with the Department of Homeland Security so citizenship can be verified.

Supporters say the measures are necessary to prevent voter fraud and ensure confidence in elections.

However, critics argue that the requirements would make registration far more complicated and risk excluding legitimate voters.

Bill Faces Difficult Path in Senate

The legislation has already passed the United States House of Representatives earlier this year, but its prospects in the United States Senate remain uncertain.

Because of the chamber’s filibuster rules, the measure would likely require 60 votes to move forward, meaning significant bipartisan support would be needed.

Some Republicans have called for the filibuster to be lifted in order to pass the bill.

Ken Paxton, a Republican candidate in a heated Senate race in Texas, said he would consider dropping out of the contest if Senate leaders agreed to remove the procedural barrier to passing the legislation.

Critics Warn of Voting Barriers

Voting rights groups argue the proposed law could disenfranchise millions of Americans.

Many citizens do not have readily available proof of citizenship. Only about half of Americans hold a valid passport, while other documents — such as birth certificates — may not match current legal names.

Advocates say this could particularly affect married women who changed their surnames and voters whose documentation has not been updated.

The Brennan Center for Justice said the measure could disproportionately impact younger voters and minority communities.

Research also suggests voting by non-citizens is extremely rare. The Bipartisan Policy Center has said there is no evidence that such cases occur frequently enough to affect election outcomes.

Still, Trump has repeatedly raised concerns about non-citizens participating in US elections and has suggested the federal government should take greater control over how elections are run — a responsibility traditionally handled by states and local authorities.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 09.03 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, ASEAN NOW News said:

Still, Trump has repeatedly raised concerns about non-citizens participating in US elections and has suggested the federal government should take greater control over how elections are run — a responsibility traditionally handled by states and local authorities.

Rather more than "traditionally handled by states" - doesn't the US Constitution stipulate that elections are the responsibility of individual states and not a Federal responsibility?

tomazbodner Ruby Member

tomazbodner

Advanced Member

Why can't they just make passport a mandatory document, or make another mandatory picture ID card, which is proof of citizenship? With trillions Government is spending on stupid stuff, issuing 400 million plastic cards with photos on them would be peanuts. On a more serious note - does the government really not have a database of their citizens with their photos and fingerprints?

rudi49jr Platinum Member

rudi49jr

Advanced Member

This from the man who claims you need ID to go shopping:

“All we want is voter ID. You go to a grocery store, you have to give ID. You go to a gas station, you give ID.”

In 2023, he falsely claimed identification was needed “if you buy a loaf of bread”.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/05/politics/fact-check-trump-groceries-identification

Why America still puts up with this buffoon is beyond me.

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, tomazbodner said:

Why can't they just make passport a mandatory document, or make another mandatory picture ID card, which is proof of citizenship? With trillions Government is spending on stupid stuff, issuing 400 million plastic cards with photos on them would be peanuts. On a more serious note - does the government really not have a database of their citizens with their photos and fingerprints?

Well they tell us half of Americans don't have passports. No doubt given time a system could be set up which will allow relatively easy issue of the appropriate document, but the point is this will not be able to be achieved in time for November's mid term elections. This in turn means that those particular elections will be marked by chaotic scenes, which will have the effect of disproportionately suppressing voting amongst young, working class, first time voters. The voting classes particularly likely, in the current political circumstances, to favour the Democrats.

Once the mid terms are in the bag so to speak, then on to construct a thorough system to allow "qualification gerrymandering". If they "lose" the midterms, well there will be effectively no political process open to the executive for the following two years, at best lame duck paralysis, at worst perhaps impeachment. The stakes are very high!

novacova Diamond Member

novacova

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, ASEAN NOW News said:

“All voters must show proof of citizenship in order to vote,”

Why would anyone oppose this, unless of course they’re criminally bent. And what other countries allow noncitizens to vote in their elections, none of course. So there you have it folks, the political left in the US aspire to criminality.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, novacova said:

Why would anyone oppose this,

Reading the OP helps.

Colki Senior Member

Colki

Member

As he stated if this was enacted Democrats would not win an election for 50 years. His intentions are stated.

To enrol to vote I assume adequate proof of current eligibility must be established.

Re postal voting am sure he stated that he did himself but is no longer adequate for other voters?

phetphet Ruby Member

phetphet

Advanced Member

Not surprised a convicted felon would resort to blackmail. 😄

Jim Waldron Silver Member

Jim Waldron

Advanced Member

Call it what it is: holding the entire legislative process hostage to force through a partisan voting restriction.

This isn’t about “election integrity”, it’s about power. If a leader is willing to shut down governance unless the rules are rewritten in his favor, that’s not democratic behavior by any definition.

And the irony? The U.S. is already one of the hardest countries in the developed world to vote in. Yet here we are, watching Trump push even further, threatening gridlock, risking shutdowns, and undermining trust in elections all over again.

MIke B Bad Silver Member

MIke B Bad

Advanced Member

Trump is dead right......this volume of illegal voting has to be totally eradicated......

Screenshot 2026-03-10 at 13.01.18.png

wwest5829 Platinum Member

wwest5829

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, tomazbodner said:

Why can't they just make passport a mandatory document, or make another mandatory picture ID card, which is proof of citizenship? With trillions Government is spending on stupid stuff, issuing 400 million plastic cards with photos on them would be peanuts. On a more serious note - does the government really not have a database of their citizens with their photos and fingerprints?

At least not officially is the answer to your ending inquiry. We still find "suspects" not having fingerprints on file. Mine might show up but only as a result of government employment long ago.

mushroomdave Silver Member

mushroomdave

Advanced Member

Someone's getting nervous..............poor Donald.....

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

During his speech at the recently renamed Trump-Kennedy Center (formerly the Kennedy Center), Trump warned that losing control of Congress in the upcoming November 2026 midterms would lead to his third impeachment:

"You gotta win the midterms 'cause, if we don't win the midterms, it's just gonna be—I mean, they'll find a reason to impeach me. I'll get impeached."

12f26234-57b8-4a50-8f6e-ead761d4acc6.png

newnative Diamond Member

newnative

Advanced Member

Probably too dumb to realize legislation that is passed becomes law anyway after 10 days, with or without his signature. With this Republican president and this Republican Congress, probably better anyway if legislation is held up.

cooked Ruby Member

cooked

Advanced Member
23 hours ago, rudi49jr said:

This from the man who claims you need ID to go shopping:

“All we want is voter ID. You go to a grocery store, you have to give ID. You go to a gas station, you give ID.”

In 2023, he falsely claimed identification was needed “if you buy a loaf of bread”.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/05/politics/fact-check-trump-groceries-identification

Why America still puts up with this buffoon is beyond me.

Shoppers at a grocery store in Dayton, Ohio, US, on October 21.

Shoppers at a grocery store in Dayton, Ohio, US, on October 21.

Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg/Getty Images/File

President Donald Trump has revived one of the most bizarre false claims from his first presidency and his 2024 campaign: an assertion that Americans are required to show identification to buy groceries.

Trump was mocked when he made versions of this claim in 2018 and 2019 while pushing for stricter voter identification laws. But he said it again in 2023 as he ran for president, then said it once more on Wednesday morning while baselessly questioning the legitimacy of US elections in the wake of Republican defeats in various state and local elections the day prior.

“All we want is voter ID. You go to a grocery store, you have to give ID. You go to a gas station, you give ID,” Trump said Wednesday at .

Americans obviously do not need to provide identification to buy groceries or gas.

Grocery stores generally require identification for purchases of alcohol or tobacco, purchases of certain medications and for the small percentage of purchases made by personal check.

cooked Ruby Member

cooked

Advanced Member
23 hours ago, tomazbodner said:

Why can't they just make passport a mandatory document, or make another mandatory picture ID card, which is proof of citizenship? With trillions Government is spending on stupid stuff, issuing 400 million plastic cards with photos on them would be peanuts. On a more serious note - does the government really not have a database of their citizens with their photos and fingerprints?

Most Americans don't have a passport. In view of the fact that places like California have been issuing driving licenses to non-citizens, which can then be used as voter ID, maybe it is time to introduce federally authorised ID's, don't you think?

tomazbodner Ruby Member

tomazbodner

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, cooked said:

Most Americans don't have a passport. In view of the fact that places like California have been issuing driving licenses to non-citizens, which can then be used as voter ID, maybe it is time to introduce federally authorised ID's, don't you think?

I do. I am just amazed there isn't one mandated already.

phaholyothin Explorer Member

phaholyothin

Member
On 3/11/2026 at 9:08 AM, cooked said:

In view of the fact that places like California have been issuing driving licenses to non-citizens, which can then be used as voter ID...

This is false. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 explicitly prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections. Municipalities in three states (California, Maryland, and Vermont) and Washington, DC allow noncitizens to vote in certain local elections.

You shouldn't have to pay a fee to use the rights that have been granted to you as a citizen.

uncletiger Advanced Member

uncletiger

Member
On 3/12/2026 at 10:26 AM, phaholyothin said:

This is false. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 explicitly prohibits noncitizens from voting in federal elections. Municipalities in three states (California, Maryland, and Vermont) and Washington, DC allow noncitizens to vote in certain local elections.

You shouldn't have to pay a fee to use the rights that have been granted to you as a citizen.

You honestly think an organized, criminal syndicate cares that something is against the law? You are incredibly naive.

Yes. Non citizens are almost certainly voting. And often even without their knowledge by Globalist operatives stuffing ballots for them in their names. With voter rolls taken from the DMV and no citizenship requirement for obtaining a driver's license, every single illegal and non citizen is a possible illegal voter.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, uncletiger said:

Non citizens are almost certainly voting.

Proof please.

newnative Diamond Member

newnative

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, uncletiger said:

You honestly think an organized, criminal syndicate cares that something is against the law? You are incredibly naive.

Yes. Non citizens are almost certainly voting. And often even without their knowledge by Globalist operatives stuffing ballots for them in their names. With voter rolls taken from the DMV and no citizenship requirement for obtaining a driver's license, every single illegal and non citizen is a possible illegal voter.

Instead of trumpeting Trump's Big Lie, why not actually do some research yourself? The issue has literally been looked at with a fine-tooth comb, by multiple states and agencies. What was found, everywhere, was no evidence of non-citizens voting in numbers large enough to be meaningful.

Michigan is a good example. That state audited their entire voting database aftter the 2024 election. What they found was 16 cases of non-citizens voting out of the 5.7 million who voted. You'll find the same thing with other states--tiny numbers out of millions of votes cast. And, not with just the 2024 election but with other past elections studied. It's a total non-issue.

Trump has taken this total non-issue and is spouting his Big Lie in order to pass the SAVE Act, which will make it more difficult for many American citizens, especially married women, to vote. Why does Trump want to make voting more difficult, not easier? Because, if it is made easier, according to Trump, "You never have a Republican elected in this country again." His words, not mine. Hmm. Republicans currently own the Presidency, the Senate, and the House. Yet another lie from the prolific Mr. Trump.

So, the goal, I don't know why, given Republican success, is to set up hurdles to getting registered, thinking some may just give up and not bother with the time and the expense involved. As with a lot of issues, the good of the many must be weighed against the abuse of a tiny few. Making voting easier, not more difficult, should be the goal, to get more voter participation, not less, by the citizens.

Purdey Diamond Member

Purdey

Advanced Member

This will certainly cause problems for citizens who don't have a passport or other document.

https://apnews.com/article/save-act-documents-requirements-citizenship-voting-congress-dfb43bcdd0255d3665da588a60286b4e

This may blowback on Republicans as the southern states are also the least educated. Thus, there is the issue that republican voters may be turned away for not having the correct ID.

This is going to lead to endless court cases about real citizens not allowed to vote.

uncletiger Advanced Member

uncletiger

Member
On 3/14/2026 at 7:23 AM, stevenl said:

Proof please.

The proof is how many CA jury summons get returned with the indication "I am not a citizen". Those jury summons are taken from voter roles. Only the intentionally myopic and desperate would claim it is impossible for an organized criminal syndicate to use such a glaringly obvious deficiency to engage in election fraud. The issue isn't proving it's happening. That's an impossible requirement because of the nature of secret ballots. At best you can use statistics to say it's probably happening with some degree of confidence, but then the assumptions underlying the statistics will simply be questioned by people such as yourself who have a personal agenda not to believe it.

So the issue we're discussing is in the flat out denial by Globalist collaborators that it could be happening at all, and that such a massive security hole like this needs to be addressed to restore confidence in elections.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, uncletiger said:

this needs to be addressed to restore confidence in elections

The only ones doubting the elections are the conspiracy theorists. And they'll deny an unfavourable result anyway.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
On 3/10/2026 at 4:20 AM, Colki said:

As he stated if this was enacted Democrats would not win an election for 50 years. His intentions are stated.

To enrol to vote I assume adequate proof of current eligibility must be established.

Re postal voting am sure he stated that he did himself but is no longer adequate for other voters?

He still does. He says how else can he vote.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/trump-casts-mail-ballot-florida-calls-method-cheating-rcna264762

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.