Trump Under Fire Over $20M Government-Funded Ads

The Trump administration is facing fresh scrutiny after federal funding was used to broadcast television advertisements promoting Donald Trump and his administration in the run-up to the November midterm elections.

The spending has drawn questions from ethics watchdogs, Democrats in Congress and some Republicans over whether the government advertising crosses the line into electioneering or propaganda.

Oval Office Defence

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump defended the broadcasts during an event in the Oval Office. He said the ads were intended to support the nation rather than to back any candidate on the ballot.

“I’m not promoting a candidate. I’m not promoting myself,” Trump told reporters. “I’m promoting the country,” he said, adding that if critics believed the approach was incorrect, he would “gladly” pay the money back. He also described the adverts as being “for the spirit of our country”.

Trump has previously urged Republican voters to “pretend” that he is running in the midterms, arguing that doing so would increase turnout for GOP candidates for Congress.

At a separate event on Wednesday, he again framed his campaign involvement as important to the party’s performance.

“I hope you can believe that I’m running. They like to say, ‘Oh, nobody wants him.’ Well, everybody that has me wins,” Trump said.

Cost And Content Of The Spots

An estimate by AdImpact, an advertising agency that tracks television ad spending, found that the federal government has spent at least $2.5 million airing three different TV advertisements.

A total of $20 million from the Department of Homeland Security budget has been allocated for the effort, according to the report.

The first four ads have been aired since last week. One of the commercials shows Trump in monochrome as he walks down a hallway, accompanied by text describing a “final battle” against the “deep state”, “the globalists” and “the sick political class that hates our country”.

Another ad pairs a montage of clips and images of Trump at events and rallies with on-screen claims about “the largest tax cuts in history”.

The latest advertisement, released on Wednesday, focuses on the United States’ war with Iran, now in its eighth month. It includes audio of Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth while U.S. military footage, including unclassified strikes, is shown. The video appears to match material played during the Republican midterm convention last month. The ad aired on Wednesday before Hegseth addressed 600 service members at his “State of the Force” speech at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia.

All of the adverts carry the message “Paid for by the U.S. Government” at the bottom of the screen as they end.

Criticism And White House Response

Ethics watchdogs and members of Congress have said the ads are inappropriate. Some critics argue the commercials may breach federal propaganda rules.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, said on Monday that while he liked the messaging, it “shouldn’t be paid for by taxpayer dollars”.

The White House has rejected the criticism. It said the broadcasts are educational public service announcements (PSAs), not campaign advertisements. The administration described them as “very clearly not campaign ads” and said they are intended as a reminder for Americans to love their country and understand why it is worth defending.

On Tuesday, Democratic Senators Patty Murray and Chris Murphy wrote to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin accusing the department of “a shockingly corrupt misuse of taxpayer dollars”. In the House, Democratic Representatives Jamie Raskin and George Whitesides asked federal watchdogs to investigate the ads. Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, and Whitesides wrote on Wednesday to the Government Accountability Office and the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, calling the ads “desperate pre-election propaganda”.

FCC View And Officials’ Comments

On Wednesday, Federal Communications Commission chair Brendan Carr said the government-funded adverts do not warrant an FCC review. “It doesn’t strike me as anything at all out of the ordinary,” Carr said during a press conference.

When asked about claims that the ads amount to propaganda, Carr laughed and said the White House had explained the commercials as standard PSAs that are seen “all the time”, adding that he did not think there was anything in them that merited FCC scrutiny.

Join the discussion?

2 October 2026