Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Tulsi Gabbard Resigns as US Intelligence Chief

Tulsi Gabbard will resign as US director of national intelligence at the end of June, citing her husband's recent bone cancer diagnosis as the reason for leaving the Trump administration.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

In a resignation letter obtained by CBS News, Gabbard said she could not continue in such a demanding role while her husband, Abraham, faces serious health challenges.

“His strength and love have sustained me through every challenge,” she wrote. “I cannot in good conscience ask him to face this fight alone while I continue in this demanding and time-consuming position.”

US President Donald Trump praised Gabbard in a social media post, saying she had “done an incredible job” and would be missed. He added that she wanted to focus on supporting her husband during his treatment.

Her resignation takes effect on 30 June. Aaron Lukas, the principal deputy director of national intelligence, will serve as acting director, Trump said.

Tensions Over Iran Policy

Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii, became one of Trump’s most prominent intelligence officials after being confirmed in early 2025. However, she has maintained a lower public profile in recent months as the administration intensified its foreign policy actions involving Iran, Cuba and Venezuela.

Known for her long-standing opposition to US military intervention abroad, Gabbard faced scrutiny after the United States joined Israeli strikes on Iran. She stopped short of fully endorsing the decision and avoided directly answering questions during a congressional hearing in March about whether the administration understood the potential consequences of the conflict.

She also came under pressure from Democrats over what they viewed as inconsistencies between intelligence assessments and White House statements regarding Iran’s nuclear programme.

Last year, Trump publicly dismissed Gabbard’s testimony to Congress that Iran was not actively seeking to build a nuclear weapon.

“I don’t care what she said,” Trump told reporters at the time. “I think they were very close to having a weapon.”

The president has repeatedly cited Iran’s nuclear capabilities as justification for US military action.

Senior Departures From Administration

Gabbard is the fourth Cabinet-level official to leave the Trump administration this year. Former labor secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer departed in April, while Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Attorney General Pam Bondi also stepped down earlier in 2026.

Her resignation follows the earlier departure of her top aide, former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent, who left over disagreements concerning US policy toward Iran. Kent had urged Trump to “reverse course” on the conflict.

After Kent resigned, Gabbard publicly defended the president’s approach, saying the commander-in-chief was responsible for deciding what constituted an imminent threat to the United States.

From Democrat to Trump Ally

A military veteran who served in Iraq with a medical unit, Gabbard first entered politics in 2002 when she was elected to the Hawaii Legislature at the age of 21, becoming the youngest person ever elected in the state.

She later served in Congress as a Democrat from 2013 to 2021 and became the first Hindu member of the US House of Representatives.

Gabbard ran unsuccessfully for president in 2020 on an anti-interventionist platform. Two years later, she left the Democratic Party, accusing it of being controlled by what she called an “elitist cabal of warmongers”.

After becoming a political commentator on Fox News, she increasingly aligned herself with Trump, endorsing him during the 2024 presidential campaign and joining his transition team after the election.

Trump later nominated her to lead the US intelligence community, a role that oversees coordination among multiple intelligence agencies and advises the president on national security matters.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 23 May 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, lou norman said:

And that is the most frightening thing about the whole issue.

3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Except that Clinton, Obama and Biden all said the threat was imminent as well.

Utter rubbish !!

Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden did not all characterize the threat from Iran as "imminent." While all three maintained that preventing a nuclear-armed Iran was a top priority, they primarily approached the issue as a long-term strategic challenge to be managed through diplomacy, economic sanctions, and deterrence

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Utter rubbish !!

Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden did not all characterize the threat from Iran as "imminent." While all three maintained that preventing a nuclear-armed Iran was a top priority, they primarily approached the issue as a long-term strategic challenge to be managed through diplomacy, economic sanctions, and deterrence

"While all three maintained that preventing a nuclear-armed Iran was a top priority,'...', Obama subsequently put Iran on a glidepath to a nuclear weapon in 2032 with the JCPOA.

Why does Iran have so much enriched uranium if not for weapons?

Do you think Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear program?

lou norman Advanced Member

lou norman

Member
28 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Utter rubbish !!

Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden did not all characterize the threat from Iran as "imminent." While all three maintained that preventing a nuclear-armed Iran was a top priority, they primarily approached the issue as a long-term strategic challenge to be managed through diplomacy, economic sanctions, and deterrence

And it worked! But the current president doesn't do intel.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

"While all three maintained that preventing a nuclear-armed Iran was a top priority,'...', Obama subsequently put Iran on a glidepath to a nuclear weapon in 2032 with the JCPOA.

Why does Iran have so much enriched uranium if not for weapons?

Do you think Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear program?

your earlier statement did not say quote "Obama subsequently put Iran on a glidepath to a nuclear weapon in 2032 with the JCPOA."

It obvious you where not good at chemistry or physics !

Medical Isotope Production: This material can be used in research reactors to drive the fission process required to manufacture Molybdenum-99. This is the parent isotope of Technetium-99m, which is essential for medical diagnostic imaging globally.

Iran was banned from buying this isotope Technetium-99m,which is used as a radioactive tracer and can be detected in the body by medical equipment (gamma cameras). It is well suited to the role, because it emits readily detectable gamma rays

And to produce this isotope you need 60% Enriched uranium

Now Iran has always maintained that is the reason and has publicly stated this in the UN and other papers but as you are aware people lie !!!

your third point Why not! nobody stopped NK and to be bullied by the US and Israel they need to to survive

as to the quantity 440 kilograms of uranium 235 would give 440,000 doses of Tcc 99 reason you need this amount is the half live of Tcc99 is 6hrs its no good after that

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

your earlier statement did not say quote "Obama subsequently put Iran on a glidepath to a nuclear weapon in 2032 with the JCPOA."

It obvious you where not good at chemistry or physics !

Medical Isotope Production: This material can be used in research reactors to drive the fission process required to manufacture Molybdenum-99. This is the parent isotope of Technetium-99m, which is essential for medical diagnostic imaging globally.

Iran was banned from buying this isotope Technetium-99m,which is used as a radioactive tracer and can be detected in the body by medical equipment (gamma cameras). It is well suited to the role, because it emits readily detectable gamma rays

And to produce this isotope you need 60% Enriched uranium

Now Iran has always maintained that is the reason and has publicly stated this in the UN and other papers but as you are aware people lie !!!

your third point Why not! nobody stopped NK and to be bullied by the US and israel they need to to survive

So, it is your position that Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear programs, thank you for your honesty.

If I believed as you do, I would have supported the JCPOA, because it allowed Iran to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear programs, largely unsupervised.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, it is your position that Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear programs, thank you for your honesty.

If I believed as you do, I would have supported the JCPOA, because it allowed Iran to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear programs, largely unsupervised.

I believe i answered ur questions !

the biggest mistake was trump tearing up JCPOA it was working !!

Kandinski Advanced Member

Kandinski

Member
On 5/23/2026 at 6:42 AM, shackleton said:

The wheels are slowly falling off The Dons war waggon

Looking back in Hind site he probably wishes he never started the war with Iran

A blind, a hornets nest and a poke; guess the outcome.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

I believe i answered ur questions !

the biggest mistake was trump tearing up JCPOA it was working !!

Yes, the JCPOA, was working, because as you know, it allowed Iran to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear programs, largely unsupervised.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yes, the JCPOA, was working, because as you know, it allowed Iran to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear programs, largely unsupervised.

This is incorrect JCPOA was used to supervise irans nuclear program inspections were carried out !!

The JCPOA did not impose direct or verifiable limits on Iran's development or testing of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) or military drones. The 2015 nuclear agreement strictly focused on limiting Iran's nuclear program.

Here is how ballistic missiles and military drones relate to the agreement:

  • Military Drones (UAVs): The JCPOA itself contained no restrictions on drone production. However, Annex B of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2231—which endorsed the JCPOA—did include restrictions on the transfer of nuclear-capable UAVs. Those specific UN restrictions expired in October 2023.

  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs): Iran currently possesses the Middle East's largest ballistic missile arsenal, but it does not have a confirmed, fully operational ICBM. The JCPOA did not prohibit Iran from developing or testing these rockets. While UNSCR 2231 called upon Iran to refrain from developing ballistic missiles designed to carry nuclear weapons, these clauses were not enforceable enough to halt the advancements in its military. These UN restrictions also expired in October 2023

  • The lack of limits on these weapons systems has remained a major point of international contention, leading to separate rounds of sanctions and military actions over Iran's regional missile proliferation and drone exports to Russia

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, MikeandDow said:

This is incorrect JCPOA was used to supervise irans nuclear program inspections were carried out !!

The JCPOA did not impose direct or verifiable limits on Iran's development or testing of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) or military drones. The 2015 nuclear agreement strictly focused on limiting Iran's nuclear program.

Here is how ballistic missiles and military drones relate to the agreement:

  • Military Drones (UAVs): The JCPOA itself contained no restrictions on drone production. However, Annex B of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2231—which endorsed the JCPOA—did include restrictions on the transfer of nuclear-capable UAVs. Those specific UN restrictions expired in October 2023.

  • Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs): Iran currently possesses the Middle East's largest ballistic missile arsenal, but it does not have a confirmed, fully operational ICBM. The JCPOA did not prohibit Iran from developing or testing these rockets. While UNSCR 2231 called upon Iran to refrain from developing ballistic missiles designed to carry nuclear weapons, these clauses were not enforceable enough to halt the advancements in its military. These UN restrictions also expired in October 2023

  • The lack of limits on these weapons systems has remained a major point of international contention, leading to separate rounds of sanctions and military actions over Iran's regional missile proliferation and drone exports to Russia

So, as I said, the JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

And the JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment, correct?

Yes, the JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections, correct?

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
14 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yes, the JCPOA, was working, because as you know, it allowed Iran to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear programs, largely unsupervised.

Yes the JCPOA was working until Netanyahu persuaded Trump to tear it up in 2018. Iran complied to the agreement not to enrich Uranium beyond 3.67% right up to the T.

US Intelligence agencies confirmed Iran does not possess nor deploy ICBM and nuclear development program.

Any more of your fact challenged malarkey?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Yes the JCPOA was working until Netanyahu persuaded Trump to tear it up in 2018. Iran complied to the agreement not to enrich Uranium beyond 3.67% right up to the T.

US Intelligence agencies confirmed Iran does not possess nor deploy ICBM and nuclear development program.

Any more of your fact challenged malarkey?

Working to what?

As is public information, the JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

The JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment, correct?

The JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections, correct?

Yes, if by "working" you mean the JCPOA put Iran on a glidepath to a developing a deliverable nuclear warhead by 2032, then yes, it worked perfectly.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
15 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So, as I said, the JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

And the JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment, correct?

Yes, the JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections, correct?

You are trolling now !!! go find another sucker !!

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

You are trolling now !!! go find another sucker !!

In other words:

Yes, the JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

Yes, the JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment.

Ad yes, the JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections.

Thanks!

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Working to what?

As is public information, the JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

The JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment, correct?

The JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections, correct?

Yes, if by "working" you mean the JCPOA put Iran on a glidepath to a developing a deliverable nuclear warhead by 2032, then yes, it worked perfectly.

Do us a favour and go read the JCPOA. It is exhausting educating you.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Do us a favour and go read the JCPOA. It is exhausting educating you.

In other words,

Yes, the JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

Yes, the JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment.

Ad yes, the JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections.

Please point out anything I have said that is untrue.

You can't.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member

Boy, it gets quiet in here when the left is faced with the truth...

DeaconJohn Advanced Member

DeaconJohn

Advanced Member
12 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Boy, it gets quiet in here when the left is faced with the truth...

The Zionist/Hasbara narrative doesn't pass the smell test anymore.

Its putrid corpse is lost somewhere in the rubble of Gaza.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, DeaconJohn said:

The Zionist/Hasbara narrative doesn't pass the smell test anymore.

Its putrid corpse is lost somewhere in the rubble of Gaza.

Why does Iran have so much enriched uranium if not for weapons?

Do you think Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear program?

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

In other words,

Yes, the JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

Yes, the JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment.

Ad yes, the JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections.

Please point out anything I have said that is untrue.

You can't.

13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Why does Iran have so much enriched uranium if not for weapons?

Do you think Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear program?

Repeating the same nonsense over and over again doesn't make it true. It only exposes you as a troll.

cdulaney Advanced Member

cdulaney

Member
18 hours ago, retayl said:

Iran has been “weeks away” from nuclear capability for the past 30 years. You really shouldn’t believe all the BS this administration serves up.

Weeks away for the past 30years??? Now you are speaking in terms of BS.

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, cdulaney said:

Weeks away for the past 30years??? Now you are speaking in terms of BS.

So that one went right over your head.

retayl Advanced Member

retayl

Member
On 5/27/2026 at 3:15 AM, cdulaney said:

Weeks away for the past 30years??? Now you are speaking in terms of BS.

Google the word irony then you just might get what I’m saying. Not the brightest are you!

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
On 5/27/2026 at 8:41 AM, stevenl said:

Repeating the same nonsense over and over again doesn't make it true. It only exposes you as a troll.

Quit deflecting, what have I said that you believe is nonsense?

  1. The JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

  2. The JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment.

  3. The JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections.

Please point out anything that is untrue.

I went on to ask:

  1. Why does Iran have so much enriched uranium if not for weapons?

  2. Do you think Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear program?

Yet you (and none of the other pro JCPOA crowd) cannot point out anything I have said that is false, nor can you answer simple questions.

All you can do is call names and run away. Weak.

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Quit deflecting, what have I said that you believe is nonsense?

  1. The JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

  2. The JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment.

  3. The JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections.

Please point out anything that is untrue.

I went on to ask:

  1. Why does Iran have so much enriched uranium if not for weapons?

  2. Do you think Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear program?

Yet you (and none of the other pro JCPOA crowd) cannot point out anything I have said that is false, nor can you answer simple questions.

All you can do is call names and run away. Weak.

Without links or proof this post is just drivel !!!

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Without links or proof this post is just drivel !!!

What have I said that you believe is nonsense?

  • The JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

  • The JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment.

  • The JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections.

Please point out anything that is untrue.

I went on to ask:

  • Why does Iran have so much enriched uranium if not for weapons?

  • Do you think Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear program?

You can't point out anything I have said that is false, nor can you answer simple questions.

All you can do is call it drivel run away. Weak.

Here is a copy of the JCPOA that supports everything I have said:

0. Main Text

https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/245317.pdf

MikeandDow Ruby Member

MikeandDow

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What have I said that you believe is nonsense?

  • The JCPOA did nothing to restrict Iran's development and production of intercontinental ballistic missiles and military drones.

  • The JCPOA allowed Iran to continue their nuclear program, including enrichment.

  • The JCPOA mandated inspections, but only in the areas Iran agreed to allow inspections.

Please point out anything that is untrue.

I went on to ask:

  • Why does Iran have so much enriched uranium if not for weapons?

  • Do you think Iran should be allowed to further develop their intercontinental ballistic missile, military drone, and nuclear program?

You can't point out anything I have said that is false, nor can you answer simple questions.

All you can do is call it drivel run away. Weak.

Here is a copy of the JCPOA that supports everything I have said:

0. Main Text

https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/245317.pdf

What has the JCPOA have got to do with this topic ??? May 8, 2018 trump pulled out of it

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, MikeandDow said:

What has the JCPOA have got to do with this topic ??? May 8, 2018 trump pulled out of it

Without links or proof your post is just drivel !!!

cdulaney Advanced Member

cdulaney

Member
2 hours ago, retayl said:

Google the word irony then you just might get what I’m saying. Not the brightest are you!

Why don't you straight up and say what you mean instead of calling someone not as Bright as yourself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.