UK Asylum Seeker Guide Covers Sex, Consent, Gender Equality

Say's it all when an Afgahn raped a 1 yr old girl in Falkirk Scotland. In his defense his defence

lawyer said it was difficult due to Cultural differeces and language.

As sentence was passed, Sadeq Nikzad repeatedly shouted ‘liar’ at Mr Justice Morris

An Afghan asylum seeker tried to defend his rape of a 15-year-old Scottish schoolgirl by citing cultural differences and a language barrier.

Sadeq Nikzad, 29, entered the UK illegally on a small boat in 2023, and later that year subjected the teenager to a terrifying sex attack in broad daylight in Falkirk town centre.

Nikzad will serve nine years in custody followed by three years on licence, go on the sex offenders register and be deported at the end of his sentence.

As the sentence was passed at Livingston High Court, Nikzad repeatedly shouted “liar” at Mr Justice Morris.

He was convicted of rape at the High Court in Edinburgh earlier this year after a jury heard how he approached the girl and asked for her phone number and if she had a boyfriend.

He then made sexual remarks towards the underage girl before leading her to the rear of The Courtyard pub, where he attacked and raped her.

The girl said she froze during the assault, while a woman who came across her shortly afterwards said she had been “in a daze”.

The witness said: “She looked stunned. I knew something had gone wrong. She came to me for comfort. She said she kept telling the guy she was only 15.”

‘An appalling, opportunistic attack’

Janice Green, Nikzad’s defence counsel, told an earlier hearing that her client had not been educated about the significant cultural differences between the UK and Afghanistan.

Ms Green also said the schoolgirl’s evidence about language difficulties between them and the fact she had not told the accused “No” meant the offence was “not a typical stranger rape”.

She added: “There are no issues raised by him in relation to fear of persecution, and the ultimate result is that he’ll be deported at the conclusion of his sentence.”

During sentencing, Mr Justice Morris told the accused through an interpreter: “You’ve been convicted of an extremely serious sexual offence against a child, and I know your counsel has now explained to you that in those

1 minute ago, worgeordie said:

I see the booklet is written in English ,so the powers that be are assuming they can speak

and read English .that's giving them a loophole if they get caught doing something....

regards worgeordie

To write it in Arabic would be "problematic" and probably considered as racist

2 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Janice Green, Nikzad’s defence counsel, told an earlier hearing that her client had not been educated about the significant cultural differences between the UK and Afghanistan.

Ms Green also said the schoolgirl’s evidence about language difficulties between them and the fact she had not told the accused “No” meant the offence was “not a typical stranger rape”.

It beggars belief what sort of female solicitor / barrister would even consider defending such a beast. Are those wigs they wear in court available in blue these days? Joking aside she should be disbarred (or whatever the correct term is ) and should never be allowed in a courtroom again except to be charged and convicted with attempting to pervert the course of justice .

As far as I was aware ignorance of the law is never a valid excuse and cannot be quoted in mitigation

What a horrendous and shocking report , truly disgusting

6 minutes ago, Tidal wave said:

and don't forget moving them in to more desirable upmarket areas ensuring that "we" all play our part in sorting out a problem that very very few ( if any ) actually asked for yet was forced on us by other equally useless politicians

19 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

I see the booklet is written in English ,so the powers that be are assuming they can speak

and read English .that's giving them a loophole if they get caught doing something....

regards worgeordie

They seem to have the practical English required for survival.

The leaflets about not raping people, on the other hand, apparently still need to be printed.

Surely lawyers, doctors and nurses would know this already?

5 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

Foreigners are 71% more likely to commit sex crimes than British nationals.

Conviction rate for sex offences per 10,000 people:

British = 6
Moldovans = 38
Chad = 40
Namibia = 50
Eritrea = 54
Afghanistan = 59

Source: Centre for Migration Control

Net migration to the UK in 2022, 2023 and 2024 totalled almost 2.2m.
All illegal data? They don’t actually know. Or if they do, they’re not telling us, & it’s not just the dinghies.

Nearly 1 in 4 sex crime convictions involve foreign nationals.

Just think how much worse it will get when the savages are bussed into the "stock-broker belt areas" They won't settle for council estate girls after they have had a taste of quality However, The grooming gangs will have to raise their game and "up the ante" somewhat as the likes of "anastasia, philippa and cassandra" won't be dropping 'em for a donner kebab , 20 lambert and butler and a bottle of Lambrini, But just who will pay for the Pimms and canapes that will be required? , the taxpayer ? , or maybe the likes of "hope not hate" and "care 4 calais" will have a whip round or open a "go fund me" just for them

34 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

What % of rapes by illegal immigrants would you personally consider to be an appropriate limit ? in order to both fully protect our women ,yet, sensitively allowing the "guests" to feel at home? A simple number will suffice for your answer

Address the 85.9%. Are British less civilized?

8 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Surely lawyers, doctors and nurses would know this already?

And surely the "lawyers" at least would represent themselves in court on the rare occasions that they get caught and punished? They would probably evenbe paid for doing so via the legal aid system,

It just proves that whoever said Brexit would solve the immigration problem didn't have a clue what he was talking about, it made it far worse.

1 minute ago, newbee2022 said:

Address the 85.9%. Are British less civilized?

The british rapists are unfortunately a problem that we have to deal with , like all other countries, there are indigenous rapists and sex offenders, yes our own nonces are less civilised than normal people , I consider sex offenders to be sub-human where ever they come from.

The difference is that the behaviour of our home grown beasts is never defended or excused by the the likes of you, just the imported ones , So put up or shut up , how many foreign rapists do you think is acceptable ?

And furthermore your statement suggesting that getting raped by an illegal immigrant is no worse than getting raped by a UK citizen is probably one of the most disgusting things I have ever heard on here , you should hang your head in shame ,

It's so pathetic and so lefty that they even have to issue such an insulting statement to the UK public. Any illegal immigrant, boat scammer, or non-UK citizen that commits crime should be instantly deported.. no questions asked. If Denmark can do it, so can the UK.

As for ECHR... it can go take a running jump off the nearest cliff, just moronic. Attitudes are hardening, and by not balancing things properly they are only facilitating the rise of their opposite... always like this. The answers are to be found in the middle as the extremes of both sides only offer failure... hence this stupid roundavout we continually find ourselves on.

4 minutes ago, Bannoi said:

It just proves that whoever said Brexit would solve the immigration problem didn't have a clue what he was talking about, it made it far worse.

I don't think it's anything to do with "Brexit" It has everything to do with the way Brexit was mismanaged, Germany as an example is still right slap bang up to its neck in Europe and they have the same issues

3 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

how many foreign rapists do you think is acceptable ?

The most stupid question ever.❗

There is no excuse for any sexual assault.

2 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

The most stupid question ever.❗

There is no excuse for any sexual assault.

Is that your final answer? For some of them just being in the UK is the only excuse they need? I suggest you play devil's advocate in a rather less controversial subject, Its too late for you to start with the "there is no excuse " response and you have yet again made yourself look ridiculous

When faced with the problem of foreign imported sex offenders, your only response is to quote the figures for UK born offenders , as in your mind that makes it all ok What is wrong with people like you ? You all disgust me

15 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

There is no excuse for any sexual assault.

Well apparently there actually is , ie not being aware of the law, an excuse that a pathetic government has validated by publishing a leaflet like this . An excuse that has no standing in the UK legal system except for illegal immigrants who wish to sexually assault our women

I wonder why Calamity Lammy is trying to avoid publishing data on foreign crime? Must be they are so angelic he doesn't want to put the Brits to shame, right? 😄

David Lammy fighting to ‘cover up’ foreigners’ crimes

40 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Address the 85.9%. Are British less civilized?

Let’s now break down the 85.9% into “British” who were previous immigrants (or sons/grandsons of immigrants) and those who are “English”.

When we have those numbers, we can then break down the “British” immigrants by country of ancestry.

That will tell you who NOT to let in and who really shouldn’t have been allowed in in the first place.

I expect that the request for these statistics will bother leftists like yourself.

Tell me. Are you Swiss or “swiss”?

52 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Just think how much worse it will get when the savages are bussed into the "stock-broker belt areas" They won't settle for council estate girls after they have had a taste of quality However, The grooming gangs will have to raise their game and "up the ante" somewhat as the likes of "anastasia, philippa and cassandra" won't be dropping 'em for a donner kebab , 20 lambert and butler and a bottle of Lambrini, But just who will pay for the Pimms and canapes that will be required? , the taxpayer ? , or maybe the likes of "hope not hate" and "care 4 calais" will have a whip round or open a "go fund me" just for them

Sending large numbers of asylum seekers into small villages and rural areas - with or without these brilliant guides - is a recipe for trouble as we know.

These communities have limited housing, limited GP capacity, limited school places, and almost no existing support infrastructure for large groups of single young men who often don’t speak English and have no local ties.

Dropping hundreds or thousands into places with a few hundred or a few thousand residents doesn’t “spread the burden” but it overwhelms the place.

This is what they end up with:
Sudden pressure on already stretched local services

Rapid change in the character and safety of the area and no bloody leaflet will change this.

For sure tensions between residents and new arrivals.

Exactly the conditions that previously produced serious integration and crime problems in larger towns and cities. Rural England is not designed to absorb this. Treating small villages as overflow sites for a failed urban asylum system will create more friction, more resentment, and more problems. Not fewer.

I feel sorry for the UK countryside folks.

6 hours ago, phil2407 said:

Well they get given a free phone along with many other benefits that UK citizens would "kill for" no pun intended so 0 excuses - screw up bye bye!

Everyone's got mobile phones in the UK these days , even beggars on the streets have got mobile in their pocket

59 minutes ago, Bannoi said:

It just proves that whoever said Brexit would solve the immigration problem didn't have a clue what he was talking about, it made it far worse.

Brexit solved the legal immigration issue .

And thats what the people voted for and its been a success

1 hour ago, Airalee said:

Let’s now break down the 85.9% into “British” who were previous immigrants (or sons/grandsons of immigrants) and those who are “English”.

When we have those numbers, we can then break down the “British” immigrants by country of ancestry.

That will tell you who NOT to let in and who really shouldn’t have been allowed in in the first place.

I expect that the request for these statistics will bother leftists like yourself.

Tell me. Are you Swiss or “swiss”?

Hogwash

1 hour ago, Bday Prang said:

Well apparently there actually is , ie not being aware of the law, an excuse that a pathetic government has validated by publishing a leaflet like this . An excuse that has no standing in the UK legal system except for illegal immigrants who wish to sexually assault our women

That's not the facts just fashion speech to discredit all Asylums seekers. So sad

12 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Hogwash

Why do you hate math?

Is it a cultural thing or just low educational achievement?

3 minutes ago, Airalee said:

Why do you hate math?

Is it a cultural thing or just low educational achievement?

It's science, unknown to you

13 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

That's not the facts just fashion speech to discredit all Asylums seekers. So sad

1000s of men arriving yearly need to be told the way to act in a civil legal manner .

They need to be told not to rape children .

They do not know that already , they need to be told its wrong .

Will they listen to what a bit of paper says or will they continue living their countries cultural ways and continue to rape ?

Just now, newbee2022 said:

It's science, unknown to you

But you seem to want to avoid using math for any kind of statistical analysis.

Why is that?

If the math shows that immigrants commit fewer sexual assaults per capita, let them stay. If it shows otherwise, send them all back to the filthy hellholes that they hail from. Doesn’t matter the race or religion. Country by country basis. Include “white” immigrants too so there won’t be any hint of racism.