UK Asylum Seeker Guide Covers Sex, Consent, Gender Equality

9 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

That's not the facts just fashion speech to discredit all Asylums seekers. So sad

Throughout history Lines have had to be drawn for people's safety, so whilst not everybody with 51 mg of alcohol in their blood is a danger on the roads, the very low limit has been set in the interests of safety, but if it saves one person from getting killed then its considered worthwhile by society and accepted

Not everybody carrying a knife or a gun is planning on stabbing or shooting somebody, but possession of such Items is generally forbidden or at a minimum very tightly controlled, again. if it prevents one person from getting stabbed or shot its generally accepted as a positive by society and accepted

Not everybody arriving on a small boat is a rapist or indeed a genuine asylum seeker, However,none of those destroying their passports have any valid reasons for doing so except to hide where they have come from and possibly make any criminal record checks impossible. They can't be vetted and so they should not be admitted and if it prevents one person from being raped or murdered then its worthwhile, in the opinion of any right minded person .

So how many of the invading savages do you consider to be genuinely seeking "asylum" and have no intention of raping or murdering ? in truth you, just like me , have absolutely no idea whatsoever, I prefer to err on the side of caution, for the safety of the UK citizens, You clearly have not given the matter any thought at all except to use it as an excuse to virtue signal. and you have ended up looking rather silly

12 minutes ago, rocketboy2 said:

F, all the ilegal immigrants, they should be arrested the moment the set foot on our shores with out the correct paper work.

They have committed an offence so why are they not arrested on sight? Talk about "sending out the wrong signals" then again , when did a lefty government ever send out the correct signals ?

So here’s the bit that matters.

Prior to the publication of this guide there was not information and instruction given to asylum seekers.

Mind, it seems that a few expats among the membership of this forum might, on the basis of their posting history, benefit from a copy of this guide, if/when they return to the UK.

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

1000s of men arriving yearly need to be told the way to act in a civil legal manner .

They need to be told not to rape children .

They do not know that already , they need to be told its wrong .

Will they listen to what a bit of paper says or will they continue living their countries cultural ways and continue to rape ?

Raping is against laws in their home countries. Of course they know this, same as you.

At present I don't know any country where raping is allowed.

Do you know one?

1 hour ago, Bday Prang said:

Throughout history Lines have had to be drawn for people's safety, so whilst not everybody with 51 mg of alcohol in their blood is a danger on the roads, the very low limit has been set in the interests of safety, but if it saves one person from getting killed then its considered worthwhile by society and accepted

Not everybody carrying a knife or a gun is planning on stabbing or shooting somebody, but possession of such Items is generally forbidden or at a minimum very tightly controlled, again. if it prevents one person from getting stabbed or shot its generally accepted as a positive by society and accepted

Not everybody arriving on a small boat is a rapist or indeed a genuine asylum seeker, However,none of those destroying their passports have any valid reasons for doing so except to hide where they have come from and possibly make any criminal record checks impossible. They can't be vetted and so they should not be admitted and if it prevents one person from being raped or murdered then its worthwhile, in the opinion of any right minded person .

So how many of the invading savages do you consider to be genuinely seeking "asylum" and have no intention of raping or murdering ? in truth you, just like me , have absolutely no idea whatsoever, I prefer to err on the side of caution, for the safety of the UK citizens, You clearly have not given the matter any thought at all except to use it as an excuse to virtue signal. and you have ended up looking rather silly

.....and can you show me the "excuse"???

1 hour ago, Airalee said:

But you seem to want to avoid using math for any kind of statistical analysis.

Why is that?

If the math shows that immigrants commit fewer sexual assaults per capita, let them stay. If it shows otherwise, send them all back to the filthy hellholes that they hail from. Doesn’t matter the race or religion. Country by country basis. Include “white” immigrants too so there won’t be any hint of racism.

I really don't know what you want. I gave official figures, I don't have others.

4 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Raping is against laws in their home countries. Of course they know this, same as you.

At present I don't know any country where raping is allowed.

Do you know one?

They are not in their home countries though are they ? They consider non muslims as dogs, unfit to judge them and do not consider themselves subject to our laws. Their males consider non muslim women as worse than whores,

When two young illegals received a non custodial sentence for the rape of a school girl and posting images of the assault on social media I 'd say that sends out the signal that whilst its not exactly allowed it is barely frowned upon

Although in fairness I did hear that the sentence was increased on appeal after complaints from racists

9 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Address the 85.9%. Are British less civilized?

Rapes are bad but very rare uk brits rape kids and there not handed booklets of hoe to accept English to protect females. Theres a reason the Government has had to print this now newbee have you figured out what the reason behind it is ? i'll give you a clue there not handed to uk rapist's.

9 hours ago, Bannoi said:

It just proves that whoever said Brexit would solve the immigration problem didn't have a clue what he was talking about, it made it far worse.

Open borders have got nothing to do with Brexit so leave that alone Bannoi before you go off topic.

Brexit cannot be blamed for open borders, as the UK never participated in the EU's passport-free Schengen Area and retained full control over its own national borders. However, leaving the EU ended the Dublin Regulation, removing the UK's legal framework to return asylum seekers to EU nations, which some critics link to subsequent small boat crossings. [1, 2, 3, 4]

We must have monet to Burn. It's being reported now that the government are translating all the pamhlets given out, a few thousand i would imagine paid by you. Cough up there reprinting them all again but heres the catch. The Telegraph that broke the story yesterday asked the home office what countrys will be translated Somali. Eretrean. Afgahn, Syria, the Government refused to answer. So remember the next time a few move next door to you don't let your kids out, and chaperone the missus when she goes to Asda.

Does the guide say, 'It's very naughty to enter a country like the UK illegally' anywhere too?

6 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

I really don't know what you want. I gave official figures, I don't have others.

Your contribution pattern on this thread is clear. One-line dismissals, no data (and you ignore when the correct one handed to you), no engagement with the actual point, then disappearance when pressed.

You were shown the Home Office is printing official leaflets explaining rape, consent and gender equality to asylum seekers.

Your response was to wave it away as “nonsense” or “fashion speech” without addressing why the state felt the need to produce them in the first place.

You were asked about per-capita rates and statistical analysis. You answered with “I gave official figures” and then went quiet on the comparison.

You were challenged on the difference between domestic offenders and large numbers of young male arrivals from cultures with very different norms around women. You replied with short denials and moved on.

This is not debate "newbee" but it’s "drive-by posting". You drop a one-liner avoiding the substance and when the reply requires actual argument or numbers you vanish or change the subject.

One-line brush-offs followed by silence are not a position they’re just noise.

Section 3.1:

"In the UK it is not allowed to indiscriminately thrust a large knife into members of the public.

This is called 'stabbing'. Stabbing a large number of people may affect your asylum claim, as will

driving a car into them."

Edited August 20Aug 20 by nexus7

Front page of today's daily mail 😅

50 minutes ago, FinChin67 said:

Your contribution pattern on this thread is clear. One-line dismissals, no data (and you ignore when the correct one handed to you), no engagement with the actual point, then disappearance when pressed.

One-line brush-offs followed by silence are not a position they’re just noise.

Don't feed the trolls - it just encourages them

12 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

and don't forget moving them in to more desirable upmarket areas ensuring that "we" all play our part in sorting out a problem that very very few ( if any ) actually asked for yet was forced on us by other equally useless politicians

It's above politicians level.
Think Rockefellers, Rothchilds etc. - Globalists who want the nation state done away with.

Probably the tiny hats behind a LOT of this stuff since they believe their messiah will only turn up when Europe falls. DYOR, it IS what a LOT of them believe

Edited August 20Aug 20 by Tourist2

5 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

It's above politicians level.
Think Rockefellers, Rothchilds etc. - Globalists who want the nation state done away with.

Probably the tiny hats behind a LOT of this stuff since they believe their messiah will only turn up when Europe falls. DYOR, it IS what a LOT of them believe

Why cant you just say Jews ?

It's above politicians level.
Think Jews who want the nation state done away with.

Probably the Jews behind a LOT of this stuff since they believe their messiah will only turn up when Europe falls. DYOR, it IS what a LOT of them believe

6 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Open borders have got nothing to do with Brexit so leave that alone Bannoi before you go off topic.

Brexit cannot be blamed for open borders, as the UK never participated in the EU's passport-free Schengen Area and retained full control over its own national borders. However, leaving the EU ended the Dublin Regulation, removing the UK's legal framework to return asylum seekers to EU nations, which some critics link to subsequent small boat crossings. [1, 2, 3,

]

Taking back control of the UK’s borders was a central campaign promise of Brexit.

It failed, so now you want to dismiss it as nothing to do with Brexit.

5 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

Your contribution pattern on this thread is clear. One-line dismissals, no data (and you ignore when the correct one handed to you), no engagement with the actual point, then disappearance when pressed.

You were shown the Home Office is printing official leaflets explaining rape, consent and gender equality to asylum seekers.

Your response was to wave it away as “nonsense” or “fashion speech” without addressing why the state felt the need to produce them in the first place.

You were asked about per-capita rates and statistical analysis. You answered with “I gave official figures” and then went quiet on the comparison.

You were challenged on the difference between domestic offenders and large numbers of young male arrivals from cultures with very different norms around women. You replied with short denials and moved on.

This is not debate "newbee" but it’s "drive-by posting". You drop a one-liner avoiding the substance and when the reply requires actual argument or numbers you vanish or change the subject.

One-line brush-offs followed by silence are not a position they’re just noise.

It's again rubbish. If you can't read i can't help you.

5 hours ago, nexus7 said:

Does the guide say, 'It's very naughty to enter a country like the UK illegally' anywhere too?

Do you need a guide to tell you not writing hogwash,?

8 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

They are not in their home countries though are they ? They consider non muslims as dogs, unfit to judge them and do not consider themselves subject to our laws. Their males consider non muslim women as worse than whores,

When two young illegals received a non custodial sentence for the rape of a school girl and posting images of the assault on social media I 'd say that sends out the signal that whilst its not exactly allowed it is barely frowned upon

Although in fairness I did hear that the sentence was increased on appeal after complaints from racists

Well, I can see you're an expert when it comes to Muslim's kind of thinking, culture and laws.

Others would call you a racist probably.

On 8/20/2026 at 4:46 AM, webfact said:

Another section, titled Respect in Public, says it is not acceptable to whistle or make kissing noises at people in the street.

Apparently wolf whistles became illegal in the UK earlier this year, on the first of April no less.

This will surely be confusing to many around the world who learnt about British culture from watching reruns of Benny Hill.

6 hours ago, FinChin67 said:

Your contribution pattern on this thread is clear. One-line dismissals, no data (and you ignore when the correct one handed to you), no engagement with the actual point, then disappearance when pressed.

You were shown the Home Office is printing official leaflets explaining rape, consent and gender equality to asylum seekers.

Your response was to wave it away as “nonsense” or “fashion speech” without addressing why the state felt the need to produce them in the first place.

You were asked about per-capita rates and statistical analysis. You answered with “I gave official figures” and then went quiet on the comparison.

You were challenged on the difference between domestic offenders and large numbers of young male arrivals from cultures with very different norms around women. You replied with short denials and moved on.

This is not debate "newbee" but it’s "drive-by posting". You drop a one-liner avoiding the substance and when the reply requires actual argument or numbers you vanish or change the subject.

One-line brush-offs followed by silence are not a position they’re just noise.

Your post is indeed one of the silliest ever. But expected, when your intellectual capacity comes to an end?

I gave you figures issued by Home Office.

If you want to know more it's easy as that to contact them and ask all your questions.

I personally can't deliver any other information and won't do your home work.

So why bother me?

Do you need someone for your gibberish, look for a stupid one. It's not me.

2 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Well, I can see you're an expert when it comes to Muslim's kind of thinking, culture and laws.

Others would call you a racist probably.

As muslim is a religion and not a race I find it highly unlikely that any normal educated person would call me racist, I think patriot would be a more accurate descriptive , I have no issues with anybody coming to the UK via legal means as long as they behave

"others" can call me racist all day long I could not care less

18 hours ago, Airalee said:

Tell me. Are you Swiss or “swiss”?

Is he not even from the UK? If that's the case why is he even posting in a thread like this except to troll and inflame ?

18 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

Well apparently there actually is , ie not being aware of the law, an excuse that a pathetic government has validated by publishing a leaflet like this . An excuse that has no standing in the UK legal system except for illegal immigrants who wish to sexually assault our women

Swooooooosh....nothing but net.