Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

UK Definition of Anti-Muslim Hate Amid Free Speech Debate

Government Introduces New Definition

The UK government has adopted a new definition of anti-Muslim hate, with ministers insisting it will not restrict free speech while helping authorities tackle rising levels of hostility toward Muslim communities.

Speaking in the House of Commons, communities secretary Steve Reed said the government had a responsibility to respond to record levels of hate crime targeting Muslims.

Reed told MPs that defining anti-Muslim hostility was essential to addressing the issue effectively.

“You can’t tackle a problem if you can’t describe it,” he said.

Get the latest headlines in your email subscribe-orange.png

The government has introduced a three-paragraph non-statutory definition outlining unacceptable prejudice, discrimination and hatred directed at Muslims. Officials say the definition is intended to guide institutions and public bodies but will not become law.

Reed said the wording had been carefully designed to ensure people could still freely discuss religion.

“The definition safeguards our fundamental right to freedom of speech about religion in general or any religion in particular,” he said.

Part of Broader Social Cohesion Strategy

The new definition was published alongside a wider Social Cohesion Strategy aimed at strengthening integration and reducing division within British society.

In an accompanying foreword, Keir Starmer said the country faced increasing pressures from forces seeking to exploit social tensions.

“In a world where so many people – digital grifters, hostile states and politicians of grievance – have a vested interest in division, we need to be much more active in asserting British values and the responsibilities of integration,” the prime minister wrote.

The strategy includes a range of measures designed to address extremism and improve community relations.

Among them are plans to introduce a whistleblowing route for university staff to report concerns about extremism and expanded powers for the Charity Commission to shut down organisations suspected of promoting extremist views.

Focus on English Language and Integration

Another key element of the strategy is a renewed focus on English language skills as a tool for integration.

Officials said the government will review existing English language provision to identify best practices and improve access to lessons.

The review will consider how technology and digital teaching could expand opportunities for people to learn English, with findings expected to be published in autumn 2026.

Government sources said the move aims to address what they described as a fragmented system currently delivered by organisations including the Department for Work and Pensions and local authorities.

The strategy also proposes introducing citizenship education in schools, strengthening digital literacy teaching and increasing understanding of faith communities across public institutions.

Mixed Reactions from Experts and Politicians

Some experts welcomed the new definition as an important step toward addressing discrimination against Muslims.

Javed Khan, managing director of the thinktank Equi and a member of the working group advising the government, described the move as a “watershed moment”.

However, he said it should only be considered a starting point.

Khan also warned that the strategy needed to place greater emphasis on tackling the rise of far-right extremism and the factors driving it.

Criticism also came from opposition politicians.

Paul Holmes, the shadow communities secretary, argued the strategy lacked concrete action and raised concerns about the potential implications for free speech.

Holmes referenced earlier advice from Jonathan Hall, the government’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, who suggested that any definition should clearly outline examples of speech that would not qualify as anti-Muslim hatred.

Without such clarity, Holmes warned, the definition could risk limiting legitimate criticism of extremist ideologies.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 09.03 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
35 minutes ago, nauseus said:

It's more of an opinion. And I'm sticking with it.

You are the expert at baselessness, while never properly explaining or demsntrating anything yourself.

Projecting much! 🤣

I gave precise examples in the post I quoted when I replied to you. Feel free to contradict what I wrote about the Asian countries I mentioned!

I'm still not holding my breath!😃

nauseus Star Member

nauseus

Advanced Member
14 minutes ago, candide said:

Projecting much! 🤣

I gave precise examples in the post I quoted when I replied to you. Feel free to contradict what I wrote about the Asian countries I mentioned!

I'm still not holding my breath!😃

You realized you messed up when you suddenly introduced Korea and Japan as exceptions.

There are more than that but I refuse to be lured into your bait bin.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, nauseus said:

You realized you messed up when you suddenly introduced Korea and Japan as exceptions.

There are more than that but I refuse to be lured into your bait bin.

You haven't read the other posts I made, of course! 😆

In other words, you are not able to demonstrate your "opinion"!

nauseus Star Member

nauseus

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, candide said:

You haven't read the other posts I made, of course! 😆

In other words, you are not able to demonstrate your "opinion"!

Why should I go back and read more BS?

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, nauseus said:

Why should I go back and read more BS?

Because I mentioned the countries you accused me of adding in my latest post! 😃

Evil Penevil Gold Member

Evil Penevil

Advanced Member

There's always a danger that such "protections" could be expanded and misused.

Atheists could be silenced under new protections for Muslims, say campaigners

Atheists such as Richard Dawkins could be silenced by Labour’s new definition of anti-Muslim hostility, free speech campaigners have claimed.

The Free Speech Union (FSU) has cited the threat to atheists’ freedom of expression in a legal letter in which it threatened action against the Government on the basis that the definition was unlawful.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/atheists-could-be-silenced-under-new-protections-for-muslims-say-campaigners/ar-AA1Z0rwo?uxmode=ruby&ocid=edgntpruby&pc=W230&cvid=69bcac2b7e6d4b3082c47c64415011f8&ei=41

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.