Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

UK Definition of Anti-Muslim Hate Amid Free Speech Debate

Government Introduces New Definition

The UK government has adopted a new definition of anti-Muslim hate, with ministers insisting it will not restrict free speech while helping authorities tackle rising levels of hostility toward Muslim communities.

Speaking in the House of Commons, communities secretary Steve Reed said the government had a responsibility to respond to record levels of hate crime targeting Muslims.

Reed told MPs that defining anti-Muslim hostility was essential to addressing the issue effectively.

“You can’t tackle a problem if you can’t describe it,” he said.

Get the latest headlines in your email subscribe-orange.png

The government has introduced a three-paragraph non-statutory definition outlining unacceptable prejudice, discrimination and hatred directed at Muslims. Officials say the definition is intended to guide institutions and public bodies but will not become law.

Reed said the wording had been carefully designed to ensure people could still freely discuss religion.

“The definition safeguards our fundamental right to freedom of speech about religion in general or any religion in particular,” he said.

Part of Broader Social Cohesion Strategy

The new definition was published alongside a wider Social Cohesion Strategy aimed at strengthening integration and reducing division within British society.

In an accompanying foreword, Keir Starmer said the country faced increasing pressures from forces seeking to exploit social tensions.

“In a world where so many people – digital grifters, hostile states and politicians of grievance – have a vested interest in division, we need to be much more active in asserting British values and the responsibilities of integration,” the prime minister wrote.

The strategy includes a range of measures designed to address extremism and improve community relations.

Among them are plans to introduce a whistleblowing route for university staff to report concerns about extremism and expanded powers for the Charity Commission to shut down organisations suspected of promoting extremist views.

Focus on English Language and Integration

Another key element of the strategy is a renewed focus on English language skills as a tool for integration.

Officials said the government will review existing English language provision to identify best practices and improve access to lessons.

The review will consider how technology and digital teaching could expand opportunities for people to learn English, with findings expected to be published in autumn 2026.

Government sources said the move aims to address what they described as a fragmented system currently delivered by organisations including the Department for Work and Pensions and local authorities.

The strategy also proposes introducing citizenship education in schools, strengthening digital literacy teaching and increasing understanding of faith communities across public institutions.

Mixed Reactions from Experts and Politicians

Some experts welcomed the new definition as an important step toward addressing discrimination against Muslims.

Javed Khan, managing director of the thinktank Equi and a member of the working group advising the government, described the move as a “watershed moment”.

However, he said it should only be considered a starting point.

Khan also warned that the strategy needed to place greater emphasis on tackling the rise of far-right extremism and the factors driving it.

Criticism also came from opposition politicians.

Paul Holmes, the shadow communities secretary, argued the strategy lacked concrete action and raised concerns about the potential implications for free speech.

Holmes referenced earlier advice from Jonathan Hall, the government’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, who suggested that any definition should clearly outline examples of speech that would not qualify as anti-Muslim hatred.

Without such clarity, Holmes warned, the definition could risk limiting legitimate criticism of extremist ideologies.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 09.03 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Evil Penevil Gold Member

Evil Penevil

Advanced Member

The crucial factor regarding free speech is whether the definition of anti-Muslim hate allows for criticism or ridicule of the Prophet Muhammad. Does the definition make illegal graphic depictions like the Danish Muhammad cartoons or text like that found in Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses?

The government seems to be saying "No." Hopefully, that is the case.

koolkarl Gold Member

koolkarl

Advanced Member

Another government waste of time.

technoronin Senior Member

technoronin

Member

The UK has free speech and anyone who disagrees will be jailed.

Smokey and the Bandit Gold Member

Smokey and the Bandit

Advanced Member

Groups like the Hindu Council UK and Christian Daily International have warned that singling out one group is "counterproductive and divisive." They argue the law should be "even-handed" and apply to all religions equally rather than creating "special" definitions for one.

Good point why just single out one group, why not include every religion in the definition?

Hatari fan Explorer Member

Hatari fan

Member

Maybe it would be better if they tackled the problem from the opposite direction and found out why there is a problem and if the Muslims could solve it by changing something that causes the problem in the first place.

Purdey Diamond Member

Purdey

Advanced Member

I agree that everyone should speak English. Everything else is sorted by the language (culture etc.). I never understood why libraries had to had to have shelves filled with books in Urdu for Pakistani grandmothers who had lived in the country for 20 years and never learned the language.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, technoronin said:

The UK has free speech and anyone who disagrees will be jailed.

This is the new democracy. You are free to say what you like as long as we like what you're saying.

WDSmart Platinum Member

WDSmart

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

The crucial factor regarding free speech is whether the definition of anti-Muslim hate allows for criticism or ridicule of the Prophet Muhammad. Does the definition make illegal graphic depictions like the Danish Muhammad cartoons or text like that found in Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses?

The government seems to be saying "No." Hopefully, that is the case.

I agree with you, but I also believe that criticism, ridicule, and offensive cartoons or text should also be allowed for all ideas, religions, political ideologies, and people.

1tooth Silver Member

1tooth

Advanced Member

Lots of comments by semi educated people. Although I'm not muslim, I agree that muslims should have specific anti hate laws in their favor. I grew up in the UK in the 1970's. Back then black people were the "boogeyman". Every 3 pages was a negative story about black people. Media recycle the same stories. The only things that change are the date, location and time. Take ANY anti black story from the 1970's and you will the same story in modern media, almost word for word. Just replace the word "black" with "muslim".

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member

This sounds Orwellian.

Evil Penevil Gold Member

Evil Penevil

Advanced Member
9 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I agree with you, but I also believe that criticism, ridicule, and offensive cartoons or text should also be allowed for all ideas, religions, political ideologies, and people.

I totally agree that freedom of speech and expression should allow criticism and/or ridicule of all religions, idea, people, institutions, etc. From what I understand, that has been the case in the U.K. for many years, but Muslim groups have sought exceptions to freedom of speech to "protect" Muhammad, the Quran and Islam from criticism or ridicule.

English literature has many negative portrayals of Jews. "The Prioress's Tale" from The Canterbury Tales is basically a retelling of a medieval antisemitic trope about Jews murdering a Christian child, The moneylender Shylock in Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice has been called the world's best-known Jewish villain. Fagin in Dickens' Oliver Twist is another famous Jewish villain.

No Jewish groups have ever attempted to censure these literary works or more recent examples of anti-Jewish expression.. Compare that to the Muslim outcry over The Satanic Verses and Danish cartoons.

DonniePeverley Platinum Member

DonniePeverley

Advanced Member

If they have laws for the Jewish community, then i see no problem why not have laws for the muslim community.

An easier way would be to crack down on social media - as this is where the masses are getting their mis information from.

TedG Ruby Member

TedG

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, DonniePeverley said:

If they have laws for the Jewish community, then i see no problem why not have laws for the muslim community.

An easier way would be to crack down on social media - as this is where the masses are getting their mis information from.

Yeah, a government crackdown on social media, what a grand idea.

DonniePeverley Platinum Member

DonniePeverley

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, TedG said:

Yeah, a government crackdown on social media, what a grand idea.

No. It's just taking curbs on speech we have in the country, and putting that to social media.

At the moment you can have children and everyone in the UK, exposed to anti semtisim or islamaphobia from someone posting in a country like India. This is where you need the crackdown on social media companies.

blaze master Diamond Member

blaze master

Advanced Member

Asking for a friend....what if someone finds all religion to be beyond stupid and archaic?

My god is better than your god. Smh.

Roadsternut Gold Member

Roadsternut

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Evil Penevil said:

I totally agree that freedom of speech and expression should allow criticism and/or ridicule of all religions, idea, people, institutions, etc. From what I understand, that has been the case in the U.K. for many years, but Muslim groups have sought exceptions to freedom of speech to "protect" Muhammad, the Quran and Islam from criticism or ridicule.

English literature has many negative portrayals of Jews. "The Prioress's Tale" from The Canterbury Tales is basically a retelling of a medieval antisemitic trope about Jews murdering a Christian child, The moneylender Shylock in Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice has been called the world's best-known Jewish villain. Fagin in Dickens' Oliver Twist is another famous Jewish villain.

No Jewish groups have ever attempted to censure these literary works or more recent examples of anti-Jewish expression.. Compare that to the Muslim outcry over The Satanic Verses and Danish cartoons.

Not the same comparison; you are better off comparing Dicken's Fagin to Bresslaw's Bungda Din.

The film Life of Brian caused outrage. It was only made because George Harrison funded it because EMI pulled out at the last moment. Mary Whitehouse lead protests, calling in filth. 11 English Councils actually banned screenings. 28 councils gave it an X rating. Italy, Norway, South Africa, Chile, and Singapore completely banned it. Torbay council maintained the ban for 30 years.

Other films, like The Last Temptation of Christ, Noah and the Da Vinci Code, earned themselve various bans.

There are many other works that many people, including non-Muslims, would want banned because of the perceived outrage. In the US, there have been mass book burnings of Harry Potter, perceived as demonic.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member

One step closer to blasphemy laws

The uk is being colonized they desperately need a trump like figure to save them

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

One step closer to blasphemy laws

The uk is being colonized they desperately need a trump like figure to save them

You have been misinformed. There is no colonisation of the UK

One Trump is more than enough for the world to have to cope with.

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member

Religious hate is nonsense because religion is nonsense.

Evolution tells us creation in religion is nonsense.

Common sense tells us that if there were a creator, he would behave in a certain way. He would treat all his/her subjects as equal (there goes Christianity with belief being a prerequisite for heaven, there goes Judaism with one group of people only being chosen, there goes Islam with it's believers better than non-believers and men better than women).

Would a benevolent creator want to be worshipped? the whole idea is preposterous. Would he be violent? Jealous? again completely preposterous.

But we have this hate because "My imaginary friend is better than your imaginary friend".

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
2 hours ago, RayC said:

You have been misinformed. There is no colonisation of the UK

Leftist gaslighting

2 hours ago, RayC said:

One Trump is more than enough for the world to have to cope with.

Leftist affliction

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, EastBayRay said:

Leftist gaslighting

Leftist affliction

You have nothing to offer but division.

BritManToo Star Member

BritManToo

Advanced Member
On 3/10/2026 at 1:44 PM, Hatari fan said:

Maybe it would be better if they tackled the problem from the opposite direction and found out why there is a problem and if the Muslims could solve it by changing something that causes the problem in the first place.

Muslims could change it by moving to another country.

BritManToo Star Member

BritManToo

Advanced Member
On 3/11/2026 at 3:28 AM, DonniePeverley said:

If they have laws for the Jewish community, then i see no problem why not have laws for the muslim community.

An easier way would be to crack down on social media - as this is where the masses are getting their mis information from.

How about some laws for the Christian community?

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
1 hour ago, RayC said:

You have nothing to offer but division.

Your denials of the truth are boring

Your country is being colonized and all you do is pretend it’s not happening it’s so lame

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
14 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

Your denials of the truth are boring

Your country is being colonized and all you do is pretend it’s not happening it’s so lame

14 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

Your denials of the truth are boring

Your country is being colonized and all you do is pretend it’s not happening it’s so lame

Your representations of the UK - a country I doubt that you have even ever set foot in - are insulting and not even close to reality.

You wouldn't recognise the truth if you bumped into it.

1tooth Silver Member

1tooth

Advanced Member

Let's be honest. The only people who oppose this proposed law, are PWT and ****.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
49 minutes ago, RayC said:

Your representations of the UK - a country I doubt that you have even ever set foot in - are insulting and not even close to reality.

You wouldn't recognise the truth if you bumped into it.

When I meet Brit’s like you I really wonder how your country achieved so much when the current generation would rather gaslight than stand up to your colonizers

I guess previous generations had more of a backbone and more courage

Sad to see all the cowards living there now terrified of being called racist or phobic or whatever

Rather hand over their country than be called racist it’s pathetic

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
24 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

When I meet Brit’s like you I really wonder how your country achieved so much when the current generation would rather gaslight than stand up to your colonizers

I guess previous generations had more of a backbone and more courage

Sad to see all the cowards living there now terrified of being called racist or phobic or whatever

Rather hand over their country than be called racist it’s pathetic

Yet more proof - as if it were needed - that you know very little about the UK.

The UK has a long and proud tradition of providing a safe haven for the persecuted and, in general, most Brits are welcoming and tolerant of outsiders.

Did previous generations have more backbone and courage? Maybe. They certainly had enough courage to fight against those who sought to discriminate against others simply because they came from a different country, had a different skin tone or followed a different religion.

They - and most of us today - view those who seek to divide on the basis of race or religion as pathetic.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
40 minutes ago, RayC said:

Yet more proof - as if it were needed - that you know very little about the UK.

The UK has a long and proud tradition of providing a safe haven for the persecuted and, in general, most Brits are welcoming and tolerant of outsiders.

Persecuted in France? Only a useful idiot would believe that

40 minutes ago, RayC said:

Did previous generations have more backbone and courage? Maybe. They certainly had enough courage to fight against those who sought to discriminate against others simply because they came from a different country, had a different skin tone or followed a different religion.

They - and most of us today - view those who seek to divide on the basis of race or religion as pathetic.

Nearly every country discriminates against those from another country. Try washing up on a Thai beach as a farang or a black and demanding the same treatment as a native. Your fluffy ideas are nonsense and thankfully ignored by most

Thank god weak mealy mouthed white liberals are such a (vocal) minority

You are not brave you simply lack moral fiber if you were around in ww2 you’d probably invite the Germans for tea and call the Brit’s fighting them bigots

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
56 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

Persecuted in France? Only a useful idiot would believe that

Which bit of "The UK has a long and proud tradition of providing a safe haven for the persecuted" is unclear?

As a matter of fact, the Huguenots were persecuted in France and many were given safe haven in England. Not knowing this is yet another example of your almost complete ignorance of Britain.

Yes, some idiots are useful; others are simply idiots

56 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

Nearly every country discriminates against those from another country. Try washing up on a Thai beach as a farang or a black and demanding the same treatment as a native. Your fluffy ideas are nonsense and thankfully ignored by most

The majority of people have no difficulty understanding the difference between legal and illegal immigration, and the majority of people are also sympathetic to genuine refugees.

You are obviously not one of the majority.

56 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

Thank god weak mealy mouthed white liberals are such a (vocal) minority

You need to look outside your goldfish bowl. Fortunately - and no doubt despite your best efforts - right-wing dictatorships are still thin on the ground

56 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

You are not brave you simply lack moral fiber if you were around in ww2 you’d probably invite the Germans for tea and call the Brit’s fighting them bigots

I've never claimed to be brave and I have no idea how I'd react in a frontline battle. Fortunately at my age, this is unlikely to be tested.

I'm the one who opposes discrimination. Bigotry is your province. Given your views, it's certainly more likely that you would invite Nazis in for tea and crumpets than me.

(My apologies, I should explain: A crumpet is a type of bread which was quite popular in the UK (less so now). Brits and knowledgeable Anglophiles know this but I thought it best to explain this word as you don't fall into either of those categories).

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.