Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

UN Warns Ocean Stress Intensifying as Sea Levels Rise Faster

The world’s oceans are facing growing pressure from human activity, with sea levels now rising at more than twice the rate recorded a decade ago, according to a major United Nations assessment.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

The UN’s third World Ocean Assessment found that pollution, industrial fishing and climate change are placing “severe and accelerating” strain on marine ecosystems, driving biodiversity loss and weakening the ocean’s ability to support life and regulate the climate.

Sea Levels and Ocean Heat Rising

The report, compiled by nearly 600 scientists from 86 countries, examined ocean health between 2021 and 2025. It found that global sea-level rise accelerated from about 2mm per year before 2015 to 4.3mm per year in 2023.

Researchers also reported that 16% of all ocean heat gained since 1955 accumulated after 2018, highlighting the increasing pace of warming. The strongest relative temperature increases were recorded in the Atlantic Ocean and southern regions of the Indian and Pacific Oceans.

The assessment noted that major gaps in scientific knowledge remain. By 2025, only 27% of the ocean floor had been mapped, leaving many deep-sea ecosystems poorly understood.

Call for Greater International Action

UN Secretary-General António Guterres said the findings underscored the need for stronger international cooperation to safeguard marine ecosystems.

He warned that the ocean could no longer be treated as an unlimited resource and called for a new approach based on science, international law and shared responsibility.

The report acknowledged progress in ocean conservation, including the implementation of the High Seas Treaty, which establishes international rules for protecting marine areas outside national waters.

Together with 56 other agreements, the treaty has improved efforts to conserve biodiversity, reduce harmful subsidies and manage ocean resources. However, the report found that governance remains fragmented across regions and sectors, making stronger coordination essential.

Plastic Pollution and Population Pressures

Covering more than 70% of Earth’s surface, the ocean plays a critical role in regulating climate, sustaining biodiversity and providing food, energy and mineral resources.

According to the assessment, the ocean has absorbed about 90% of excess heat and 30% of carbon dioxide emissions generated by fossil fuel use. Scientists also warned that changing ocean currents could have significant implications for future climate patterns, although many impacts remain uncertain.

The report estimated that 52.1 million tonnes of plastic enter the ocean each year, contributing to around 24.4 trillion microplastic particles that affect more than 4,000 marine species.

Researchers identified population growth, technological development, changing governance systems and geopolitical instability among the main factors increasing pressure on marine environments. The global population rose from 7.7 billion in 2017 to 8.2 billion by the end of 2024, with more than one-third of people living within 100 kilometres of a coastline.

Environmental Groups Urge Faster Protection

Environmental campaigners said the findings should prompt governments to accelerate conservation efforts.

Greenpeace described the report as an urgent warning and called for stronger protections against deep-sea mining and industrial fishing.

The group urged governments to fulfil their commitment to protect 30% of the world’s oceans by 2030 through the creation of fully protected marine sanctuaries.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 9 June 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Surasak Gold Member

Surasak

Advanced Member

Imagine if you will... A world where people believe, that the temperature of the planet can be controlled by giving money to the government.

Al Gore is laughing all the way to the bank!

Trump is as sore as hell because he didn't think of it.

The rampant madman in the UK can't spend other peoples money fast enough. He has been dealt a good hand to bankrupt the country.

If there is so much Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere, why are we not over run with massive amounts of jungle vegetation, and people dropping like flies due to a massive loss of oxygen?

Ignorance can be educated and crazy can be medicated, but there's no cure for stupid!

newbee2022 Star Member

newbee2022

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Surasak said:

Imagine if you will... A world where people believe, that the temperature of the planet can be controlled by giving money to the government.

Al Gore is laughing all the way to the bank!

Trump is as sore as hell because he didn't think of it.

The rampant madman in the UK can't spend other peoples money fast enough. He has been dealt a good hand to bankrupt the country.

If there is so much Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere, why are we not over run with massive amounts of jungle vegetation, and people dropping like flies due to a massive loss of oxygen?

Ignorance can be educated and crazy can be medicated, but there's no cure for stupid!

Come out of your conspiracy group and join reality 🙏

Surasak Gold Member

Surasak

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, newbee2022 said:

Come out of your conspiracy group and join reality 🙏

Sending that quote back to you!

newbee2022 Star Member

newbee2022

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Surasak said:

Sending that quote back to you!

Lame reply (not even a reply).

However, if you deny science...in what kind of group are you then?

Surasak Gold Member

Surasak

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Lame reply (not even a reply).

However, if you deny science...in what kind of group are you then?

If it was such a lame reply, why did you bother?

Purdey Diamond Member

Purdey

Advanced Member

I personally can't stand this throwaway culture. Plastic can be recycled but too many people drop plastic, and other, containers without looking back.

Those who think EVs are helping the environment forget that they are built using plastic to lightweight them. Eventually, we have to deal with the mess they leave behind at their end of life.

People need to understand that they are the cause of pollution.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member

Climate conspiracy nutters scaring folk into handing over their money and liberty to save them.

A massive scam man

newbee2022 Star Member

newbee2022

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, EastBayRay said:

Climate conspiracy nutters scaring folk into handing over their money and liberty to save them.

A massive scam man

What is scam and who is "them" 😳

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member

Who do I make the check out to?

nglodnig Gold Member

nglodnig

Advanced Member

As the sea-level has risen 120 metres since the last ice age 20k odd years ago (6mm a year approx) this is NOTHING

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

We're past the tipping point. Everybody thought money was so much more important than the life that can only be viewed through David Attenborough. Deforestation led to species extinction aso.

To quote The Doors, this is the end, my friend. Too many of us for the Mother to support. We literally sucked the life out of the Earth and we're still not satisfied!

We're getting exactly what we deserved. No, I told you so. Those folks will be going down with us.

I won't live to see the end but it was sure a beautiful world we destroyed through greed.

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member

As the sea-level has risen 120 metres since the last ice age 20k odd years ago (6mm a year approx) this is NOTHING

Seems like putting all that plant food (CO2) into the atmosphere has slowed it down from 6mm a year to 4.3...

I don't know that I'd go around high fiving each other, because we just don't know. But I also wouldn't be charging people double to heat their homes in winter, because we just don't know.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
2 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

What is scam and who is "them" 😳

My post made that clear

Can you read ?

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member
15 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

We're past the tipping point. Everybody thought money was so much more important than the life that can only be viewed through David Attenborough. Deforestation led to species extinction aso.

To quote The Doors, this is the end, my friend. Too many of us for the Mother to support. We literally sucked the life out of the Earth and we're still not satisfied!

We're getting exactly what we deserved. No, I told you so. Those folks will be going down with us.

I won't live to see the end but it was sure a beautiful world we destroyed through greed.

Get a grip man it’s a lovely day and birds are singing in the trees it’s all in your head you drank the rancid kool aid and it’s fried your brain

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, Purdey said:

Those who think EVs are helping the environment forget that they are built using plastic to lightweight them. Eventually, we have to deal with the mess they leave behind at their end of life.

People need to understand that they are the cause of pollution.

Sorry to burst your conspiracy theory, science says the opposite

EVs (electric vehicles) generally have significantly lower overall pollution than conventional gasoline or diesel cars (“normal” ICE vehicles), especially over their full lifecycle. This holds for greenhouse gas emissions (like CO2) and most air pollutants, though there are nuances around manufacturing, electricity sources, and certain non-exhaust particulates.

1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (CO2e) — Lifecycle Comparison

Lifecycle analyses (cradle-to-grave) account for manufacturing, fuel/electricity production, operation (driving), and end-of-life. Key findings from reputable sources (ICCT, EPA, IEA, MIT, etc.):

•  EVs produce 50-73% lower lifetime GHG emissions than comparable gasoline cars in most regions (e.g., Europe, US).

•  Example (EU, projected 2025-2044 electricity mix): BEV ~63 g CO2e/km vs. gasoline ICE ~235 g CO2e/km (73% lower).

•  US average: EVs often ~half or less the emissions of gasoline cars (e.g., ~200 g CO2/mile vs. >350 g for gasoline).

•  Break-even point: EVs offset their higher manufacturing emissions (mainly from batteries) after ~15,000–20,000 miles (often 1–2 years of typical driving). After that, they pull ahead decisively.

•  Manufacturing: EVs have higher upfront emissions (often 50-80% more, due to battery production — e.g., 8-14 tons CO2 vs. ~5-9 tons for ICE). But operational savings dominate over 150,000–200,000+ km lifetimes.

•  Electricity grid matters: Cleaner grids (renewables, hydro, nuclear) make EVs far better. Even on coal-heavy grids, EVs are usually still cleaner due to efficiency and no tailpipe waste. The advantage grows as grids decarbonize.

Over a typical vehicle lifetime, a gasoline car might emit 60-80+ metric tons CO2e total, while a comparable EV emits ~half or less.

2. Tailpipe and Local Air Pollution

•  EVs: Zero tailpipe emissions (no CO2, NOx, SO2, CO, hydrocarbons, or direct PM from exhaust).

•  ICE cars: Significant tailpipe pollution, contributing

Hummin Star Member

Hummin

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, newbee2022 said:

What is scam and who is "them" 😳

There is more to this than just “saving the planet.”

Politicians have to deal with several scenarios at the same time: climate change, pollution, food, energy, industry, jobs, national security, and competition with other nations. That is the part many people forget.

They have to evaluate different scenarios and solutions when dealing with climate change. I would be careful with the word crisis, because no matter our influence or other causes, this planet has seen massive changes before. What is new is human-made pollution in every form.

Still, it is the politicians driving the train, using more resources to save the climate, while at the same time there are no real brakes if we still want to compete with other nations and the money monster that keeps us safe for now.

The good thing is that the scientists have called off the worst scenario, for now. Still, it seems some have called off the whole climate change issue because the worst scenario is not the case for now.

And last but not least, climate science is a different thing than climate politics, but most should understand that by now, or?

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, newbee2022 said:

Lame reply (not even a reply).

However, if you deny science...in what kind of group are you then?

There is a school of thought that says a rise in CO2 follows a rise in temperature, not vice versa. Science is not exact and can be interpreted for political purposes. As we see now.

newbee2022 Star Member

newbee2022

Advanced Member
34 minutes ago, EastBayRay said:

My post made that clear

Can you read ?

No, your gibberish is too much by far 😁

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
47 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

We're past the tipping point. Everybody thought money was so much more important than the life that can only be viewed through David Attenborough. Deforestation led to species extinction aso.

To quote The Doors, this is the end, my friend. Too many of us for the Mother to support. We literally sucked the life out of the Earth and we're still not satisfied!

We're getting exactly what we deserved. No, I told you so. Those folks will be going down with us.

I won't live to see the end but it was sure a beautiful world we destroyed through greed.

The world has been through meteor strikes, upheavals of unimaginable levels, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and still it is here. The world will be fine.

We won't save anything by destroying the economy.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

Sorry to burst your conspiracy theory, science says the opposite

EVs (electric vehicles) generally have significantly lower overall pollution than conventional gasoline or diesel cars (“normal” ICE vehicles), especially over their full lifecycle. This holds for greenhouse gas emissions (like CO2) and most air pollutants, though there are nuances around manufacturing, electricity sources, and certain non-exhaust particulates.

1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (CO2e) — Lifecycle Comparison

Lifecycle analyses (cradle-to-grave) account for manufacturing, fuel/electricity production, operation (driving), and end-of-life. Key findings from reputable sources (ICCT, EPA, IEA, MIT, etc.):

•  EVs produce 50-73% lower lifetime GHG emissions than comparable gasoline cars in most regions (e.g., Europe, US).

•  Example (EU, projected 2025-2044 electricity mix): BEV ~63 g CO2e/km vs. gasoline ICE ~235 g CO2e/km (73% lower).

•  US average: EVs often ~half or less the emissions of gasoline cars (e.g., ~200 g CO2/mile vs. >350 g for gasoline).

•  Break-even point: EVs offset their higher manufacturing emissions (mainly from batteries) after ~15,000–20,000 miles (often 1–2 years of typical driving). After that, they pull ahead decisively.

•  Manufacturing: EVs have higher upfront emissions (often 50-80% more, due to battery production — e.g., 8-14 tons CO2 vs. ~5-9 tons for ICE). But operational savings dominate over 150,000–200,000+ km lifetimes.

•  Electricity grid matters: Cleaner grids (renewables, hydro, nuclear) make EVs far better. Even on coal-heavy grids, EVs are usually still cleaner due to efficiency and no tailpipe waste. The advantage grows as grids decarbonize.

Over a typical vehicle lifetime, a gasoline car might emit 60-80+ metric tons CO2e total, while a comparable EV emits ~half or less.

2. Tailpipe and Local Air Pollution

•  EVs: Zero tailpipe emissions (no CO2, NOx, SO2, CO, hydrocarbons, or direct PM from exhaust).

•  ICE cars: Significant tailpipe pollution, contributing

Everything single thing you have mentioned has always been on the planet. Humans haven't created anything. Might have changed the ratios somewhat, but so has the natural variations.

Stop panicking, the planet will be fine.

Dinosaures did ok with extremely high levels of CO2 as did plants.

Ice ages came and went, as will humans.

Stop stressing, it makes no difference to most people, unless you are a politician and need the power and money.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, EastBayRay said:

Get a grip man it’s a lovely day and birds are singing in the trees it’s all in your head you drank the rancid kool aid and it’s fried your brain

<deleted>, I thought it was the acid!

You're right, of course. Refreshing rain, birds singing, bananas, mangos, rose apples on our trees, squirrels running on the wall...wife making money!

I enjoy every day but have compassion for the future.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JBChiangRai said:

Sorry to burst your conspiracy theory, science says the opposite

EVs (electric vehicles) generally have significantly lower overall pollution than conventional gasoline or diesel cars (“normal” ICE vehicles), especially over their full lifecycle. This holds for greenhouse gas emissions (like CO2) and most air pollutants, though there are nuances around manufacturing, electricity sources, and certain non-exhaust particulates.

1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (CO2e) — Lifecycle Comparison

Lifecycle analyses (cradle-to-grave) account for manufacturing, fuel/electricity production, operation (driving), and end-of-life. Key findings from reputable sources (ICCT, EPA, IEA, MIT, etc.):

•  EVs produce 50-73% lower lifetime GHG emissions than comparable gasoline cars in most regions (e.g., Europe, US).

•  Example (EU, projected 2025-2044 electricity mix): BEV ~63 g CO2e/km vs. gasoline ICE ~235 g CO2e/km (73% lower).

•  US average: EVs often ~half or less the emissions of gasoline cars (e.g., ~200 g CO2/mile vs. >350 g for gasoline).

•  Break-even point: EVs offset their higher manufacturing emissions (mainly from batteries) after ~15,000–20,000 miles (often 1–2 years of typical driving). After that, they pull ahead decisively.

•  Manufacturing: EVs have higher upfront emissions (often 50-80% more, due to battery production — e.g., 8-14 tons CO2 vs. ~5-9 tons for ICE). But operational savings dominate over 150,000–200,000+ km lifetimes.

•  Electricity grid matters: Cleaner grids (renewables, hydro, nuclear) make EVs far better. Even on coal-heavy grids, EVs are usually still cleaner due to efficiency and no tailpipe waste. The advantage grows as grids decarbonize.

Over a typical vehicle lifetime, a gasoline car might emit 60-80+ metric tons CO2e total, while a comparable EV emits ~half or less.

2. Tailpipe and Local Air Pollution

•  EVs: Zero tailpipe emissions (no CO2, NOx, SO2, CO, hydrocarbons, or direct PM from exhaust).

•  ICE cars: Significant tailpipe pollution, contributing

I thought ICE only had paddy wagons...

Actually, how racist is that! They must have been locking up a lot of Irish!

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
43 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

The world has been through meteor strikes, upheavals of unimaginable levels, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and still it is here. The world will be fine.

We won't save anything by destroying the economy.

You're right, of course. The world will heal itself...without us.

Hummin Star Member

Hummin

Advanced Member
45 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

The world has been through meteor strikes, upheavals of unimaginable levels, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and still it is here. The world will be fine.

We won't save anything by destroying the economy.

The planet has always changed. Life has always changed with it. Most species that ever lived are already gone, and one day we will also be history.

Big meteor strikes have not really devastated humans in modern history, but they could have. Volcanic eruptions have done real damage, but still nothing compared to what humans have done to ourselves in wars.

So the end point is this: there is not one single natural catastrophe that has hit Homo sapiens as hard as we have hit ourselves, and we have damaged our planet, our home.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
30 minutes ago, Hummin said:

The planet has always changed. Life has always changed with it. Most species that ever lived are already gone, and one day we will also be history.

Big meteor strikes have not really devastated humans in modern history, but they could have. Volcanic eruptions have done real damage, but still nothing compared to what humans have done to ourselves in wars.

So the end point is this: there is not one single natural catastrophe that has hit Homo sapiens as hard as we have hit ourselves, and we have damaged our planet, our home.

That's life.

EastBayRay Advanced Member

EastBayRay

Member

<deleted>, I thought it was the acid!

You're right, of course. Refreshing rain, birds singing, bananas, mangos, rose apples on our trees, squirrels running on the wall...wife making money!

I enjoy every day but have compassion for the future.

Someone has to believe it of course.

Leaves more plane seats burgers and v8s for the rest of us

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.