Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Unsubstantiated claim that Trump abused minor in Epstein Files

Unreleased FBI Memos Detail Unverified Trump Claim

Three FBI memos from 2019 contain explicit but unsubstantiated allegations that President Donald Trump sexually abused a minor with the assistance of Jeffrey Epstein, according to a review by The Guardian. The documents were not included when the Department of Justice began releasing millions of Epstein-related files in December.

Get the latest headlines in your email subscribe.png

The memos describe four FBI interviews conducted on 24 July, 7 August, 22 August and 16 October 2019 at the Washington state law offices of attorney Barry Brandenburg. The Guardian obtained the missing FBI form 302 reports, which total 25 pages of agents’ notes. Only the first interview, in which Trump was not named, was included in the public release.

An administration official confirmed the three missing reports are authentic. The Department of Justice told NPR that “nothing has been deleted” and said withheld material was duplicative or privileged. The same explanation was given to Breitbart.

In a statement to The Guardian, an administration official said the accusations were listed as duplicative files in the SDNY records and were not legally required to be released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The official said the Department of Justice is continuing its review. The department did not immediately respond to a request for further comment.

According to the memos, the woman told agents she was sexually abused by Epstein from about 1983, when she was 13 and living in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina. She alleged that when she was between 13 and 15, Epstein took her to a building in New York or New Jersey, where she met Trump and others.

She claimed that when alone with Trump, he attempted to sexually assault her after making a remark about teaching her “how little girls are supposed to be”. She said she bit him and that he struck her and had her removed from the room. She also alleged that she heard Trump discuss blackmail and “washing money through casinos” with Epstein.

The allegations have not been verified. The FBI did not bring charges related to her claims, and parts of her account contradict known details of Epstein’s life in the early 1980s. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing related to Epstein and said last week, “I did nothing.”

Mark Epstein told The Guardian he had no knowledge of his brother spending summers in Hilton Head in the early 1980s. There is no evidence that Trump and Epstein knew each other in 1983. Trump told New York magazine in 2002 that he had met Epstein 15 years earlier.

The woman also alleged Epstein gave her alcohol, drugs and forced her to perform sexual acts. She claimed Epstein blackmailed her mother with explicit photographs, leading to embezzlement and a prison term in South Carolina. The Guardian said it was unable to corroborate the claimed prison case.

In 2020, a Jane Doe with matching biographical details joined a lawsuit against Epstein’s estate but later dropped her claims. It is not known if a settlement was reached. Her lawyer in that case, Lisa Bloom, declined to comment.

US Representative Robert Garcia said he reviewed unredacted files at the Department of Justice and could not find the reports. House Oversight Committee chair James Comer said lawmakers would examine claims that the allegations were removed from the database.

Garcia wrote to Attorney General Pam Bondi seeking a full explanation for the withheld files. He said the Department of Justice had “illegally withheld” FBI interviews containing serious accusations.

Join the discussion? creat-account.png

Already a member? comment on this.png


image.png
  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 26 Feb 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Presnock Platinum Member

Presnock

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So, the Biden DOJ protected pedophiles for four years.

Do you think Merrick Garland and anyone else involved should be prosecuted?

IMHO an investigation too of the Biden administration should take place and anyone suspected of covering up anything in the Epstein files should be checked thoroughly and hung up to dry if found guilty until they have spent many years in prison. I realize the current statue of limitations has passed so will have to wait until an extension is agreed upon by the congress so that those victims can get deserved justice and the rich and powerful criminals brought to justice along with any officials involved in aa cover up of the charges. Something as big as this has to have many people aware of the covering up as it is so wide that one person could not go through all the evidence IMHO since there are millions of pages, pictures, et al and they probably continue to learn of other Epstein houses like that ranch in N. Mexico and with some emails suggesting possible "get rid of victims" have current N. Mexico officials digging up the property and their state officials have already amended the statue of limitations for this type of crime so anything evidence of that activity in N. Mexico could still be brought to trial even if the current feds won't agree to fix that problem. All the perps should rot in jail forever IMHO.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Presnock said:

IMHO an investigation too of the Biden administration should take place and anyone suspected of covering up anything in the Epstein files should be checked thoroughly and hung up to dry if found guilty until they have spent many years in prison. I realize the current statue of limitations has passed so will have to wait until an extension is agreed upon by the congress so that those victims can get deserved justice and the rich and powerful criminals brought to justice along with any officials involved in aa cover up of the charges. Something as big as this has to have many people aware of the covering up as it is so wide that one person could not go through all the evidence IMHO since there are millions of pages, pictures, et al and they probably continue to learn of other Epstein houses like that ranch in N. Mexico and with some emails suggesting possible "get rid of victims" have current N. Mexico officials digging up the property and their state officials have already amended the statue of limitations for this type of crime so anything evidence of that activity in N. Mexico could still be brought to trial even if the current feds won't agree to fix that problem. All the perps should rot in jail forever IMHO.

If one assumes there is evidence of pedophiles committing crimes (pedophilia is not a crime) then one also has to assume that either Biden's DOJ was completely incompetent, or that they were covering it up. I see no evidence of either. Epstein & Andrew aside, there does not seem to be much, evidence of sex crimes against minors, and no crimes involving prepubescent children.

I do not think there is a federal statute of limitations on sex crimes against minors, that said, I think there should be compelling evidence that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone of such a heinous crime, not and not just a ten-year old he-said-she-said.

SunnyinBangrak Ruby Member

SunnyinBangrak

Advanced Member
On 2/27/2026 at 1:36 AM, WDSmart said:

The title of this document is wrong. It should read “minors,” plural, not singular. 😡

Incredible seeing the political side that ignored and censored Ashley's diary suddenly becoming concerned with inappropriate acts with minors.

Seriously?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member

Twelve years the left has been trying to convict Trump of a sex crime and nothing.

The Biden DOJ scoured the unredacted files for four years, and nothing on Trump.

Yet we are to believe that Trump has been banging underage girls for years. Seems weak to me.

Oh wait, someone called in and said Trump raped them, and apparently that's enough proof for the left.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
23 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Incredible seeing the political side that ignored and censored Ashley's diary suddenly becoming concerned with inappropriate acts with minors.

Seriously?

Lame deflection. Biden is not in the Epstein files! 😂

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, candide said:

Lame deflection. Biden is not in the Epstein files! 😂

Biden had the Epstein files unredacted for four years. Is he a pedophile protector?

How do you know Biden is not in the Epstein files?

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Biden had the Epstein files unredacted for four years. Is he a pedophile protector?

How do you know Biden is not in the Epstein files?

Funny remark, as you claimed that the DOJ has released all the files! Do you think that Trump's DOJ witheld files concerning Biden? 😂

Biden is not in the Epstein files, at least in the ones released so far.Unlike Trump, he cannot be suspected of having tried to cover his ass up! 😂

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

How do you know Biden is not in the Epstein files?

I posed the query to Gemini: is there any record of joe biden ever meeting jeffrey epstein or ghislaine maxwell.

As of March 2026, there is no credible public record of Joe Biden ever meeting Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.

While numerous documents, flight logs, and photographs related to Epstein have been released over the years—including significant tranches made public through the Epstein Files Transparency Act in late 2025 and early 2026—Biden’s name has not appeared in them.

Key Points of Verification:

Flight Logs: Biden’s name does not appear on the flight logs for Epstein’s private jets (often referred to as the "Lolita Express"). These logs, which date back to the late 1990s and early 2000s, have been extensively vetted by journalists and investigators.

White House Visitor Logs: A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for records related to Epstein and Maxwell in the Obama-era White House (where Biden served as Vice President) did not yield any evidence of meetings or communications with him.

The "Epstein List": Much of the social media speculation regarding Biden stems from misinterpretations of court-unsealed documents. While these documents mentioned many high-profile figures (such as Bill Clinton and Donald Trump), Biden was not among those listed as an associate, guest, or acquaintance.

Fact-Checking: Independent fact-checkers and news organizations have repeatedly debunked viral claims or AI-generated images attempting to link Biden to Epstein’s social circle.

Presnock Platinum Member

Presnock

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

If one assumes there is evidence of pedophiles committing crimes (pedophilia is not a crime) then one also has to assume that either Biden's DOJ was completely incompetent, or that they were covering it up. I see no evidence of either. Epstein & Andrew aside, there does not seem to be much, evidence of sex crimes against minors, and no crimes involving prepubescent children.

I do not think there is a federal statute of limitations on sex crimes against minors, that said, I think there should be compelling evidence that proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone of such a heinous crime, not and not just a ten-year old he-said-she-said.

Not only was Epstein and co. guilty of rape of minors but also of sexual trafficking of those minors for the "pleasure" of rich and powerful people. You have your opinion on this activity and I have mine. Same for just about anything I mention about your political heroes. That's life and I will not be changing my opinion on this subject so any more messages from you on this subject will be ignored as usual. Have a good day.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, candide said:

Funny remark, as you claimed that the DOJ has released all the files! Do you think that Trump's DOJ witheld files concerning Biden? 😂

Biden is not in the Epstein files, at least in the ones released so far.Unlike Trump, he cannot be suspected of having tried to cover his ass up! 😂

Biden had the unredacted files for four years, how is it he cannot be suspected of covering up and or purging the files related to him?

Oh, that's right, your hero is pure are the driven snow,

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
20 minutes ago, Presnock said:

Not only was Epstein and co. guilty of rape of minors but also of sexual trafficking of those minors for the "pleasure" of rich and powerful people. You have your opinion on this activity and I have mine. Same for just about anything I mention about your political heroes.

Yet your hero Biden had the unredacted files for four years and did nothing.

20 minutes ago, Presnock said:

That's life and I will not be changing my opinion on this subject so any more messages from you on this subject will be ignored as usual. Have a good day.

What is your opining, that everyone whose name is in the files is guilty of raping minors?

Do you think Trump is guilty of raping minors?

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
21 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Biden had the unredacted files for four years, how is it he cannot be suspected of covering up and or purging the files related to him?

Oh, that's right, your hero is pure are the driven snow,

Biden do not have the Epstein files period. Files were with the DOJ. Biden do not interfere with DOJ matters unlike your cult hero. Biden is too decent a man to be compare with Trump.

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
26 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yet your hero Biden had the unredacted files for four years and did nothing.

What is your opining, that everyone whose name is in the files is guilty of raping minors?

Do you think Trump is guilty of raping minors?

Put all alleged sex offenders mentioned in the Files on oath especially Trump who was the most mentioned. Why only the Clintons?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Biden do not have the Epstein files period. Files were with the DOJ. Biden do not interfere with DOJ matters unlike your cult hero. Biden is too decent a man to be compare with Trump.

Your cult hero Biden was on TV telling his AG to go after Trump.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Put all alleged sex mentioned in the Files on oath especially Trump who was the most mentioned. Why only the Clintons?

I don't care about your hero Clinton, I know he's a horn-dog, but I doubt he was raping minors.

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

I don't care about your hero Clinton, I know he's a horn-dog, but I doubt he was raping minors.

So the question is why Chairman Comer subpoena Bill and Hillary who was not given mentioned in the files and not Trump who has many mentions or Howard Lutnick who lied about his relationship with Epstein.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

So the question is why Chairman Comer subpoena Bill and Hillary who was not given mentioned in the files and not Trump who has many mentions or Howard Lutnick who lied about his relationship with Epstein.

Your heroes Bill and Hillary Clinton were mentioned many times in the files.

Why did your hero Biden direct his AG to prosecute Trump and Lutnick?

Biden's DOJ had the unredacted files for four years and did nothing. Why?

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Your heroes Bill and Hillary Clinton were mentioned many times in the files.

Why did your hero Biden direct his AG to prosecute Trump and Lutnick?

Biden's DOJ had the unredacted files for four years and did nothing. Why?

Bill yes but less times than your hero Trump. Hillary not mentioned. Which planet are you on to say Biden direct his AG to prescute Trump and Lutnick. Making up things as usual? Release the files now and unredacted.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Bill yes but less times than your hero Trump. Hillary not mentioned. Which planet are you on to say Biden direct his AG to prescute Trump and Lutnick. Making up things as usual? Release the files now and unredacted.

Hillary was absolutely mentioned in the files.

What planet are you from that you think it okay to lie?

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
38 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Your cult hero Biden was on TV telling his AG to go after Trump.

It is about time they did!

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

It is about time they did!

Yeah, that was three years ago. I guess RawStory missed it, huh?

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, that was three years ago. I guess RawStory missed it, huh?

Who or what is "RawStory"?

Is it a sexy film, a personal "tell all" diary story or whatever?

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Except that all the files that Congress demanded be released, have been released.

No, they have not all been released. On top of that, many were redacted, not to protect the victims but to protect the predators.

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
7 minutes ago, stevenl said:

No, they have not all been released. On top of that, many were redacted, not to protect the victims but to protect the predators.

All the files that Congress demanded be released, have been released. That "Congress" now wants more files does not mean they were not all released.

Why did the Biden DOJ not prosecute these child predators? They had the unredacted files for four years, yes?

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

All the files that Congress demanded be released, have been released.

And you believe that?

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, scottiejohn said:

And you believe that?

Do you have any evidence why I should not believe it?

If so, post a link, if not, I believe my government over a bunch of know-nothing leftists on a chat board.

You, on the other hand...

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Do you have any evidence why I should not believe it?

I know that you are totally incapable of doing this but I asked you the question:

"And you believe that?"

Please answer with either yes with proof/links or just say "NO I am sorry I got it wrong"!

PS; Please just give a direct response without your predictable deflects and obfuscations!

still kicking Star Member

still kicking

Advanced Member
On 2/27/2026 at 6:35 PM, Eric Loh said:

Release the files unredacted snowflake.

I just watched about Epstein on TV. There are 3 million more files to be released, and 1200 more witnesses. to be heard, and Trump's name is mentioned more than Jesus in the Bible.

Not winning again?

Presnock Platinum Member

Presnock

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Yet your hero Biden had the unredacted files for four years and did nothing.

What is your opining, that everyone whose name is in the files is guilty of raping minors?

Do you think Trump is guilty of raping minors?

yes without any doubt IMHO. I also believe as I mentioned earlier, an investigation should be taken by the Congress about covering up of the Epstein files both by previous administrations and this administration. The FBI supposedly took depositions from many victims that now seem to be "lost" or blacked out totally and ALL names of potential perpetrators should be revealed. That is my opinion and also that there is and has been some kind of coverup in the activities and persons involved with Epstein. There does appear to be at least half the files still being held by the DOJ that are not clear and release to the public containing names of the rich and powerful IAW files seen by the Congressional committee (both DEMS and REPS) statements after viewing some of the clean files.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
18 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Biden had the unredacted files for four years, how is it he cannot be suspected of covering up and or purging the files related to him?

Oh, that's right, your hero is pure are the driven snow,

Ridiculous deflection! Unlike Trump, Biden is not in the Epstein files. There is even no "unsubstantiated" claim about him in the files! 😂

He cannot be suspected of having tried to cover his own ass up, such as having his DOJ redacting his name, and hiding some testimonies, as the DOJ did for Trump.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.