Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

US and Iran Agree Two-Week Ceasefire After Pakistan-Led Mediation

The United States and Iran have agreed to a two-week ceasefire following last-minute diplomatic efforts led by Pakistan, halting a looming escalation after US President Donald Trump had warned Tehran to surrender or face large-scale military attacks.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

Trump announced the agreement on Tuesday evening, less than two hours before a self-imposed 8pm Eastern Time deadline he had set for potential US strikes on Iranian power plants and bridges. Legal experts, officials from several countries and the Pope had cautioned that such attacks on civilian infrastructure could constitute war crimes.

Earlier in the day, Trump had posted on the social media platform Truth Social warning that “a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again”, adding that he did not want that outcome but believed it was likely. Reports indicated that B-52 bombers were already heading toward Iran before the ceasefire was confirmed.

Pakistan mediation

According to Trump, the ceasefire was brokered after intervention by Pakistan’s government. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had requested a two-week pause in hostilities to allow diplomatic negotiations to continue.

In a statement on social media, Trump said he would suspend bombing operations “subject to the Islamic Republic of Iran agreeing to the COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING of the Strait of Hormuz”.

He added that the pause in fighting would provide time for both sides to negotiate around a 10-point proposal presented by Tehran that could lead to a more permanent armistice.

“This will be a double sided CEASEFIRE,” Trump wrote, saying US military objectives had already been met and that progress was being made toward a broader agreement aimed at long-term peace in the Middle East.

Iran confirms agreement

Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, confirmed shortly afterwards that Tehran had accepted the temporary ceasefire.

In a statement, he said safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz would be permitted during the two-week period, coordinated with Iran’s armed forces.

The strait is one of the world’s most important energy shipping routes, carrying about a fifth of global oil supplies. Shipping traffic there had slowed significantly during the five-week conflict as tensions escalated.

Axios reported, citing an Israeli official, that Israel would also observe the ceasefire once Iran lifted its blockade of the waterway.

Escalation before the truce

Before the agreement was announced, tensions had continued to rise.

Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir-Saeid Iravani, told a UN Security Council session that Trump’s threats amounted to “incitement to war crimes – and potentially genocide”. He warned that Iran would exercise its right to self-defence if attacks continued.

The United Nations secretary-general, António Guterres, also reiterated that international law prohibits attacks on civilian infrastructure. Trump, however, said earlier he was “not at all” concerned about accusations that such actions could amount to war crimes.

In the hours leading up to the deadline, Israeli forces carried out strikes on Iranian infrastructure. Iranian state media reported that a railway bridge in the central city of Kashan was hit, killing two people. Other reported strikes targeted bridges near Karaj, Qom and Tabriz, while power outages were reported in Karaj after a substation and transmission lines were damaged.

The United States also launched attacks on around 50 military targets on Kharg Island, home to Iran’s main oil export terminal. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they had retaliated by striking Saudi Arabia’s Jubail petrochemical complex following an earlier attack on an Iranian petrochemical facility.

The ceasefire pauses a conflict that has lasted five weeks, during which fighting intensified with little indication that Tehran would surrender or relinquish control over the Strait of Hormuz.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 8 April 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
12 minutes ago, NONG CHOK said:

Has Donald Trump got a nice word for anyone who disagrees with him? Even if they're right and he's totally wrong. If Mother Therese was alive right now she would be totally against Trumps views on Iran. In response Trump would reply who's Mother Therese anyway. In the next breath he would say that lady has no talent and very poor ratings. A very poor response from a devout Christian and International peace maker. What's his next diversion to keep the Epstein from public viewing?

Do any of the people Trump speaks poorly about have a nice word to say about Trump?

How is it you feel qualified to speak for Mother Tersea? (Therese?)

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Initially it was said 4-6 wks and core military objectives were given. As it is it's under 6 wks and the core military objectives have pretty much been achieved. Stating this isn't boasting it's simply pointing out that the objectives have been achieved.

You are simply spouting nonsense. Which analysts are stating this as a win for the USA? Analysts, rather than Trump and Hegseth.

From what I see, analysts are stating this is the biggest strategic defeat for the USA.

This is Ma Fia style business. Trump is angling to get a cut of the Hormuz tolls...or else.

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Incredible that a ceasefire has been achieved on US terms, the Islamic regime is now pretty much combat ineffective and shipping traffic is increasing in the Strait yet Trump's delusional. Again Trump could bring world peace, find a cure for cancer and end all hunger but the hate is so irrational and deep seated that he'd still be the "orange man bad".

You appear somewhat delusional.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, IsmeUno said:

You are simply spouting nonsense. Which analysts are stating this as a win for the USA? Analysts, rather than Trump and Hegseth.

From what I see, analysts are stating this is the biggest strategic defeat for the USA.

This is Ma Fia style business. Trump is angling to get a cut of the Hormuz tolls...or else.

Please show this. It will be interesting. it's not from the IRGC is it?

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, CallumWK said:

Kushner to the rescue again.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/vance-lead-iran-talks-tehran-200128855.html

(Bloomberg) -- The White House announced the US would hold direct talks with Iran even as continued fighting in the Middle East, punctuated by Israeli strikes in Lebanon, threatened to derail the fragile ceasefire in the six-week conflict.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Vice President JD Vance will lead a delegation to Islamabad, which would include special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. The first round of talks is set for Saturday morning local time, even as the Strait of Hormuz remained largely closed as of Thursday morning, falling short of a key US condition for the ceasefire.

“The Iran–U.S. Ceasefire terms are clear and explicit: the U.S. must choose—ceasefire or continued war via Israel. It cannot have both,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a social media post.

That because these are all business deals. It's hardly hidden. It's not about diplomacy nor morality. It's business. They have to dress it up as something else to make it palatable for the general public. All of this talk of terrorists with nuclear weapons....no. They want to erode Iran's ability to provide security. That's why Trump is trying to enter the picture by stating that they want a piece of the Hormuz action by providing security.

Of course there are some here that will cheer this kind of predatory behaviour as a win for the USA. That's fine, but then you lose credibility as a nation. Murderous greedy unhinged thugs. Winning?

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Andrew Dwyer said:

Very much doubt if any of these will happen …. especially number 5 !!

That will be paid by "allowing" Iran to charge transit fees in the Hormuz strait.

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Please show this. It will be interesting. it's not from the IRGC is it?

Show me yours.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Incredible that a ceasefire has been achieved on US terms, the Islamic regime is now pretty much combat ineffective and shipping traffic is increasing in the Strait yet Trump's delusional. Again Trump could bring world peace, find a cure for cancer and end all hunger but the hate is so irrational and deep seated that he'd still be the "orange man bad".

It sounds desperate to evoke such hypothetical arguments. Typical of MAGAs when they have no valid arguments. 😀

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, candide said:

That will be paid by "allowing" Iran to charge transit fees in the Hormuz strait.

But Trump wants a piece of that action. Be assured that will be discussed during any negotiation.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, IsmeUno said:

But Trump wants a piece of that action. Be assured that will be discussed during any negotiation.

Of course! Trump cannot stand other countries being ransomed without at least his participation! 😄

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, candide said:

Of course! Trump cannot stand other countries being ransomed without at least his participation! 😄

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5821752-iran-ship-toll-cryptocurrency-strait-hormuz/

Trump on Wednesday said he is considering the formation of a “joint venture” with Iran to set up tolls in the Strait of Hormuz.

“We’re thinking of doing it as a joint venture,” the president told ABC News’s Jonathan Karl. “It’s a way of securing it — also securing it from lots of other people. It’s a beautiful thing.”

Ma Fia style.

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, IsmeUno said:

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5821752-iran-ship-toll-cryptocurrency-strait-hormuz/

Ma Fia style.

If he/Iran get away with this "TOLL" nonsense then every tin pot controller of a country with restricted waterways will do the same!

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
4 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

If he/Iran get away with this "TOLL" nonsense then every tin pot controller of a country with restricted waterways will do the same!

Can't be worse than the USA throwing it's weight around. Seems a better solution than murdering people under the guise of morality.

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member
22 hours ago, MIke B Bad said:


Under Obama:

•The Strait of Hormuz was open because it was never closed.

•Limitations were placed on Iran's uranium enrichment.

•Iran agreed not to to make nuclear weapons.

•International inspectors were permitted into Iran to confirm full compliance.

Under Trump's ceasefire:

•The Strait of Hormuz will open but under direct Iranian control, possibly with a $2 million fee extracted from each vessel passing through. That toll would be split between Iran and Oman. The Strait was only closed because Trump started his war.

•Iran does not have to guarantee a limit on uranium enrichment.

•Iran does not guarantee that it will never develop nuclear weapons and there will be no international inspectors.

And those are just the top line items for Trump's ceasefire. He also stated that Iran's "10 point proposal" is a "workable basis on which to negotiate."

If Trump ratifies that proposal he will have to:

•Lift all primary and secondary sanctions on Iran.

•Withdraw the U.S. military entirely from the Middle East.

•End all attacks on Iran and its allies.

•Release frozen Iranian assets.


image.png

36 minutes ago, candide said:

That will be paid by "allowing" Iran to charge transit fees in the Hormuz strait.

and all has been "supposedly agreed upon" by Iran and Trump, nobody can make that shxt up besides the grifter he forgets there is an international treaty about free navigation that also includes the strait,

The origins and principles of Freedom of the Seas

https://lsj.com.au/articles/the-origins-and-principles-of-freedom-of-the-seas/

Trump appeared to welcome the toll idea on Wednesday, telling ABC: 'We're thinking of doing it as a joint venture. It's a way of securing it - also securing it from lots of other people.

'It's a beautiful thing.'

The vital Strait through which a fifth of the world's oil flows has now become known as the 'Tehran Tollbooth'.

Trump declares Strait of Hormuz joint venture with Iran - $1m per ship: 'It's a beautiful thing'

https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/trump-declares-strait-of-hormuz-joint-venture-with-iran-1m-per-ship-it-s-a-beautiful-thing/ar-AA20qDmf?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=LCTS&cvid=69d70d7d5d3b49429703bb133fa4fc74&ei=75

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member

Iran and the grifter, by the law of the seas, can not charge a penny for the right of passage thru the strait

Under international law, the Strait is considered part of the high seas, and all ships have the right and freedom to pass through it as long as their passage does not harm the safety of the coastal states or affect their order or security. The legal regime of the Strait of Hormuz is derived from two important international legal instruments: the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Law of Sea and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)

Yet collecting tolls in the strait would violate a basic and enduring principle of international maritime trade: freedom of peaceful navigation. It’s an ancient idea that was codified by the United Nations’ Convention on the Law of the Sea, which took effect in 1994.

Freedom of navigation in the world’s seas has been a fundamental right for hundreds of years, founded on “the idea that the sea doesn’t belong to anyone.”

Does Iran Possess the Right to Close the Strait of Hormuz under International Law?

https://internationallaw.blog/2026/04/06/does-iran-possess-the-right-to-close-the-strait-of-hormuz-under-international-law/

Iran’s proposal to collect tolls in the Strait of Hormuz violates trade norms

https://www.nydailynews.com/2026/04/08/iran-us-hormuz-tollbooth/

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

Iran and the grifter, by the law of the seas, can not charge a penny for the right of passage thru the strait

Under international law, the Strait is considered part of the high seas, and all ships have the right and freedom to pass through it as long as their passage does not harm the safety of the coastal states or affect their order or security. The legal regime of the Strait of Hormuz is derived from two important international legal instruments: the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Law of Sea and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)

Yet collecting tolls in the strait would violate a basic and enduring principle of international maritime trade: freedom of peaceful navigation. It’s an ancient idea that was codified by the United Nations’ Convention on the Law of the Sea, which took effect in 1994.

Freedom of navigation in the world’s seas has been a fundamental right for hundreds of years, founded on “the idea that the sea doesn’t belong to anyone.”

Does Iran Possess the Right to Close the Strait of Hormuz under International Law?

https://internationallaw.blog/2026/04/06/does-iran-possess-the-right-to-close-the-strait-of-hormuz-under-international-law/

Iran’s proposal to collect tolls in the Strait of Hormuz violates trade norms

https://www.nydailynews.com/2026/04/08/iran-us-hormuz-tollbooth/

How many times a day do you pray for Trump to fail?

CallumWK Diamond Member

CallumWK

Advanced Member
13 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

Iran and the grifter, by the law of the seas, can not charge a penny for the right of passage thru the strait

I think Iran charges are to avoid your tanker to be turned into a Swiss cheese, rather than for the passage.

CallumWK Diamond Member

CallumWK

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

How many times a day do you pray for Trump to fail?

Nobody needs to pray for that, it happens all the time without praying

MIke B Bad Silver Member

MIke B Bad

Advanced Member
17 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

How many times a day do you pray for Trump to fail?

Pointless praying for that when he is (almost) the son of God...........how he has suffered as Jesus did.....odd in a way.....it is the Jews that are orchestrating his demise just like they did for Jesus.

0ffshore360 Gold Member

0ffshore360

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

Hezbollah has stated that it did not agree to the ceasefire. Why then are you exclusively blaming Israel?

Israel was not even involved in the truce discussions and has refrained from attacking Iran at the request of the USA.

The Iranians have a long history of bad faith negotiations, agreeing to things in meetings and then not following through.

Where is my exclusive blame on Israel?

If you choose to contrive and conflate events as convenient fact you are unlikely to ever comprehend truth.

Presnock Platinum Member

Presnock

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

The regime leadership was replaced by a man who is far more hardline than the Ayatollah, so his supporters cannot even attempt to try to put a happy face on this. This is a dismal failure on the part of America and nothing has been gained from this, except enormous amounts of economic decimation and huge waves of inflation. Iran kicked his huge butt.

The garbage prince has failed dismally. Trump is toxic street junk.

but, Trump assured all that his high school military training made him much smarter than of the military brass. Yeah US military is good, were able to stand off , lob missiles and stealth bombers drop bombs on everything just about so how could the Iranians still make the claims they have made and now Trump can't declare any kind of victory IMHO>

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

Oil companies has always been ripping customer off. That's why they donated massive sum to Trump and Congress to get pro-fossil fuel executive actions and for Trump to announce his signature policy for "Drill Baby Drill". Alternative energy projects were dismantled by Trump. Meanwhile the Democrats are pushing for a WindFall Tax as Big Oil profit from the high oil price but for the GOP control House to resist. Americans will be slaves to Big Oil because the wrong adminstration is in power.

Until Americans wake up they will always be slaves to the rich and powerful. They support the candidates of either party that will keep their taxes lower with maximum deductions while the rest of the public can barely afford to pay their bills yet Trump continues to praise himself as their savior by lowering their taxes while driving all the other prices higher. Even if the Dems could manage to pass a millionaire/billionaire tax bill of 5%, the rich and powerful could still lead a better life than all the rest of the citizens. IMHO!

On 4/8/2026 at 1:35 PM, Presnock said:

I have read where every go, stop reverse go stop reverse etc. somebody with seemingly with insider information that the US was going to do this was pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into which way the oil or stocks would move. Amazing that the news reported it without Congress opening an investigation.

add to my previous one - markets showed someone bought shares on the market just before this latest TACO move - 950million dollars worth. Inside trading for sure!

Mavideol Star Member

Mavideol

Advanced Member

people do have funny reactions to Trump's accomplishments going after Iran... follow the link to have a good laugh

"How Can I Give A Flying F—k About People Going To The Moon When Our Country Is Doing So Much Evil **** On Earth": People Are Posting The Most Brutal Reactions To Trump's Threat On Iran

https://au.yahoo.com/news/flying-f-k-people-going-172117569.html

GroveHillWanderer Platinum Member

GroveHillWanderer

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, phetphet said:

Pipelines may be a short term answer for oil if they can build them, but they won’t work for LNG.

China is the big winner here as everything will be paid in Yuan, and possibly crypto.

Trump has surely f***ed the petro dollar, and thereby the US economy.

Pipelines are not a short term answer - they take years (and cost billions of dollars) to build.

Also they most definitely can carry LNG.

Here's a description of the East West pipeline currently being used to carry crude oil across Saudi Arabia.

"The pipeline has two pipes, one of 56 inches (142 cm) diameter and the other, originally for natural gas liquids, of 48 inches (122 cm) diameter."

Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

people do have funny reactions to Trump's accomplishments going after Iran... follow the link to have a good laugh

"How Can I Give A Flying F—k About People Going To The Moon When Our Country Is Doing So Much Evil **** On Earth": People Are Posting The Most Brutal Reactions To Trump's Threat On Iran

https://au.yahoo.com/news/flying-f-k-people-going-172117569.html

Oh no, you mean leftists are no longer supporting Trump?

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
7 hours ago, IsmeUno said:

Show me yours.

Fantastic. You must be right. My apologies.

dinsdale Star Member

dinsdale

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh no, you mean leftists are no longer supporting Trump?

It's sad isn't it. The thing we cannot say on here but is allowed to be said everywhere else means that this particular subsection of society have to support a murderous Islamic theocratic terrorist regime purely because of an irrational hatred driven by the radical left and the propaganda arm of the radical left aka the legacy media. These maniacs were going to get nukes. Stopping this is somehow a bad thing. It's insane.

Cave Johnson Senior Member

Cave Johnson

Member

Something about, if it ain't broke, don't try to fix it.

IsmeUno Platinum Member

IsmeUno

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

It's sad isn't it. The thing we cannot say on here but is allowed to be said everywhere else means that this particular subsection of society have to support a murderous Islamic theocratic terrorist regime purely because of an irrational hatred driven by the radical left and the propaganda arm of the radical left aka the legacy media. These maniacs were going to get nukes. Stopping this is somehow a bad thing. It's insane.

What on earth are you barking on about?

1tooth Silver Member

1tooth

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Do any of the people Trump speaks poorly about have a nice word to say about Trump?

How is it you feel qualified to speak for Mother Tersea? (Therese?)

Run Forrest, run!🤣

Big-Dog Star Member

Big-Dog

Advanced Member
15 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

How many times a day do you pray for Trump to fail?

Has not a thing to do with Trump. It's the law.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.