atpeace

I'm not a person that really cares about a car other than it gets me to where I want to go. After buying a Neta V last October, I got rid of my truck last month because the Neta was so much nicer to drive. Now after switching I now do care about comfort and ease of use which will make it hard to ever go back to driving an ICE car. Camping trips and picnics are on a whole different level with the Neta V. I bought an external power supply for 500 baht and now I have more power than I use at home available for days while camping (not really camping I guess ). The bankruptcy sucks but already over it. Most likely there will be workarounds for parts and maintenance. Many options are popping up every month and other than CDU box issues, most problems should be easy to resolve. My brother in-law has 100k on his Neta and zero issues other than his wife backing into a truck and having to wait months for a panel. He just got his last checkup because the dealership told him it might not be around much longer. Also I noticed his odometer is now 56k - LOL.

I'm all for legalization but this above is an oversimplification without any consideration of alternative viewpoints. It is FAR from one person pushing for changes to how pot is sold and smoked. There are many others reasons that are not dark or conspiratorial that may be behind the possible enforcement of existing and new laws. People that have used weed like myself need to drop the righteous attitude and start being solution oriented. There has to be a better alternative than the haphazard weed legalization a few years ago. It just took off and everybody I think was amazed with the magnitude of the weed dispensaries and public smoking. Too much for many to digest and telling them to go to hell if you don't like it was the prevailing sentiment. What is happening now is the result.

Sure but after you post the video of the lady being pushed without reason.

No - you at times post unreliable info to be confrontational. Not an issue for me and it can even be entertaining. I simply didn't watch the video where she was pushed over and without being first assaulting her. It might exist but probably not 🙂

OK 🙂

OK - whatever but not what is being debated.

What happened the prior 60 years? Your making my point. The previous 60 years was extremely violent and make the altercations you listed look like bar brawls. America is FAR from perfect.

Which are nothing burgers compared to previous conflicts. You just covered 50 year period. What happened the prior 50 years? Yep, I'm sure the world has been a much much much safer place 🙂

Because I didn't watch the other video and I'm sure that is debatable considering your history 🙂

The world is full of terrible people that enjoy beating others and especially if in a group. The Thais should be arrested and the same would apply if they were Americans. Don't know what went down before the video but SERIOUSLY doubt it could justify the beating. He is fortunate and probably should evaluate how he got in the mess in the first place. Lovely GF he has acquired 🙂 If my friends back home saw this girl which I called my GF behaving like this, I would be mortified.

Better ot have friends when you need them but get what you are saying. Don't agree 100% but generally think America should play a much smaller role in policing the world. It is worth considering the impact the USA has had since it began to police the world. The world isn't perfect but vs pre-American military dominance, It sure is much less deadly.

Making some good points and not losing your cool. Refreshing thread and still think the Pres is making the right decisions but time will tell. Would you include the Ukraine involvement as also a bad idea?

Yep, head/ shoulder check prior to entering traffic are not popular here for some reason. To each his own but something that I would NEVER do.

Yes it is assumed if no other info is available that the car doing the rear-ending is at fault. It is determined that the car in front is at fault or nobody is at fault depending on many scenarios. Below are just a few from AI. BTW- I wasn't the person that attached the laughing whatever you call it pic on your post. Sudden, Unnecessary Braking: If the front driver slams on their brakes for no apparent reason, and this causes a rear-end collision, they could be partially or fully at fault. Malfunctioning Brake Lights: If the front driver's brake lights are not working, the following driver may not have adequate warning of a stop, and this could shift some liability according to Drake Injury Lawyers. Sudden Lane Changes: If the front driver makes a sudden lane change without signaling and cuts off another driver, leading to a rear-end collision, they could be held liable. "Brake Checking": If the front driver intentionally slams on the brakes to intimidate or retaliate against the driver behind, they are likely at fault for any resulting collision. Mechanical Failure (with prior knowledge): If the front driver's car has a mechanical issue (like brake failure) and they continue driving without addressing it, and this leads to a rear-end collision, they could be held liable according to Steinger, Greene & Feiner.

It would be contained to the border because both countries for the most part don't have the military might to invade. Thailand is much more powerful and could bomb cities but assume they would only do this if Cambodia was successful at creating catastrophic issues along the border which I doubt.