WorriedNoodle

All I'm reading here is negativity and whinging, no input. Not British are you?

It's amazing people can be duped by President like this, when he is surrounded by sycophants all preaching the same lies and no one points out the errors of his ways. The tattoos on Kilmar Abrego Garcia's knuckles—a marijuana leaf, smiley face, cross, and skull—do not definitively indicate MS-13 membership, according to multiple gang experts and researchers. The Trump administration's claim, amplified by a digitally altered photo labeling these tattoos as "M," "S," "1," and "3," suggests they spell out "MS-13." Experts like Steven Dudley of InSight Crime and Roberto Lovato, who has studied MS-13, state these symbols are not known MS-13 signifiers and are commonly used in mainstream tattoo culture. Some law enforcement officials note that certain symbols, like a marijuana leaf, have appeared on gang members, but they are not exclusive to MS-13 and are insufficient alone to prove affiliation. Current MS-13 members consulted by Lovato also denied these tattoos represent the gang. The narrative tying these tattoos to MS-13 appears largely driven by the Trump administration, with critics pointing out the lack of concrete evidence and the photo's alteration as misleading. Meanwhile, Garcia’s legal team and family deny any gang ties, and no court has definitively ruled him a gang member based on these tattoos.

Wrong on both counts. Trump clearly says in interview the MS13 tattoo is real and not photo-shopped above the original tattoos. The original tattoos (without the MS13 photo-shopped text) have no basis of meaning MS13 anyway, as the gangs tattoos are clearly documented and available on the internet showing different images.

The reality of being in a senile parallel universe of opposites, where truth is lies and lies are truth. No thanks. #VascularDimensia

Are looks important to you in this context?

The opinion you @Cameroniprovided contains several problematic elements, both factually and ethically, that warrant a reply: You use derogatory terms like "whore" and reduces Virginia Giuffre to an object devoid of agency or complexity. This dehumanizing language dismisses the nuances of her situation and perpetuates victim-blaming. It ignores the power dynamics inherent in relationships involving minors and influential adults, especially in cases of alleged trafficking or exploitation. Giuffre was 17 when she met Epstein, a minor under U.S. law, which complicates the narrative of "willing participation." You assert Giuffre "chose" to engage with Epstein repeatedly, framing her actions as purely transactional and voluntary. This ignores the potential for grooming, manipulation, or coercion, which are well-documented tactics used by individuals like Epstein to exploit vulnerable people. Minors cannot legally consent to sexual activities in many jurisdictions, and psychological or financial pressures can undermine perceived "free will." The claim that Giuffre "made up lies" to extort millions is speculative and not fully supported by evidence. Giuffre’s allegations against Epstein and others were part of legal proceedings that resulted in settlements, not convictions for perjury or fraud. For example, her settlement with Prince Andrew (reportedly around $16 million) was a civil agreement, not proof of falsehood. The opinion also misrepresents the Dershowitz case: Giuffre’s acknowledgment of possible "misremembering" was part of a mutual settlement, not a legal finding of perjury. The assertion that Giuffre was a "professional blackmailer" lacks substantiation beyond the opinion’s narrative. Legal settlements in high-profile cases often involve complex motivations, including avoiding protracted litigation, and do not inherently prove deceit. Misogynistic Undertones: Your fixation on Giuffre’s alleged greed and sexual behavior, while framing her as manipulative, reflects misogynistic tropes that disproportionately vilify women in sexual abuse cases. It suggests that her pursuit of financial compensation undermines her credibility, ignoring that civil lawsuits are a common recourse for survivors seeking justice. Misapplication of "Karma" and Moral Judgment: The invocation of "karmic law" and the claim that Giuffre was "ruined" introduces a moralizing tone that lacks grounding in evidence. There’s no clear indication that Giuffre faced legal or personal ruin; this appears to be wishful speculation. Such rhetoric shifts focus from factual analysis to personal vendetta. Selective Use of Legal Outcomes: You highlight Giuffre’s settlement with Dershowitz as evidence of her dishonesty but ignores the broader context of Epstein’s crimes. Epstein’s 2008 plea deal and subsequent 2019 charges for sex trafficking corroborate a pattern of predatory behavior, lending credence to some of Giuffre’s claims. Dismissing her entire narrative as "fantasy" overlooks these established facts. You fail to grapple with the power imbalance between a wealthy, connected figure like Epstein and a young, economically disadvantaged individual like Giuffre. Even if she returned to Epstein, this does not negate the possibility of exploitation, as victims of trafficking or abuse often face barriers to leaving, including fear, financial dependency, or lack of support.

You must have had one sorry sex life if that's what you got out of it.

Utterly ridiculous retort that would make Andrew Tate proud of you. Just because a person is legally old enough to engage in certain activities, like getting married or moving out, doesn’t mean they can’t be taken advantage of. Let’s be clear: anyone who is under 18 is legally a minor, and anyone who is being sexually exploited, regardless of their age, is a victim of a crime. perpetuating harmful stereotypes that place the blame on the victim rather than the abuser. You’re essentially saying that because Virginia was 17, she should’ve been responsible enough to avoid being exploited. But that’s not how it works. The responsibility lies with the abuser, not the victim.

I think someone has their head up their ass. This oversimplifies the situation, and potentially minimizes the gravity of the harm done to the victims of Jeffrey Epstein. While Virginia may have been paid for her time, it's important to remember that she was a minor and was being manipulated by a powerful man. The fact that she was "willing" doesn't change the fact that she was being exploited and taken advantage of. Regardless of whether or not she was "willing," the fact that Epstein was using these girls for his own sexual gratification is absolutely unacceptable. There were four people in that photo, the fourth being Epstein who took it, two now dead, one doing 20 years and the 'aristocrat' you referred to out of his day job. The stench and poison of Epstein knows no bounds, has it touched you likewise?

It's across the whole web site. A shame the owners allow this as its going down the toilet with such banal and senseless posts that have nothing to do with what was the forums initial focus.

China doesn't need to do anything. China doesn't need to talk to someone digging its own hole deeper. Its just waiting for the hole diggers to come to their senses or get tired of it. In the meantime China will trade elsewhere. Old Asian proverb, when one smells a stink walk away.

Understandable. Biden lives rent free in most MAGA heads since the election. He's the excuse for every fu made since.

No pussyfooting here either, some people are absolute morons.#livingproof

What does this even mean? Teams is the new Skype. Viber is another product and not the cheapest. There are alternatives. MyTello comes to mind, but there are others also.

It's not news silly, read and learn from history. Historical precedents suggest that expansionist powers often don't stop until they're met with significant resistance or diplomatic pressure. Current US-supported rhetoric, however, seems to dismiss this concern, suggesting Putin's goals are limited to Eastern Ukraine. This underestimates the potential for further escalation or miscalculate Russia's long-term ambitions. After you've been been robbed and had your home ransacked in some Rustbelt town filled with MAGA billboards and your family killed you don't do deals with the perp, you punish them for their misdeeds.

If you think that you'll be left behind Already left behind and on ignore for most account users. I suspect not a real person but some AI bot (or A1 to MAGA fans) running some in some kind of cretin mode to test our reactions. Ignore best course of action.

This kind of surrender monkey rhetoric is misguided in the extreme. The reality is if Russia does not retreat and surrender monkeys allow Russia aggression to pay off, they won't stop with Ukraine.

Maybe English isn't your native language, but the post by Trump is a disgusting way to refer to a funeral - as if he is going off on holiday. If you cannot see that and find it only funny, you need help.

Just like in the 1920's when the Agricultural Marketing Act and Smoot Hawley tariffs tried to revitalize farming? How did that work out? The market is always correct.

It's more of a common sense post, that most anti vaxxers somehow lost from birth? Maybe they should have got a common sense jab from their parents? Vaccines are rigorously tested, safe, and effective in preventing serious diseases that do exist and can harm newborns. Decades of research show vaccines protect infants from illnesses like measles, polio, and whooping cough, which can be deadly. The "toxic filth" claim ignores that vaccine ingredients are carefully studied, used in safe doses, and monitored for adverse effects. Denying the existence of these diseases contradicts well-documented medical evidence. Scientists have spent years confirming vaccines save millions of lives annually.

Markets say otherwise. The markets are always right no matter who is POTUS. Now we see gold at all time highs and dollar and stocks falling. When people are investing in a rock rather than capital and innovation, there's your signal.

Kennedy should be consigned to the 'Off The Beaten Track' group like all of the tosh on this thread that has nothing to do with science and medicine.

The roads link you from A to B. Cars are often used on the roads to achieve it.

The end of civilization as I once new it.