I think the game is to force paper recounts in enough states that if they miss the Dec 19th electoral college deadline and thus reduce Trumps vote to less than that required for a majority. In truth it's a squalid little ploy that can only further tarnish democracy.

In the very unlikely event they 'find' enough votes to change the outcome I'm almost certain the same will apply to the other two states.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

 
She raised less than that for her own campaign for the presidency.

The DOJ does not carry out investigations into electoral votes based on a tally of liberal outrage, they stick to facts and facts alone.

 
So draining the swamp now means draining the Democrats? All corrupt Republicans can stay?

At this point in time what difference does it make?


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

If they go ahead and introduce a law like that it'll kill off any hope Turkey has of joining the EU: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accession_of_Turkey_to_the_European_Union#Women.27s_rights
 

 
 
Says who?  Here's the actual definition.
 
"Reverse racism is a phenomenon in which discrimination, sometimes officially sanctioned, against a dominant or formerly dominant racial or other group representative of the majority in a particular society takes place, for a variety of reasons, often initially as an attempt at redressing past wrongs."
 
Someone has gone to a lot of trouble in defining something you alleged does not exist.

Exploded, as they supposedly did following the Brexit vote. The so called explosion in the later case turned out to be little more than press hype, I expect the same here once the dust settles and the hysterics abate.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

Anti-Semitism has been on the rise worldwide and for several years now. I don't see the recent US election influencing this one way or another, to argue otherwise is in my opinion using the Jews as a tool to further partisan politics.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

 
From your link...Obama was responding to the question below which did not reference violence, so why would he tell people to stop protesting, it's a legal right for non violent protest.
 
"You’ve spoken a great deal about what you’ve characterized as kind of a crude form of nationalism perhaps on the rise. I’m wondering if you would advise some of those protesters at home to stop demonstrating against some of the charged rhetoric that has been used by Donald Trump?"

He of the famous "Muslim brotherhood is largely secular" quote. He will not be missed.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/84979/case-firing-james-clapper-ryan-mauro

P.s I can't wait for the 20th Jan after which Obama will no longer be able to pardon anyone.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

Obama whilst visiting Germany was asked whether he would advise the protesters to stop. His answer was to waffle but basically it was 'no'.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/264868/obama-encourages-anti-trump-protesters-go-rioting-daniel-greenfield

"I would not advise people who feel strongly or are concerned about some of the issues that have been raised during the course of the campaign. I wouldn’t advise them to be silent. What I would advise, what I advised before the election, and what I will continue to advise after the election, is that elections matter; voting matters; organizing matters; being informed on the issues matter."

Sigh, those who refuse to learn the lessons of histrionics are doomed to repeat them, in 2020 no doubt.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

You have to ask yourself what is the point to the protests? Do the protesters somehow imagine a complete breakdown in law and order will lead to Martial law and Obama somehow delaying the handover of power?



Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

I think such an inflammatory statement should be backed up with a credible link.   

I was really hoping for John Bolton, which would have made liberals forget their hysterics regarding the appointment of Bannon.

Of course the whole notion of tantrums influencing the political appointments of an opposing president is all the more risible considering Citibank gave Obama a list of appointees to confirm.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

 In your opinion. That doesn't mean your opinion reflects the reality.
I watched his campaign closely. It WAS about all those things.
Now elected, he picks a man who ran a white supremacist, Islamophobic, misogynistic, antisemitic, and homophobic website to be his MOST IMPORTANT adviser ... there in the oval office with him when he makes all important decisions.
 
Again, this is not to assert that all trump voters are racists, etc. HOWEVER, they all did support a campaign based on all those forms of disgusting hatred.
 
"Donald Trump ran a campaign of racist demagoguery against Muslim Americans, Hispanic immigrants, and black protesters. He indulged the worst instincts of the American psyche and winked to the stream of white nationalists and anti-Semites who backed his bid for the White House. Millions of Americans voted for this campaign, thus elevating white nationalism and white reaction to the Oval Office.
...
Millions of Americans are justifiably afraid of what they’ll face under a Trump administration. If any group demands our support and sympathy, it’s these people, not the Americans who backed Trump and his threat of state-sanctioned violence against Hispanic immigrants and Muslim Americans. All the solicitude, outrage, and moral telepathy being deployed in defense of Trump supporters—who voted for a racist who promised racist outcomes—is perverse, bordering on abhorrent."
(Software issue, can not use quote tool)
 
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/there_is_no_such_thing_as_a_good_trump_voter.html
 

For 'Outrage and fear' read Soros and other globalists. Incidentally I wonder where Obama and Clinton are, surely it's high time they told the demonstrators to go home before someone is killed.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

I've really never considered myself presidential timber and also considering all the dirt in my past (including my posts here) it could never happen. But ... no time in my life have I seriously felt that I was more qualified to be president than the actual president. It scares me to think that right now ... I definitely am. 
 
Others, I ask you to consider that. Look at that man. Don't you think you're more qualified? 
 
Really, American dreamers, if trump can be president, ANYONE can! (Borrowed from the Daily Show.)

Soros-Funded Orgs Behind Violent Anti-Trump Protests Across America

Washington CAN! is a far left group leading the protests against Donald Trump in Seattle.

The far left group is paying protesters to attend their rally.
Here is one of their ads on Craigslist.

 

Soros-funded groups are behind many of these violent demonstrations.
Russia Today reported:

Some of the anti-Trump protests in the US have been organized by groups that were sponsored by Clinton sympathizer and billionaire George Soros.

Among Wikileaks’ Podesta emails was a strategy document involving the Soros-supported MoveOn.org and grassroots organizing and funding.

MoveOn.org issued a press release on Wednesday afternoon about the protests where they wrote “hundreds of Americans, dozens of organizations to gather peacefully outside the White House and in cities and towns nationwide to take a continued stand against misogyny, racism, Islamophobia, and xenophobia.”

If it's not been mentioned here previously there is a change.org petition calling for the electoral college to select the president based on the candidate who received the greatest total number of votes thus disregarding those allocated by the state electoral college votes.

I would put nothing past the Dems, even if such an unprecedented turn of events were to lead to civil war.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

The polls deliberately over sampled Democrats and groups likely to vote Democrat. They were paid to do so in some cases by the DNC. The pollsters are as completely discredited as the MSM, unfit for purpose.

P.s I was so confident the polls were wrong that I bet my friends beforehand that if Trump was within 4% of Clinton on Election Day he would win.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

The electorate rejected Obama and Clinton's globalist agenda allowing Trump to reverse the damage they caused. Not only does he control congress and the House of Representatives he is also not beholding to a list of rich and often foreign donors, who care not a jot about the American people.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

Well there are already Craigslist ads for paid agitators bussed in as demonstrated by lines of new coaches parked in rows near the demonstrations. The NWO are mad as hornets about this, Trump needs to dismantle their power base as a top priority.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

I am OK with the electoral college system although after the Bush vs Gore fiasco, I had to think about that. As long as everyone knows the rules going in, it's fair enough and does have the advantage of small states getting any attention at all. Instead, they get TOO much attention, but no scheme is perfect.
That said, in cases where a candidate WINS the popular vote and loses the election by electoral college, I do think it is very LEGIT for the losing side to aggressively assert that the winner did NOT win a mandate, and thus to unify the nation, NEEDS to offer more compromise that they might have wanted. That's what's happening now, and it's totally legit. I don't think trump will respond to that, but it's worth trying.