Bluespunk

1 hour ago, Gottfrid said:

In your opinion again. Never denied you that. Actually I posted that long time ago. Please look below, once more.

 

 

I just tried to defend accusations from you about something you called a claim, that in reality was a question.

It's not an opinion.

It is a fact she was exercising her democratic right to peaceful protest

10 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

This a truly amazing! How many time does it take? Ýet again, It was no claim! Look below once more.

 

There you see what you call a claim. A claim that ends with a question mark, does not exist. My post and sentence ends with a question mark. Therefore, NOT a claim. Now I can´t explain that more clear to you. After it stand "Can you please show me......". This is to be understood as if, the answer is yes on the question. Most people understand such thing, and read, "if so", between the lines.

After that, I can´t be touchy about anything that regards you or Greta Thunberg. she was removed out of a reason. In some channels and other media they say because she was to close to the mine with risk of jumping in. I believe that is just an easy approach, to get rid of the problem and just let her on her merry way home again. Once out of the country, they just say "YES" she is gone this time too!

And that is my belief, and my opinion, and it will stay as is. Regarding everything about if it is a question or a claim, I sincerely hope we have settled now. Please do not make me explain again.

Deflect away and make baseless claims all you want [and that is what you were doing] but the fact is you are calling for draconian, totalitarian measures for exercising the democratic right to peaceful protest.

You have been exposed for what you are.

2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

You must be a right laugh at parties !!!    

About as much as you I suspect...

8 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

As, I said! you have been shown proof of that it was a question. Seems you realized that, and taking another approach. I have not made any false accusations. That seems to be your job.

If I see it as she is a trouble maker, and should be locked up and have the key thrown away. Hell, that´s my rightful opinion. Nothing that I have to defend in front of you. Who do you think you are?

I asked you to back up your claim I believed the arrest was unlawful, something you have failed to do...

Oh dear, we do seem to be getting touchy over having your dictatorial approach to people exercising the democratic right to peaceful protest being exposed. 

15 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

Yup.. you still didn’t get it...     2340 hrs to walk from Bangkok to Nottingham (approx 100 days).. just under 4 months...   thread is 4 months old....       You didn’t get it, no need to try and save face, some people just miss a lot of stuff.

 

No I got it but it was still the case he had a ticket home before the article was published so your ''point'' is moot...

2 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

Yes, I have screenshot to back up there is a question and not what you are saying.

Not digging, it is you who is falsely accusing me.

Also here, It is you that refuse to realize you are wrong. You want to get on topic, then stop the false accusations. Otherwise, I will continue to reply to your false accusations.

More deflections and off topic trolling.
 

You just can’t defend your claim that someone should be locked up and have the key thrown away for exercising their democratic right to peaceful protest.

You ramble away because of this and make false accusations which when asked to back up fail to do so.

Instead you deflect away again. 

6 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

I figured some people wouldn’t get it... 

sure you did. 

47 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

This is a 4 month old thread.....   He’s surely made it home by now... 

 

 

 

 

He had already booked a ticket home before the thread began…

9 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

As I said, I have given you the evidence in a screen shot. You are embarrassing yourself.

Nope. 
 

Stop digging. 
 

Get on topic. 

6 minutes ago, transam said:

It seems strange that you and the pro-GT camp keep quoting to others "you have nothing".

I find that very strange as there has been a lot of input from others angle on things..... 

And what exactly has that got to do with the topic?

4 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

I have given you evidence of that it was formed as a question. It is you, that are deflecting that fact. However, if you are amused, go on!

More deflection. 
 

More digging of holes. 
 

Move on, you’re embarrassing yourself. 

26 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I'd add to that, ban all private vehicles (except bicycles), require all workers to live within 10Km of their place of work, and allow households to only have a maximum of 1 spare bedroom.

I don’t drive, never learned. 
 

Walk to work each day, as have chosen to live close to the work place. 
 

Live in a 1 bedroom flat. 
 

So all good by me. 

“Rebel reporters”…’tis to laugh. 
 

As a parody this would be a golden globe nominee…as news reporting it is jaw droppingly ludicrous. 

13 minutes ago, pomchop said:

so now you are judging me....got it.

Nope.
 

The post comes across as such, I don’t know you. 

2 hours ago, pomchop said:

I did not mean or attempt to judge the guy.  I simply relayed what I saw as I thought it to be unusual.  And I also hate to see food wasted as it is every day all over the world while people go hungry.

 

 

OK, if you say so, but yours and several other posts come across as judgemental. 

1 hour ago, Gottfrid said:

As you can see I am not saying that you did. It´s formed as a question. It would have been very simple for you to just post that you did not mean it that way, instead of accusing me for something I still did not do. 

No, you made the claim and I did point out that your claim was erroneous.
 

In fact I asked you to back it up and you failed to do so. 
 

Now enough of your deflections. 

9 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

Ok, so then you are saying that she was detained and removed unlawfully? Can you please show me where you can back up that.

For your information, there is different rules and laws concerning democracy depending on which country you are in. I think they acted according to the law, which is why she is a trouble maker.

5 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

So, where did I say that you did so

3 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

You said peaceful protest, and I take that as a person assume it would be lawful. If they then remove her, that would be wrong, right? What do you call that then?

The protest was peaceful and that is all I said.

You mentioned law enforcements actions not me.

 Please post a link proving the protest was anything but lawful if you are going to comment on such issues. 
 

However as I say, at no point did I comment on the legality of the removal of the protesters. 

Good man. 

1 hour ago, Purdey said:

Anyone in any country showing pictures of the prophet endangers themselves. I guess the University teachers in this case reached their conclusion faster than those reading this article. 

Not so.
 

The op makes clear that within branches of Islam in different parts of the world pictures of the prophet are acceptable.
 

Iran being such a country. 

3 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Is the belief that Humans are facing extinction soon a fact or a conspiracy theory ?

You have been asked to back up your claim she lied, why not do so?

1 minute ago, transam said:

So you have no opinion on why she hasn't done her thing in India or China, you know, the countries that are causing the major part of purported problems......?  

I don’t care why she has not. Nothing to do with my posts. 
 

By the way why do you keep missing out the country between China and India in terms of polluting countries? Does it not fit your narrative?