Loiner

25 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Absolute nonsense. 

Absolutely the case. 

18 minutes ago, baboon said:

You have no argument, other than screeching the equivalent of 'Two legs good, Four legs bad'.

I have no argument because I really could not careless about Boris and the KGB. I don’t suppose he received any cash to attend the party. 
Now, back to sleazy Labour MPs in the unions pocket to picket. 
 

19 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

No need because I know you are wrong.
 

You have claimed that mps and the Labour Party are on the take or involved in sleaze because of perfectly legal contributions from trade unions. 
 

You have consistently failed to back this erroneous claim because you can’t. 
 

The reason you can’t is because it’s not true. 

Labour MPs taking cash from unions is Sleaze.  
Legal or not, registered or not, it is still Sleaze. 
All true. 

5 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Nonsense. 

Now back up your claim. 

Its there on the record if you want to check it. Do a bit of Googling if you want, but don’t bother with your Guardian because they will probably have glossed over it. 

1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:

No need. 
 

The reason being that’s exactly what it does. 
 

Now back up your very specific claim. 

How much did the register record they were on the take? That’s the back up. All official. Labour sleaze. 

53 minutes ago, baboon said:

There were trades unionists there. So whose payroll is she on? Corruption, sleaze...

So a union paid for her and trades unionist support on a picket line?

21 minutes ago, baboon said:

I disagree, but as you insist. Now: What about granting peerages to sons of KGB agents and shaking off your security detail to meet him and his tather in private while serving as a minister?

Let me guess: 'So what is the big deal unless they are politicians I don't like, in which case it is a bloody scandal'?

Nice bit of whataboutery. Try again. 
Does the KGB pay for help at strikers picket lines?

26 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

Nonsense. 
 

Back up your claim. 

Have a look on the register of interests.
Just because it’s in there does not make it not sleaze. 

14 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

 

They are perfectly legal

Still sleaze. 
Still on the take. 

9 minutes ago, baboon said:

Oh? Whose payroll is Natalie Elphicke on? Shame on you!

Is it a union?

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

How on earth did you miss out on the history of the UK’s Labour movement’s during your years in school?

That was a very different Labour Party I learned about. Nothing like the recent cabal of liars masquerading as a party ‘for the many.’

18 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

As I thought, you can’t back up your hyperbolic nonsense. 
 

Just as I knew you wouldn’t have the courage or integrity to admit you are wrong. 

Because I’m not. 

40 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

That is not graft, being on the take or illegal. 

 

Now back up your claims of being on the take and sleaze. 

MPs taking money from unions is Labour’s sleaze. Declare it on the register, it is still sleaze. 
They are in the unions’ pocket. Supporting the union strikes and joining their picket lines is sleaze.
Did they actually get disciplined? Sleaze. 

5 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

Really?

 

On the take?

 

Sleaze?

 

Care to back those claims up. 
 

Keep in mind declared contributions above a certain amount to a party or individual MP is completely legal. 
 

Donations below this level do not need be declared. 

Read something else other than your rag and you will see how many Lab MPs have been taking thousands from the unions. 
 

The party really needs it now, with a £4.8M deficit after loosing 100,000 members since last year. Even their own membership are leaving Starmer. 

53 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So you don’t understand inflation.

Do you understand that prices  go up and prices can come down, especially when they are being compared at the top of comparatively large spikes.

Is the the Armageddon that George Osborne predicted and prices will soar forever as you would like us to believe?

13 hours ago, Scott said:

biggest drop in their spending power in more than 20 years as prices keep soaring.

Will CNN still be printing this guff when the prices go back down?
Energy costs will be curtailed when Liz is in charge.  Fuel is already being reduced, albeit slowly. 

31 minutes ago, baboon said:

The RMT is not affiliated with the Labour Party. He doesn't take their cash.

ASLEF are. Are all the strikers from only one union?
Affiliated or not, they’ve still been in the take. Individual MPs have been too. 
Labour is mired in their own corrupt sleaze with the unions. 

19 hours ago, RayC said:

What actions would you suggest Starmer takes in order to stop the rail strikes?

He could threaten to stop taking their cash and block votes at congress if they strike. 

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Millions of people in a wealthy nation having to choose between ‘Heating and Eating’, millions of others already struggling to afford food.

Millions more having to choose between Christmas holidays in The Alps or having to rough it with the pensioners in Tenerife, already struggling with the private school fees. 
Those north London labour supporters won’t tolerate it either, because they believe Starmer would sort it all for them. 

43 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

The news and facts are accurate, that you can’t cope with that and blame the source is your problem not the sources. 

Nonsense. 

21 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I don’t think they did as they are just reporting the facts-double helpings holidays while the country endures crisis. 
 

 

Labour and MSM were the cause of him going on gardening leave, and now are putting their own spin on him not been at his desk. It’s a bit rich, but only the rubbish you expect from them. 

14 hours ago, Scott said:

Labour leader Keir Starmer said his party, if in power,

Back off his holidays then? Why was there no outcry about him being away at a time of crisis?

The real point here is “…if in power…”. He isn’t and never will be, so whatever he says is of no consequence. As he’s labour it will be a pack of lies anyway. 

2 hours ago, baboon said:

Yes. Look at the Crime and Policing bill. Look at Truss wanting to abolish the right to strike. Look at the privatisation of Channel 4 for upsetting the regime.

Full of great ideas today. Let’s flog the BBC off too, for anti-government leftist and woke propaganda.

3 hours ago, baboon said:

Alas, I fear it will be the latter. If the ERG don't get their way, they will burn the house down out of sheer spite and moderate Tories know it.

'Either we run the place or nobody does.'

Great idea. Let’s go for it.