Loiner

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Just because it discriminates against white people, doesn't mean it isn't racist.

Of course it is racist. They believe that racism can only work one way and only whites can be racist.
How wrong can they be, but that’s the left for you. Blinded by their own bigotry. (Something else that is not only characteristic of whites.)

1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

You are not only woefully wrong but are also deliberately making inaccurate claims based on an attempt to promote an agenda rooted in misinformation and prejudice. 
 

https://www.tvnewsroom.co.uk/itv-news/itv-news-presenters-2333/?amp

 

 

I’m very right because I’ve seen it regularly.

Thought you didn’t watch ITV, or do you manage to miss the adverts? What about BBC presenters?

1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

Outraged? Who’s outraged?

 

I’m just pointing out your deliberately inaccurate deviations from the truth. 
 

No problem, always happy to expose prejudice laden misinformation. 

Nothing inaccurate at all, just the truth. Watch some UK telly if you don’t believe. You might be pleasantly surprised. 

39 minutes ago, baboon said:

He has appointed a new cabinet. He intends on going nowhere, 'Caretaker' or not.

Great, he’s fooled you all again. 

2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

My oh my but how you are changing your, equally deliberately hyperbolic untruthful, arguments.
 

First it was adverts now it’s news presenters on one tv channel… not that it matters- it is still nonsense, though nonsense laden with prejudicial deviations from the truth. 

Mere observations, truthful and without opinion or comment. 

Why are you so outraged, is it all fake for effect? I though you wanted affirmative action?
 

1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

Tut tut…what utter nonsense.
 

I’m in the uk now and what you have said there is so far from reality that it could be considered a deliberately hyperbolic untruth. 

You don’t watch much ITV then,  only BBC? Try counting the white faced news presenters. You won’t need both hands. 

6 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

I’m all for affirmative action.

 

Makes the world a much better place.
 

Viva diversity. 

“Affirmative Action”? It’s reverse racism. 
Nor does it create diversity. Try viewing a few UK advertisements. N’er a white face to be seen. 
Tut tut. 

2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Te Tories won't spend so it's easy to avoid that criticism. How's that working out for you guys?

Keeps the Tories in power and Labour out, so working pretty well thanks. 

27 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Labour doing what?

 

Labour are not in power.

Labour not being able to come up with coherent costed policies. 
 

 That’s why they have not been able to win power at the last four elections. 

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Yes you did.

 

But at the time it took place it was not in breach of any law or regulations.

 

As the police have unequivocally stated:

 

’No case to answer’.

We saw it.
Not interested in the police cover up. 

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Sadly it’s not a joke.

So why do Labour keep doing it?

46 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Cameras produce images taken at a moment in time.

 

At the moment in time when the images of Starmer drinking beer with his takeaway food was taken, he was not breaking any law or regulations in place at that time.

 

As the police unequivocally stated ‘No case to answer’.

 

Try to grasp that reality.

We saw him on video at the afterwork party.
Starmer, Angela and the rest of the Labour Party lied and are hypocrites. That’s the only reality to grasp here. 

40 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 Candidates for the post are now promising tax cuts, without explaining how these tax cuts will be funded.

 

 

I know, it’s a joke isn’t it. You would have thought they would have learned that won’t win because they’ve seen Labour constantly fail with the same tactics. Thanks 

2 hours ago, NanLaew said:

Not as guilty as the hundreds of photos

 

"regardless of what the police say."

1 hour ago, baboon said:

No. He isn't. At least until you can produce evidence of police corruption regarding the case, which you can't. 

 The other poster above seems to think he’s a bit guilty. 
 

I don’t have to produce evidence of anything. It’s already there in the video. The camera doesn’t lie. He’s as guilty as sin. Plus even more guilty of being a lying hypocrite. 

38 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Not as guilty as the hundreds of photos of the multiple indiscretions at #10 have obviously portrayed.

 

"regardless of what the police say."

But still guilty though? Regardless of what anybody else may have done. 

3 hours ago, Excel said:

Unfortunately this whole episode was brought about by one of your blue tie pals not behaving himself with other members whilst in the private Carleton Club. ????

Very little to do with that non-event. It’s due to a concerted campaign of anti-Boris bullying by the combined forces of the left, remainers and MSN, to which some opportunist Tory MPs have seen their chance at the top job. 

3 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Boris Johnson actually had quite centralists policies , its quite likely that the new Conservative leader will be more to the Right .

   Be careful what you wish for 

A proper Conservative with a capital ‘C’ would be more than welcome. 
Watch the seething and frothing at the mouth posts on here then. 

9 minutes ago, baboon said:

'Unless they reflect my point of view in which case, it is the exact, literal and absolute truth'.

You are a very silly man.

Whatever. 

17 minutes ago, baboon said:

No they aren't. You are a liar.

Well there you go again. Flinging accusations about which you have no idea. 
 

Let me tell you again: They are all the same. 

40 minutes ago, baboon said:

 

He is as guilty as charged. Starmer is not.

The video shows different to your interpretation. 
 

40 minutes ago, baboon said:

 

Don't make me laugh. The Kremlin clearly has a friend in you.

What do you think it would take for The Kremlin to get me their friend a peerage? I think I’d rather take the money.  

3 hours ago, RayC said:

Let me guess. The only sources of true, important facts are 'The Daily Mail' or 'Daily Express'?

I certainly don’t automatically assume anything in those links are true. We know the BBC for one cannot be trusted. The others also are not to be believed. 

3 hours ago, RayC said:

Lying to his party, lying to parliament, lying to the public. Threatening to break international law.

 

Yep, mere fibs about nothing important if you don't happen to believe in the rule of law.

Yes, still nothing important. Whatever is said to the bunch of liars in parliament is really not important. 
Your reference to international law I guess relates to the hated Northern Ireland Protocol. Now that really is important but Boris has not done anything about it yet. There would be no breaking of the international law you allude to. Simple application of a provision within the existing contractual agreement. The sooner Boris (or anybody else) does it, the better. 

3 hours ago, NanLaew said:

Which ones? The Met or the Durham rozzers?

Both. 
The Met, an opportunity to stick it to Boris. 
Durham an opportunity to turn a blind eye to Starmer.