animalmagic

Try going to a Thai language school. There you should meet foreigners who have at least one thing in common with you.

OMG! You really only have a passing acquaintance with logic. If Mussolini was left wing and invented Fascism he then becomes Fascist and NOT left wing. For example - if a chap, let's call him Mohammed, was a Jew and invented Islam he would then, by your logic, be a Jewish Moslem! Or perhaps easier to understand. A certain orange coloured politician was a Democrat but became a Republican President. Is he now a Democrat Republican?

You are getting your name calling terms a little confused. Fascism is defined as an authoritarian and nationalistic RIGHT wing system for government!

Double post

I suppose it's possible. But, I have to ask why would Russia waste any of its disinformation resources or efforts on a website/chatgroup that has no relevance or influence in the rest of the world?

You generate more random numbers than the national lottery!

Every one of your ancestors did!

It's not rational to declare an election rigged without documentation; especially after multiple failed court cases alleging that fact!

My reasons for living where I live are personal, whilst my politics are irrelevant to that choice. Your assumption that I am a leftist is ridiculous in the extreme. Not that it's any of your business but I have never voted for a left wing candidate in my life. An individual should not be defined by which group or person they blindly follow but by their actions as part of society.

You are demanding %age figures when you admit that your original post was made up based on your personal estimates. Sounds fair!

It's 75%.....no, hang on, it's 60%..........no, hang on again, it's just an estimate. You have now completely undermined your original post and shown it to be along the lines of, 'it's not fair, people on here don't agree with me!'. The Trump is strong in this one - in a Yoda voice.

So now it's 60%. Plucking statistics out of the air is a very Trumpian thing to do!

In a later post you state that your figures are taken from observation of posters on this website; it is a strange extrapolation to then claim that 75% of farangs are centre left to far left. It has no basis in a verified statistical process providing empirical research to back up your claim. It is simply your subjective opinion of others on here based on what you do not like to hear. Why does that the fact that, according your claimed statistics, you are outnumbered three to one worry you? Some people are fortunate to have an option on where to live and their choices behind that decision are based on numerous and very different factors; they cannot be claimed to be because of their political leanings. Such fear of the three to one ratio would suggest that you prefer to seek confirmation bias and political echo chambers to help you justify your political and social views. There is nothing wrong with reading opposing opinions and discussing them rationally. Too many resort to name calling as a way to dismiss a person of opposing views without attempting to at least consider their opinions and why they formed them. In a different thread you called one of my posts, 'stupid'. As if simple name calling is sufficient to dismiss/disprove anything written that you don't like! People have a choice on what they read and the outlets that provide the information but again you categorise mainstream media as radical left wing. If that is so, then mainstream people must all be radical left wing. Perhaps your figures of 75% may be accurate?

Thank you for those kind words. I'm sorry if you are unable to recognise humour, but it's sad that your reply is limited to calling something 'stupid'. Basically America under 45 and Project 2025

I will bow to your obviously superior knowledge of the Constitution and accept that Judiciary can be considered a representative election of sorts. Please advise why term limits should not apply to ALL branches of Government; the 22nd Amendment considers it necessary for the Executive branch.

Legislative - elected but no term limits. Judicial - appointed but no term limits. Executive - elected and term limits. Not a very fair or balanced system that is open to abuse. How about all being elected and under term limits for a start?

I'll bet they will then support some petrochemical products....like vaseline?

After that he could maybe go for - arbeit macht frei, or kraft durch freud; or some other catchy motto?

And he doesn't have a great track record against Prosecutors!

It's a shame that police officer wasn't available for England in the Euros. Looks like he could have scored more goals!

Wow, such a violent protest! But at least they didn't hospitalise or kill police officers, or build a scaffold to hang the vice president and speaker of the house. For the record I do NOT support Hamas or any other terrorist organization and its supporters.

That's ok, attendee numbers are so low the outdoor rallies are not large, and the events do not pull in significant crowds!

It is as I said earlier. I suggest you download the pdf from Google.

Karma in politics refers to the idea that actions have consequences, and the ethical dimension of these actions can impact an individual's future existence. Throughout history, political leaders who started with positive intentions but later abused their power have faced the consequences of their actions, leading to misery for many. The theory of karma is based on cause and effect, rather than notions of justice or reward and punishment.