Jump to content

JCauto

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1692
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About JCauto

  • Birthday 08/27/1962

Recent Profile Visitors

3419 profile views

JCauto's Achievements

Gold Member

Gold Member (8/14)

  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • 10 Posts
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

3.8k

Reputation

  1. This is what we call "clutching at straws". How about Karen McDougal?
  2. Look, I don't get a lot of practice going at people who defame Canadians. Most people are nice to us. Give me a bit of time to refine my ripostes. And of course, thanks for saying "sorry".
  3. Did you observe the high class post I was responding to? At least he took the high road.
  4. This is always one of the amusing things to me - often Conservatives have grown up listening to and loving rock'n'roll and have good taste in music, including this excellent song by what was the best incarnation of the Jefferson Airplane. Yet when they try to play the songs they love at their political rallies, it's just a matter of time before the "cease and desist" letters arrive from those artists that they so love, because those same artists find the policies advocated for by the Conservatives to be so appalling they don't want their music associated with it. This is why you end up with musical luminaries like Kid Rock as the top of the bill for the Republican Party. LOL.
  5. LOL! What bizarro Canada did you live in? I detect a rather fragile specimen of masculinity! But don't worry, there's help available. For a mere $18,000 (US that is, not CDN), YOU TOO could be an ALPHA MALE! I know that's what you're really expressing here. I happen to be a Canadian man, but I'm so tuff that I don't need to take a course to be the Alpha that you so badly wish you were. It's so weird though, once I ascended to the Alpha level I didn't completely lose respect for women or have my knuckles start dragging on the ground. Perhaps dis is a Quebecois thing? You come to Canada to cut down da tree and play da hockey Andre? So tuff you are! But just in case you're masquerading as an Alpha and are in fact just another limp-wristed ladyman, here's where you can address those issues:
  6. Then explain this post that you made previously, the one I was responding to. There was no location or time specificity in your post. When challenged about 7 October you answered that you're only talking about violence SINCE then although it is clear that you were not, otherwise you'd have said so at the time. I pointed out that there were numerous examples of violent conflict that also involved Muslims during your now specific time period. You now say that you were only referring to Gaza. We call this "moving the goalposts". It's one of many dishonest debating tactics. You seem to use many of them. Have you ever tried an honest debating tactic, or are you so bad at it that you just won't even attempt it? No doubt this will bring out the least intelligent of the dishonest debating tactics, the ol' ad hominem. In your case, someone taught you a new word describing your posts, that being "gibberish". Now it's the only comeback you seem to have. Aren't you a bit embarrassed about being out of your league?
  7. Read all your posts. Not one attribution of the claims you make. You're not even a decent troll - barely have enough neurons firing to respond in a coherent manner. Once again, you may claim things during debates and discussions, but when accused of making spurious or untrue statements it is your obligation to prove that you weren't just speaking extemporaneously. You've refused to even attempt to do so. If you believe I'm posting nonsense, then show me how what I have written is illogical, incorrect or otherwise made up. Because so far, that's pretty much a description of your posting history here.
  8. When you make supposedly factual claims, then you're obligated (if you're being an honest poster) to provide some level of attribution such that we can consider whether your point was true or false. Someone who blindly states things that are challenged and then rebuts it without any facts is unlikely to gain any credibility. Not that you're much interested in credibility, I rather expect that you're just here to spread poison against whomever you dislike. But in case you're wondering why nobody will take you seriously, this is the reason.
  9. So have you been observing the conflicts in Yemen between the Saudi and the Houthis? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they're both Muslim nations and peoples for the most part. Perhaps then you might peruse the violence ongoing in Burkina Faso, Niger, Mali and the Sahel? Perhaps the war in Sudan is more your flavour? Point I am making is not that Muslims are bad, nor that they are good. Similar things can be said about those of any religion. To pretend this is simply the only ongoing violence in the world is beyond absurd, so presuming you have control of your faculties, you've simply chosen to ignore things other than what Israel is doing. Why is that?
  10. In that case you've got selective vision. This is why these conflicts happen, there remain fools who believe that there are only one side who are right.
  11. Yes, precisely! Observe Europe's decline without the vital labor gaps and innovation that was brought by the British. Whereas the United Kingdom is now leading the world's economies with their innovative and vibrant economy!
  12. This method of debate is so old the Romans had a specific phrase for it - non sequitur. It means a conclusion or reply that doesn't follow logically from the previous statement. Why are you talking about this when it had nothing to do with the previous discussion? Are you so bereft of argument that reflexively braying "Biden lie" is all you can do?
  13. Thank you for your compliments on my work - if I wrote something that you agreed with, I'd have to go back and make sure I hadn't misspoken. So let's see what sort of quality response we have managed to elicit...an imaginary story about Democrats with no attribution! How unusual! No doubt you'll now have to go into the Breitbart archives to unearth some minor comments by a radical individual whom you can then state is representative of all Democrats and all of their views on Mathematics. Well, I got an idea...let's see who the people who vote Democrat are with respect to education? https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/partisanship-by-race-ethnicity-and-education/ But you probably already knew that. Insert your favourite "liberal university indoctrination" meme.
×
×
  • Create New...