Jump to content

car720

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    6,602
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by car720

  1. 4 hours ago, rabas said:

      the rivalry between S.A. and Iran for leadership in ME.  scritch, scritch, scritch  

     

    ... rivalry between the free world's need for stable energy supplies and the economically failed Soviet Union that depends on expensive energy exports to survive.

    Darn,   Soviet Union  scritch, scritch Putin's Russia.

     

    Been this way since the 1950s when Egypt was Russia's babe. Nothing on Earth that Russia Putin loves more than Iran causing trouble destabilizing the middle east to raise the price of its energy. Just like there is nothing the West loves more than lots of little powerless ME countries peacefully pumping oil and competing on price. But if you really need to see things as one bad guy causing instability (why not?) that would be Russia (dam!) Putin.

     

    or there may be a more fickle finger at play.  One that cannot be mentioned through fear of everything.

  2. 16 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

    You are absolutely correct about the social divide in the US. Just spent some time back there. I would estimate, the top 20% are doing well. The bottom 80% are hurting. No savings. No safety net, at all. For all of the amazing things they say about the US economy, it is not benefitting the average person. And in terms of corporate policy, I would take it one step further. I would say the corporations, ARE the government. And that trend, which started a long time ago, is only increasing under Trump. 

    Trump_rusia_illo.0.jpg

    Well said.  I have been saying for years that the next major conflict will not be national but corporate instead.  Companies are buying countries and their militaries.

    • Like 1
  3. If a normal person doesn't go to work then he won't have any money in his pocket.  It is the same with a country and its people.  If you want the country to get rich then you have to give the people work to do. i.e. jobs.

    Just for how long are these blowhards going to go on about this and that without doing anything at all about jobs?  I am not talking about a few mining jobs here and there but major manufacturing type work.

  4. 10 hours ago, geoffbezoz said:

    Apologies but just to digress when I read the headline I thought why is Labor spelt incorrectly since the country is based on the Queens English.  When I googled it I found out why.

     

     Now there's a thing for those of you interested.

     

    "The Australian spelling of labour is just like the BrE one. The reason why labouris spelled labor in Australian Labor Party is an important historical one: ... TheALP adopted the formal name "Australian Labour Party" in 1908, but changed thespelling to "Labor" in 1912."

    just goes to show how interested in them I am.  After 66 years I have never noticed the spelling.  :cheesy:

×
×
  • Create New...