Chopperboy

39 minutes ago, NCC1701A said:

Then the man has caught that girlfriend has gigs. 

He dresses and acts like a pimp and has a "girlfriend" that has "gigs".

But its got nothing to do with hookers and a pimp...     

I am just surprised they haven't put a quota on the numbers of retirement visas they're prepared to issue.

5 minutes ago, MaksimMislavsky said:

Just doing his job. But not exactly professional. Got too much of needless attention by hitting her. Lack of confidence. Haste.

He comes over as an underling - playing his hand too strongly.

1 minute ago, hobz said:

You know what else is big? Violence against women.. sexual assault against women.. sure the whole movement thing is inflated massively by media and celebs.. but it's still a real thing. Overblown as hell, but real.

Not saying that the issue of sexual assault against women isn't important or relevant - but its the players that are involved, the backers and the timing...  its a deliberately created distraction. 

2 minutes ago, hobz said:

Maybe that's how it started but it's huge in Europe / Sweden and there's no pedo allegations in Sweden.. or is there? *Dramatic music* *adjusts tinfoil hat*

Anything is huge where they want to make it huge - and tons of pedo stuff going on in Scandinavian countries just not generally in the fake news media.

3 minutes ago, MaksimMislavsky said:

could be indicative of habitual intimidation, hopelessness. 

Exactly, thats what the body language says to me.

1 minute ago, hobz said:

Could this be the thing that finally Sparks the #metoo movement in thailand.? Its way overdue...

#metoo is a fake left movement setup to muddy the waters and distract from all the Pedo allegations.

2 minutes ago, hobz said:

Aren't all Thai girls dressed like that right now?? Oh wait.. maybe they are all hookers.. hehe.. but yeah, sure, hookers do dress like that but so does many young pretty Thai girls..

If you guys ever got past the look of a woman you might actually see whats really going on ?

3 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

I can help thinking in that manner and I don’t. 

 

The only roles I see are victim and aggressor. 

 

I dont care why he hit her, it was the action of a coward. 

If only the world were that simple...

13 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

So crop tops and shorts equal hooker now?

 

Jesus H...

Hello - watch the body language of how they interact he treats her like an object...

37 minutes ago, mauGR1 said:

Who said that he's a pimp ?

Are you guys blind ?

She's dressed like a hooker!

Pimp ?

On 10/9/2018 at 1:05 AM, BAYBOY said:

For the legal issues explained fully re termination, severance pay, reasons why termination can occur, advice re written warnings etc. etc.

Go to the Ministry of Labour website, look for Labour Protection Act BE2541(1998) scroll down to a detailed what it is about, load the PDF pages and look for chapters 10, 11, 12.
All explained clearly and is the Ministry's English translation.
Should solve any queries.

Going through this at the moment, so far 4 court hearings and the 5th in December. Pretty stressful, sadly as it involves my late wife's family.


Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect

Sorry to hear about that - the problem is that the Labour Protection Office has been described to me as being quite powerful and hard to beat. To win you need to pull out all the stops especially on discrediting the planitif in a true and meaningful way - else settle out of court.

On 10/5/2018 at 3:58 PM, Scottjouro said:

No a written warning is not legally mandated, the steps taken are dictated by the reason of ones termination, ie if one stole from the company or committed another "illegal" act...termination would be automatic, no written warning is applied

 

 

 

 

You'd have to prove that they stole which could be hard unless they were actually charged and convicted of it in a criminal court. The attitude usually taken is "why did you put them in a position where they could steal" i.e its the employers fault for failing to control or monitor them adequately.

1 hour ago, jgarbo said:

You don't understand "embassies". They exist to promote high level diplomacy, trade and international relations. Helping expats with pensions is a nuisance, handled if at all by low level staff. 

Thats a nice way of putting it...

Embassies are beachheads use for the business/ financial/ intelligence interests of the Elite and to push their political agenda. The Plebs are just a nuisance.

Petitioning - what a blissful waste of time.

Look how they treated the Brexit vote... do you really believe thats the actions of a democracy?

Reality check - Britain is a Plurocracy or even a Pedocracy but its not a democracy.

12 hours ago, fforest1 said:

I bet the BE knows exactly down to the last person how many British expats live in Thailand...I would make a wager that Thailand shares that info....

The PALANTIR AI spy system knows exactly where you are and correlates NGA geospatial data with you profile. 

Think of an Embassy as a Deep State Beachhead and you won't go far wrong.

Its there to protect the financial/ businesses interests & political agenda of the Elite - its not there for you.

A trillion dollars isn't chump change and no one seems to audit it or know where it goes.

If there's a pack of dogs you need to be very confident. Dog sense fear and then get triggered, it depends how you react to them. 

The Official Red Cross figures of 271k were correlated with the death certificates meticulously issued by the Germans for each death and subsequently seized by the Russians.

Incidentally the figure also closely matches the energy budget (coke deliveries) required to cremate that number of bodies at 30-40Kg per body + coke for heating and cooking. 

1 hour ago, transam said:

So starving folk is OK regarding their death....? Have you seen the pictures of the inmates of Nazi prisons taken bye the allies on capture..?

The allies deliberately bombed the supply railway lines thus creating situation where they had no food supplies and were starving.

My father was at the liberation of Bruckenwold and the scenes of starvation were so horrific he could hardly speak about it till he died in his 90's. They were so weakened that one decent meal could kill them.

20 hours ago, BestB said:

Yes and not one but 3 warnings.

 

Though it may still land you in labour court.

 

as someone mentioned there are many other ways to get someone to quit.

 

example if they can only work mornings , you move them to afternoon or nights .

 

if they must have Sunday off, you change it to Monday and so on

Absolutely, you can use a range of tactics to make life as uncomfortable as possible to get them to quit - though expect a bit of passive revenge from them at the least.

The warnings 1-3 should only be used to get them to quit and not as a reason to sack, because as we know even then they can still win in a labour court. 

Don't terminate staff - instead get them into a position where they want to resign. Loss of face is one way to do it - the threat of being given a written warning may be enough to trigger a resignation.

Reuters owned by the Rothschild's since 1890..

No hit of bias there then on behalf of their Shadow Government masters.