sustento

You keep using words like 'minor' and 'youngster'. Are you talking about people who are above the age of consent or not?

You can't be serious.

I'm perfectly serious. Why don't you answer my question?

You also keep using the words 'natural' and 'normal'. In what sense are you using them? To a gay person sex with a member of the same sex is natural.

Why don't you read my posts properly before asking your questions? I was specific about those minors who, in the absence of any 'promotion', would not adopt a 'non-traditional' lifestyle. i.e. those who are either seduced or groomed.

I repeat:

If both parties in any sexual encounter are above the age of consent and the act is consensual then I don't see what the problem is. Would you feel the same way about a straight couple having sex?

If someone below the age of consent is suborned into sexual activity then the person who did it should be prosecuted regardless of their gender or orientation.

whole post seems to assume that being straight is somehow 'better' than being gay. The only truth in that is that you're much less likely to have the crap beaten out of you for being straight.

Nonsense. You won't be having children, you can't get married in most countries, you spend most of your life desperate for acceptance, you may need to take poppers to enable anal intercourse and you are apparently at higher risk of contracting AIDS... http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/sexandrelationships/analsex.htm

Oh please. Stop making this stuff up. This may be what you think being gay is like. It's not.

Apart from that I agree with you.

As for having the crap beaten out of me, my youth was a war zone because thugs can always find a reason to attack you. Homosexuals are at risk but don't let's pretend they have a monopoly on being assaulted.

I repeat " The only truth in that is that you're much less likely to have the crap beaten out of you for being straight."

Be warned. That's what happens when you stick coffee up your duff

what's your budget? If you get the suite at B2, there is a private patio. They gave it to me for the 370 thb I had paid Agoda, after I pointed out to them that the ad said Bathtub. Normally 8-1200 per night.

Which B2 is this? There seem to be 3 of them around Santitham.

Cock ?

Chicken

They would be confiscated and you would pay an enormous fine. From memory I think it's 4 times the value of the goods. It is not possible to pay tax on goods that you bring in over the limit. You will lose them.

You can do as you want harry. Unfortunately I won't be joining you. Congratulations on reaching such a magnificent age.

Why are gay so lazy

Now go to streets in Europe and America around the Russia Embassy chain yourself to the gates of the Russia Embassy Worldwide Jewelry did it get its people out of Soviet Union.

If not that go to the street s and riot like us black do

but no you post

No good Do somehing

I'm really interested in the Worldwide Jewelry. Can you get me a discount?

Ladyboys do all they can (sometimes to the point of removing their genitalia which is pretty extreme by any standards) to be women. This automatically reduces their attractiveness to gay men who, as I said, are attracted other men. Why is a ladyboy who does this assumed to be gay?

I don't assume this, nor have I ever met anyone who does.

Coming back to the law that has triggered these 'homophobic' attacks. The law is aimed at 'non-traditional' relations. Ladyboys are clearly non-traditional.

Here is the statement again.. 'Alekseevs arguments that his actions were not propaganda, but were aimed at spreading objective information, which cannot inflict harm to health, moral or spiritual development of minors. Alekseevs claim was contradicted by the materials in the case, the court said.'

Perhaps to Alekseev the material was 'education' and to the court 'propaganda'. I don't know. However, it does beggar a fundamental question, which thus far, the forum 'lobby' has avoided answering, preferring personal attacks. Is it possible to 'push' a minor towards a behaviour they would not adopt, in the absence of promotion? In other words, can youngsters be 'groomed' or seduced into choosing a non-traditional lifestyle? Common sense should tell you that if a youngster was responding to 'natural' and 'normal' imperatives, there would be no need for 'grooming'. The fact that grooming does occur, shows that some youngsters CAN be swayed.

If you agree, shouldn't the LGBT community exercise restraint and NOT target the young? And if they refuse, doesn't the State have a responsibility to protect impressionable youngsters?

You keep using words like 'minor' and 'youngster'. Are you talking about people who are above the age of consent or not?

If both parties in any sexual encounter are above the age of consent and the act is consensual then I don't see what the problem is. Would you feel the same way about a straight couple having sex?

If someone below the age of consent is suborned into sexual activity then the person who did it should be prosecuted regardless of their gender or orientation.

You also keep using the words 'natural' and 'normal'. In what sense are you using them? To a gay person sex with a member of the same sex is natural.

Your whole post seems to assume that being straight is somehow 'better' than being gay. The only truth in that is that you're much less likely to have the crap beaten out of you for being straight.

Thanks for the suggestions folks. Keep them coming please

Political correctness is just a way to clobber white people worldwide.

Ah diddums...

Sadly the more one reads and hears concerning KohTao the more one gets the feeling that something is not right.Strange deaths that are passed off as, or regarded as accidental.Murder investigations that are totally flawed etc etc

Why does there seem to be an ongoing cover up ?

There seems to be no regard for the rule of law and order on the island or is it the fact there is no law and order on the island which seems to be in a state of anarchy.

There appears to be total silence from the islands political team, council and the police and business and medical community who all seem to be somewhat inept ,corrupt.

Lies and deceit seem to be the norm, why are there no comments from the residents both Thai and foreign.It would seem a possibility that a solo killer, a psychopath or the possibility a group of violent characters roaming around the island bent on violence and subsequent death, again not necessarily 100% Thai in its make up either.

The island seems to be a snake pit of violence corruption lies and deceit, yet we still see posters spring to the defense of the island .Indeed one is left to speculate why there is such support ans ongoing denials of the truth on this island.

Perhaps a clean out of the administration team and what passes as the police farce force on this island may well be in order if in fact not long overdue.

Or maybe this death was an accident; drunk person falls of a cliff is not exactly a far fetched scenario, is it?

50m fall and only some bruises to his face, not anywhere else and not any broken bones. Amazing!

Yes very amazing seeing as he would have hit the ground at approx 90km/hr assuming he didn't hit anything on the way down

His body was found in the sea. Maybe he'd fallen into the sea rather than onto land? Would there be any injury from falling into the sea rather than hitting nthe ground?

Can anyone suggest any reasonable hotels/guesthouses in the Santitham area? Not looking for anything too flash but would like a little garden to sit in during the day and onsite food if possible.

As Thai Visa's 2013 Poster of the Year, incumbency appears to have weighed very heavily on David48's shoulders. His 2014 contributions to the forum have been very lackluster and disappointing indeed.

Then again, George W. Bush was voted in for two terms, wasn't he?

Thaivisa's 2013 poster of the year was tutsiwarrior not David48...

No last yr was D48.

Really? Where did last year go then? It's the lost weekend all over again only longer

If you think that ladyboys represent (or are even part of)the gay population then you really have no idea.

If the label LBGT doesn't include ladyboys, then you are correct.

Let me give you a couple of thoughts to ponder on that many straight men don't seem to be able to 'get'. I'm not saying you're one of them by the way.

Gay men are attracted to other men - that is to other men who actually look like men. That's the whole point of being gay. Where do you think that ladyboys fit into this scenario? Why would gay men be attracted to someone who looks like a woman?

Ladyboys do all they can (sometimes to the point of removing their genitalia which is pretty extreme by any standards) to be women. This automatically reduces their attractiveness to gay men who, as I said, are attracted other men. Why is a ladyboy who does this assumed to be gay?

As Thai Visa's 2013 Poster of the Year, incumbency appears to have weighed very heavily on David48's shoulders. His 2014 contributions to the forum have been very lackluster and disappointing indeed.

Then again, George W. Bush was voted in for two terms, wasn't he?

Thaivisa's 2013 poster of the year was tutsiwarrior not David48...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/sydney-siege-muslim-funeral-directors-tell-authorities-to-dump-man-haron-monis-body-in-the-shouse-9935176.html

Your first post on this issue claimed that LGBT people were not normal or engaged in normal activity.

My first post did nothing of the kind.

This is not a feeling. This is an assertion based on ignorance.

There is no ignorance in observing the exaggerated movements of ladyboys and finding them 'not normal'. It is a clearly a learned behaviour.

If you think that ladyboys represent (or are even part of) the gay population then you really have no idea.

Dear Lord don't you feel sorry for all those poor white men who've been oppressed and held down from positions of power and control for at least 10 minutes.

Of course, as we all know, there's no such thing as the white working class. All whites have been in positions of power including dock workers, road sweepers and postmen.

White males are more likely to actually be employed in the first place...

It would not matter which passport you used. Multiple entry visas need to approved by the embassy in London.

Unless you are married to a Thai or the legal parent of a Thai or 65 or over you will not get the visa.

The Thai Consulate in Dublin appear to be able to issue Non-Imm visas without reference to the Thai Embassy in London. The Republic of Ireland isn't part of the UK.

http://www.thaiconsulateireland.com/#types-of-visa

Dear Lord don't you feel sorry for all those poor white men who've been oppressed and held down from positions of power and control for at least 10 minutes.

Whatever are they going to do now the brown folks, women and gays are requiring equal rights and treatment?

My Lord it's a wonder their heads don't explode!

Has anyone nominated Sandman yet? If not, I do.

Is one of his campaign promises:

1. "More sauce for my chicken"

Can we have less of the filthy talk please. Young families read Thaivisa!