sebastion

Did you read the entire article?
"Washington calls for concrete action, such as a full disclosure of North Korea's nuclear and missile facilities, before satisfying Pyongyang's key demands, including an official end to the war and the easing of international sanctions."

We haven't given them anything so far.
Sanctions are still in place.

Heather Nauert states clearly in the article.

"Nauert did not respond when asked if the United States was willing to take "corresponding measures," except to say: "Nothing can happen in the absence of denuclearization; denuclearization has to come first."

That's pretty straightforward.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Wants more concessions from Donald they are getting what they want easing of sanctions and recognition as a world nuclear power they played us like a fish Donald was outsmarted by a backwoods Asian hillbilly another of Donald’s failures

Why not read the article.

U.S.A won't negotiate anything until they de-nuke.

It must come first before they negotiate.

 

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Sharks at the beginning of Spring on the barrier reef.
I'm shocked.




Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

This is a Male Dominant Society, with all the evils that brings with it, and I don't see it changing any time soon.
 

Very male dominated.
Even aids is considered a "lady disease"
That's what Thais call it.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Thailand has nothing on China when it comes to pesticides.
All that imported vegetables in Makro are Chinese imports.

I'll eat local over that Chinese stuff all day.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Of course it is, no one said you was. One day it may be your family in distress in your absence. Let’s hope other people have a different attitude. 

I don't expect anyone to help me or my loved ones.
I wouldn't expect it. That's the difference.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Be careful what you wish for. 

My choice. I'm not obligated.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

He will loose, Elon has a endless supply of money and I'm sure he has  evidence to support the accusations...

He could call me a pedophile 1000 times and I wouldn't sue. I'd ask him for a job.
I'm not stupid enough to sue a billionaire with connections worldwide.

I sure hope Vern is squeaky clean because they are digging deeper than he would ever imagine.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

By all accounts it was an heroric effort by all involved - not everyone had to enter the cave to provide a valuable contribution.               

He contributed yes. Doesn't make him a hero.
The ladies selling noodles to the bystanders even contributed. Are they hero's for setting up food carts and making a few baht?

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

 
You are absolutely correct in what you say.
 
BTW what did you do to help the boys?

I did nothing and intend to never help anybody in distress.
If that's selfish so be it. I look out for myself and my loved ones only.



Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Not by Kavanaugh it wasn't.
 

 
Plus please look at your link:
"brett-kavanaughs-mother-is-judge-who-dismissed-foreclosure-action-against-accuser-fords-parents"

Scroll further down to the case completes.
You'll find she presided twice at the end of the case.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

>>It's called research. Try it.
Palestine had Jews resettling there since 1896 because it was under British control
 
Well that is mighty strange because the British did not even capture Palestine until 1917. 
 
The rest of you post is similarly inaccurate.
 
You're trolling. Goodbye.
 
 

Jews were resettling long before 1917.
Britain was there but not in control in 1896 when Jews were invited to immigrate.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Where is the link that proves your claim they sold the house?   Who was it sold to? Where is the link to prove they lost the case?

The case was ruled to the plaintiff.

Then it was dismissed due to both parties coming to an agreement after the fact.

Happens all the time and it's the best outcome the Blasey-Fords could expect.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/18/brett-kavanaughs-mother-is-judge-who-dismissed-foreclosure-action-against-accuser-fords-parents.html

 

"The records suggest that the dismissal was granted after the Blaseys and the bank cut a deal that avoided a sale of the property at a foreclosure auction.

 

Martha Kavanaugh signed off on the motion after the case had initally been assigned to another judge."

 

 

 

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Its a hotel made of shipping containers.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

You claim they lost the house.  The onus is on you to provide the link.  I know for a fact that Thakkar can, but you can't as you are not telling the truth.

They lost the house yes. It was sold in conjunction with the bank because they lost the case. They had no other choice to settle that way or get nothing.

He says they didn't so I'd like to see a link.



Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Complete baloney! Link please.

It's called research. Try it.

Palestine had Jews resettling there since 1896 because it was under British control. The Palestinians didn't bat an eyelid because the money was flowing for them to allow Jews to integrate into Palestinian society.
After the 1948 Holocaust a mass migration happened and that's when things got heated. Britain couldn't control the fighting from Palestinians so the U.N carved it up.

Palestinian leaders accepted the first map because they were heavily compensated which probably went to a select few at the top.

We have this mess today because they can't accept that they made a bad deal and the Israelites are just protecting themselves.

Muslims didn't give a crap about Jerusalem before the Jews claimed it. It was in disrepair.
Things would have been fine if they just honoured their original deal.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

 
“They lost the house”
 
Then I guess it was a pretty neat trick for them to be able to transfer the lost house to the Blasey family trust in 2014. This is a matter of public record.
 
Please see item -3- in my post # 165.

Show me the link.


Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

maybe all these Chinese are just suicidal, they all can't be this stupid, can they?

They just don't listen.
Also make poor choices.
They walk on the road instead of the footpath, they go in the water when they can't swim.
They also ride rental scooters like Stevie Wonder.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Yes, she ruled in favor of the plaintiff’s SECOND motion which was to ask the courts to dismiss their first motion to foreclose as the defendants had arranged for a refinance. By agreeing to dismissing the first motion, the court allowed Ford’s parents to keep their house. This was a ruling in EVERYONE’S favor.
 
But, pkease, keep embarrassing yourself for our entertainment, thanks.

They lost their house when they agreed with the bank to sell. They lost the case and made a deal with the bank so they got something out of it.
How hard is that to understand.

Stop reading brainwashing MSNBC.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

No, facts make us right.

You aren't stating any facts.
Just links to liberal news.

Try looking up actually factual records.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Indeed.  I did a full text search on the text and guess what the top hit was (apart from the snopes debunk):
 
https://www.pacificpundit.com/2018/09/16/christine-blasey-ford-revenge-parents-foreclosure/
 

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch/inquiryByCaseNum.jis

Type in case number 156006V

It's plain as day.
Motion was filed by the plaintiff and the status was granted.

She ruled against them.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

 
Court proceedings are public records and easily verifiable. “They” must know this, so it says a lot that they would try this shenanigan. It shows several things:
1. Their utter disregard for facts
2. They have no real arguments
3. Their utter disdain for the Trump base they hope to fool, convinced that the idiots will buy this uncritically.

Typical deflection when confronted with facts.
Belittling opinions doesn't make you right.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

 
Martha Kavanaugh actually ruled in favor of Ford’s parents, so that they were able to keep the house.*
 
Ford must hate her parents so much that she waited decades to take revenge on the son of the person that ruled in favor of them. Women, eh? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
 
*Links to court records at this site:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/brett-kavanaugh-foreclosure-accuser-parents/

She ruled to the plaintiff, not the defendants.
Try reading the court paper before replying.

Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk

Hahaha. Snopes. The democrat party sycophants.

They debunk anything against their own.


Sent from my EVA-L19 using Tapatalk