Jump to content

pennine

Member
  • Posts

    347
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pennine

  1. 21 hours ago, myprivate said:

    Been looking into this a lot myself lately. Assuming you have 13.6M baht as implied in your first post, then you could put this into a Multi-Asset Income Fund like the one I copied below (actually better to split it into several funds to share the risk). It is currently paying 4.3% income which is about average for this type of lower risk multi asset fund.

    So if you put your 13.6M into it you'll get 584,800 per year or 48,733 a month, and you won't have to touch the principle amount except for emergencies like healthcare costs.

    https://www.hl.co.uk/funds/fund-discounts,-prices--and--factsheets/search-results/f/fidelity-multi-asset-income-income-inclusive

    Don't you have to be a UK resident to use these funds?

  2. 1 hour ago, parallaxtech said:

    If you are retired in Samui with money and a lovely place to live then it's still paradise, even more so now without the aggravating tourists or hoards of Covid bots.  I was enjoying the pristine Chaweng beach yesterday, when the jetski mafia arrived and told Thais and farangs to clear off their patch.  Most of us were hoping that this business would end, but they probably spotted a few farangs who needed fleecing.  Samui will return one day, bigger than ever, along with all the greed and corruption.  No lessons will be learned.  I still love it, relative to living in Florida, and have no plans of ever leaving.

    I agree completely.

    • Like 2
  3. 1 hour ago, Camillof said:

     

    I think you are mixing different issues here. Non-Imm O visa holders are not "tourists". Those many elderlies who reside here with or without a family also bring all of their retirement money here, besides the small capital necessarily deposited in a Thai bank. Thai authorities have all interest in keeping that group here as long as possible IMHO.

    True. But what if the Non-O visa holder has to go overseas for medical reasons and then return home to Thailand?

    • Thanks 1
  4. 19 hours ago, OJAS said:

    So you still had to wait 9 minutes for your number to be called, then? Highly unlikely, therefore, that I would be singing Samui's praises to the very highest heavens as if they were the best thing since sliced bread if I had been in your shoes - particularly as presumably there weren't too many others submitting 90-day reports in person at the same time as you in view of the current suspension!

    The main thrust of my post was the use of the screen to show ticket numbers, not the 9 minutes wait. perhaps you missed that.

×
×
  • Create New...