Jump to content

Chelseafan

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,508
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chelseafan

  1. 12 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

    Conspiracy theories, heresay and assumptions.

     

    Had Harry been born first, his paternal heritage not been questioned by mass media and the same mass media not hounded him about most aspects of his private life, including hacking his phone, I doubt what has happened since between him, the royal family and the media would have happened at all.

     

    This is Major James Hewitt who had a dalliance with Princess Diana. No resemblence to Charles. There, I've said it.

     

     

    image.jpeg.d986335f0aa03552e670d49676eb9be1.jpeg

     

    • Like 1
  2. 3 hours ago, Bangkok Barry said:

     

    The parents are entirely to blame, for not being parents. Proper parents raise their kids, they don't pass them on to others. Some might, might do what you say and actually visit their kid now and then, but bring a parent is not a part-time job.

     

    Unfortunately necessity means that parents have to travel for work. Look at bargirls for example, do you really think they can support their kid while they are out on the game? Good grandparents will raise good kids but as someone else alluded to, there are a lot of bad or indifferent Grand-parents out there.

     

    • Like 1
  3. 6 hours ago, Negita43 said:

    I would tend to agree with you also BUT would you rather live in a society where you can choose or one where you have no choice?

    That's the dichotomy of freedom of choice - if you can choose one way then you have to allow another to choose their way that's the price you have to pay for your freedom of choice.

     

    Quire right but there should be no expectation that said person will get medical care if they become infected, although having said that, the same could be said for smokers, heavy drinkers, the obese etc...

     

    • Agree 1
  4. 3 hours ago, Andre0720 said:

    All those who understand the culture in this land, they were all waiting, and all survived. They understand the lack of enforcement of traffic laws here, combined with the selfishness of the locals who will try to save some seconds...

    The locals here understand that, because that is what they want, as everybody here will want to avoid the frustration of having to wait a minute because they just missed a green light by a few seconds. That is what the people want here, and that is why traffic laws are not enforced.

    So they wait some 5 seconds or more before they go through a green light, because they also do not like that frustration when it happens to them. It is a social agreement, this Ukrainian man was unaware of that so it appears....

     

    I think that's a a good point. Jumping a red is obviously illegal but I understand why they do it when you might have to wait upto 300 seconds for the light to turn green again. They need to shorten some of these wait times.

     

    • Agree 1
    • Heart-broken 1
  5. I've finally persuaded the missus to take driving lessons. She has arranged with an instructor to take a one week course (not enough in my opinion).

    I asked her if the instructor is insured if my wife is driving the car - seems not and I have to pay around 5000b for the additional insurance.

    Is this the norm ? Surely as a driving instructor she should have automatic insurance for her pupils ?

     

  6. On 12/11/2023 at 9:17 AM, richard_smith237 said:

     

    Its a separate issue IMO... It doesn't matter what time the Bars close... and it doesnt matter if people are over the legal limit for driving (if not driving). 

     

     

    Drink driving needs to be dealt with...  whether someone is driving from a bar, a friends house, a restaurant etc... 

    Anyone caught driving over the legal limit needs to face the full force of legal consequences and thats down the police... not a bar. 

     

     

     

    Exactly. That 200 baht fine should really hurt them in the wallet...

     

     

  7. 12 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

    We all make mistakes, I agree!

    However not all mistakes are the same.

    A 'normal or small' mistake would be something like putting too much sugar in your tea, or forgetting to lock your house when going out. No one gets hurt!

    But when a person goes thru a red light, cos they didn't see it, could kill people and as this nurse did giving someone, a child, the wrong medication, could have killed the child?

    Normally it takes two nurses to give out medication so this type of thing doesn't happen! So one nurse checks that the other nurse has indeed given the correct medication.

    Maybe their procedures need improving, maybe its lack of training, I suspect we will never find out?

    The nurse screwed up and it could happen again?

     

     

     

    Yes, the nurse screwed up and if the child had died or suffered some lifeterm disalibilty I might be more inclined to agree with you in this particular case what benefit is it to anyone to dismiss her ? This wasn't deliberate, it was human error and IMHO a severe reprimand with additional training would be a better solution.

    Medical malpratice happens all the time - are we going to sack every single practioner for every mistake they make ?

     

    I agree a large compensation package should be negociated - Fines tend to focus the minds of those in charge to improve conditions and safety standards

     

  8. On 12/6/2023 at 1:00 PM, RobU said:

    Very much on the high side they say the average income is 30000 however that is skewed by the very highly paid upper income workers. The median salary is around 22000 (the median is the amount the majority of workers earn)

     

    According to the interweb, the average mean income for full time employees is £39,966 though I reckon the Median income is a lot lower.

     

     

    • Like 1
  9. 2 hours ago, Lemsta69 said:

     

    Bro, there's a new thread about this every other week. It's a subject that's been done to death.

     

    The airline is required to check that you meet the requirements to enter the destination country. If they don't, and you get denied entry then they are responsible for repatriating you and they can cop a fine of up to $10,000.

     

    In practice it depends on the airport and the individual check-in staff. You might get asked, you might not. YMMV as the Americans say.

     

    Are we clear now?

     

     

    It is NOT the airlines responsbility to check how long you will be in Thailand which is ALL I have said.

    I have NOT mentioned anything about airlines respinsbility to check you meet the requirements which as a frequent flyer I am very well aware of

     

    Are we clear now...Bro?

     

×
×
  • Create New...