Jump to content

sandyf

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    15,896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sandyf

  1. 2 minutes ago, Peter Denis said:

    When I opened the Emirates site this morning, a pop-up appeared that if you book before 30th of March that no charges would be applied when having to change.

    And indeed I opted for the cheapest return flight (17.600 THB Bangkok-Brussels) and my confirmed ticket indicates NO charges for changes.

    Glad to hear that, I am booked with Emirates to go to the UK in May. What is more of a headache is I have booked a package holiday to Morocco during the visit. The way things are going. Morocco could ban arrivals from the UK.

  2. 6 hours ago, saengd said:

    Yes, agreed. As said previously: I started off believing that transit at BKK was possible, I even recall dong so myself. But then I was persuaded by a poster who claimed to be "airline personnel" that it was no longer possible, I posted that discussion earlier. I then checked further and see there are transit facilities albeit I don't know any airline that uses them any more, even Bangkok Airways seems to have forced everyone into transfers.

    I would take what you were told with a grain of salt, and your comment is not in line with what appears on the BK airways website.

    Restrictions:

    Passengers are required to remain in the transfer areas at Suvarnabhumi (BKK) or Phuket (HKT) airports.
    - Only single tickets containing the ongoing segment(s) will qualify for Check Through service.
    - Passenger with special conditions (eg. Unaccompanied Minors) are not eligible for Check Through service.
    - Passengers who have not obtained their onward boarding pass(es) due to system or ticket problems shall recheck-in at the transfer desk of the ongoing carrier.
    - Bangkok Airways will issue boarding pass(es) for passengers connecting with the following participating airlines (operating carriers) listed in the tables below.

    When passenger travel with two separate tickets, Bangkok Airways will no longer through-check passenger and bags to the end destinations on the secondary separate ticket. Please see more details in Separate Ticket Policy

    https://www.bangkokair.com/through-check-in

  3. On 2/20/2020 at 10:04 PM, theoldgit said:

    Yes, as I indicated earlier the decision making for visit visas has already moved to Sheffield, it will move to Croydon later in the year.

    "in theory, be any changes to the turn around times.
    Visa vingettes will be attached to successful applicants passports in Bangkok, as they are now.   

     

    The turn around times do seem to be the same, my wife's application was submitted just a couple of days earlier than last year and came back in exactly the same number of days.

    The vingettes, although still done in Bangkok have changed appearance, no longer titled visa but UK Entry Clearance. Overall a significant move away from the EU format. 

  4. 42 minutes ago, john terry1001 said:

    In the 26 years I've been coming to/living in Thailand I have never met anybody who's had a problem. Perhaps somebody could post on here with a specific problem they've had concerning name change, what the problem was and why it was a problem.

    As you will be well aware, every situation in life carries exceptional circumstances and this is no different, its a personal issue.

    If someone has avoided a problem by not changing their name, then there is not going to be a specific problem to post.

    As far as the documents are concerned that is very easy as now each time the marriage certificate is requested just attach the name change as the marriage certificate carries a statement that the female has chosen to keep her maiden name.

  5. 14 hours ago, saengd said:

    Setting aside for a moment the question of whether or not it is actually possible to transit Swampy versus Transfer at Swampy, I'll dig out the prior thread where airline staff argued it was not possible to transit at Swampy, I argued that is was but was subsequently convinced otherwise.

     

    Back to the numbers: if it is possible to transit at swampy then transit passengers cannot possibly be included in the arriving passenger count because they never clear Immigration ergo they never arrive....TOT even separates them from their passenger counts (see below).

     

    Transfer passengers do arrive because they clear Immigration hence they are counted, even if they immediately check in for a connecting flight. But as said earlier, how many long haul passengers would do that sort of turnaround, some I suppose but not many.

     

    https://www.airportthai.co.th/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Annual-Airport-2018.pdf

     

    Transfer refers to passengers going from international to domestic or domestic to domestic, all international passengers would clear immigration on arrival. Same for me going BKK to MAN via LHR.

    Transit is international to international, hence the term transit visa. I used to travel on the Amsterdam/Taipai flight which came via BKK. Although the stop was very short all passengers had to disembark to clean the aircraft for new passengers boarding at BKK, there would have been insufficient time for through passengers to leave the airside of the airport.

    Transit passengers may leave airside if they wish but they would be liable for the 700 baht airport tax as it would not be included in the ticket.

  6. 1 hour ago, bluemoonpattaya said:

    They are only refusing to change cash from other countries. 

    What they should be looking at, is the fingerprint virus spreading devices at the airport.

    "fingerprint virus spreading devices" - where does that come from?

    I went in and out of Malaysia at Padang Besar a few weeks back and there was a guy at the immigration desks cleaning the fingerprint machines each time they were used.

    Of course that is not an airport so your theory must be right.

  7. 15 hours ago, CG1 Blue said:

    It's the excessive force being used by the Greeks including gun shots and tear gas that is considered a breach. 

    As I've said before, I sympathise with the Greeks having to deal with the brunt of this issue. But I was pointing out the hypocrisy from Von Der Layen. 

    Once again vagueness becomes overriding proof and makes an indisputable connection to the Law of the Sea.

    Pointing the finger of hypocrisy at the EU and not at the UK is hypocritical in itself, but then having taken back control the UK can rewrite the dictionary in the brexit image.

    • Like 2
  8. 15 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

    Deflection and obfuscation - I was referring specifically to infant mortality, not child mortality, which includes deaths due to accidents, violence and the effects of toxins in children up to the age of 19. But nonetheless, it is absolutely deplorable, I agree. However it takes nothing away from my point. 

     

    Health in England 'faltering' after 10 years of austerity, warns damning Marmot review

    "Life expectancy has stalled, patients are living longer in ill health and health inequality has risen after a decade of austerity that will 'cast a long shadow' over the lives of UK children, according to a devastating follow-up to the 2010 Marmot review."

     

    But in answer to your final question, yes - there is something askew in my country. It's that we are forced to give all our cash to the country next door and let them decide how much to return to us. If we weren't routinely bled dry by them, we might stand a better chance to fix our own problems. 

    I get the impression that many seem to think that the austerity regime did not apply to Scotland, or relevant to the way people vote.

     

    https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/there-is-no-safety-net-fifes-child-poverty-epidemic-laid-bare_uk_5dd7eab4e4b0d50f328e3657?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAD-r2wbSfEZfaRu7lIdlJ7bRktl9L6b9Nwrg63QNhLijcUKxKO_OPw77pl7FHg4xxGKdrxxtwTR3Etv22nIFxmkfzuNk0XhA8a5-p9J5B1rf2lvbQwf3rheEty-fpdWNEr6UYWIZ09u4_W8iPuR1y2ZvcAMtQpRKYgxhNeTYOkOv

    • Like 2
  9. 15 hours ago, billd766 said:

    I had forgotten about the marine side. Thank you for reminding me.

     

    https://www.rolls-royce.com/products-and-services/defence/aerospace.aspx

     

    Defence Aerospace business
    With more than 16,000 military engines in service with 160 customers in 103 countries, Rolls-Royce is a powerful player in the defence aero engine market. From combat to transport, from trainers to helicopters, our engines and pioneering service solutions ensure that our customers have world-leading engine technology available, whatever the mission demands.

     

    https://www.rolls-royce.com/country-sites/india/products-and-services/civil-aerospace.aspx

     

    Civil Aerospace
    We are a leading manufacturer and service provider of aero engines for large civil aircrafts and corporate jets worldwide, powering more than 30 types of commercial aircraft. We have over 13,000 engines in service globally with airlines, freight operators, lessors and corporates; with 50% share in the modern wide-body engines on order.

     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Holdings

     

    Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (company number 04706930)[3] is a British multinational engineering company incorporated in February 2011 that owns Rolls-Royce, a business established in 1904 which today designs, manufactures and distributes power systems for aviation and other industries. Rolls-Royce is the world's second-largest maker of aircraft engines[4] (after General Electric)[5] and has major businesses in the marine propulsion and energy sectors.

    Rolls-Royce was the world's 16th largest defence contractor in 2018 when measured by defence revenues

     

    TBH I had only a vague idea of the size of Rolls-Royce holdings and I didn't realise that it was this big or this varied. There must be a huge export market world wide.

     

    So much for the UK not producing very much for export.

     

    I simply cannot be be bothered to reply to logoosones post as he always runs down the UK and England wherever and whenever possible.

    Bill, you have to remember that Rolls Royce went bankrupt in 1971 and was nationalised by Ted Heath, who according to some was the architect of the UK's demise.

    The government will have a bit of a challenge if they have to bail them out again.

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/feb/28/rolls-royce-makes-29bn-loss-as-engine-fault-costs-790m

    • Like 2
  10. 15 hours ago, sanemax said:

    The Greek Drachma would have devalued due to the terrible state of the Greek economy  and financial affairs , this would have helped their economy by ways of increased tourism and their exports would have been cheaper and more attractive to buyers 

       As Greek was in the Euro , their currency didnt devalue

    I have to assume you would blame the NHS for people getting lung cancer after smoking all their life.

    The problems were there before they had the Euro so why not devalue at that time, couldn't possibly the fear of losing the EU as a sugar daddy.

    • Like 1
  11. 21 hours ago, digibum said:

    Actually, you can get text messages on a non-smartphone.  Believe me, I remember having to triple-tap a key to get the right letter back in the early 2000's. 

     

    Sounds like you're confusing two things.  You have a Thai number which CapitalOne will not text and saying that you can't receive text messages because you don't have a smart phone.  Almost any phone sold today can receive a text message.  It's that CapitalOne isn't going to pay the international fee to send you a text message.

     

    I would agree, I was getting text messages from various entities for years before smartphones came about. I had 2 small nokias, one UK sim card and the other Thai. The UK sim was a pay as you go, still works and held as an emergency when travelling, must be nearly 20 years old.

    I now use a smart phone with dual sim, UK and Thai.

  12. 6 hours ago, vinny41 said:

    Not really you failed to criticize the article you instead decided to make a comment against the poster says it all

    If you had been engaged in trade with the EU prior to the single market you would be aware of how tariffs operate and not need an opinionated article as to the benefits the SM brought to the small UK exporter.

    Of course trying to deride personal experience is a way of life to many on this forum.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  13. 21 hours ago, tomacht8 said:

    The price of Danish Blue was 258Baht for 820 grams.
    Incredibly cheap. Have never seen an import cheese here so cheap for years.
    31 Baht for 100 grams.
    The cheapest cheese in macro, and you have to buy at least a Kilo or more, is 50-60 baht per 100 grams.
     

    The poster must have been to a different Siamburi to me. The price you mention is nearer the ballpark for the cheaper cheeses. The problem is that they are cutting it and packing it themselves so each piece is priced on weight and on some cheese the price goes down the larger the piece. There is quite a wide selection so not easy to be specific. Most comes from Australia and with some, like Edam, they have both Australian and Dutch, with the Australian being a good bit cheaper.

    Danish Blue and Gouda are not ones I would have looked at.

    • Like 2
  14. 17 hours ago, Nanaplaza666 said:

    555555555 it's of so much importance to king IV of marroco, that he doesn't want the criminal filth that is living in my homecountry back into his own . And if my government treatens to stop paying them social wellfair there would be procutions . My government is trying to send back many of the rif and berber marrocans that are clearly not in my country to integrate, but just to steal and benefit , but their own country just won't take them back . And it's only getting worse with all these new so called fugitives from save country's as marroco and algeria , i would urge them to take care of that problem first before playing the nice guy and talk about enviroment . Sorry for that but other people that are from my country know axactly what i am talking about . Sending them back is a big step in cleaning up my enviroment . 

    "king IV of marroco,"

    First indication post is garbage.

×
×
  • Create New...