Digitalbanana

When Trump said he phoned Putin and described his war with Ukraine as like two school kids fighting in a park that need to be left to carry on a little longer, this is like putty in Putin's hands, he knows there is a child like mind running the Oval Office. This oversimplified analogy, combined with Trump’s reluctance to impose new sanctions or military aid to Ukraine, could embolden Putin, who may perceive a less assertive or naive counterpart in the Oval Office, giving him leverage to prolong the war or push aggressive terms.

Nothing to do with being left or right. Unless Leavitt speaks objectively no one will ever believe a word out of her pretty little mouth.

I suppose you will have already rubbed one out over her, with such adoration? However this is the lying Leavitt we are talking about here so I would hold off. The BBC rejected this, stating the claim was "completely wrong" and that it never removed the story in question. The corporation emphasized its commitment to accurate journalism and noted that a viral video cited by Leavitt was not used in its reporting. Critics accused the White House of political point-scoring. Given the BBC's call for independent access to Gaza to verify facts and the lack of evidence supporting Leavitt's claim of a retracted story, the accusation appears more as a politically motivated critique than a substantiated claim of bias.

Why are they charging extra satang for overpriced coffee, if not to just piss customers off?

Perhaps a Freudian slip by the content creator? The term "reign" is generally associated with monarchs or authoritarian rulers, implying a prolonged, sovereign rule. For a democratically elected prime minister like Paetongtarn, "tenure," "leadership," or "term" would be more accurate, as "reign" inaccurately suggests non-democratic or hereditary rule. The title is thus poorly worded.