Jump to content

Sviss Geez

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,893
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sviss Geez

  1. Yes, he does look quite dashing with his 1970 Era haircut.

    Let's see how your haircut stacks up in comparison.

    No. I like women. Thank you for the interest but your not my type and my comment regarding his hair was light humor, sailor.

    I didn't mention your preferences neither did I show any interest in you but I did notice the lack of any humour, light or otherwise, in your haircut comment.

  2. Good afternoon, Sviss Geez! Back for your daily dose, eh?

    You can expand your venue by getting this tattooed to your forehead, then go walk around the mall.

    Avoid Starbucks and Villa. Report back with results.

    attachicon.gifimages.jpg

    Thank you, I do appreciate that recognition.

    Hmmm. You aren't so clever after all.

    That's what you think. Even given all the previous clues you still can't recognise what's actually being said, can you?

  3. Ford are even worse! They replaced my slightly sluggish (when retracting) seatbelt under warranty, no hassle. Terrible Ford people!

    Ok pretty terrible that you got a new seatbelt from Ford. Anyway I suppose Honda should replace the seatbelt under warranty!

    Why should it be replaced? Because there is a small rattle from that area? Using that logic why don't you ask for the car to be replaced under warranty as it also has a rattle?

    And if you consider a rattle from the seat belt to be such a huge safety issue why don't you pay for a replacement yourself, a small cost for peace of mind?

    Learn to read or don't bother replying

    Up yours, I wasn't replying to your nonsensical comment. I can read perfectly well, perhaps you can't?

  4. For all the peudo gangland hardmen out there with their "nobody likes grasses" and "snitches get stitches' remarks, consider this. Morons such as you should contemplate what your reaction to reporting illegal activities would be if, just for the sake of an example, a member of your family was assaulted and someone who knew who had committed the assault told you he would mind his own business and keep it to himself so as not to get the attacker into trouble. You would all be happy with this, yes? Unless you're all two-faced hypocrites you'd have to be.

    And before some clown jumps in with "there's a difference between assault and falsifying qualifications" there is no difference in the principal, you are either happy to let people get on with their illegal activities or you are not, which one is it?

  5. Srcasm? Even if it was, you seem to rely on your self-styled sense of sarcasm day in day out on TVF.

    You know what they say about sarcasm, and those who use it at the exclusion of other means of expression.

    I'm surprised that you now seem able to recognise it in order to be able to misjudge that I use it day in, dayout.

    Go on, tell me what "they" say about sarcasm but please don't use the old fall back of Oscar Wilde's personal opinion quoted by some of the ignorant who seem to think it is gospel.

    Good afternoon, Sviss Geez! Back for your daily dose, eh?

    You can expand your venue by getting this tattooed to your forehead, then go walk around the mall.

    Avoid Starbucks and Villa. Report back with results.

    attachicon.gifimages.jpg

    Thank you, I do appreciate that recognition.

  6. Ford are even worse! They replaced my slightly sluggish (when retracting) seatbelt under warranty, no hassle. Terrible Ford people!

    Ok pretty terrible that you got a new seatbelt from Ford. Anyway I suppose Honda should replace the seatbelt under warranty!

    Why should it be replaced? Because there is a small rattle from that area? Using that logic why don't you ask for the car to be replaced under warranty as it also has a rattle?

    And if you consider a rattle from the seat belt to be such a huge safety issue why don't you pay for a replacement yourself, a small cost for peace of mind?

  7. Bloody hell, that's rich coming from you considering the nasty, malicious BS you posted about his wife.

    I have only 'speculated' about his wife in a manner that the OP would see as 'factual.

    That is nothing more than your ridiculous, vivid imagination that deserves nothing but contempt.

    As, indeed is the whole post......and your ridiculous opinions....

    Clearly you don't know the difference between fact and speculation, the 18 year old that is the subject of this thread admitted his lack of qualifications so what the OP considers factual are actually facts.

    I'd ask you to point out just one of my opinions that is ridiculous but, (a), there aren't any, and (B), I don't want to drag this on any further.

    I'm curious to know, and I'm really just thinking aloud now, which of the posters on this thread are unqualified teachers?

  8. As far as the 'facts' go I can deduce from the OP is that this lad has been employed presumably by people who seemed satisfied enough by him, to employ him. Since then he seems to have settled into the job to the satisfaction of his employers- a 'fact' that seems to have got the OP into a right old tizzy.

    He has admitted himself that he isn't sure of the qualifications; or lack of, of the lad.

    I do not know any more than the OP but am appalled at his vendetta against someone he doesn't even know all the facts about. The more I read it the more I see ''My missus fancies this young bloke who is teaching at a local school'' Is what he really wanted to post but couldn't so had to make up a load of nonsense.

    Fair enough but I'd say you could say that about a good percentage of foreign 'teachers' here in Thailand, and that the OP could probably say that about most of the foreign teachers in the very same school this lad works at, yet I doubt he's 'investigated' any of their credentials as his missus doesn't fancy any of them.

    I'll hazard a (wild) conjecture here, especially as the OP hasn't returned to his post, in that this youngster has turned up in the OP's sphere where he thought he was 'the only 'farang' in the village' if you will....and now, along has come some brash young lad possibly with more dynamism, language skills, charisma, money than he has and is turning the heads of the local lasses and the OP has been usurped as the centre of local focus which he doesn't like so is making up malicious lies about the subject in the OP, hoping someone in power at the school picks up on them.

    I hope the kid finds out and sues the OP for every penny of the OP's pension money and then pops his missus one while the OP is in jail.

    Thailand is a tough enough country to make it in without nasty malicious liars like the OP spreading BS about you.....

    "As far as the 'facts' go I can deduce from the OP is that this lad has been employed presumably by people who seemed satisfied enough by him, to employ him. Since then he seems to have settled into the job to the satisfaction of his employers- a 'fact' that seems to have got the OP into a right old tizzy."

    Your deducing anything is not factual.

    "The more I read it the more I see ''My missus fancies this young bloke who is teaching at a local school'' Is what he really wanted to post but couldn't so had to make up a load of nonsense."

    "yet I doubt he's 'investigated' any of their credentials as his missus doesn't fancy any of them."

    That is nothing more than your ridiculous, vivid imagination that deserves nothing but contempt.

    "Thailand is a tough enough country to make it in without nasty malicious liars like the OP spreading BS about you....."

    Bloody hell, that's rich coming from you considering the nasty, malicious BS you posted about his wife.

  9. ...and after that, they will go back to a deep slumber and last year, we will face the exact same problems again!

    Putting hope on STORMS?

    Seriously?

    Last time I checked, storms cause people to loose their homes and livelihood.

    Oh, well...all for the greater good!coffee1.gif

    Last time you checked did you not notice that storms are a natural phenomenon that no-one has any control over? Thailand is not inviting storms to visit us in order to replenish the reservoirs at the expense of it's citizen's homes and livelihoods.

  10. i have traveled all over the us and asia also hundreds of times for years and never had to pay a deposit or present a credit card.

    Im mystified by this bullshit too….I recently stayed at the Centra Avenue Pattaya for 2 weeks…first of all they made me pay the entire room tariff upfront.

    I did so, by credit card.

    Next they want 3K a day as deposit!!!!

    I had already paid for the room in full…..I had asked them to remove the contents of the minibar for the entire duration of the stay…plus I undertook not to eat at their shitty jewish restaurant…..so Im wondering what possible claim they could have on me.

    Refused to cough up the deposit until they relented….just kept repeating room is paid for and there are no future expenses…what you want deposit for….they had no answer.

    During my stay I noticed some damage in the room, including a humongous scratch the cleaning lady left on the mirrored wardrobe door…I can confidently predict that had I paid the deposit, they would be blaming the scratch on me…..what a bunch of dishonest dickheads.

    So if they didn't charge you for the scratch that you saw the cleaning lady make why were they dishonest dickheads?

  11. You're lucky that hotels don't ask those paying cash up front for their stay to leave an additional amount as a deposit, returnable when you check out, to cover incidentals. If hotels did do that you'd lose out every time you left.

    You need to get out of your basement more often. Hotels do that quite often, and not just low end ones.

    That was exactly my point. You need to be able to recognise sarcasm aimed at Fey's claim.

    Sarcasm? Even if it was, you seem to rely on your self-styled sense of sarcasm day in day out on TVF.

    You know what they say about sarcasm, and those who use it at the exclusion of other means of expression.

    I'm surprised that you now seem able to recognise it in order to be able to misjudge that I use it day in, dayout.

    Go on, tell me what "they" say about sarcasm but please don't use the old fall back of Oscar Wilde's personal opinion quoted by some of the ignorant who seem to think it is gospel.

  12. Hardly evil is it - he's not a pedophile.

    OP bases his reason for intending to report the individual is based upon two factors - the OPs perception that the individual is 'immoral', and lack of teaching paperwork. Immoral because he drinks and has smoked pot.. if so that would be along with 156 million others around the world - I assume he is not actually holding booze and ganja parties for the students?

    Teaching with lack of licence is hardly anything new in Thailand.

    I'd question the morality of curtain twitching grasses more than someone who drinks and smokes pot.

    What you're missing is that the rest of your claimed 156 million pot-heads are not unqualified teenagers trying to teach our children.

    Most rational, normal people would actually question the morality of those who question the morality of those trying to do the right thing, curtain twitchers or not.

    What your missing is that the OP is conflating the two, and intimating that because the individual in question may drink and have smoked pot, that it somehow exacerbates the situation.

    I'm not questioning doing 'the right thing', I'm questioning the logic upon which the OP has determined to be 'the right thing' which appears to be primarily based upon an archaic and unrealistic concept of morality.

    "...the OP has determined to be 'the right thing' which appears to be primarily based upon an archaic and unrealistic concept of morality."

    only if you ignore the fact that he is an unqualified 18 year old tourist, that has a great deal to do with the argument.

×
×
  • Create New...