candide

And I am expecting soon: tu quoque, Giuliani mi!

Thank you for the source. However, it doesn't mean they would not have increased access to other sources. Also (from your source), "That would cover coal, oil and gas projects that are "unabated" - meaning that they burn fossil fuels without using technology to capture the resulting CO2 emissions."

What is your evidence that developing countries such as in Africa are going to be deprived from increased access to energy (all sources)?

And It's not like so-called green technologies would ever be useful in Africa. For example, the most appropriate situation for using photovoltaic energy would be a lot of sun, combined with a low density of traditional electricity distribution networks. That's surely not the case in Africa! Oh wait! ????

One month Graph from your source

Another win for Trump! ???? Mar-a-Lago property manager invokes speedy trial rights in Trump classified documents case https://news.yahoo.com/mar-lago-property-manager-invokes-020600196.html

Right. Lowest inflation and highest growth among G7 countries

Republican state chairman blames Trump "Former Georgia GOP chairman David Shafer, who led the state’s delegation of fake electors, said in a court filing that he and the other fake electors “acted at the direction of the incumbent President and other federal officials.” https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/22/politics/trump-fulton-county/index.html

Republican lawmakers help me! Ah ah!

A big change from the previous President. He knew what his family was doing! He was employing them at the WH! ????

It confirms the decadence of Russia. It 's a pity because this country had a lot of potential, but has beem led by incompetent people such as Putin

Come on. You're not expecting MAGA fans to be rational, are you?

Thanks for these precision. So it doesn't fully correspond to PTP electorate.

Sò if I remember well, the % of people who agree with a merged government lead by PT corresponds broadly to the % of people who voted for PT.

What has the big guy done, whoever he may be?

Which percentage? Which source?

Not sure there's an obvious decline. He's always been like that.

Nightlife, girls, ladyboys, booze....Thailand has everything to attract Muslim tourists!

Lol! As usual, you cherry pick the parts of the testimony you like and choose to ignore the parts you don't like.

Tu quoque, Meadows mi! Eh eh! Meadows told special counsel he could not recall Trump ever declassifying Mar-a-Lago docs: Sources https://news.yahoo.com/gma/meadows-told-special-counsel-could-124511661.html

No no! They don't need evidence! The GOP even stated it officially!

Trump sparks derision for saying he was ‘apple of Putin’s eye’ as EU diplomats ‘terrified’ of 2024 win – live “Putin would’ve never gotten into Ukraine, but that’s just on my relationship with him. My personality over his,” Mr Trump said. “I was the apple of his eye and I would say, ‘Don’t ever do it.’ It was tough stuff there but he would have never done it.” https://news.yahoo.com/trump-dubbed-coward-skipping-gop-120812129.html

Another big win for Putin!

I agree of course. Just to mention, for example, how Christians have been enslaved by Muslims in Arab and Turkish kingdoms/empires around the Mediterranean Sea. However, the replies are made by ChatGPT according to the local context. For example I am on holiday in Spain and don't get exactly the same reply as the one quoted by the poster who made the test. The questions to ChatGPT have been asked in a specific context (the US), and the replies made in this context. In this context, it's black people who have been considered as inferior for centuries, and to some extent still are. Hence the reply. In this context, white people have not been considered as inferior by other ethnicities, quite the opposite indeed. (Some white people are considered as inferior but other white people, but that's another story)

Again, stop making things up! Nobody claims ChatGPT is a substitute for hitting books, and certainly not the so-called liberal posters on this forum. As a likely "thread throller" in your mind, here are a few thoughts. 1. AI is very useful for specialised subjects with relatively low ambiguity and a circumscribed scope of information, ex. analysing jurisprudence on legal matters, doing technical service diagnosis, etc... 2. In general, for example in education, it should be used as a complement. People should do their own research and thinking in order to identify complex issues and problematize them, and then use AI to improve it. The danger is that most students may likely use AI to indentify issues and problematize them, and then only improve it by themselves. So they may lose the ability to define and analyse complex issues by themselves.