Jump to content

candide

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    18,400
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by candide

  1. The trick being there's officially no war. Only a special operation!
  2. There may be plenty of reasons other than your conspiracy theory, I.e. they don't want to disclose a source, they don't want to disclose how they are able to investigate, etc....
  3. So, if I understand well your post, Obama's familly made around 1000 trips during 6 years, and Trump's familly around 4000 during 3 years, so 8 times more trips per year than Obama's familly. ????
  4. *Deleted post edited out* It's you obfuscating. The topic is "Trump company charge....", It's not about Obama, and there was also no "Obama company charge....". So It's an obvious false equivalence (on top of being off-topic) Fact is there was an obvious conflict of interest, aggravated by the high price charged for rooms.
  5. Not so nice attempt at distracting attention from the key issue. It is not about how much taxpayer money Presidents have spent, it is about a conflict of interest: the money Trump spent went into his pocket (well, his company).
  6. For such luxury brand watches, each watch has an ID number and is registered in order to manage guarantees, and also to trace the watch in case of robbery. What's the name on the certificates? I know, stupid question! ????
  7. Exactly. It's called conflict of interest: a situation in which a person is in a position to derive personal benefit from actions or decisions made in his official capacity.
  8. Exclusive: Emails reveal warning to Trump team about fraud claims https://www.axios.com/2022/10/21/trump-eric-herschmann-email-voter-fraud-georgia
  9. As already stated this is a global issue and not a U.S. issue. There is no shortage in the U.S. so getting oil from Canada will not solve the global supply issue. I agree that it is not in the interest of oil companies to make any long-term investment in any country, as there are uncertainties about the long-term demand and prices. There are currently plenty of permits which are not used. Their exploitation may be profitable under current prices, but not under the prices expected in a few years' time. This is a global and long-term trend. Worldwide investment in oil and gas started to decrease in 2015 and it's not going to recover the pre-2015 level.
  10. He's not having the reverse effect, he's putting more oil on the market. BTW, the decrease of the SPR has been voted in a bipartisan law in 2018.
  11. He's not begging for oil to be sent to the U.S.! As you perfectly know, It's because the price of oil is global. So in order to get prices down in any country (except by lowering taxes), It's necessary to get the global price down by increasing supply internationally.
  12. The United States started the petroleum reserve in 1975 to mitigate future supply disruptions as part of the international Agreement on an International Energy Program, after oil supplies were interrupted during the 1973–1974 oil embargo. The situation is quite different now. Since the a policy started by the Obama administration, the U.S. is self-sufficient and even net exporter. There is no need to maintain the same level of strategic reserve.
  13. Here is something interesting which was not clear in the OP. Quote But Trump and his lawyers still filed their complaint citing those numbers, and Trump signed a letter "swearing under oath that the incorporated, inaccurate numbers 'are true and correct' or 'believed to be true and correct' to the best of his knowledge and belief," Carter wrote. https://news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-finds-trump-lied-000120999.html
  14. I think it's broader than that. I guess a significant share of their voters actually smoke weed. It differs from other countries, such as some European countries, where right-wing people tend to be against it.
  15. It was already obvious from the hearings, but a written proof is even better!
  16. How many times have we heard that? You will see the next lawsuit about stolen elections (the kraken B.S., etc....), you will see the supreme court ruling about elections, you will see the election audit in (choose the place), you will see the IG investigation about the Russia probe, you will see the Durham investigation, and now It's you will see when the GOP will take back the house....
  17. In particular, delaying production custs would have allowed people to fill up their fuel tank before winter at a a lower price.
  18. Biden’s Chip Limits on China Mark a War of High-Tech Attrition The US now realizes it can’t outpace its foremost rival simply by running faster; it must also slow Beijing down. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-10-09/biden-s-chip-limits-on-china-mark-a-war-of-high-tech-attrition
  19. Fox News suggests Trump’s Russia case ‘imploding’ after Steele dossier source acquitted https://news.yahoo.com/fox-news-suggests-trump-russia-215320507.html
×
×
  • Create New...