nonthaburial

I spent half of the 90s drinking in Patpong and I never heard this story. Then again, the 90s were the era of the massive, lying idiots loitering around bars telling whoppers to anyone who would listen

Whilst your credibility is noted, I assure you there was a story, but sadly cannot remember. You will also remember the good times in the British bar upstairs of the car park, over the top of food land. What was it called, the Bobby's arms. Those were the real days when history was made,

Excuse me, have in missed something, as the government are in total disarray, is there such a thing in Thailand as a legal PM.?

Ok girls, let's pack away your PMS syndromes, put your sanitary napkins back in your handbags and throw away the lipstick and as educated people, try to respond to a serious question.

Now if you haven't been here very long,And are totally ignorant of history, may I suggest you add your egos to your napkins and hide them away.

As it happens, I do have a lingering memory of such an episode, but with the onslaught of Alzheimer's , which I am not joking about, the true facts elude me.

So if anyone can answer the OP without showing ignorance and pettiness, my feeble mind would be very happy to hear it.

He also asked the same question in the "ask the lawyer" section

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/720381-landlord-entering-premises-what-are-the-rules/

And the lawyer answered with

Regarding when the landlord can enter the property and the amount of notice needed to be given should be stipulated in your lease agreement and if your landlord seems to be acting in excess of the arrangement that was agreed upon then you can point out the agreement to them.

Yes noted MJCM, so this is either a troll or a very spoilt white behind the Knees spoilt great breast fed little brat, suggest this whole thread and content is deleted. The OP will not be happy until he gets a response he likes.

Message to OP, you have had a pitiful number of responses to your two posts. Accept what you have been told and take it all in and understand. You are becoming boring and not worth responding to any more.

Best to check your rental agreement and see what that stipulates. However saying that, I believe a landlord can enter the premises to carry out exactly he said to you about a house inspection, but it has to be a time convenient to you and you should be there to let him in.

If this doesn't work and he still insists on entering without permission suggest you change the locks telling him you lost the original keys. I think he would get the message

The language in the lease is something along the lines of "you must allow the landlord to enter the premises at all reasonable times."

Its pretty vague, and I really think they are just being nosy. They already know I am not happy about having to deal with them.

Very simple then use the wording "reasonable" to your advantage, sorry tomorrow at 9am is not reasonable as I am at work, however I will be available at 5pm for an hour etc etc. Reasonable works two ways not just reasonable to the landlord. I would still change the locks.

Would you let them into the house to look around? I'm curious what other people do in this type of situation.

As previously stated, you do not own the property, he does. He has every legal right to inspect to ensure that you as the renter are keeping his property in the manner he would expect. Put yourself in his position !

As for gardening, well he should not need access to the internal property for that. You asked for advice, you have got it, accept it or move on and pay legal advice. Sorry but you seem to want to find other people to back you up, but have you noticed you haven't had many answers. Accept the facts

Best to check your rental agreement and see what that stipulates. However saying that, I believe a landlord can enter the premises to carry out exactly he said to you about a house inspection, but it has to be a time convenient to you and you should be there to let him in.

If this doesn't work and he still insists on entering without permission suggest you change the locks telling him you lost the original keys. I think he would get the message

The language in the lease is something along the lines of "you must allow the landlord to enter the premises at all reasonable times."

Its pretty vague, and I really think they are just being nosy. They already know I am not happy about having to deal with them.

Very simple then use the wording "reasonable" to your advantage, sorry tomorrow at 9am is not reasonable as I am at work, however I will be available at 5pm for an hour etc etc. Reasonable works two ways not just reasonable to the landlord. I would still change the locks.

Best to check your rental agreement and see what that stipulates. However saying that, I believe a landlord can enter the premises to carry out exactly he said to you about a house inspection, but it has to be a time convenient to you and you should be there to let him in.

If this doesn't work and he still insists on entering without permission suggest you change the locks telling him you lost the original keys. I think he would get the message

It's my belief, because we had to do it, and that is a personal visit is required, the applicant submits their documentation then after checking, a biometric check/ test is carried out then documents sealed in a courier bag and sent to embassy VHS duties are then completed and decision now up to embassy

It's my belief, because we had to do it, and that is a personal visit is required, the applicant submits their documentation then after checking, a biometric check/ test is carried out then documents sealed in a courier bag and sent to embassy VHS duties are then completed and decision now up to embassy

I really cannot understand why people can continue to argue the pros and cons on this subject when it has been agreed there is not enough info forthcoming and the OP has gone to ground. I and others have attempted to sensibly explain how such a situation can occur, only for morons, class 1,2 and 3 start bringing the price of prostitutions into the scenario.

Try looking at it from a different angle and viewpoint, and try to understand the difficulties here. To start with you have not identified the nationality of the so called victim, although you have said your friends are Canadian. Nor have you said whether she was flying domestic or international.

If the victim was non Thai and flying internationally, then it is understandable that she would have to be prevented from flying due to the fact she had no passport and effectively she could not have cleared immigration at her intended destination. She would have been refused entry and her carrier would be legally bound to fly her back to Bangkok.

So the obvious course of action would be for her to go to her embassy in Thailand to get an emergency passport, but hold on, how can she re enter Thailand without her passport or any form of ID ? Next best thing and less of an hassle for authorities is to hold her at Swampy and get an embassy official to the airport, to issue an emergency passport.

The use of the word jail is from you, it's more than likely she was placed in a relatively comfortable holding facility. But at the end of the day, it will teach her to be vigilant in future.

This is false. When she arrived in Canada she could make a verbal declaration of citizenship and be interviewed to establish her citizenship of declaration. That's what a passport IS; a document in lieu of verbal declaration. The request for expediency, implicit or explicit in the passport is what makes it easier to travel with one than without.

The issue is there isn't a non stop flight, she would have to transit in Europe or elsewhere in Asia in order to get on a flight which lands in Canada. Those transit stops even within a secure zone require postive proof of identity before she would be allowed to board.

I think she may have been held in a sterile area at the airport and not behind bars.

Edit: Another problem most likely was the Embassy was closed on Good Friday and Ottawa would have been the main contact when the Embassy is closed.

You are quite right, however, and as I pointed out earlier, there is no mention of the victims nationality. The OP stated his friends were Canadian and from that comment everyone has assumed she is also Canadian. This lack of information just muddies the waters.

Am I correct in saying your ten year old daughter is being looked after by your parents in the Phils and you want to bring them from there to Thailand for a holiday ?

If that is correct, you being a Filipina should know the Immigration rules of your own country. However, I would suggest that your parents would have few problems as they would most certainly,not at their age, be included in the human trafficking scenario, your daughter tho could be a different ball game.

I would write a legal letter stating that you are the legal mother of ( give full name, passport number, copy of birth cert and your passport, her address etc in the Phil's) and that she is being looked after by your parents and has your permission to depart the Phil's, with your parents for a holiday with you in Thailand.

I would also state that whilst in Thailand you would be the one to cover her full financial costs and the address she will be staying in Thailand.

Good luck

I would build another small hotel/guesthouse

I have faith in the Russians/Chinese/Indians to visit Phuket if civil war rages in Bangkok...

There will be no civil war in Phuket/south Thailand because everyone seems to be 'yellow' with the exception of one person - me ....

The first juntion north of big c is the juntion to chiang kong to the left and to the right is the juntion back to town . Which is it or am i getting it the wrong side ?

If you came out of Big C you would need to do a U-turn in front of Central and head North, then turn right at the first set of lights. That is the road to Wiang Chai heading East. Then just follow AjarnP's directions.

If it is the same place I remember they have more Pomeranians than Goldens but it is worth a try.

Please, please ,please if they only have Poms don't buy one as a second option, useless little breed, nothing more than handbag dogs. I know my wife bought one !!! Cannot beat a true breed GR or Lab,

ok, it can be 10 mlllion baht,

was only throwing a number every one can handle,

feel free to multiply it

Using a small 1m Baht as your groundbreaker could Indicate your financial situation. And it doesn't look good.

Always pays to get medical examination in cases such as this.

Fakers, there are plenty on both side of the spectrum. Plenty of fake ladies and guys. Plenty of guys that act all nice screw the girl and dump her after their free of charge sex holiday. Plenty of girls acting all nice but going for money alone.

So yea fakers are bad but will always be there.

I agree

Hi Rain, now I am not trying to put you down, but unfortunately you come from a nation that is internationally known for its scammers. Go onto YouTube and search "online dating Filipina scammers" and you will probably be shocked at how many items are there. Go to many countries in the world, and see how many Filipina are there working illegally without visas, and that is another form of scamming.

Why is the OP paying for the caregiver and not the family ?

Sorry my friend that statement is totally irrelevant. Can I request you apologise and retract.

I had the exact same set up in Manila, and the same issues. The problem turned out to be two fold, the actual pressure setting and an air leak at the inlet. In my case the on off on off was due to the pressure dropping below the preset pressure which was aggravated by the air Inlet. I got totally pissed off calling the suppliers who constantly sent people to sort but couldn't. In the end I did it myself.

If you listen to the channel that gives news on updates for Truevisions...it's because they are changing to HDTV/digital...and it only affects satellite for

now. On Monday the 21st. the network will be down from one minute past midnight until 10 a.m. Cable subscribers will get the same updates soon. Whole country changing to digital.

Why, so we can have 500 channels of Thai soaps and variety shows?

Yes that makes good sense considering 99% of the population are probably Thai and very much in the majority. However I think Truevisions should be applauded, they have a huge amount of non Thai material and I have not seen better in HK, China, Japan etc.

Their only downside in my opinion was losing the EPL the rest is fine.

At to further keep things straight, the OP now states in a post today he was divorced from a Filipina 5 years ago even though 'Honky' says regarding his Chinese wife "Eight years ago we married."

Oops you are correct that was a typo I missed should read fifteen not five. Aplogies