Dan SG

Buy an existing condo that you can see - as others have said too much uncertainty with an off plan in thailand and I think you can get a better discount with a re sale if you find the right seller. Sending the money is easy - you send in foreign currency (so GBP) in your case you can see the banks rough conversion on the day so you shouldn't need to overspend. Note it is only the purchase price and not the taxes that need to come from overseas

The WHT only applied if the tenant is a company and it is paid to a non resident. A tenant renting as an individual would not be subject to WHT. In any case, this would not apply in your case. THB30k a month in rent will probably not be taxable as there is a personal allowance before you start paying any tax. As others have said many don't declare their rental income but obviously that is a personal risk you would be taking and governments access to info is improving.

Are you sure this is right? There would be no cash changing hands so why would the value need to be transferred into Thailand? What about if it was just sold by the beneficiaries and provided the transfer taxes paid the cash is transferred out of Thailand?

Have any of you fellow Bangkok condo owners received requests from tenants to pay for their hotel accommodation while they choose not to stay in the condo until it's confirmed safe? What is the approach you've taken?

Yes, TiT and it doesn't work like that - unlike most countries that tax the gain, Thailand basically taxes the sales proceeds, so the cost of acquisition and any renovation costs are irrelevant. There is a set formula to calculate the income tax based on the appraised value and length of ownership.

I don't think this is right. If the cheque has not been drawn, it can be cancelled.....say it got lost would it not be able to be cancelled? In fact, I've asked the bank the exact same question and they have confirmed it can be cancelled. However, if your buyer cancelled the cheque then you would of course have a legal remedy. I think the chance of someone going through that entire process only to cancel after the chanote was changed would be so slim and practically never happens

I too have terrible sleep (I never have trouble falling asleep but wake up in the middle of the night most nights) but I would personally resist taking anything. I just try and put at the back of my mind that a bad nights sleep will ruin me the next day and just try to get a nap after lunch which tends to get me through the whole day!

Yes I totally agree in the past but you need to understand where things are heading to understand why its not worth taking any risks now - financial transactions are all becoming digital and tax authorities are working with central banks so they see transaction real time. So, it will be very hard to hide anything in the future which opens up risk around what happened in the past - the tax authorities have the right to go back many years if they suspect someone of tax evasion; in your case all they need to see are your bank statements and they'll see past monthly payments into your account. It's either salary or rent. Either way they can tax it plus interest, penalties etc.

Because despite what you think, the tax authority now have loads of big data at their disposal that they could easily use to identify people that rent out their property! Not worth not declaring especially if most your costs cover the rent.

Hi, I think the 100k deduction is just a general deduction anyone can take to encourage home ownership - irrespective of whether they have a home they live in or rent out (sort of like what the UK had years ago - MIRAS). If you're renting out a property you have two options - either a deemed deduction (30%) or actual expenses - based on my discussions with tax advisors the interest would be an expense of renting out the property and in theory deductible. However, they always recommend taking a deemed deduction since a claim for actual expenses will be scrutinised and require documentation etc. Of course, if you can support it - which I am sure you can - then no reason to not claim if gives you a better outcome but given the uncertainty at the moment re offshore income remitted etc you may not want the tax office sniffing around your tax return but that really depends on your circumstances.

Dee money (sorry response wasn't clear)

I don't think anyone would risk using them anymore....have you seen the reviews? seems like a big scam. For a large amount I would never risk cash and possible issues with customs.....go through your bank.....bangkok bank process my international payments despite many people saying you need to fall in a certain category e.g. have a work permit etc

Many thanks for clarifying that CM. I had always wondered what happens over the weekend

I'm not sure if it's just a glitch with XE but seems to be moving downwards quite a bit over the weekend....hoping it doesn't start Monday down and continue that trend.....have a large transfer this week

Agree. Basically, all they have done is preserve the old rule that income earned in a previous tax year and remitted in the current year is not subject to tax; that does not mean that income earned in current year and remitted in the current is not taxable. You would think if someone has the funds to qualify for this visa they also have the funds to always be one year ahead of themselves in generating passive income. What is not clear is how the rules would apply if they move to residence based taxation - in theory, the remittance rules should trump residency but we'll need to see how they draft the law - if they ever manage it.