
stuandjulie
-
Posts
392 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by stuandjulie
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
It is their very subtle way of chasing people from what they consider is their patch of beach
-
3
-
20 hours ago, BestB said:
So according to this poster all comps yes including all the multinationals can no longer have foreign directors? You do of course realise how insane that sounds and all will be packing up. But welcome to believe an annonymous poster of what he thought he heard or understood ????
Spelt anonymous BTW, anonymous how? what do you want, a written introduction? Also it seems my hearing is suspect as is my understanding. Not sure exactly where I mentioned multinationals, I was told this was Companies that own land, believe what I was told or not, I couldn't care less.
-
23 hours ago, stevenl said:
My guess would be the new rule is for dormant companies, in other words companies that were used to circumvent ownership rules.
For active companies with land most likely no changes.
That was asked at the Land Office, the answer was doesn't matter.
-
On 10/10/2019 at 12:55 PM, LivinginKata said:
Need to look into this as I am a 49% owner of a company that owns land.
Edit .... I suppose we can still be shareholder. Just have no control under those new rule.
As far as I know being a shareholder is still ok and breathing the precious Thai air is ok for now. Of course if you are not a director you can't get a 1 year multi entry Non O B Visa. I believe now.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
A friend of mine (Aussie) was in the land office the other day as they want to sell their house of the last 15 years, they went through the generally accepted route of a Company to own the land and house with them as 49% shareholders and directors.
Please lets not get into the old arguments of whether that is the best way of doing it etc. that is not what this is about.
They were told that as from next year NO foreigners would be allowed to be Directors of Companies that own land, This has been confirmed since by my lawyer.
Has anyone else heard this? If it is true then it could mean a lot of issues for home owners.
-
2
-
2
-
- Popular Post
19 minutes ago, roadrunner32 said:Wrong! I'm holding a non Imm O visa based on retirement with one year of validity, and I do not need to leave the country within 90 days.
Wrong ! You have a retirement extension of a Non o visa, as such you just have to report to immigration every 90 days, if you just have the Non O then you have to visa run every 90 days.
-
4
-
Ao Yon on the East Coast
-
On 9/30/2019 at 1:29 AM, newnative said:
Nice to start the day with a joke. '...the final nail in Pattaya's coffin'. 55555. No coffin that I can see--let alone any nails in it. Quite laughable that you think Pattaya's robust growth these past years has been because of British tourists and now that the Pound is sinking Pattaya will, too.
In reality, the growth continues. Several new, large condo projects have been announced to join those already under construction. Amari's all-suites hotel addition is done and the new Ozo Hotel next door is nearing completion. Several hotels are remodeling and adding features--such as A-01 on Beach Road. The city itself is finally doing some infrastructure work.
Recently I mentioned that in Wong Amat near Cape Dara an old low-rise resort on a large tract of land has been bulldozed and cleared. Drove by yesterday and saw construction fences going up and a sign announcing 'Grande Centre Point 2. From the photo it's a large high-rise hotel resort project. I guess Grande Centre Point at T21 is doing so well--even though Pattaya is apparently near death--that another hotel is on the way. If posters can tear themselves away from Soi 6 and Walking Street they'll see there's a lot positive going on.
Seems to go against this
https://forum.thaivisa.com/topic/1124026-lack-of-european-visitors-the-cause-of-thailands-tourism-woes-says-hotelier/page/2/?tab=comments#comment-14581417
-
16 hours ago, JamesBlond said:
Except that's not at all the way it is. They are bound by the fact that if the result is not enacted, Britain's international reputation will be in shreds, parliament will lose all credibility, the foundations of participative democracy will be utterly undermined, and there will be rioting in the streets.
'Not legally binding' is just caviling. Everyone knows a referendum is morally binding otherwise it would not be held, and the result will stand unless there are legal reasons why the vote was invalid. As there are no such reasons, the vote is as good as binding.
As good as is not binding then is it? Your whole comment does not alter the facts and I was talking facts not what someone thinks of it !
-
Might as well be Shanghai
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, JamesBlond said:Madness. It's not for the judiciary to tell parliament what to do. The judiciary has now politicised itself when it must be kept out of politics. Who made or influenced this decision? One little old lady? What if that judge was politically biased? Whether or not this particular woman is biased is besides the point - the point is that a court's decision, swayed by who-knows-what personal motives, is being allowed to dictate British politics and British culture for decades to come. Did the judges take into consideration the fact that the purpose of the proroguement is to defend the lawful enactment of the British public's lawful referendum decision, which would otherwise be severely jeopardised?
This is just insane.
Both Brexiteers and remainers seem to forget facts, a referendum is NOT lawful, it is advisory and as we are a Parliamentary Democracy no Government is legally bound to abide by a referendums decision, sorry if you don't like that (either side) but that is the way it is.
-
5
-
1
-
1
-
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:This is terrible news. I suppose the verdict here essentially takes us back to 1997 when the then PM John Major prorogued parliament for 3 weeks to stop an inquiry into his govts corruption. So by the fruit of the poisoned tree principles anything that took place after this illegal act effectively didn't happen. All jails will be emptied(except for the few lifers convicted before 1997), all buildings made after 1997 will be tore down as planning has been deemed null and void. At least we can smoke inside pubs again, as from 20 minutes ago.
The ramifications of this will be earth shattering. All to undo the democratic will and referendum result voted by 17.4 million people. Let the madness begin!
Quite possibly the biggest load of BS in a long time
-
3
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
On 5/1/2018 at 8:25 AM, Jingthing said:
I don't think it's that simple.
If I went out and had sex with a woman tonight, I would still be gay.
Don't want to start an argument but wouldn't that make you Bi ?
-
- Popular Post
35 minutes ago, Fex Bluse said:@emptypockets I disagree.
I maintain a residence on Wireless road.
From your comments, I would guess that you are not on speaking terms with many wealthy farang in Thailand.
Because they largely share the OP's observations.
These are guys who have NO financial issues, in any country anywhere on earth.
Do you know any such farangs? Or, are you taking about pensioners?
You maintain a residence in the city, how very Victorian of you, normal people have houses or flats or apartments ! Do you retire to your Country Estate for the Summer by any chance?
-
1
-
3
-
On 9/4/2019 at 1:51 PM, DrDave said:
Wow, starting at 3.5 million baht for a 28 square meter studio shoebox with no kitchenette. Based on the websites promoting this property, it appears to be aimed at the Russian market.
So it is a time share on the 'Beach' at the <deleted>tiest part of Chalong, right next to the power boats and their noise, smell of fuel every day, have a walk on the beach from my shoebox in a metre of <deleted>ty mud. No thanks
-
On 8/30/2019 at 6:48 AM, MartiniMan said:
Cigarette smokers have a hard time getting an erection and cannot perform as long in bed
Just say this a few times within earshot
Sometimes they tell you to shut up but you just look into those weak addicted eyes and continue lambasting
If he does anything more he gets done and in the jail house so you cannot lose this one just bully him till he cries and goes home very easy to win against the weak boyWow what a charmer you are, you must be real fun to go for a drink with, I mean just bully him, really?
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, sunnyboy2018 said:Just as there wasnt during the Brexit campaign. Remainers just used it after the fact of Leave result. Nor when the NI good Friday peace agreement was signed was there any mention of Europe.
The Good Friday Agreement, signed in 1998, brought an end to sectarian conflict and established power-sharing in Northern Ireland. The agreement assumes EU membership for both the UK and Ireland and makes provisions for the UK and Irish governments to co-operate on EU matters. Taken from here https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainers/ireland-brexit So we were both in the EU as we both joined at the same time in 1973, therefore not relevant then in the slightest.
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
42 minutes ago, Pilotman said:well I must say that despite the odds, so far, he's not doing an bad job at all.
Yep H2S looking like being cancelled, not the 20,000 extra police promised, pound still falling, trying to suspend parliament on the sly.
Doing a great job.
-
4
-
2
-
- Popular Post
Basically got fed up of rice and food of poor quality loaded down with msg, sugar and chilli's to mask everything. That is not being negative BTW it is just one mans opinion.
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Always tickles me when expats bang on about how cold it is back home, so what if it is cold ? As a Scottish comedian said "there's no such thing as bad weather, only wrong clothing" lol.
-
2
-
1
-
1 hour ago, sunnyboy2018 said:
Its Safer than London or the USA. Whats your point?
The point is it isn't safer, some 1,700 road deaths per year as opposed to 20,000 and that is died at the scene <deleted>.
We were burgled 3 times in 10 years even though we had 2 dogs, security cameras and metal window guards, wife was assaulted twice walking from the shops, police response ? Thailand not good for lady walking alone !
Most crime in Thailand is not even reported due to total lack of interest from the Bib unless something in it for them.
So safer, exactly how?
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, mok199 said:
And all along Thai tourism thought tourists wanted more malls....Should have been protecting those beaches Khun Ratchakidpakderm....Its always been about the beaches ,everyone but TAT knew that....
Problem is you cant make money from sand so they are not interested, no thought that sand is why the tourists come.
-
1
-
-
On 7/21/2019 at 11:35 AM, steven100 said:
yes … totally agree, these guys see the AUD & GBP fall 10-20% and all of a sudden it's posts about going back home.
Well sorry but a house only costs 500k-1 mil to build in Thailand, in Australia and I expect the UK you are lucky to get a garden shed for that, a taxi can take you 20kms for $10.... food at the markets is still way cheaper than Australia. Oh and the government will tax you as much as they can, and you will need a licence to fart … well in Auss you just about do.
No thank's …. they can have both those miserable shitholes... lol
\if you want to live in the sticks it might, try Phuket lol.
-
19 hours ago, musicscene said:
Same Same in Hua Hin Very little rain We still have to water the garden
So heading for a drought and you are still watering the garden ?
-
1
-
"Sweet talking farang ripped me off to the tune of 1.2 million baht", says Thai woman
in Bangkok News
Posted
Not sure how many "sales girls" have 1.2m THB to just lend to someone.