mgb

Maybe you should read the national act first.
A consolidated version in english is available here:
https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/445774

The magic words for renunciation of thai citizenship are "if he or she desire".

Involuntary losing thai citizenship is only possible for naturalized thais in special circumstances.

It doesn't matter if she need your support.
If you would support her she would qualify as dependent.

http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d0f130d507a50841013647b1952d878e6c8cd613.e34KaxiLc3eQc40LaxqMbN4PaNePe0?text=&docid=49231&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=664661

A printout could help.

Take a look at Chen C-200/02.
The child and eu citizen has also the right of unconditional stay for 3 month due to article 6 of the directive and therefore Chen is also applicable for a short stay.

There is a thai mechanic in Pattaya who advertise via bahtsold about his work on Proton cars and Proton parts in stock.
" Located across from Big C on Sukhumvit Rd. or highway Rt. 3. Caddy corner from B Quick. Call Ton @ 0877465906 "

6 hours ago, JoeW said:

As for their quality, I would give them another few years before considering them at the same level as other manufacturers.

Many of their cars are facing basic quality issues such as leaking door seals, breaking transmissions, paint fading, rust, etc.

Issues which are not taken care of by their dealers urgently leaving people completely in the dark regarding their car.

I read owner reports from the UK about leaking seals in the first series but not more.
Can you link to a owner report about breaking transmissions, paint fading, rust?

IND can only refer to article 12 of the schengen border code.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32016R0399

Due to the schengen rules the passport holder has to prove in a other way if a exit stamp is missing.
A entry stamp from Thailand afterwards is a good proof.

Are you talking about a application for a Aufenthaltstitel "Familienangehöriger" in Austria.
If yes take a look here:
https://www.help.gv.at/Portal.Node/hlpd/public/content/12/Seite.120401.html 
 

As far as I know only Ryanair want a passport for the check-in for a local flight inside the common travel area.

I think the question is if the wife can reach the international gate from a so to say domestic flight (Belfast) without passing the border control.
If yes there is nothing needed for a thai.

http://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/Transit Visas

I guess the problem is to walk from a domestic flight to the international area.

At the bottom of the referred internet sites are links to the portal de immigracion.
There are simply orders in place in Spain.

For the eu citizen
http://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/residence/documents-formalities/registering-residence/spain/index_en.htm

For the non-eu family member
http://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/residence/documents-formalities/non-eu-family-members-residence-card/spain/index_en.htm
 

Article 6 2004/38
1.1. Union citizens shall have the right of residence on the territory of another Member State for a period of up to three months without any conditions or any formalities other than the requirement to hold a valid identity card or passport.

2. The provisions of paragraph 1 shall also apply to family members in possession of a valid passport who are not nationals of a Member State, accompanying or joining the Union citizen

What are eea citizen and family member doing than? Right residing.
What is the ECJ talking in Metock section 99? Right residing.
Where is your understanding problem?

The songthaews driving the red route in the picture from pattaya46 mostly have route number 6 written at the side.
The songthaews hanging around near Balihai pier mostly have route number 4.
Obviously a lot of drivers care about the old routes.
The new routes published in december nobody care about.
 

What is a eea national doing in a member state which is not his home country?

1 hour ago, 7by7 said:

Metock is about the rights of non EEA national partners of EEA nationals who are residing in an EEA state other than that of which the EEA national is a citizen.

Metock C-127/8 section 99

The answer to the second question must therefore be that Article 3(1) of Directive 2004/38 must be interpreted as meaning that a national of a non-member country who is the spouse of a Union citizen residing in a Member State whose nationality he does not possess and who accompanies or joins that Union citizen benefits from the provisions of that directive, irrespective of when and where their marriage took place and of how the national of a non-member country entered the host Member State.

Read:

irrespective of how entered the host Member State.

1 hour ago, wpcoe said:

They appeared in December (2016) at the same time the new routes were announced

The route numbers at the front appeared in December.
They were always there at the side of the songthaews beside the big numbers.

What do you think the route numbers at the site of the songthaew beside the big numbers are good for?

16 hours ago, Pattaya46 said:

Real routes are mainly theses ones:

How are the real routes numbered?

I guess the red one is route number 6.

On 25.4.2017 at 7:00 PM, 7by7 said:

To take advantage of Article 6, first you have to legally enter the country concerned!

Say who? Take a look at Metock  C-127/8.

A 5 year old would understand it if there is enough time to think about it. Your mother-in-law was not the onliest visa applicant.
I guess the papers weren't fully read and the dates at the application form were misunderstood.
Now the embassy could only cancel the visa and issue a new one with the correct data.

The normal way would be 23/06/17 in field 29 and 22/07/17 in field 30.
In field 24 two entries and 17 in field 25.
It looks like the embassy didn't understand the travel plan.
 

Which dates were written to field 29 and 30 at the schengen application form?