Globalres

Indeed they will try to block it. Also, independent research has found traces of plasmid DNA in some batches of the vaccine. In other words those fragments were not removed 100% during production and purification. But this news is also suppressed. Eventually, this will come out in the wash. Just like Pfizer who first refused to act on a FOIA request for further information, then said OK - BUT since it would be so time consuming they needed 75 YEARS to comply with the request!!! This was overruled and Pfizer were told they were given 2 yrs or so. I guess we haven’t heard yet about the outcome of this info. The entire Covid ordeal stinks to the high heavens!

Yes.

Generally speaking, that name would be spelt as Olof and not Olaf in Sweden. So I doubt he was/is Swedish.

Yes indeed, it’s a fast slippery slope to 1984. However extremely difficult to handle. Where is the boundary set? I agree, I started feeling uncomfortable with all the banning and censorship during Covid. Never in my life have I seen such obvious “1984” “thought police” in action as then. Scientists and doctors who previously were heralded as international leaders within their fields were not only silenced but lost their jobs/licenses, just for having a different opinion than what the government wanted. This, IMO set a dangerous precedent. Obviously, the more you ban the more you will find resistance. The problem is where is the line between acceptable or not? Who makes the decision about where to set that line? Furthermore, who makes the decision about what is acceptable. Once it’s acceptable to imprison the old grandpa for making his opinion heard but is otherwise a peaceful person, it’s not far away to the Gulag. Never in my life could I have imagined that in our modern society where we are told to accept/embrace all versions of sexual behaviours, be frightened of addressing a person with the wrong pronoun, of now having to read about pregnant “people” instead of pregnant “women”, that our climate crisis is imminent etc, but not be permitted to accept/prefer personal choices when it comes to health care and neither be permitted to have our personal feelings about war/politics without being called a racist. where has civility gone, where we used to agree to disagree? It’s gone too far left, 1984 is here.

Yes, once upon a time facts told us that the earth was flat. How long time did it take humans to finally see the light? Who is the “alternative”, Fox News or CNN. Guess it’s in the eye of the beholder. So called scientific facts today based on large trials costing millions of dollars are generally paid for by the company hoping to reap the financial benefits from the positive outcome. These trials are called the gold standard so all gullible people believe it without even questioning HOW the trial was run. How was the control group treated? With saline? Or with something else that would guarantee a favourable outcome for the investor? When they finally did the trial on Ivermectin, the experimental group were given half the recommended dose AND that was initiated on the 5th day off covid, rather than the first day. Of course they had to show that Ivermectin was useless otherwise the vaccine would never have seen the light of day. The world of drugs today has become a dirty business, sadly.

Anyone who doesn’t think like you is apparently a conspiracy group. The “science” that was all over msm was bought and paid for. Scientists/doctors who had an opposite opinion were silenced or lost their jobs/licenses. Science is never settled and to disallow continuous discussions from both sides was/is heinous. This behaviour from government/3-letter agencies/big pharma only created distrust and confusion. This distrust will remain for quite some time and is well earned.

Yes, his personal experience. Many others can handle it well. Same as alcohol. Should substances be deemed illegal because some people can’t handle it? On the other hand, how far do we go in protecting each and everyone? We have alcohol and cannabis on the one hand and heavier drugs on the other. When is it a nanny state and when is it acceptable to all? Where and WHO draws the line? Who judges the judges?

Well, chatGPT has this to say: E-cigarettes (or vaping) are generally considered less harmful than traditional cigarettes, but they are not risk-free. Here’s a breakdown: 1. Comparative Harm • Traditional Cigarettes: Burn tobacco, producing thousands of harmful chemicals, including tar and carbon monoxide, which are major contributors to lung and heart disease, cancer, and other health issues. • E-Cigarettes: Deliver nicotine through a vaporized liquid, avoiding combustion. This means they typically have fewer toxic substances compared to cigarette smoke. However, the aerosols in e-cigarettes still contain harmful chemicals, such as heavy metals, volatile organic compounds, and some carcinogens. 2. Nicotine Addiction • Both products deliver nicotine, a highly addictive substance that can harm developing brains (adolescents and young adults) and increase heart rate and blood pressure. • While e-cigarettes can deliver nicotine in varying amounts, the potential for addiction remains a concern. 3. Long-Term Risks • Cigarettes: Long-term risks are well-documented, including lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cardiovascular disease. • E-Cigarettes: Long-term effects are not fully known yet because they are relatively new. However, early evidence suggests risks like lung irritation and potential heart effects. 4. Smoking Cessation • Some studies suggest e-cigarettes can help smokers quit, especially when combined with other cessation aids or support. However, they are not FDA-approved for this purpose, and some users end up using both cigarettes and e-cigarettes (dual use), which is harmful. 5. Public Health Concern • For non-smokers, especially youth, e-cigarettes pose a significant risk due to their appeal and potential to lead to nicotine addiction and, in some cases, smoking traditional cigarettes. Bottom Line: E-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes for current smokers, especially if they fully switch to vaping. However, they are not safe and should not be used by non-smokers, youth, or those who are nicotine-free. If you’re considering quitting smoking, speak to a healthcare professional for guidance on safer, evidence-based methods.

Maybe you could use the story as inspiration and write children’s’ books about it and end up as the new J.K. Rowling!

It’s a cute story! 😻

You can find NAC at any pharmacy. The OPEP device I bought from Lazada.

I have COPD since many years, so I understand what you’re saying. Take NAC (N-acetyl cysteine) 600 mg twice a day. This will loosen up the mucus in your lungs and make it easier to get rid of. Added bonus is helps the liver to produce more glutathione (the mother of all anti oxidants). Buy an OPEP device, a pipe-like looking thing with a metal ball that vibrates when you exhale into the pipe. This causes a cough reflex which helps to get rid of mucus. its when mucus remain in your lungs that you get more prone to infections,m so getting rid of it is key. Also vitamin E is good for the lungs. Get the natural vit E called tocopherols and tochotrianols, not the lab made one ending in acetate. This has kept me and my pulmonologist happy. additionally, get molecular hydrogen pills and dissolve in water, excellent for lung health. Many science papers on that. You can google molecular hydrogen and lung disease, you’ll get tons of references. NAC acts instantly! Best of luck.

I have read that photobiomodulation (red/infrared light therapy) helps. You’ll get plenty info if you google it.

What kind of CBD are you using for sleep? I have tried a “full spectrum CBD oil” for about a month and have had no success at all, except vivid dreams.

An intellectually vacuous analogy

I am certainly no expert in this field at all, but I do question whom is actually giving us all this information: eg. The majority of National Institutes of Health grants go to conflicted researchers. the FDA drug approval department is 75% funded by pharma. In other words the FDA is funded by the very institutions that they are supposed to inspect. The USDA guideline committee on Nutrition has 95% of the advisors funded by food or pharma. The American diabetics Association accepts money from Coca Cola, this association dictates the standard of care for Diabetis. Industries that let out fluoride has municipalities paying for fluoride to be inserted into our tap water. Lucky for said industry not to have to pay for removing it themselves. It was now proven that fluoride lowers IQ in children and several states in the US is forbidding the addition of fluoride to household water. All I’m saying is that I am sad that I cannot trust the scientists these days and I repeat, they prove what they are paid to prove. We must look at who is paying the scientists! Pfizer scientists told us that we would not catch COVID if we took their vaccines - you know the rest of this story. To name another “discipline” statistics: here’s another one that can prove anything you want. There seems to be no honour these days, just mass media spewing out what they are paid to say, the one who has the most money gets their message out. Nobody is searching for the truth - just what they want to see which obviously in the end is money.

Scientist prove what they are paid to prove - in many cases

Why don’t we start by cleaning land and oceans from all plastic? Why don’t we start finding a better way for industry to get rid of their toxins rather than spilling out in our rivers and lakes and sea? Why don’t we find a better way than spraying all our crops with glyphosate? Why don’t we invest in new household water cleaning plants instead of recycling antibiotics, estrogen and toxins in household water? Why don’t we stop vaccinating our livestock with antibiotics, growth hormones that we later consume? Why don’t we feed our livestock with what they are supposed to eat. If they were permitted to eat what they normally eat there would be less belching and farting, that some people are apt to blaim on climate change. Why do we keep using monocrop systems that deplete our soil of minerals? Why do we continue to use artificial nitrogen to fertilise our soils, when we know it kills many minerals? Why do we still let pharma companies judge their own science results, thus allowing more and more toxins in so called medicine? Why to we allow chemtrails in trying to create rain? All of the above is harmful to all living beings. You are all screaming about the population numbers being to high, yet you complain about allowing birth control. Why not educate ALL population about birth control? Why don’t we correct our own living environment before throwing money at stuff that we don’t really know how well it will work? All the above is within our means to do, why don’t we do it? 💰💰💰

I take nicotinamide mononucleotide, nicotinamide being a derivative of vit B3. It assists in the creation of NAD+ which “communicates” and helps to create ATP (the body’s energy currency). NAD+ has a “communication line” with ATP and directs it to the areas of the body most in need of ATP in cell restoration. It is considered to be a “longevity” assistant, by helping to repair problems at the cell level. I personally buy from iHerb which is more guaranteed to have “clean” products.

Stunning family!

Maybe it’s time to find a “holistic/functional” doctor?

I absolutely love this hotel. Have stayed tons of times over 25 yrs. some of the staff are still there, incredible. The service is impeccable, the treatment and care to details is outstanding. It feels like a home more than a hotel.

The problem seems to be who decides what is “disinformation”? It’s like “who judges the judges”?

I believe that having less patients per day is more quality time for each patient thus promoting correct and caring diagnosis. Too often patients are treated as inorganic blobs on an assembly line.