Social Media

As global warming causes shorter snow seasons, ski resorts across Europe are facing an uncertain future. In Västerås, central Sweden, Thomas Ohlander of the outdoor adventure business Do The North, is struggling to predict when the snow will come. “To schedule a trip, we have to be sure of snow,” he explains, noting that the date for the season's start has been moving further back each year. In 1988, the local ice-skating club recorded its first day on frozen lakes as November 4th. This year, it is predicted to be December 4th. This troubling pattern is not confined to Sweden. Across Europe, there are growing concerns about the future of winter sports. In France, resorts like Alpe du Grand Serre and Grand Puy have announced they will not open this winter due to financial and environmental challenges. According to geographer Pierre Alexandre Metral from Grenoble University, since the 1970s, 180 resorts have permanently closed. Alpe du Grand Serre lacked funds to become a year-round destination, while Grand Puy was forced to shut down because inconsistent snowfall has led to fewer visitors and significant financial losses. This trend of closures is well-established: as snow lines retreat, lower-altitude resorts are unable to sustain their operations. In Spain’s Sierra Guadarrama, the Club Alpino, opened in the 1940s, has also been closed for good, often remaining snow-free. Globally, this decline is reflected in the sustainability of Winter Olympics locations. A recent study found that of the 21 former host sites, only one—Sapporo—could still feasibly host by the end of the century. The Beijing Olympics in 2022 relied entirely on artificial snow. Johan Eliasch, president of the International Ski and Snowboard Federation, warns that the ski industry faces an existential crisis. Richard Sinclair, CEO of Sno, one of Britain’s largest ski holiday providers, echoes these concerns. “The demand is for ‘snow surety,’ which means more pressure on higher altitude resorts like Valle Thorens and more reliance on destinations like the US and Canada,” Sinclair says. He fears that the affordability of skiing, which began to improve in the 1980s, may be reversed. “I don’t want to see skiing become the preserve of the rich again. Decarbonisation and sustainability have to be the way forward.” Despite the bleak outlook, some analysts see hope in innovation. German winter sports consultant Karl-Christoph Schrahe highlights new technologies, such as snow-making machines that use water flow to generate electricity. In areas like Sauerland in Germany, where the maximum elevation is just 843 meters, snow machines have become essential for survival. Sauerland, catering primarily to local and Dutch skiers, uses over half a million cubic meters of water to create snow. Schrahe acknowledges that artificial snow may appear harmful to the environment but insists the broader picture is positive. “Economically, it can work. In Germany, no additives are allowed, so it’s clean water. The water is not lost, it returns to the ecosystem. Resorts are using renewable energy. You get rural jobs and a big return on the investment.” Other resorts have taken similar approaches. In Slovenia, snow-making machines are supported by investments in solar and hydro power plants. Matej Kandare, director of the Slovenia Outdoor Association, emphasizes the importance of these innovations, stating that every euro spent generates six in return for the economy. Additionally, Slovenia is investing in summer activities such as cycling and hiking, which are now essential for keeping resorts viable year-round. However, not everyone believes snow machines are the solution. Vanda Bonardo, co-president of Italian environmental group Legambiente, criticizes the heavy dependence on artificial snow in Italy. “It’s not a sustainable practice,” Bonardo argues. “It is bad for the environment and a waste of public money. It’s time to think about a new model of winter tourism.” Back in Sweden, Ohlander remains optimistic. While the future of snow sports may be uncertain, he believes that innovation goes beyond technology. “We try to bring something new every year,” he says, pointing to a new expedition planned for this winter. “Up there, Sweden has a small herd of musk ox that are rarely ever sighted. It’ll take a week to ski in, pulling everything we need on sleds, then search for them.” Based on a report from The Guardian 2024-10-12

A US Army soldier, Cole Bridges, has been sentenced to 14 years in prison after pleading guilty to attempting to help the Islamic State (ISIS) ambush his fellow soldiers. Bridges, who is from Stow, Ohio, had conversations with an undercover FBI agent whom he believed to be a terrorist, offering advice and assistance in planning attacks. During a nearly five-hour hearing in Manhattan federal court, Bridges, 24, asked to be given the maximum possible sentence of 40 years. "Honestly, I do believe that I deserve the maximum sentence," Bridges told Judge Lewis J. Liman. "I know what I did was wrong," he said, expressing deep regret. He added that he would carry this regret "for as long as I live." Judge Liman acknowledged that Bridges had shown signs of remorse and emphasized that the soldier had not had direct communications with actual ISIS operatives. Liman also noted that Bridges was "not a hardened criminal." Despite Bridges' request for the maximum sentence, the judge handed down a 14-year prison term, stressing that it would serve as a deterrent to others in the military who might consider turning against their comrades. At the time of the crime, Bridges, also known as Cole Gonzales, was serving as a cavalry scout with the Third Infantry Division at Fort Stewart, Georgia. He had joined the Army in September 2019, but about a year before enlisting, he began to explore online jihadist propaganda and express support for ISIS on social media. Court documents revealed that about a year into his military service, Bridges started communicating with an undercover FBI operative posing as an ISIS supporter. In these exchanges, Bridges voiced frustration with the US military and indicated a desire to aid the terror group. He provided advice on military combat tactics, portions of a US Army training manual, and even suggested targets in New York City, all with the understanding that this information would be used by ISIS. Bridges went further by instructing the undercover agent on how to carry out attacks on US troops in the Middle East. He provided diagrams of military maneuvers aimed at maximizing casualties among US forces and offered guidance on fortifying ISIS encampments to ambush US Special Forces. He even suggested wiring buildings with explosives to kill American troops. In January 2021, Bridges sent the FBI operative a video of himself in his Army body armor, standing in front of a flag commonly associated with ISIS, making a gesture of support for the terrorist group. Shortly afterward, he sent another propaganda video, in which he used a voice manipulator to narrate support for a planned ISIS ambush on US forces. While Bridges' attorney, Sabrina Shroff, argued for leniency, citing that he had been lured into the plot by undercover agents and was struggling with depression and isolation from his family, the court focused on the severity of his actions. Judge Liman referred to the "most chilling evidence" as being Bridges' willingness to provide advice on minimizing casualties during an attack. Nonetheless, the judge acknowledged that Bridges had shown relief after his arrest, realizing he had been dealing with the FBI rather than actual terrorists. Based on a report from NYP 2024-10-14

Donald Trump recently found himself in an awkward situation after repeating a claim that he had been awarded Michigan’s "Man of the Year." During a speech where he criticized Detroit, Trump proudly held up a printout of an article from *The Oakland Press* as proof of the accolade. He told the audience that his staff had successfully located evidence of the award from 11 years earlier. “It was like 19 years ago. It was a long time. But I was honored. And guess what? They found it. I was,” Trump said, holding up the article. He pointed to a specific part of the article, stating, “The county party gave Trump the Man of the Year award at the dinner, too.” However, fact-checkers quickly pointed out inconsistencies in Trump's claim. A report from *The Washington Post* revealed that the Oakland County Republican Party, which hosted the event Trump referred to, had never given out a "Man of the Year" award. Despite Trump's repeated assertions, made at least 20 times during his presidency, the award simply did not exist. Adding to the embarrassment, the article Trump presented to back up his story was not from 19 years ago, as he had claimed, but from the previous year. Following Trump’s remarks, the article was swiftly updated with a correction. Under the heading “EDITOR’S NOTE,” the correction explained that a reference in the article regarding the 2013 award had been inaccurate. Trump was the keynote speaker at the 2013 dinner in Novi, which drew a record crowd. He was not honored as Man of the Year.” The note further clarified that Trump had been honored at the 2023 dinner as "Man of the Decade," a separate distinction from the false claim about 2013. The *Washington Post* added that a former Republican congressman involved in organizing the 2013 event confirmed Trump had not received any award that year. He also affirmed that no "Man of the Year" awards had ever been given out by the group. Trump’s statement not only caused confusion over the nature of his supposed award, but his broader speech also attracted criticism, especially his remarks about Detroit. During the same address, Trump warned that if Kamala Harris were to win the election, “the whole country will end up being like Detroit.” This remark provoked backlash from Detroit’s Mayor Mike Duggan and other prominent Michigan Democrats. Duggan, eager to counter Trump's grim portrayal of the city, tweeted a strong rebuttal: “Detroit just hosted the largest NFL Draft in history, the Tigers are back in the playoffs, the Lions are headed to the Super Bowl, crime is down and our population is growing.” Despite Trump’s persistent narrative of being honored, both the media and public officials were quick to set the record straight. With the correction now prominently displayed, Trump’s claims of a 2013 "Man of the Year" award appear to be yet another instance of exaggeration in his political storytelling. Based on a report from The Daily Beast | X 2024-10-12

In the wake of several high-profile controversies, the BBC has initiated an independent review aimed at addressing workplace culture and power dynamics within the organization. The review comes after a series of damaging scandals, raising concerns about abuse of power and the need for greater accountability within one of the world’s leading public broadcasters. These scandals have severely impacted the BBC’s reputation, particularly as it struggles to maintain a culture that upholds ethical conduct and professionalism. The incidents have also sparked broader discussions about power imbalances within the media industry. BBC chair Samir Shah addressed the internal concerns, stating that it had "taken longer than I had hoped to get to this stage," but emphasizing that he was "fully committed to tackling inappropriate or abusive behaviour." Shah acknowledged that recent events had prompted the BBC to reconsider how it manages workplace dynamics, particularly in creative and editorial environments. In August, the BBC board released a statement expressing their concern about potential power imbalances in the workplace, which have the capacity to foster inappropriate behavior. "These events have put a spotlight on the question of power imbalances in the workplace," the board noted, highlighting their determination to address these issues head-on. The review aims to ensure that the BBC remains a "safe, secure, and welcoming workplace for everyone." Shah remarked that although the launch of the review was delayed, this was due to the need to follow "due process," which he described as essential to ensure a comprehensive and thorough examination of the issues at hand. He added that moving forward, it was crucial for the organization to prevent future instances of misconduct and to reaffirm its commitment to ethical standards. The recent controversies have not only damaged the BBC’s standing in the eyes of the public but have also raised serious questions about the corporation's internal culture. Beyond the cases of Edwards and Jenas, the BBC also faced complaints from former *Strictly Come Dancing* contestant Amanda Abbington, who had spoken out against her professional dance partner, Giovanni Pernice. Though unrelated to the larger scandals, Abbington's complaints added further scrutiny to the corporation’s handling of interpersonal conflicts and its overall workplace environment. As the independent review gets underway, it will focus on preventing abuses of power and ensuring that employees and high-profile figures alike adhere to the organization’s values. While the BBC has faced challenges in confronting these issues, Shah remains committed to reforming the broadcaster’s workplace culture to prevent future scandals. The outcome of this review will likely shape the future direction of the BBC as it seeks to rebuild trust and reinforce a culture of respect and professionalism across all levels of the organization. Based on a report from The Standard | Sky News 2024-10-14

Off topic post removed, please get back on topic if you want your posts to remain: Thai Hostages Still Missing a Year After Hamas Attack

Nonsense troll baiting post removed

Paywall links and troll posts removed. Next time it will be the poster.

Troll post removed @ThaiFelix along with a comment on moderation Topic here is: U.S. Seeks to Weaken Hezbollah’s Grip on Lebanon Amid Israeli Offensive

Nihon Hidankyo, a Japanese organization representing atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, has been awarded the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize. The Norwegian Nobel Committee recognized the group’s persistent efforts "to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons" and commended their powerful role in advocating for nuclear disarmament. The survivors, known as Hibakusha, have spent decades sharing their personal stories and campaigning against the use of nuclear weapons, serving as living reminders of the devastating effects of these weapons. The Nobel Peace Prize has a rich history of honoring individuals and groups that have made significant contributions to peace and humanity. Past laureates include anti-apartheid icon Nelson Mandela, former U.S. President Barack Obama for his efforts in strengthening global diplomacy, and Pakistani education activist Malala Yousafzai, who has advocated for girls' right to education worldwide. The Nobel Prize itself was established by Alfred Nobel, the Swedish inventor and industrialist, who in his will directed his wealth to be used for awards benefiting humankind in various fields, including peace, chemistry, and literature. This year, Sir Demis Hassabis, a British computer scientist, was among the winners of the Nobel Prize in chemistry. He, along with John Jumper and David Baker, was recognized for pioneering work in predicting and creating protein structures using artificial intelligence. The awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Nihon Hidankyo underscores the global commitment to the pursuit of peace and the urgent need to continue working toward a world free from the threat of nuclear warfare. The Hibakusha’s enduring legacy reminds the world of the catastrophic consequences of nuclear weapons, and their voices serve as a powerful call for disarmament and global cooperation in the name of peace. Based on a report from Sky News 2024-10-12

The influence of far-right figures from the United States is increasingly seeping into Ireland’s political and social landscape. American extremists, including former members of the Ku Klux Klan, antisemitic conspiracy theorists, and QAnon promoters, are now advising Ireland’s far-right groups, helping to shape their narratives and tactics. These claims mirror the rhetoric seen on far-right platforms in the US, suggesting a concerning cross-Atlantic connection. A striking example is a fabricated report from a website called *The Irish Channel*, which falsely suggested that Irish lawmakers were transporting refugees to polling stations to sway elections. This conspiracy is nearly identical to claims in the US that undocumented immigrants are being brought in to manipulate voting results. Researchers from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue recently revealed that such false narratives are created using generative AI, drawing heavily from US election denial efforts. In addition to election fraud claims, Irish far-right circles are recycling other American conspiracies, such as accusations that teachers and librarians are "groomers" for promoting discussions on gender and sexual health. One of the most outlandish false claims to emerge recently is that Irish schoolchildren will be forced to watch pornography as part of a new curriculum—another entirely fabricated story. This flow of conspiracies from the US to Ireland highlights a growing relationship between the two far-right communities. According to Mark Malone from the Hope and Courage Collective, this connection underscores the Irish far right’s lack of domestic support, forcing them to turn to American extremists for guidance. "Irish neo-Nazis are looking for friends and intellectual leadership," says Malone. While he doubts their influence will translate into electoral success, he warns that the violent tendencies of these groups are a serious threat. Despite Ireland’s progress in recent years—legalizing same-sex marriage, easing abortion restrictions, and electing an openly gay, mixed-race leader—the country has become an attractive target for the US far right. They view Ireland as one of the last bastions of white Christian values in the West, even though the Catholic Church no longer dominates Irish society. Agitators within Ireland’s far-right movement have been using national issues, such as the housing crisis and rising immigration, to stoke fear and provoke action. These groups have organized violent protests, often targeting locations designated to house asylum seekers, leading to the destruction of property and several arson attacks. The situation escalated in November 2023, when riots broke out in Dublin following a stabbing that left three children and one adult injured. The alleged attacker, a naturalized Irish citizen from Algeria, became a symbol for the far right’s anti-immigrant narrative. In the aftermath, police cars were set on fire, and widespread looting ensued. Among those amplifying the situation was UFC fighter Conor McGregor, who tweeted: "Ireland, we are at war," just before the violence began. His comments helped elevate the riots to a global stage, drawing attention from prominent US figures like former Trump adviser Steve Bannon and white supremacist Nick Fuentes, who suggested Ireland was on the brink of civil war. US extremists aren’t just offering rhetorical support; they’re actively advising Ireland’s far-right agitators. Frank Silva, a former Ku Klux Klan member and neo-Nazi, has joined multiple online calls with Irish extremists, offering strategic advice on how to make anti-immigrant protests go viral. Similarly, Jon Minadeo II, founder of the antisemitic Goyim Defense League, has provided Irish activists with posters and flyers filled with hate speech, encouraging them to plaster their neighborhoods with these materials. American QAnon promoter Jeffrey Pedersen also recently joined an Irish extremist platform to spread antisemitic conspiracy theories. Pedersen framed the global political struggle in religious terms, claiming that the people in power are not loyal to any faith but are instead Satanists. He emphasized the importance of Donald Trump’s re-election in the US, arguing that if America falls, "the whole world falls." The financial connections between the US and Ireland’s far-right movements are also strengthening. Justin Barrett, a notorious Irish far-right figure, recently launched a fundraiser on the Christian crowdfunding platform GiveSendGo, soliciting funds for his political party’s "protection unit." While his efforts have raised only a fraction of his goal, many donations have come from American supporters, with messages of encouragement like "Much love from America" and warnings to "fight the invasion." This growing relationship between the US and Irish far-right groups marks a troubling shift. Ireland, while lacking the same access to firearms that characterizes American extremism, is beginning to adopt similar organizational tactics. Localized groups, like the Irish Freedom Party's newly established "watchdog" initiative, aim to mobilize men to respond to supposed illegal immigrant threats in their neighborhoods. The group's name, *Sinne na Daoine*—translated as "we the people"—echoes the rhetoric used by American far-right movements for the past decade. Based on a report from Wired 2024-10-12

British YouTuber and BBC personality Yung Filly, born Andres Felipe Valencia Barrientos, has been arrested in Australia on suspicion of sexually assaulting a woman. The 29-year-old internet star was detained in Brisbane and subsequently extradited to Perth. He is accused of raping a woman in her 20s at a hotel following his performance at Bar1 Nightclub in Hillarys, Perth, on September 28. This arrest comes after Barrientos performed two days earlier at Havana Nightclub on the Gold Coast. The track amassed over 2.5 million views on YouTube and 10 million streams on Spotify. In addition to his online fame, Yung Filly has hosted several BBC shows, including *Hot Property* and *Yung Filly's Celeb Lock-In*, and made appearances on popular programs like *The Great Celebrity Bake Off* and *Would I Lie to You?* Beyond his YouTube success, Barrientos has worked with prominent brands such as ASOS, Primark, McDonald's, and Heinz. He has also played in the high-profile charity football match Soccer Aid and took part in a star-studded game in Qatar alongside football legends like Didier Drogba and David Villa. As a result of his diverse endeavors, Yung Filly has amassed a substantial following, with over 3 million Instagram followers and 1.84 million YouTube subscribers. Since joining YouTube in 2013, his videos have been watched nearly 120 million times. Despite his professional achievements, Yung Filly’s arrest in Australia has shocked his fans and colleagues. Barrientos, who was born in Colombia and moved to the UK as a refugee when he was a child, has often spoken about his humble beginnings and the pride he takes in his background. He once expressed his gratitude for his experiences as a refugee, stating, “I'm most proud of the fact that I was a refugee, I'm proud that I had to struggle. It makes you appreciate all the little stuff a lot more.” He recalled how his family lived above a fried chicken shop in Lewisham, South London, and how those hardships shaped his perspective on success. As Barrientos's case proceeds, his future in the entertainment world remains uncertain. His representatives have yet to comment on the allegations. The arrest marks a significant turning point for the social media star, whose popularity skyrocketed over the past decade. Based on a report from The Daily Mail | X 2024-10-12

Boris Johnson, the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, has teased the possibility of returning to front-line politics, suggesting that his political career may not be over. Johnson, who was forced out of office in 2022 and resigned as a Member of Parliament a year later, revealed his ongoing desire to serve in public life. Referring to his own resilience, Johnson said that all effective politicians must possess a "cockroach-like" determination to survive. In a recent interview with *Times Radio*, Johnson downplayed his chances of leading the Conservative Party again, humorously comparing the odds to “being blinded by a champagne cork or decapitated by a frisbee.” However, when pressed on whether he still harbored political ambitions, Johnson didn’t rule out a return, instead quoting the late Queen Elizabeth II: “You should only do things if you think you can be useful.” When asked if he believed he could still be of use to the public, Johnson responded cryptically, saying, "I’m not saying that." He elaborated, stating that politicians, to be effective, must have a survival instinct akin to "wasps in a jam jar" or "cockroaches" and that this persistence is not necessarily a negative quality. "We all need people who really, really want to do their best for us," Johnson added, defending the tenacity required to navigate public life. Though Johnson refrained from weighing in too heavily on the current Conservative leadership race, he did acknowledge the competence of the candidates, including Robert Jenrick and Kemi Badenoch. “You haven’t asked me about the current Tory leaders because you think I’m not going to say anything,” he said with a smile. “But I will say, actually, the candidates are very good, and they’re having some excellent conversations about where we go next.” Johnson also addressed the controversy surrounding the "Partygate" scandal, which significantly contributed to his political downfall. Fined for attending a birthday party in the Cabinet Room during lockdown in 2020, Johnson faced a vote of no confidence in June 2022, which he narrowly survived. However, the scandal continued to haunt him, and the Chris Pincher affair ultimately led to his resignation from Parliament in July 2023. Reflecting on the inquiry led by Sue Gray into Partygate, Johnson expressed frustration, accusing Gray of bias. "She cherry-picked stuff… She had hundreds of young officials, not all of whom were favourably disposed towards me," he claimed, suggesting the report was slanted against him. When asked if Gray had "screwed him over," Johnson replied, "I think to some extent yeah, probably." Johnson went further, claiming that Gray was "about as responsible as I was" for the breaches of lockdown rules within Whitehall during the pandemic, a statement likely to reignite debates about his role in the scandal. Shifting his attention to international affairs, Johnson defended former U.S. President Donald Trump. Despite disagreeing with Trump’s actions during the January 6 Capitol riots, Johnson maintained that Trump did not intend to "overthrow the constitution." He emphasized the importance of the peaceful transfer of power, which ultimately occurred after the riots. Regarding Trump’s stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Johnson suggested that concerns over the former president’s position were "overdone." He pointed to Trump’s support for Ukraine during his presidency, citing the provision of Javelin missiles and the expulsion of Russian spies from the U.S. during Johnson’s tenure as foreign secretary. “So he can surprise very much on the upside,” Johnson remarked. Reflecting on his own time as Prime Minister, Johnson also admitted responsibility for the high levels of net migration during his leadership, explaining that inflation and labor shortages drove his decisions. "We faced a huge problem... we didn’t have anyone to stack the shelves, we didn’t have any fuel drivers,” Johnson said, acknowledging that in 2022, his government "opened the doors too wide" in an attempt to manage the economic crisis. Based on a report from The Daily Telegraph 2024-10-12

Taylor Swift has once again demonstrated her commitment to philanthropy by making a substantial donation to support relief efforts in the wake of Hurricanes Helene and Milton. The pop superstar contributed $5 million to Feeding America, a national food bank organization, as the southeastern United States continues to grapple with the devastating aftermath of the storms. The donation is aimed at providing immediate aid to communities affected by the hurricanes, which have left widespread damage and disrupted the lives of countless individuals. Claire Babineaux-Fontenot, CEO of Feeding America, expressed the organization's deep gratitude for Swift’s generosity. "We're incredibly grateful to Taylor Swift for her generous $5 million donation to Hurricanes Helene and Milton relief efforts," she said in a statement shared on Instagram. "This contribution will help communities rebuild and recover, providing essential food, clean water, and supplies to people affected by these devastating storms. Together, we can make a real impact in supporting families as they navigate the challenges ahead." Babineaux-Fontenot emphasized the importance of Swift’s contribution in addressing the immediate needs of those affected and highlighted the singer’s long-standing dedication to making a difference. "Thank you, Taylor, for standing with us in the movement to end hunger and for helping communities in need," she added. Taylor Swift, who hails from Pennsylvania and is now 34 years old, is well-known not only for her music but also for her charitable work. This recent donation is part of a broader pattern of giving that has seen her support numerous causes over the years. Previously, she made significant donations to a Tennessee tornado relief fund and a food bank in Kansas City, showcasing her commitment to helping communities in times of crisis. Swift’s latest act of generosity reinforces her reputation as a celebrity who uses her platform to drive positive change, offering both financial support and hope to those in need. Based on a report from USA Today 2024-10-12

Suella Braverman, the former Home Secretary, was compelled to postpone her scheduled speech at the University of Cambridge due to security concerns amid protests led by a pro-Palestinian group. Braverman, who was set to speak on Thursday to the Cambridge University Conservative Association (CUCA), an organization she once led as a student 20 years ago, faced opposition from the group Cambridge for Palestine. She further emphasized her resolve, stating: “I refuse to be intimidated by the pro-Palestinian mob. I was resolute in my intention to speak to the Cambridge University Conservative Association, and whilst the event has been delayed for now, it will proceed at a future date. Conservatives will not back down. I will not be silenced and neither will the millions of British people and defenders of free speech who stand proud, firm and unyielding against radical mob rule.” The event, which was set to take place at Corpus Christi College, was deemed too costly for CUCA to ensure adequate security, estimated at £1,500. Although an alternative venue at the Cambridge Union was considered, the timing clashed with another event involving MPs, and it is believed the police advised against adding CUCA’s event to the schedule. CUCA’s chairman, Szymon Sawicki, expressed disappointment over the postponement but pledged that the event would take place at a later date. He emphasized CUCA’s commitment to pluralism and open debate, stating, “It is a huge shame that a speaker who has contributed so much to the UK political environment is unable to talk about her record.” The protests against Braverman come amid heightened tensions over the university’s stance on issues related to Palestine. King’s College Cambridge was the site of a 100-day protest encampment earlier this year, driven by concerns over the university’s investments in the defence and arms industry. The university has since stated that it is committed to reviewing its approach to responsible investment. Additionally, the University of Cambridge has announced new rules aimed at protecting free speech on campus, set to come into effect in August 2024, reaffirming its commitment to promoting freedom of speech for staff and students. Braverman’s postponed speech also follows the shelving of a new law by the Labour Government, which had been aimed at tackling cancel culture on university campuses. The law would have required universities, colleges, and student unions to promote academic freedom and protect visiting speakers, offering more robust protections against disruptions like those faced by Braverman. However, Labour has argued that the legislation is not fit for purpose, citing concerns that it could expose Jewish students to anti-Semitic abuse. Based on a report from The Daily Telegraph 2024-10-12

With the 2024 presidential election fast approaching, the political landscape has shifted dramatically in the past few weeks. Vice President Kamala Harris, once riding high after a post-primary "honeymoon" period, is now in a razor-thin battle against former President Donald Trump. Polls from key battleground states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan show a tight race, with no clear front-runner emerging as November draws nearer. A new Quinnipiac poll released this week highlights Trump’s resurgence. He leads Harris in Wisconsin and Michigan, states that were crucial to his victory in 2016 and swung back to Democratic control in 2020. RealClearPolitics’s polling average now shows Trump ahead in Michigan for the first time in months, signaling potential trouble for the Harris campaign. These tight margins underscore a larger trend: the race is too close to call in most of the crucial swing states. In many of these, the lead for either candidate is in the low single digits, meaning a small shift in voter sentiment could alter the outcome dramatically. Both parties recognize that the election could hinge on a single state or even a few thousand votes. Pennsylvania, with its large electorate and history of flipping between parties, remains a particular focus. A small shift of one or two percentage points in states like Michigan or Pennsylvania could change the entire dynamic of the race. As things stand, no one has a clear path to victory in the Electoral College, leaving the outcome uncertain. While the presidential race is in a deadlock, the Senate races tell a different story. Democrats are facing an increasingly steep climb to maintain control of the upper chamber. Vulnerable Republican incumbents like Rick Scott in Florida and Ted Cruz in Texas are holding on by thin margins, according to a recent Marist poll. However, these races are still competitive, with both candidates at risk of losing. Meanwhile, in Montana, GOP candidate Tim Sheehy appears to be pulling ahead, jeopardizing the seat held by Democrat Jon Tester, one of the Senate’s few remaining moderates. With the likely loss of Tester’s seat and the expected defeat of West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, Republican control of the Senate seems almost inevitable. Democratic candidates are still leading in several important Senate races, including Maryland, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Arizona. But even if these races break in favor of the Democrats, they could still be left facing a slim 51-49 GOP majority in the Senate come January. The narrowing gap between Harris and Trump in the presidential race has left Democrats frustrated. Despite a significant advantage in fundraising and grassroots support, Harris’s campaign has struggled to translate these strengths into a clear polling lead. This is particularly concerning as the campaign heads into its final stretch with few opportunities left to change the polls in a big way. With the debates behind them, Harris and Trump must rely on last-minute campaign efforts and strategies to sway undecided voters. Trump has already unveiled one such effort—a large rally at Madison Square Garden in New York. While billed as a bold play to flip the traditionally Democratic state, the rally is likely more about energizing his base and generating media attention. His running mate, JD Vance, has already confirmed his attendance, signaling the importance of the event for their campaign. Harris, meanwhile, is sending Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to Wisconsin for a series of campaign events in hopes of solidifying her support in that key battleground state. Walz’s reappearance on the campaign trail after weeks out of the spotlight suggests the Harris campaign is making a renewed push in areas where Trump is gaining momentum. With October already more than a third over, both campaigns are running out of time to sway undecided voters. The race remains a toss-up, with neither candidate able to claim a decisive lead. In the final weeks, every rally, ad, and event could tip the scales. Both Harris and Trump are likely feeling the pressure as they make their final pitches to the American people in this unpredictable and fiercely competitive election. Based on a report from The Independent 2024-10-12

As Florida deals with the aftermath of Hurricane Milton, Governor Ron DeSantis is facing growing pressure from environmental activists and scientists who claim climate change is fueling stronger hurricanes. However, DeSantis has pushed back against these claims, stating during a media briefing in Port St. Lucie that hurricanes are a historical part of Florida's weather pattern, especially during hurricane season. "There is precedent for all this in history," he said. "It is hurricane season. You are going to have tropical weather." Scientists have repeatedly stated that the warming planet, caused by fossil fuel emissions, is directly linked to rising ocean temperatures, which in turn strengthens hurricanes. Jeff Chanton, a professor of environmental science and oceanography at Florida State University, pointed out that the connection between warmer waters and more intense hurricanes is well-documented in scientific literature. "He is assuming that this is all cyclical, whereas many scientists believe there is a trend towards stronger hurricanes and increased intensification," Chanton remarked, referencing five scientific papers that support his view. Despite DeSantis's statements, Chanton is unsure where the governor is sourcing his historical hurricane data. When asked for further information, the governor’s office did not provide the requested details. Hurricane Milton, which hit Siesta Key as a Category 3 storm, has reignited debates over climate change, particularly as it comes just two weeks after Hurricane Helene struck northern Florida. Environmentalists are seizing the moment to bring climate change to the forefront of political discussions, especially with the upcoming elections. Some are calling for candidates to take more decisive action on the issue. DeSantis, however, has long been skeptical of climate change. Earlier this year, he signed legislation removing climate goals from Florida’s state statutes. He remains firm in his belief that the current storms are part of a natural weather cycle, emphasizing, "There is nothing new under the sun." The debate has even extended to the Florida Senate race between Republican Senator Rick Scott and Democrat Debbie Mucarsel-Powell. Scott acknowledged in a recent CNN interview that "the climate is clearly changing," though his past comments suggest skepticism about the left’s approach to climate policy. His spokesperson, Chris Hartline, pointed out that Scott's stance has remained consistent, referencing a 2019 op-ed in which Scott described climate change as “real and requiring real solutions,” but criticized the left for making it "a religion." In the broader political landscape, Vice President Kamala Harris has also criticized former President Donald Trump for spreading misinformation about the recent storms. Trump has blamed the federal response to Hurricane Milton as a failure, despite some members of his own party disputing his claims. Hurricane Milton developed quickly off the coast of Mexico’s Yucatán Peninsula, becoming a Category 5 storm before weakening upon its Florida landfall. DeSantis cited the 1930s Labor Day hurricane, stating it was "head and shoulders above any powerful hurricane we’ve had in the state of Florida." He urged people to consider the historical context of hurricanes rather than view each storm as evidence of climate change. As the governor dismissed claims that the government could control the weather, joking that he would opt for “78 and sunny year round” if he had such power, Chanton offered a different perspective. "As the oceans become warmer, we can expect that hurricanes will respond to distribute that heat," he explained. “And one of their responses is to be stronger.” The clash between those focused on long-term climate trends and leaders like DeSantis who prioritize historical weather patterns is likely to continue as hurricanes increase in intensity and political divisions over climate change grow sharper. Based on a report from Politico 2024-10-12

The Guardian has found itself at the center of an online controversy following the publication of a review of *One Day in October*, a documentary by Channel 4 covering the events and aftermath of the Hamas massacre on October 7. Written by feature writer Stuart Jeffries, the review sparked outrage, particularly over the suggestion that the film "demonises Gazans" as “Hamas killers.” Jeffries’s review noted that, despite the documentary's portrayal of "evident evil," it followed a narrative structure that encouraged viewers to identify with the Israeli victims, while casting Hamas as a faceless and generalized threat. This perspective, according to the Campaign Against Antisemitism, was "disgraceful," and many agreed that it trivialized the severity of the massacre. In response to the backlash, Guardian News & Media reaffirmed that the article had been taken down because it did not meet their editorial standards. Readers are awaiting further clarification from the publication regarding how such content made it to print in the first place. Based on a report from The Daily Telegraph | X 2024-10-12

Greta Thunberg is facing calls for her to be banned from entering Germany amid a decision by local police to classify her as a “violent participant” in political demonstrations. Thunberg had accepted an invitation to a pro-Palestinian protest camp organized at the University of Dortmund. However, the event was swiftly canceled after authorities expressed concerns that her presence would attract a larger crowd than initially expected. German police ordered the event to be dismantled, prompting Thunberg to respond with a video on Instagram, where she criticized the German authorities for "silencing activists." Wearing a traditional Palestinian keffiyeh, she stated, "Germany threatens them (activists) when they speak out against the genocide and occupation in Palestine." The event organizers took to social media to condemn the cancellation, claiming it was unjust and announcing their intention to file an appeal. According to them, they were given little time to disassemble the protest camp after the police intervened. Earlier in the week, Thunberg attended another pro-Palestinian protest in Berlin, marking the anniversary of the October 7 attacks. The protest saw tensions rise, with four demonstrators being detained after they set off pyrotechnics and burned car tires. Thunberg expressed her disapproval of the police's actions on social media, stating that she "didn't have words" to describe how the German police handled what she referred to as "peaceful protesters." Thunberg’s involvement in pro-Palestinian protests has led to several confrontations with law enforcement. In early September, she was forcibly removed by police during a demonstration in Stockholm. More recently, Thunberg was detained by Belgian authorities after participating in a protest against European Union subsidies for fossil fuels. As the debate surrounding Thunberg’s activism continues, the call for her to be banned from Germany adds to the growing tension over her participation in politically charged demonstrations. Based on a report from Euro News | X 2024-10-12

Former Prime Minister Theresa May expressed doubts that justice will ever be achieved for those affected by the Salisbury Novichok attack. Speaking about the 2018 poisoning that claimed the life of Wiltshire resident Dawn Sturgess, she admitted that it is “highly unlikely” that those responsible will face trial. Instead, May hopes that Sturgess’ family will find solace in the forthcoming independent inquiry into her death. “I would hope by the end of it the family and friends of Dawn Sturgess feel it has got to the truth,” she stated during an interview for a new BBC podcast on the Salisbury Poisonings, which covers the inquiry. Ms. Sturgess, a 44-year-old mother of three, tragically died in July 2018 after coming into contact with Novichok, a deadly Russian nerve agent. It is believed that the chemical weapon had been carelessly discarded by Russian agents who were targeting former Russian spy Sergei Skripal in March 2018. In addition to Skripal, his daughter Yulia Skripal and Wiltshire Police officer Det Sgt Nick Bailey were also exposed to the toxin, though they later recovered. Charlie Rowley, Sturgess’s partner, unwittingly gave her the poison after finding the perfume bottle containing the Novichok, unaware of its deadly contents. May, who was the prime minister at the time, expressed deep sadness over the incident. "I felt huge sadness about Ms. Sturgess' death," she said, while also pointing out that the number of potential victims could have been much higher, given the quantity of the nerve agent discovered. She described the Russian agents’ actions as "utter recklessness." Within a week of the Skripal attack, the UK government, led by May, publicly accused the Russian government of involvement. This swift response led to the expulsion of Russian intelligence officers by the UK and numerous other countries. “We had to be certain of our ground,” May explained, recalling the tense moment she stood in the House of Commons to formally accuse Russia. "It's why we took our time" to gather the facts and avoid “rash declarations.” She acknowledged the challenge of balancing the public’s desire for immediate information with the need for caution. Reflecting on the broader context of Russian-linked poisonings, May also expressed regret that the UK had not responded more forcefully to the 2006 murder of Alexander Litvinenko, another former Russian spy, who was killed in London using radioactive polonium-210. A public inquiry concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin had likely approved Litvinenko's assassination. “I think we probably should have taken a stronger response to that at the time and given a clearer message to Russia," she admitted. The public inquiry into Dawn Sturgess’s death, which was converted from an inquest in 2021 to allow for classified evidence, is set to begin on October 14, more than six years after the incident. The inquiry aims to uncover the circumstances surrounding her death but cannot assign guilt or lead to a trial. While UK counter-terrorism police identified two Russian nationals, Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov, as suspects in September 2018, and later named a third suspect, Sergey Fedotov, all three remain in Russia. Despite the international arrest warrants issued against them, they are unlikely to face justice, as Russia’s constitution prevents the extradition of its citizens. Russia has continuously denied involvement, with its foreign ministry dismissing the inquiry as a “circus.” As the inquiry proceeds, May’s hope is that while justice may remain out of reach, the truth surrounding Ms. Sturgess’s tragic death will provide some measure of closure to her loved ones. Based on a report from BBC 2024-10-12

The Biden administration is taking advantage of the current Israeli offensive against Hezbollah to push for a new Lebanese president, hoping to curb the militant group’s long-standing political dominance. According to U.S. and Arab officials, this move marks an opportunity to address Lebanon’s political stalemate, which has left the country without a president since Michel Aoun’s term ended in 2022. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has reached out to leaders in Qatar, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, urging their support for electing a new Lebanese president. The push is part of a broader U.S. initiative to weaken Hezbollah's influence in Lebanon, a group that has entrenched itself not only as a militant organization but also as a powerful political party. Amos Hochstein, a senior White House official, has emphasized to Arab officials that the Israeli strikes on Hezbollah provide a chance to potentially resolve Lebanon's political deadlock. “We want to see Lebanon break the grip that Hezbollah has had on the country—more than a grip, break the stranglehold that Hezbollah has had on the country and remove Hezbollah veto over a president,” State Department spokesman Matt Miller said. The U.S. effort to sideline Hezbollah comes after years of frustration over Lebanon's ineffective government, where political reforms have been stymied by entrenched elites. Lebanon’s power-sharing system, established during the French occupation after World War I, divides power among its major religious groups—Sunni Muslims, Shia Muslims, Christians, and Druze. Despite previous U.S.-backed efforts, the country's fractured political landscape has hindered meaningful change. Saudi Arabia, which historically played a significant role in Lebanon’s political and economic affairs, has backed the U.S. initiative. The plan’s success, however, depends on key Lebanese figures, including Prime Minister Najib Mikati and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. Both have voiced support for electing a new president but remain closely tied to Hezbollah, especially in the context of cease-fire negotiations. While the U.S. sees a new president as essential to forming a stable and empowered government, Hezbollah’s leadership opposes any political shift amid ongoing conflict. Naim Qassem, Hezbollah’s Deputy Secretary-General, rejected calls for a political rearrangement while the war with Israel continues. Electing a new president is a complex process in Lebanon, where the president is chosen by a 128-member parliament. Without Hezbollah’s support, it remains unclear how political factions can unite to elect a leader. Several Arab nations, including Egypt and Qatar, have expressed skepticism about the U.S. approach. They argue that attempting to sideline Hezbollah, particularly during a time of crisis, could reignite sectarian violence in a country still scarred by its civil war, which ended in 1990. Egypt, in particular, has voiced concern that intervening in Lebanon’s political affairs now could lead to the kind of internecine fighting that devastated the country during the civil war. Lebanese political analysts warn that any leader seen as rising to power due to Israeli and U.S. actions risks being discredited. Robert Ford, a former U.S. ambassador to Syria and Algeria, noted, “The more a new Lebanese president is seen to have come to office on the coattails of Israeli military actions with American support, the more discredited I think he will be among many Lebanese.” The absence of a president has worsened Lebanon's economic crisis, which the World Bank describes as one of the worst globally in the past 150 years. Since 2019, Lebanon's currency has plummeted by 97% against the U.S. dollar, leaving public sector salaries nearly worthless and hollowing out government institutions. Parliament hasn’t convened since May, and the caretaker government has been unable to address the country’s economic collapse, which has plunged millions into poverty. In the midst of the current war, Lebanon remains in a political and economic vacuum, with Hezbollah maintaining greater strength than the national army despite limited U.S. military aid. Based on a report from WSJ 2024-10-12

A bunch of trolling posts removed from @Gweiloman if you have nothing to offer the topic other than antagonizing and off topic trolling then expect your posting rights to be removed if you carry on.

A link from 17 years ago making a historical claim that has no bearing on the siutation now has been removed.

In the final stretch of his 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump has made a bold new promise to eliminate US income taxes for Americans living abroad. This latest proposal joins a growing list of plans aimed at cutting personal tax bills. Trump has also floated the idea of exempting tipped wages, overtime pay, and Social Security benefits from taxation, all part of his broader strategy to lessen the tax burden on Americans. In a statement aimed at American expatriates, Trump declared, "I support ENDING the Double Taxation of overseas Americans!" He added, "Let’s put America First, together. Register to Vote, and vote Republican." Currently, US citizens, no matter where they reside in the world, must file tax information with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Some expatriates are required to pay US taxes in addition to the levies they pay in the country where they live. Trump's plan could simplify these obligations for the approximately 9 million Americans the State Department estimates live abroad. The tax system, as it stands, does not mean all expats owe money to the IRS. The tax code provides credits to offset federal taxes owed, and individuals earning less than $126,500 are not required to pay any US taxes. However, advocates for changing the taxation of Americans abroad point out that these IRS rules contribute to a trend where a few thousand people renounce their US citizenship annually. It is typically higher-earning expatriates who face the most significant tax bills under current rules. If implemented, Trump’s plan could potentially allow wealthier Americans to relocate to low-tax countries and avoid paying US taxes altogether. The Wall Street Journal was the first to report Trump’s proposal. While the plan would reduce paperwork and likely lower tax bills for Americans abroad, it would require approval from Congress. If successful, it could mark a significant shift in how the US handles expatriate taxation. This pledge to eliminate taxes for Americans living overseas is just one piece of Trump’s broader tax-cutting agenda. Throughout his campaign, he has championed efforts to reduce household and corporate tax burdens. Trump has promised to push for a renewal of the 2017 tax overhaul, much of which is set to expire at the end of next year. These sweeping tax proposals, if implemented, could amount to more than $10 trillion over a decade, according to estimates from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. While Trump’s plan offers relief for Americans abroad, it contrasts with his approach to US-based businesses. He has called for lowering the corporate tax rate to 15 percent from the current 21 percent, but only for companies that manufacture inside the US. Companies that operate overseas, on the other hand, could face higher tax rates and tariffs if they attempt to sell their products to American consumers. Widespread tariffs are a core component of Trump’s economic strategy. Last month, he threatened to impose steep import duties on Deere & Co., a major US farm machinery manufacturer, if the company moved its manufacturing operations to Mexico. As the 2024 election approaches, Trump’s tax-cutting promises continue to grow, appealing to various groups, from expatriates to domestic manufacturers. Whether these proposals will come to fruition, however, depends on the outcome of the election and the willingness of Congress to support such sweeping changes to the US tax system. Based on a report from Business Standard 2024-10-11

Kamala Harris often tries to distance herself from President Joe Biden with a simple statement: "I am not Joe Biden." Yet, when it comes to explaining how she would be different if she were to assume the presidency, Harris has been careful not to delve into specifics. This approach reflects her complex position as both a candidate seeking change and a vice president loyal to the administration she serves. For over three years, Harris has prioritized loyalty to Biden, even when it may have affected her own political standing. Now, as she runs for president with the slogan "A New Way Forward," she treads cautiously, avoiding direct criticism of the president or the administration. According to her allies, this strategy is a balancing act—she seeks to maintain her loyalty while appealing to voters eager for change. Still, she has backed a few economic and border policy proposals that her team crafted with the intention of setting her apart from Biden. In a recent appearance on ABC’s "The View," Harris was asked if she would have done anything differently than Biden during their time in office. Her initial response was, "There is not a thing that comes to mind." However, by the end of the interview, she did mention that she would appoint a Republican to her cabinet if elected president. Later, on CBS’s "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," when asked a similar question, Harris focused more on distinguishing herself from former President Donald Trump, stating, "It’s important to say with 28 days to go, I’m not Donald Trump." Trump, seizing on her earlier comments, played a clip of Harris at a rally in Scranton, Pennsylvania, mocking the vice president and criticizing the Biden administration’s handling of issues such as the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, the southern border, and inflation. "Can you believe our country is being run by these people?" Trump asked, questioning Harris's suitability for leadership. Despite the Republican efforts to lump Harris together with Biden, she has managed to maintain a slight edge over Trump in recent polls. According to a New York Times/Siena College survey, Harris led Trump by a narrow margin of 46% to 44% when voters were asked which candidate represented change. She continues to perform slightly better than Biden in most national polls and remains competitive in key swing states. However, some Democrats were surprised by Harris's reluctance to clearly differentiate herself from Biden during her media blitz this week. Evan Roth Smith, a Democratic pollster, expressed concern, stating, "They were a missed opportunity to do something voters will reward." Smith's polling found that voters responded best to messages that emphasized a break from Biden on key issues, while portraying Harris as a continuation of Biden’s policies was less successful. "She doesn’t need to stab the president in the back," he said, "just pick a specific issue that is of high importance to voters and draw a really clear distinction." Harris's campaign has introduced incremental policy changes to position her as more business-friendly and tougher on immigration than Biden. For example, she proposed a less aggressive increase in the capital gains tax compared to Biden’s plan. Additionally, during a visit to the border, she suggested that she would take a firmer stance than Biden on maintaining restrictions that prevent migrants who cross illegally from applying for asylum. Despite these shifts, when directly asked about Biden, Harris has avoided emphasizing these differences, instead opting to speak broadly about her vision for economic leadership and the next generation of political leadership. While Harris's background as the daughter of immigrants and her potential to become the first female president offer a natural contrast to Biden, some Democrats believe she could afford to create more space between herself and the current administration. On foreign policy, particularly regarding the intensifying conflict in the Middle East, Harris has been hesitant to criticize Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, even though this might resonate with certain Democratic voters. Abbas Alawieh, a co-founder of the Uncommitted movement, remarked, "I’ve been surprised by just how allergic to even inching in the direction of antiwar voters Vice President Harris has been." Alawieh believes that a stronger stance against Netanyahu could actually mobilize Democratic voters, without costing Harris any significant support. "I don’t know that being more critical of Netanyahu would cost a single Democratic vote," he said. "It might gain us some votes. I think that would mobilize a lot of Democratic voters, actually." As Harris navigates her campaign, she continues to balance the need for change with her deep ties to the current administration. How she manages this balancing act will likely define her candidacy in the months ahead. Based on a report from WSJ 2024-10-11

In a shocking revelation at his trial, former British soldier Daniel Khalife, 23, has been accused of stealing highly classified UK military information for Iran and compiling a list of personnel from the SAS and other special forces. Prosecutors claim Khalife, who had access to sensitive information as part of the British army’s communications wing, offered to act as an agent for Iran for 25 years, engaging in direct contact with Iranian intelligence handlers. According to the court, Khalife's connection with Iran was initiated through messages to an individual using the alias David Smith, who was believed to be an Iranian intelligence handler. Smith reportedly assured Khalife that he would be paid well for his cooperation and even promised: “We look forward to seeing you in Tehran … pal.” Khalife is also accused of receiving cash from Iran in exchange for providing secret information during his time in the army. During the second day of his trial at Woolwich Crown Court, the prosecution alleged that Khalife took a photograph of a handwritten list of 15 soldiers, gathering names from an internal spreadsheet related to promotions in June 2021. He reportedly used the British Army’s internal HR system to gather further details, including the first names of military personnel. The trial also revealed that in August 2020, Khalife traveled to Turkey, where he allegedly left a package for Iranian intelligence agents. Mark Heywood KC, leading the prosecution, stated that Khalife originally intended to travel further to Iran. “That was, says the prosecution, an attempt at least to meet, engage, face-to-face directly,” said Heywood. "The original attempt was to go to Iran." Heywood painted a picture of Khalife as more than just a junior soldier, describing him as a "resourceful man" capable of evading capture. Khalife’s alleged spy activities weren’t limited to information theft. He is also accused of orchestrating his escape from Wandsworth prison in September of last year, reportedly strapping himself to a food truck in a daring bid for freedom. His four-day escape ended when he was recaptured by police. Further allegations suggest that Khalife planted a fake bomb in his barracks in Stafford and went missing for three weeks in January 2023, during which he lived in a stolen van with fake license plates. When police later searched his belongings, they found over £18,000 in cash, both genuine and counterfeit, along with a note that ominously read: “You can say with certainty that you will go to prison for a very long time. Your options are suicide or absconding.” The note further encouraged Khalife to flee to Iran, where he could “manage life again and travel to interesting places freely.” In one particularly chilling exchange of encrypted messages on the Telegram app, Smith allegedly told Khalife, “We can work together a lot of years.” Khalife responded enthusiastically: “Absolutely, I won’t leave the military until you tell me to … 25+ years.” The trial also heard that Khalife’s involvement with Iranian intelligence deepened when he was deployed to Fort Hood (now known as Fort Cavazos) in Texas in early 2021. While stationed at the U.S. military base, he allegedly continued to collect intelligence and take photographs of sensitive material. In a surprising twist, Khalife made two anonymous calls to MI5 in November 2021, claiming that he had been in contact with Iranian intelligence for over two years. He expressed his desire to help British security services and return to normal life, even though he had previously been ineligible for higher security clearance. The prosecution claims that Khalife also saved an electronic note detailing his plan to start his own intelligence operation to prove his worth to British intelligence. Khalife is facing charges under the Official Secrets Act, including gathering and communicating information that could aid an enemy between May 2019 and January 2022. He is also accused of attempting to obtain personal information about armed forces personnel, which could be useful to those preparing acts of terrorism. Despite the weight of the charges, Khalife denies all allegations, and the trial is ongoing. Based on a report from The Guardian 2024-10-11