Social Media

Unsubstaniated claims and way off topic posts removed @Neeranam Thai worker killed by leftover ammunition in Israeli orchard

Nonsense troll post removed

Paywall link & the topic is already running here //closed//

During a Pennsylvania campaign stop on Sunday, Donald Trump took an unconventional approach, working behind the counter at a McDonald’s and reigniting a peculiar debate about Kamala Harris’s past. The former president, known for his showmanship on the campaign trail, ditched his suit jacket, put on a black and yellow McDonald’s apron, and proceeded to fry batches of french fries, a task he said he had wanted to do "all my life." Kamala Harris, who is currently running as the Democrat candidate for vice president, marked her 60th birthday on the same day as Trump's campaign appearance. She spent the day campaigning in Georgia, participating in two worship services just outside of Atlanta. The fast-food moment, though seemingly lighthearted, highlighted the often bitter exchanges between the two political figures, with Trump's jab adding an odd twist to the usual campaign rhetoric. His unfounded statement about Harris’s work history at McDonald’s raised eyebrows, particularly because Harris has consistently referred to her past experiences working at the chain, which she discussed as a way to connect with everyday Americans. However, as with many of Trump’s public statements, this one triggered further scrutiny and debate, drawing attention away from the policy issues central to the campaign. Trump’s public persona and willingness to engage in unscripted, often bizarre stunts have long been a hallmark of his political style. The McDonald's stop was yet another example of this, serving to entertain his supporters while igniting political conversations, however unconventional they may be. Based on a report from the Standard 2024-10-21

Think tanks and campaign groups in the UK are sounding the alarm on the growing threat posed by scientific racism, a dangerous ideology that uses flawed science to justify racial inequality. Recent investigations have revealed that these ideas are gaining traction and could potentially seep into mainstream discourse, posing a significant risk to minority communities. Scientific racism claims that biological differences, rather than social factors, are responsible for inequalities among racial groups. By using research to validate notions of genetic superiority, proponents of this ideology often push back against efforts to improve diversity and combat structural racism. In recent years, rightwing politicians have co-opted these beliefs to advocate for strict immigration policies and the expulsion of migrants from western nations. Despite the warnings, national institutions in the UK, particularly within the health sector, have been slow to respond. According to the Institute of Race Relations, the Race Equality Foundation, and Race on the Agenda, attempts to bring attention to the resurgence of race science have been largely ignored. Liz Fekete, director of the Institute of Race Relations, voiced her concerns, stating that for years, Black health campaigners and civil rights organizations have been raising their voices about this issue without much acknowledgment from powerful institutions. She pointed out that scientific racism poses a direct threat to NHS users from minority backgrounds. A recent investigation conducted by *The Guardian* in collaboration with anti-racism campaign group Hope Not Hate has escalated concerns. The investigation uncovered an international network of academics and activists working to normalize scientific racism, with financial backing from a wealthy US tech entrepreneur. This network allegedly obtained genetic data from the UK Biobank, which contains genetic information from 500,000 volunteers. The revelation has heightened the urgency for action, with campaign groups warning that "today’s fringe ideas could be tomorrow’s mainstream." They call for immediate steps to hold accountable those promoting these dangerous ideologies. Fekete added that the mainstreaming of such fringe ideas has already begun, citing the cultural wars that mock efforts to address racism, while structural and systemic racism continue to rise. She specifically noted how anti-Muslim and anti-migrant rhetoric, echoing the sentiments of controversial figures like Enoch Powell, has already become more acceptable in mainstream culture. Ideas rooted in cultural racism, which posit a hierarchy of cultures with western civilization at the top, have made their way into public discourse—setting the stage for scientific racism to follow. The dangers of this ideology spreading into more mainstream thought are not without precedent. Fekete referenced the secret eugenics conferences held at University College London (UCL), exposed in 2018, as well as the increasing prominence of the "great displacement theory" in western politics. These events demonstrate how racist and eugenicist ideas can migrate from fringe communities to positions of influence, aided by the growing popularity of "anti-woke" and populist right-wing rhetoric. Health and policy institutions are now being urged to take the threat of scientific racism seriously and to address the challenges it poses to equality and diversity. According to think tanks, failure to act now could lead to the further erosion of progress in dismantling systemic racism, and the legitimization of dangerous ideologies that harm minority communities. The warning is clear: the UK must wake up to the insidious influence of scientific racism before it gains even more traction in public life. Based on a report from the Guardian 2024-10-21

William George, a Belgian national and convicted gang member involved in the killing of 18-year-old Abdul Hafidah, cannot be deported from the UK despite a six-year legal battle led by Home Office officials. George, who was sentenced to 12 years in prison for manslaughter in connection with Hafidah’s brutal death, has been shielded from deportation due to EU regulations that were in effect at the time of his conviction. Hafidah was murdered in Manchester in May 2016, in an attack witnessed by commuters during rush hour. A member of the Rusholme Crips gang, Hafidah was hunted down by members of the rival AO gang after straying into their territory in Moss Side. He was beaten, struck with a car, and stabbed in the neck. George played a key role in the attack, confronting Hafidah and allowing others to catch up to him, ultimately leading to his death. Seven men were convicted of murder, while George and two others were convicted of manslaughter. Despite George's conviction and his association with the notorious AO gang, his deportation to Belgium has been blocked due to regulations stemming from EU directives. George, who moved to the UK at the age of eight, was served with deportation papers in 2018, citing a “real risk” of reoffending. However, EU nationals who have lived in the UK for a significant period are protected from deportation unless it can be shown that they pose an “imperative” threat to public security. In the latest development of the case, the Court of Appeal upheld an earlier immigration court decision quashing George’s deportation. The court ruled that George did not meet the strict criteria for removal under the EU regulations, which were in force prior to Brexit. Lord Justice Nicholas Underhill stated that as a European Economic Area (EEA) national, George was entitled to the highest level of protection against removal. The court concluded that there had been no legal error in the previous decision and that George, who has shown remorse and expressed no intention of reoffending, does not pose a sufficient risk to justify deportation. The immigration tribunal ruling emphasized George's remorse and efforts to rebuild his life after serving time in prison. Judge Bruce, who presided over the case, described George as a once-promising footballer with no prior criminal record. He had been working toward a semi-professional football career, securing a contract with Morecambe FC and a scholarship at Lancaster College before becoming involved in the killing of Hafidah. His life changed drastically after the crime, and he has since spent almost seven years in prison. The court acknowledged that George had learned a hard lesson about the consequences of violence and believed his claims of rehabilitation. Lord Justice Underhill reiterated the gravity of George’s actions but noted that deportation is not automatically linked to the severity of the crime. Instead, it depends on whether the individual poses a serious ongoing threat to public security. In George’s case, the court found no compelling evidence that he did. "Nothing in our decision means that we take anything but the most serious view of Mr George’s conduct. But he has been punished for that conduct by the sentence of 12 years’ imprisonment which he received,” Underhill said, adding, “The judge, after carefully weighing all the evidence, found that he does not [pose a future threat]. I must say that I find her reasoning convincing, but in any event, it contains no error of law." The outcome of the case has sparked concerns, particularly among those who argue that serious offenders should be deported. Following Brexit, the UK no longer adheres to EEA regulations, meaning non-British criminals can now be deported if they are sentenced to 12 months or more in prison. However, George’s crime, which was committed before Brexit, was still governed by pre-existing EU rules. The case has drawn comparisons to previous instances where EU regulations prevented the deportation of criminals, such as the infamous case of Learco Chindamo, the killer of headteacher Philip Lawrence. For now, William George remains in the UK, living in a bail hostel and reportedly working to rebuild his life. His case highlights the complex legal landscape surrounding immigration and deportation, particularly for individuals who committed crimes before Brexit took full effect. Based on a report from the Daily Telegraph 2024-10-21

This summer, Taylor Swift's record-breaking Eras tour swept through the UK, captivating fans who spent countless hours trying to secure the coveted tickets. For most, it was an arduous task, with demand far outstripping supply. Yet for a select group of Labour MPs, including seven cabinet ministers, the process was much smoother. In total, 14 Labour politicians, including Sir Keir Starmer, received free tickets, some with high-end hospitality packages, collectively worth £23,328. Even the Liberal Democrat leader, Sir Ed Davey, was given a pair of tickets. Labour MPs defended their decision to accept the freebies, pointing out that they had properly declared them. Starmer, now both the opposition leader and prime minister, accepted ten tickets and attended two of the concerts, where he had a brief meeting with Swift and her mother, Andrea, on one occasion. Meanwhile, Sadiq Khan, London's mayor, has come under scrutiny for underreporting the value of the six tickets he received. His initial declaration valued them at £194 each, but it later emerged that they were worth £500. The Conservative group in the Greater London Authority may push for an investigation into this discrepancy, which Khan’s team attributed to “human error.” Since the revelation of these gifts, Labour has faced increasing criticism, especially considering the party’s previous attacks on Tory sleaze. The controversy intensified when reports emerged of tension between the police and government over Swift’s security arrangements. Allegedly, the Metropolitan Police were pressured into providing a police escort for the star during two of her Wembley performances, a privilege typically reserved for royalty or government officials. Though the government denied applying pressure, there is clear resentment within Scotland Yard, as many officers feared this move would set a dangerous precedent for celebrity treatment. This issue came on the heels of a terrorist plot foiled by the CIA in Vienna, which targeted Swift concerts and filled Swift and her team with heightened concern over safety. Andrea Swift, often credited as a significant force behind her daughter’s career, engaged directly with the Metropolitan Police over security measures. She initially pushed for an armed escort, which was quickly denied, and then for a police escort, which also faced resistance. Police argued that escorts are reserved for public figures and that no concrete evidence suggested a threat in the UK. Nevertheless, Swift’s mother continued her campaign, and eventually, top government officials, including Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and London’s Mayor Khan, became involved in the discussions. Ultimately, a compromise was reached, but not before Scotland Yard sought legal reassurance concerning their officers’ personal liability for breaking protocol. As ministers enjoyed their perks, critics questioned whether there was undue pressure on the police and whether these gifts blurred ethical lines. Labour’s previous focus on sleaze only amplifies the embarrassment, especially for a party now dealing with its own scrutiny over hospitality. It also became known that Starmer met Swift backstage during one concert, but Downing Street insists the meeting was focused solely on the tragic murder of three children at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport. There is growing unease within Labour about the appearance of conflicts of interest. Starmer himself has accepted gifts totaling more than £100,000, including £32,000 worth of tickets. Recently, he agreed to reimburse £6,000, which included his Taylor Swift concert packages. However, he has yet to ask his cabinet colleagues to follow suit. New guidance is being drawn up on acceptable hospitality practices, particularly in light of potential conflicts related to gifts from football clubs or the Premier League. Some ministers remain unapologetic. Darren Jones, the Treasury's chief secretary, defended his decision to accept four tickets for his family, saying, "I had not seen my children during the election period, so I thought it was a nice treat for them. I’m not really a Swiftie, but I declared it properly.” Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson echoed a similar sentiment, calling it “too good to turn down” and recognizing that she was “in a fortunate position.” While Phillipson says she wouldn’t accept concert tickets again, Jones remains defiant, stating that he might do so under similar circumstances in the future. Amid the controversy, some ministers tried to inject a lighter tone into the debate. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, who attended a concert with her husband, former Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls, quoted Swift's hit song, "Shake it Off," remarking, "Haters gonna hate, hate, hate, hate, hate." Despite the humor, the Labour government now faces significant backlash, and Downing Street appears keen to avoid further controversy over gifts and hospitality. Based on a report from The Times 2024-10-21

Next week, Russia will host a major summit of the BRICS group, gathering around two dozen world leaders in what is set to be the largest international event in Russia since the onset of the Ukraine conflict. Russian President Vladimir Putin is positioning this summit as a key moment to demonstrate that Western attempts to isolate Moscow have failed. The summit will take place in Kazan from October 22 to 24, bringing together key global figures such as UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, Chinese President Xi Jinping, Brazilian President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also expected to attend. The Kremlin views the gathering as an opportunity to bolster its alliances and present itself as an influential global player in the face of Western sanctions and isolation efforts. The BRICS alliance—comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—has become a cornerstone of Russia’s foreign policy. The Kremlin has been actively pushing for the expansion of the group, with a particular focus on developing a BRICS-led payment system to rival SWIFT, from which Russian banks were disconnected in 2022. The escalating conflict in the Middle East will also feature prominently on the summit’s agenda. Russian officials, including Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov, have framed the summit as a victory for Russian diplomacy. Ushakov emphasized the importance of BRICS as a prototype for a "multipolar" world order, one that challenges what he described as Western "hegemony." He noted, "What BRICS is doing is gradually—brick by brick—building a bridge to a more democratic and just world order." The United States, however, has downplayed BRICS’ potential to become a serious geopolitical rival, though it has expressed concerns about Moscow's growing diplomatic influence. Amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Russia has deepened its ties with several of Washington’s adversaries, including China, Iran, and North Korea. Konstantin Kalachev, a Moscow-based political analyst, noted that by hosting the summit, Putin is sending a clear message that Russia is not isolated. “The Kremlin aims to show that not only is Russia not isolated, it has partners and allies,” Kalachev said. He added that this summit is an opportunity for Russia to showcase an "alternative to Western pressure" and promote the idea of a multipolar world where power is shared across regions rather than dominated by the West. Putin’s international standing has been strained by the International Criminal Court (ICC), which declared him wanted in 2023 for the illegal deportation of children from Ukraine. This led to his absence from the previous BRICS summit in South Africa, a member of the ICC. In contrast, this year’s summit represents a chance for the Kremlin to reassert its diplomatic weight. Putin has consistently argued that the West provoked Russia into launching its military offensive in Ukraine, dismissing claims that the invasion is an imperialistic land grab—even though Russia has seized four Ukrainian regions and declared them part of its territory. The Kremlin insists that global affairs should be governed by international law, not by the rules of individual states like the U.S. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has warned of the broader implications if Putin succeeds in his military and geopolitical objectives. “If Putin achieves his crazy goals—geopolitical, military, ideological, and economic—it will create an overwhelming impression among other potential aggressors, particularly in the West, Indo-Pacific, and Africa, that wars of aggression could be beneficial for them as well,” Zelensky told lawmakers earlier this week. Founded in 2009 with four members, BRICS has since expanded to include nations such as South Africa, Egypt, and Iran. Turkey, a NATO member with complex relations with both Moscow and the West, also expressed interest in joining the group in September. Although Saudi Arabia will be represented at the summit by its foreign minister, the absence of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has sparked speculation about potential tensions between two of the world’s largest energy producers. Kalachev remarked, "It is clear that the Kremlin wanted to see the Crown Prince," but overall, he said, “everything is going rather well for the Kremlin.” Based on a report from Barrons 2024-10-21

Transgender teachers in the UK must be permitted to use the same showers and bathrooms as their female colleagues, according to recent guidance provided to school governors. This recommendation, issued by the National Governance Association (NGA), has stirred a significant public debate, with some calling it irresponsible and a misinterpretation of legal requirements. The NGA, which provides training and advice to governors and trustees in state schools across England, has been instructing school leaders that staff should be given access to the bathroom “available to other members of their newly acquired gender.” The advice, seen by *The Telegraph*, further suggests that requiring transgender individuals to use a disabled toilet rather than making reasonable adjustments “is not lawful or good practice.” The NGA’s guidelines read: “Employees who have undergone gender reassignment or who are transgender must be supported to use all toilets and shower facilities which are available to other members of their newly acquired gender. Requiring transgendered people to use disabled toilet facilities instead of making reasonable adjustments is not lawful or good practice.” The NGA serves more than 80,000 members in over 70 percent of schools and trusts in England. Through its extensive reach, it offers advice, training, and events on issues such as equality and diversity, which aim to support school leaders in navigating complex legal and social landscapes. Not everyone agrees with the NGA's stance. Maya Forstater, CEO of the human-rights charity Sex Matters, has expressed her outrage, calling the guidance “grossly irresponsible” and “deeply disturbing.” Forstater explained, “Nowhere in the Equality Act does it say that men who identify as women have the right to access female toilets, so this is a shocking misrepresentation by the NGA.” She emphasized that the law mandates employers to provide single-sex toilets unless they are fully enclosed unisex facilities. “It is grossly irresponsible for the NGA to tell school governors and trustees otherwise,” Forstater continued. “The Equality Act protects transgender people so that they can’t be harassed or discriminated against, such as being denied employment or housing. It doesn’t give them an all-access pass to opposite-sex facilities. It is deeply disturbing that school governors are being misinformed by the NGA in a way that breaches the rights of teachers and other staff to basic privacy and dignity.” The issue of transgender access to facilities has already gained political attention. In June, Bridget Phillipson, the current Education Secretary, noted that under Labour’s proposals to simplify the process for gender recognition, trans women with male genitalia could use female lavatories. She explained that any trans woman with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) would be able to use female toilets, even if they had not undergone reassignment surgery. Currently, to obtain a GRC, individuals must provide two years of evidence that they have been living in their newly acquired gender, as well as receive approval from a panel of medical professionals and lawyers. Labour has expressed a desire to simplify this process, which they have criticized as “degrading and torturous” for trans people. They propose removing the two-year reflection period and reducing the requirement for medical sign-off to one clinician's approval. However, Sir Keir Starmer, Labour’s leader, has previously stated that transgender women do not have an automatic right to access female-only spaces. His stance has contributed to the ongoing debate over how gender recognition laws should evolve, and the implications these changes might have on single-sex spaces. Based on a report from the Daily Telegraph 2024-10-21

Jonathan Bailey, a plagiarism expert, addressed claims on Tuesday that Vice President Kamala Harris had plagiarized portions of her 2009 book, *Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor's Plan to Make Us Safer*. Bailey’s assessment came in response to accusations first raised by German plagiarism watchdog Stefan Weber, who claimed that Harris had borrowed several passages from other sources without proper citation. Conservative activist Christopher Rufo amplified these concerns in a post on X, which was later reposted by Senator JD Vance, R-Ohio. Vance took a shot at the Vice President, writing, "Lmao Kamala didn’t even write her own book! I wrote my own book, unlike Kamala Harris, who copied hers from Wikipedia." After reviewing Weber’s full report, Bailey concluded that while there were undeniable issues in the book, they did not stem from any malicious intent. Instead, the problems revealed what he described as "sloppy writing habits." He noted, “Harris’s book contained roughly two paragraphs copied from Wikipedia without citation. To be clear, that is plagiarism. It’s compounded by the fact that Wikipedia is typically not seen as a reliable source, and, according to Weber, there was an error in the information." Bailey added that it appeared unlikely that Harris or her co-author had any intention of presenting someone else’s work as their own. Rather, they had made poor choices that went largely unnoticed until now. He explained that, while the copied passages were indeed “sloppy to the point of negligence,” he did not believe there was any deliberate effort to deceive. "When you look at the portion of the book involved, the nature of the issues, and the citations provided, negligence remains more likely than malice in my eyes." In his closing remarks, Bailey advised Harris on how to move forward, acknowledging the political complexities surrounding the issue. He made it clear that neither an outright dismissal of the accusations nor a severe response seemed appropriate. “Ultimately, I recognize that this view will make absolutely no one happy. I don’t feel that the book is a product of wholesale malicious plagiarism, nor do I think it’s free from problems. No matter your side, this will be an unsatisfactory answer.” Plagiarism accusations have a history of derailing political careers. Notably, President Joe Biden’s first White House bid in 1987 was tarnished by such claims, and former Harvard President Claudine Gay resigned in 2023 after similar allegations, ending her brief tenure as the university’s head. Based on a report from the National Desk 2024-10-21

Donald Trump has declared that China’s President Xi Jinping would not provoke the U.S. under a Trump administration because Xi knows the former president is "crazy." Speaking to the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board, Trump suggested that if he were re-elected, China would think twice about blockading Taiwan due to his tough stance. "If you go into Taiwan, I’m sorry to do this, I’m going to tax you at 150% to 200%," Trump said, outlining his plan to impose massive tariffs on China if it took aggressive action. On the campaign trail, Trump has repeatedly asserted that America’s adversaries would avoid challenging U.S. interests if he were back in the White House. He argued that his unpredictability and willingness to respond forcefully kept foreign powers in check. "President Xi respects me and he knows I’m [expletive] crazy," Trump remarked, insisting that military force would not be necessary to prevent a blockade of Taiwan. Reflecting on his past relationship with Xi, Trump described it as strong, though he stopped short of calling Xi a friend. "I had a very strong relationship with him," Trump said. "He was actually a really good, I don’t want to say friend – I don’t want to act foolish, ‘he was my friend’ – but I got along with him great." He further praised Xi as "a very fierce person." Trump also spoke positively of his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin. "I got along with him great," Trump said, though he claimed to have issued a stark warning to Putin about Ukraine. According to Trump, he threatened Putin with severe consequences if Russia invaded Ukraine. "I’m going to hit you right in the middle of fricking Moscow," Trump claimed to have told Putin. "I said, ‘We’re friends. I don’t want to do it, but I have no choice.’" Putin, Trump said, doubted his resolve, to which Trump responded, "You’re going to be hit so hard, and I’m going to take those [expletive] domes right off your head. Because, you know, he lives under the domes." Trump’s foreign policy stance, branded "America First," focuses on trade wars and limiting U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts, particularly the Russia-Ukraine war. His choice of Ohio Senator JD Vance as a running mate has concerned Ukraine’s allies, given Vance’s firm opposition to sending further U.S. aid to the country. On immigration, Trump defended his administration’s controversial "zero tolerance" family-separation policy. "I said, 'We’re going to separate your family.' It doesn’t sound nice, but when a family hears they’re going to be separated, you know what they do? They stay where they are, because we couldn’t handle it," Trump explained. He acknowledged that there were humanitarian concerns but said that tough decisions had to be made. As for the upcoming election, Trump voiced his fears of unrest, not from foreign actors but from within the U.S. "I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within," he said, referring to what he called "sick people, radical left lunatics" who he believed could cause trouble. Based on a report from the BBC 2024-10-21

A unique piece of Cold War history is up for grabs on the edge of Dartmoor: a 122 sq ft nuclear bunker is set to be auctioned with a guide price of £12,000. Hidden underground and accessible only via a 15-foot vertical shaft and rusty ladder, the bunker near the village of Ugborough is far from your typical real estate listing. Prospective buyers are even warned to “exercise extreme caution” when viewing the property, with the tour being taken entirely at one’s own risk. The bunker, which lacks windows and modern amenities, offers only the barest of creature comforts. Its interior features a 70-year-old iron bunk bed, a chemical toilet, a worn fire blanket, and a few battered wooden shelves and cupboards. Originally designed to detect nuclear threats, this Cold War-era Royal Observer Corps (ROC) bunker was a vital part of Britain’s defense strategy during a time of heightened tension between the West and the Soviet Union. The bunker’s current owner, 76-year-old retired engineer David Cavendish, purchased the property nearly two decades ago for £5,000, after stumbling across a newspaper article on Cold War bunkers. Cavendish, a member of Subterranea Britannica (Sub Brit), a society dedicated to studying man-made underground spaces, explained, “It sounded like an interesting curiosity, so I went for it.” Despite his interest in the Cold War, Cavendish insists he’s not a fanatic, but enjoys reading about the era. Interestingly, Cavendish never spent a night in the bunker. “I’ve never had the courage to lock myself in,” he admitted. “I can’t say I’m claustrophobic, but I wouldn’t like to do it.” The bunker would have been manned by three civilian volunteers during the Cold War, who took turns working eight-hour shifts, constantly on the lookout for potential Russian nuclear missiles. Cavendish, who checked on the bunker two or three times a year, noted that he grew fond of the surrounding Devon countryside. His children, however, showed little interest in the site, and after 19 years, he decided it was time to sell. "I haven't found an alternative use for it, and as I am getting older, it's time to part company." The retired engineer acknowledged that his wife was initially less than enthusiastic about the purchase. “She thinks I was slightly cranky, and I didn’t tell her I’d bought it, but she found out later,” Cavendish said. Despite her initial reservations, it seems the bunker has remained a quirky, if underused, addition to the family's life. A handful of interested parties have already signed up to bid at Monday’s online auction, according to the estate agent, Luscombe Maye. The agent advises potential buyers to be cautious, noting in the advertisement that the bunker shows signs of water damage and “some water ingress and damage to the lid.” The bunker is one of about 1,500 built in the UK between 1956 and the 1960s. While these shelters were designed for use by ROC volunteers, they were not intended for the general public. Despite the small size and lack of modern conveniences, Cavendish believes the new owner might find a way to enjoy the site. He joked that buyers could “pitch a tent next to it and spend a nice time there.” For those fascinated by Cold War relics or looking for an unusual piece of real estate, this bunker offers a rare opportunity—just be prepared for an unconventional living experience. Based on a report from the Daily Telegraph 2024-10-21

Philip G. Zimbardo, the psychologist renowned for the controversial “Stanford Prison Experiment,” has passed away at the age of 91. Stanford University announced his death on Friday, stating that he died on October 14 at his home in San Francisco. The cause of death was not disclosed. Zimbardo's legacy is intertwined with the infamous 1971 prison study, which was intended to explore the psychological effects of imprisonment. In this experiment, Zimbardo and a group of graduate students recruited college-aged males to simulate life in a mock prison set up in the basement of a building on the Stanford campus. The experiment, which was supposed to last two weeks, was cut short after only six days. The participants who were assigned the role of guards quickly became abusive, while those acting as prisoners suffered from severe psychological distress, including anxiety, depression, and rage. Zimbardo himself faced criticism for his role in the study, as he took on the position of superintendent, becoming actively involved rather than remaining an impartial observer. In later reflections, Zimbardo admitted that the results were both unexpected and disturbing. “The outcome of our study was shocking and unexpected,” he co-wrote with one of the graduate students who participated in the project. Despite its ethical controversies, the Stanford Prison Experiment has become a cornerstone in the study of the psychology of evil and the ethics of research involving human subjects. It is frequently used in psychology courses as a case study to examine the complex dynamics of power, authority, and moral behavior under extreme conditions. In addition to his work on the prison experiment, Zimbardo made significant contributions to various fields of psychological research, including persuasion, hypnosis, cult behavior, shyness, time perspective, altruism, and compassion, according to Stanford University. Zimbardo is survived by his wife, Christina Maslach Zimbardo, along with their three children and four grandchildren. Based on a report from the News Nation 2024-10-21

As the 2024 election neared, Donald Trump once again made efforts to suppress potential damaging statements from adult-film actress Stormy Daniels, according to a recent report. Trump’s lawyer attempted to negotiate a deal with Daniels in the months leading up to Election Day, aiming to prevent her from making unflattering remarks about the former president. Trump, who had previously been convicted on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records related to hush money payments to Daniels, reportedly sought to make another attempt at silencing her. Maddow explained that Trump’s legal team reached out to Daniels offering a financial arrangement designed to minimize what she owed Trump in legal fees. Despite Trump's conviction, Daniels was still on the hook for over half a million dollars in legal costs stemming from a failed defamation lawsuit she filed against Trump in 2018. Maddow reported that the deal aimed to "get another hush money deal," with Trump’s lawyer suggesting a way to reduce Daniels' debt in exchange for her silence. Citing documents from Daniels’ attorney, Maddow said that Trump’s legal team intended to "launder the new hush money payment" by framing it as a settlement of the legal judgment Daniels owed. According to the report, Trump’s lawyer proposed settling the outstanding amount for $620,000, provided Daniels agreed to remain silent about her past interactions with Trump and refrained from making any defamatory comments about him, his business, or his suitability as a presidential candidate. An email obtained from Daniels’ attorney reportedly included the exact terms: the offer to settle for $620,000 in exchange for Daniels’ agreement to "make no public or private statements related to any alleged past interactions with President Trump" or any disparaging remarks about him. However, Maddow noted that Daniels rejected the offer. When Daniels declined, Trump’s attorney responded with a slightly increased offer—$635,000—but this time, without any mention of a non-disclosure agreement. Eventually, Daniels agreed to a settlement of $627,500, and no confidentiality clause was included in the deal. During her news segment, Maddow shared a screenshot of the email from Trump’s lawyer. In response to the report, Trump's spokesperson, Steven Cheung, dismissed the claims, stating that the documents Maddow referenced were part of an "illegal foreign hacking attack" against Trump and his team. Cheung said they were "working with authorities to determine the legal repercussions" for what he claimed were federal offenses related to the use of stolen material by "terror regime adversaries." Cheung's comments alluded to the broader context of cyberattacks targeting Trump’s campaign. In September, the Department of Justice charged three men with hacking Trump’s campaign. While acknowledging that some documents had surfaced online, Maddow clarified that MSNBC had obtained the documents directly from Daniels’ legal team, not from a hacking source. This latest attempt to silence Daniels, even after Trump's conviction, shows the ongoing complexities surrounding his legal battles and their intersection with his presidential campaigns. Based on a report from the Rolling Stone 2024-10-21

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar’s attack on Israel last year was intended to trigger a transformation across the Middle East. He envisioned dragging Iran, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, and much of the region into a decisive battle that would result in the destruction of the Jewish state. The attack left some 1,200 Israelis dead, and though it profoundly shifted the region's political landscape, it failed to achieve Sinwar’s ultimate goal. Instead of Israel’s collapse, the aftermath has seen tens of thousands of deaths in Gaza and Lebanon, including civilians, as well as the elimination of key figures like Sinwar and Hezbollah’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah. For the first time in history, Israel is directly engaged in military conflict with Iran. Much like the Sept. 11 attacks orchestrated by Osama bin Laden, where he aimed to cripple American influence in the Middle East and promote Islamist rule, Sinwar’s attempt also fell short. The immediate result of his bloody strategy has been an exhibition of Israel’s military strength, the weakening of the Iranian-led "axis of resistance," and a further distancing of Palestinian self-determination efforts. One of the reasons for this outcome is Israel’s ability to deal with its enemies sequentially rather than simultaneously. After subduing Gaza and toppling Hamas’s de facto rule in the enclave, Israel shifted its focus to Hezbollah in Lebanon. Precision airstrikes took out the leadership of Hezbollah, leaving the militant group incapacitated as a strategic deterrent for Iran. This move allowed Israel to begin ground operations in southern Lebanon. Simultaneously, with support from the U.S., Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is now planning to target Iran in retaliation for a ballistic missile attack. Despite these ongoing military engagements, Israeli society and its economy have remained largely stable. Based on a report from the WSJ | X | TOI 2024-10-21

Valentina Sampaio, the first openly transgender model for Victoria's Secret, has responded to critics following her groundbreaking appearance at the iconic fashion show. Sampaio made her debut on Tuesday at the highly anticipated return of the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, which took place at the Duggal Greenhouse in Brooklyn Navy Yard, New York City. She shared the runway with fellow transgender model Alex Consani, marking the first time transgender women were featured in the show’s history. Sampaio first made headlines in 2019 when she became Victoria’s Secret’s first transgender “Angel,” a term the company later retired in 2021 as part of an effort to redefine its image. That same year, the brand also canceled its annual fashion show amid mounting controversies and public criticism. One of the controversies that surrounded Victoria’s Secret occurred in 2018, just hours before the fashion show. Ed Razek, the former chief marketing officer of the company, told *Vogue* that transgender and plus-sized models wouldn’t be cast because the event was intended to represent a "fantasy." He later apologized for the comment, calling it "insensitive," and retired from his role a year later. Sampaio's journey to success has been remarkable. Born in the small village of Aquiraz in Northeastern Brazil, she was identified as transgender by a psychologist at the age of eight. By 12, she began going by the name Valentina and fully embracing her identity as a female. Her big break came when she graced the cover of *Vogue Paris* with the headline "Transgender Beauty," propelling her into the international spotlight. As Sampaio continues to break barriers, her message is clear: her presence on the runway is part of a broader movement toward acceptance and visibility for the transgender community. Based on a report from the NYP 2024-10-21

Troll responses removed.

UPDATE: US Investigates Leak of Classified Intel on Israel’s Plans to Strike Iran The U.S. government is investigating a significant leak of highly classified intelligence regarding Israel's planned retaliation against Iran, according to three sources familiar with the situation. One of the sources confirmed the authenticity of the documents involved. The leak has raised serious concerns within the U.S. government. "The leak is deeply concerning," a U.S. official told CNN. The documents, which are dated October 15 and 16, began circulating online last Friday after being posted on a Telegram channel called “Middle East Spectator.” Marked as top secret, these documents were intended to be viewed only by the U.S. and its “Five Eyes” intelligence-sharing allies—Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. The documents outline apparent Israeli preparations for a military strike against Iran. One of the leaked reports, attributed to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, discusses the movement of munitions by Israel. Another document, sourced to the National Security Agency, details Israeli air force exercises involving air-to-surface missiles, which are believed to be in preparation for a strike on Iran. CNN has chosen not to quote or display the documents directly. A U.S. official has confirmed that the investigation is now focused on identifying who had access to the alleged Pentagon document. Any leak of this nature automatically triggers an FBI investigation, in coordination with the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies. The FBI declined to provide any comment on the matter. The timing of the leak comes at a particularly delicate moment in U.S.-Israeli relations. Israel has been preparing to launch a retaliatory strike on Iran following a missile barrage by Iran on October 1. This leak is likely to infuriate Israeli officials, who have been tight-lipped about their military plans. One of the leaked documents also touches on a topic Israel has consistently refused to confirm publicly: its possession of nuclear weapons. The document states that the U.S. has not detected any indication that Israel intends to use nuclear weapons against Iran. “If it is true that Israeli tactical plans to respond to Iran’s attack on October 1 have been leaked, it is a serious breach,” said Mick Mulroy, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East and a retired CIA officer. Mulroy emphasized that the leak could have far-reaching implications for U.S.-Israeli cooperation. “The future coordination between the U.S. and Israel could be challenged as well. Trust is a key component in the relationship, and depending on how this was leaked, that trust could be eroded.” This is not the first time a leak of U.S. intelligence has caused tensions with allies. A major leak of classified documents last year strained relations between the U.S. and several key partners, including South Korea and Ukraine. Based on a report from CNN 2024-10-20

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), led by Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas, expressed its condolences on the death of Hamas chief Yahya Sinwar, referring to him as a “great national leader” and describing his death as a martyrdom. Sinwar, a key figure in orchestrating Hamas’s activities, was killed during the ongoing conflict with Israel. The PLO urged Palestinian national unity in light of his death, as messages of mourning poured in from various factions within the organization. Among those extending condolences were members of the PLO’s constituent groups, including Abbas’s secular Fatah party. In a statement, Fatah condemned Israel’s actions, saying, “Israel’s killing and will not succeed in breaking the will of our people.” Several left-wing PLO factions, such as the Palestinian National Initiative and the Palestinian Democratic Union, also expressed grief, despite historically opposing armed struggle against Israel. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan similarly offered condolences to Hamas representatives in talks on Friday, mourning the death of Sinwar. The Turkish Foreign Ministry released a statement following the discussions, further highlighting the diplomatic ties between Hamas and Turkey during the ongoing Gaza conflict. Sinwar’s death was confirmed by Hamas earlier on Friday. The terror group vowed that they would not release hostages unless Israeli forces withdrew from Gaza and halted their military operations. In light of Sinwar’s pivotal role in orchestrating the October 7, 2023, massacres, Abbas has expressed criticism of Hamas, accusing the group of providing Israel with “even more excuses and reasons to attack in the Gaza Strip.” However, despite his critique, Abbas has refrained from outright condemnation of Hamas’s actions. Israel has consistently accused Abbas and the PA of glorifying terrorism by honoring terrorists as “martyrs” and financially supporting the families of slain terrorists and those jailed for terror-related activities. This has further strained relations between the PA and Israel, as accusations of incitement through the Palestinian education system persist. Fatah has, on multiple occasions, praised the actions of Palestinian terrorists, with senior Fatah officials at times offering support to Hamas and its violent campaigns against Israelis. As the conflict continues, Abbas has suggested that the PA is willing to assume control of Gaza following Hamas’s removal from power. However, his condition remains the establishment of a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. International leaders, including those from the United States, have advocated for a reformed Palestinian Authority to take control of Gaza in the post-Hamas era, as efforts to stabilize the region intensify. Based on a report from the Barrons & TOI 2024-10-19

South Korea's spy agency has reported that North Korea has begun sending troops to aid Russia in its conflict with Ukraine, a move Seoul has described as a "grave security threat." This alarming revelation comes a day after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky suggested that as many as 10,000 North Korean soldiers could join the war, citing intelligence reports. In response to these developments, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol convened a security meeting, urging the international community to respond with "all available means." According to South Korea's National Intelligence Service (NIS), 1,500 North Korean troops have already arrived in Russia, with some estimates suggesting that the final number could reach up to 12,000. This comes amidst increasing evidence that North Korea has also been supplying Russia with ammunition, including a missile found in Ukraine’s Poltava region. "The West can not stay silent. It is time to make a move." Earlier this week, Russian President Vladimir Putin introduced a bill to ratify a military pact with Kim Jong Un, promising mutual support in the event of "aggression" against either nation. This development further underscores the strengthening of military ties between the two countries. South Korea’s NIS has also reported that North Korean troops are currently training at Russian military bases in Vladivostok, Ussuriysk, Khabarovsk, and Vlagoveshensk. Aerial photographs of these locations have been released, showing gatherings of North Korean soldiers. Additionally, a photograph of North Korea’s Chongjin port reportedly shows a Russian ship carrying North Korean troops. The NIS revealed that since August, North Korea has sent 13,000 containers filled with shells, missiles, and anti-armour rockets to Russia. It is believed that around eight million 122-mm and 152-mm shells have been supplied. However, some military experts question the effectiveness of incorporating North Korean troops into the Russian frontlines, citing language barriers and the lack of recent combat experience among North Korean forces. Valeriy Ryabykh, editor of the Ukrainian publication *Defence Express*, commented, "They could guard some sections of the Russian-Ukrainian border, which would free Russian units for fighting elsewhere. I would rule out the possibility that these units will immediately appear on the front line." Based on a report from the BBC | X 2024-10-19

A post making unsubstaniated claims and advocating an extreme violent act on a state has been removed. Noted was the member who also gave this post a plus 1 like. A number of additional posts by one of the same members @thaibeachlovers have been removed for trolling and off topic comments

In a light-hearted yet pointed moment, Vice President Kamala Harris took aim at former President Donald Trump during a pre-recorded video address for the Al Smith charity dinner in New York City. Although Harris couldn’t attend the event in person due to her campaign commitments in Wisconsin, she found a unique way to make an impact through a video featuring comedian Molly Shannon. Shannon reprised her famous “Saturday Night Live” character, Mary Katherine Gallagher, a Catholic schoolgirl, for the occasion. The banter didn’t stop there. Shannon cautioned Harris against saying anything negative about Catholics, to which Harris quipped, “I would never do that no matter where I was. That would be like criticizing Detroit in Detroit,” referring to Trump’s recent disparaging comments about the city during a speech in Detroit. The video continued with Shannon asking Harris, “Does it bother you that Trump guy insults you all the time?” Harris offered a measured and empowering response: “You should never let anyone tell you who you are, you tell them who you are.” Following this humorous exchange, Shannon left the scene, and Harris addressed the dinner attendees directly. Her message turned serious as she emphasized the importance of the event’s tradition of unity and charitable work. “The Al Smith dinner provides a rare opportunity to set aside partisanship and come together to do some good by supporting the tremendous charitable work of the Catholic church,” Harris said in her speech. She encouraged the audience to focus on unity and cooperation, saying, “In the spirit of tonight’s dinner, let us recommit to reaching across divides, to seek understanding and common ground. And in honor of the great Al Smith, let us fight to build a better future with faith in God, our country, and in each other.” The Al Smith dinner, now in its 79th year, is hosted by New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan and is a key event for political figures, offering them a chance to engage in some good-natured humor while also supporting the charitable efforts of the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation. Harris’ absence at the dinner was noted by Trump, who attended in person and criticized her for not being there. The event has long been a venue where presidential candidates make light-hearted remarks every four years, but it took on a different tone in 2016 when Trump used the occasion to launch attacks against then-opponent Hillary Clinton. In 2020, both Trump and President Joe Biden addressed the dinner virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Harris' speech, though remote, struck a balance between humor and sincerity, reminding the audience of the importance of unity in a deeply divided time. Based on a report from the Hill 2024-10-19

The Archdiocese of Los Angeles has agreed to a groundbreaking $880 million settlement to resolve 1,353 claims of childhood sexual abuse. This monumental agreement, considered the largest of its kind by a Catholic archdiocese, follows the introduction of California Assembly Bill 218, which allowed victims a three-year window to revive past civil claims of sexual abuse involving minors. Many of the claims date back decades, some as far as the 1940s. The alleged perpetrators include clergy members, lay individuals, religious order priests, and clergy from other dioceses who were serving in Los Angeles. The breadth of the settlement reflects both the scale of the abuse and the magnitude of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, which is the largest Catholic diocese in the United States. In a letter addressing the settlement, Archbishop José H. Gomez expressed deep regret for the suffering endured by the victims. "I am sorry for every one of these incidents, from the bottom of my heart," Gomez wrote. "My hope is that this settlement will provide some measure of healing for what these men and women have suffered." The settlement was reached following mediation that began last fall, after the window for reviving claims under California's bill had closed. Lawyers for the plaintiffs and the Archdiocese worked together to find a resolution that would allow victims to receive compensation while ensuring the archdiocese could continue its operations. A joint statement released by the Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel acknowledged the archdiocese’s acceptance of responsibility, stating: “While there is no amount of money that can replace what was taken from these 1,353 brave individuals who have suffered in silence for decades, there is justice in accountability.” Archbishop Gomez explained in his letter that the funding for the settlement would not come from donations but instead from reserves, investments, loans, and other archdiocesan assets. The settlement represents yet another chapter in the Catholic Church’s ongoing struggle to address its global history of abuse. In California alone, at least a third of the state's 12 Roman Catholic dioceses have either filed for bankruptcy or considered doing so in response to the influx of sexual abuse lawsuits, according to reports from last year. This settlement underscores the immense toll that decades of abuse have taken on survivors and marks a significant moment in the church’s reckoning with its troubled past. While financial compensation may offer some relief, the pain and trauma of those affected cannot be erased. Archbishop Gomez’s hope, shared by many, is that this resolution will provide victims with some degree of healing and justice. Based on a report from the WP 2024-10-19

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump recently shared that he received a phone call from Apple CEO Tim Cook, who expressed concerns about the hefty financial penalties imposed on the tech giant by the European Union. This revelation came during a conversation Trump had with podcaster Patrick Bet-David, which was released on Thursday. According to Trump, Cook contacted him regarding the financial challenges Apple faces due to EU regulatory actions. "Two hours ago, three hours ago, he (Cook) called me," Trump said during the interview. He further explained the details of the conversation, stating, "He said the European Union has just fined us $15 billion. … Then on top of that, they got fined by the European Union another $2 billion." This reference points to the mounting pressure on Apple and other Big Tech companies from European regulators. The European Union has been increasing its scrutiny of large tech corporations, investigating their practices and imposing significant penalties in order to promote fair competition. Last month, Apple lost a court case with the EU, forcing the company to pay 13 billion euros (approximately $14.08 billion) in back taxes to Ireland. The case was part of a broader initiative by the EU to rein in tech companies and ensure smaller competitors can thrive in the market. Additionally, earlier this year, Apple was fined $2 billion by the EU for antitrust violations. This fine stemmed from accusations that Apple restricted competition in the music streaming industry by enforcing certain rules on its App Store. Trump, recounting his conversation with Cook, implied that resolving these issues would require him to win the upcoming election. “Tim, I got to get elected first. … But I’m not going to let them take advantage of our companies. That won’t be happening,” Trump quoted himself as saying to the Apple CEO. The nearly 90-minute podcast featured Trump discussing various topics, but his remarks about Cook’s concerns highlighted the ongoing tensions between U.S. tech giants and European regulators. Apple has yet to confirm the authenticity of the phone call between Cook and Trump, and no statement has been released by the company in response to the matter. However, the growing focus on Big Tech by the EU continues to shape the landscape of international business and politics, with Apple being one of the key players affected by these regulatory measures. Based on a report from Reuters 2024-10-19

In a move that has sparked controversy, Sir Keir Starmer has agreed to a Rwanda-style deal to deport migrants who arrive at the British-owned Chagos Islands, sending them to St Helena, another UK territory over 5,000 miles away. This decision mirrors a similar arrangement made by the previous Conservative government, which Starmer once condemned as "completely wrong" and "immoral." The Chagos Islands, located in the Indian Ocean, are a strategic British territory that houses the Diego Garcia airbase, co-operated with the United States. Since 2021, the islands have faced an influx of asylum seekers, particularly Sri Lankan migrants fleeing political persecution. This surge in migrants has become problematic for the military operations of the airbase. Many of the migrants have been housed in temporary camps, and some are contesting their detention in court. Under the new arrangement, any further migrants who arrive at the Chagos Islands before their handover to Mauritius—an agreement Starmer made earlier this month—will be deported to St Helena. St Helena, one of the most isolated places on Earth and home to less than 4,500 people, lies in the middle of the South Atlantic. Its limited public services, including a single hospital, have left the local population uneasy about the deal. Islanders were not consulted before the agreement, leading to frustration and concern. In return for housing migrants, the government of St Helena has been allocated £6.65 million in funding, which it plans to use to alleviate its healthcare backlog. Despite the financial boost, islanders fear that the cultural shock and strain on services will be too much for the small population to bear. Andrew Turner, a St Helena councillor, expressed concern, saying, “We are a very small island. There are less than 4,500 people who are resident on St Helena, so any influx to the island would have an impact. The cultural shock alone would have a big impact.” The situation has ignited criticism back in Westminster as well. Starmer has faced backlash for canceling the UK’s Rwanda migrant deal shortly after assuming office, a plan that would have involved sending asylum seekers to Rwanda for resettlement. Many are questioning how the new arrangement with St Helena differs from the scrapped Rwanda deal, especially given that both agreements involve deporting migrants to remote locations in exchange for financial support. The Prime Minister has also been accused of neglecting the needs of British overseas territories like St Helena. Islanders feel that their small community is being used as a stopgap solution for a complex migration issue. A spokesman for Friends of the British Overseas Territories, a campaign group, criticized the deal, stating, "Saint Helena is a small island with public services that already face a number of pressures. The last thing it needs is an undetermined number of illegal migrants being homed there for an unspecified length of time." The Foreign Office has defended the agreement, citing the "deeply troubling situation" on the Chagos Islands as the reason for this new plan. A spokesman explained that the government inherited the issue of stranded migrants on the islands, leading to mounting legal challenges. “Ministers have worked hard to find solutions and contingency plans which protect the integrity of British territorial borders and migrant welfare,” the spokesman said, adding that the arrangement would only be implemented if migrants continued to arrive on Diego Garcia. This latest development has intensified the ongoing debate over how the UK handles asylum seekers and the ethical implications of deporting them to far-flung territories. As the Chagos Islands are set to transfer to Mauritius, the future of the migrants arriving there—and the communities like St Helena tasked with housing them—remains uncertain. Based on a report from the Daily Telegraph 2024-10-19