Social Media

The topic here is: Latest developments and discussion of recent events in the Ukraine War

cross posting troll post removed @Gweiloman you are having a lot of posts removed. It will be you removed. next.

Dutch leader denounces ‘Jew hunt in the streets of Amsterdam’ 'The days of chasing Jews down European city streets should remain in the dark annals of history,' the Israeli embassy in Washington said of the violence. Amsterdam police reported on Friday that five individuals were hospitalized and 62 people were detained. The events unfolded after a soccer match, with rioters actively seeking out Israeli fans in what authorities described as systematic attacks. This incident has sparked condemnation from both Dutch and Israeli leaders, as well as Jewish organizations worldwide, with Israel’s foreign minister undertaking an urgent diplomatic mission to the Netherlands. German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock reacted with shock, calling the incident “awful and deeply shameful for us in Europe.” She stated on X, “The outbreak of such violence against Jews breaks all boundaries. There is no justification for this.” Baerbock emphasized that Jewish people must be able to feel secure in Europe, a sentiment shared by other international officials. The United Nations also weighed in, with spokesperson Jeremy Laurence from the UN human rights office describing the reports as deeply troubling. He emphasized, “Nobody, nobody should be subjected to discrimination or violence on the basis of their national, religious, ethnic or other origin.” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressed similar sentiments, condemning the attacks as “unacceptable.” In her message on X, she stated, “Antisemitism has absolutely no place in Europe. And we are determined to fight all forms of hatred.” This incident reflects an ongoing global concern over the safety of Jewish communities, particularly in the context of sporting events involving Israeli teams, as these matches have increasingly become a focal point for antisemitic violence amid escalating Middle Eastern tensions. As the investigation progresses, the world will be closely watching how Dutch authorities address this latest disturbing incident. Based on a report by BBC | AP | X 2024-11-09

A post with blatant conspiracey nonsense has been removed.

Post with numerous unattributed claims removed @Gweiloman along with historical repetitive ramblings about Boris Johnson

In an exclusive interview with NBC News, President-elect Donald Trump outlined his plan for one of the largest mass deportations in U.S. history, which he said is a necessary step to fortify the country’s borders. He reiterated his campaign pledge to build a “strong and powerful” border as one of his administration's first priorities. Responding to questions about his commitment to mass deportations, Trump emphasized that his administration would have “no choice” but to implement the plan. Trump described his electoral victory over Vice President Kamala Harris as a mandate for what he called "common sense" policies. “We obviously have to make the border strong and powerful, and we have to — at the same time, we want people to come into our country,” he said. “And you know, I’m not somebody that says, ‘No, you can’t come in.’ We want people to come in.” During his campaign, Trump promised to lead the “largest deportation effort in American history.” When asked about the potential cost, he responded, “It’s not a question of a price tag. It’s not — really, we have no choice. When people have killed and murdered, when drug lords have destroyed countries, and now they’re going to go back to those countries because they’re not staying here. There is no price tag.” Details on how the administration plans to execute such an expansive deportation are still unclear. Acting ICE Director Patrick J. Lechleitner previously acknowledged in July that a mass deportation effort would present significant logistical and financial challenges. Former Trump administration officials involved in immigration policy indicated that such an initiative would necessitate cooperation across multiple federal agencies, including the Justice Department and the Pentagon, due to its scale. Despite his hardline stance on immigration, Trump’s message on border security seems to have resonated with various voter demographics. He notably garnered support among Latino voters, despite the Democrats’ attempts to highlight his rhetoric on immigration issues and a pro-Trump comedian's controversial joke about Puerto Rico. Explaining his appeal, Trump said, “They want to have borders, and they like people coming in, but they have to come in with love for the country. They have to come in legally.” Trump also emphasized the wide coalition of voters that backed him, citing increased support among young voters, women, Asian Americans, and Latino voters compared to the 2020 election. “I started to see realignment could happen because the Democrats are not in line with the thinking of the country,” he said. “You can’t have defund the police, these kinds of things. They don’t want to give up and they don’t work, and the people understand that.” Reflecting on his recent phone calls with Vice President Harris and President Joe Biden following the election, Trump spoke about moving forward with a focus on his administration’s key promises, including his immigration policies. Based on a report by NBC 2024-11-08

In the hours following Donald Trump’s 2024 election victory, social media platform X saw a surge in conspiracy theories, this time driven by the political left. Fueled by claims of “missing votes” and other suspicions, posts casting doubt on the legitimacy of the election proliferated on Elon Musk's platform, marking a shift from previous years when election denial was predominantly associated with Trump’s supporters. According to research from PeakMetrics, the number of posts calling for recounts and questioning the results peaked at 94,000 per hour on Wednesday morning, with some posts receiving millions of views. “How can we have had record turnout and twenty million fewer votes cast nationally?” author John Pavlovitz wrote in a widely shared post viewed over 5 million times. Meanwhile, NewsGuard CEO Gordon Crovitz noted that terms like “Trump cheated” were trending, with over 92,000 mentions in just a few hours. Although many of these theories remain vague, the predominant claim suggests that 20 million votes are “missing.” Factually, the Associated Press vote count at that time was lower than the 2020 count by around 16 million votes. However, this discrepancy is easily explained: several states, especially those with high populations like California, were still counting votes. Election officials and experts were quick to push back. “No, 20 million votes aren’t missing,” said David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, in a post on X. He emphasized that the total vote count for 2024 would likely mirror that of 2020 once all votes were reported. These left-leaning conspiracy theories represent a significant challenge to democratic integrity, especially as they echo the denial tactics used by Trump’s supporters in 2020. “It doesn’t matter whether baseless allegations about voting irregularities come from the right or the left,” noted Nina Jankowicz, CEO of the American Sunlight Project. “The impact on our system of these lies is the same: People will end up trusting the infrastructure of democracy less, setting us up for more disinformation and disengagement.” She pointed to examples from Eastern Europe, where countries have struggled for decades to rebuild trust in their democratic systems after waves of misinformation. PeakMetrics data highlighted the persistence of these conspiracy posts, noting that between 2 am and 7 am Eastern Time—when social media activity typically declines—the number of posts remained high, possibly indicating automated activity. By 8 am, the rate of posts surged to nearly 32,000 per hour. This wave of conspiracy posts marked a shift from 2020’s election denial, which was largely prompted by Trump himself; this time, Trump’s opponent Kamala Harris publicly urged her supporters to accept the results and pledged a peaceful transfer of power. The phenomenon of “BlueAnon” conspiracy theories—a term that describes left-leaning accounts spreading unfounded claims—has gained traction in recent years. Mike Rothschild, an author who studies conspiracy theories, explains that events perceived as improbable, such as Trump’s victory, often fuel baseless narratives. “In this case, it’s a factually incorrect narrative that there are tens of millions of missing votes and that Russian bomb threats sabotaged the Harris campaign. Neither are true,” he stated, adding that lower turnout and ongoing vote counting explained the gaps. Based on a report by Wired 2024-11-08

You have probably heard of paedophile hunters. They are the self-styled vigilantes who pose as children online to ensnare creeps who seek to meet up with boys and girls for sex - then expose them online. Well, I was one of Australia's first paedophile hunters - and I scored my first scalp long before social media made it easy to expose these monsters. Nowadays, 'hunters' lay their traps on social media and chat rooms, arrange a meeting with the target and confront them on camera. Usually they hand the footage and chat logs over to police to handle, but sometimes the public shaming is punishment enough. But back when I started, we operated in the shadows and our methods were old-fashioned. It was the late '90s in Sydney. I had discovered the address of a teacher from a private school who had been accused of a litany of sickening sex crimes - including kidnapping - against young boys in the eastern suburbs. William Charles Lucan-Roberts, 61, had been charged with abusing dozens of children aged 12 to 16 over a four-decade reign of terror at the prestigious Sydney Boys High School, whose alma mater includes Hollywood stars and prime ministers. Lucan-Roberts, a languages and cricket master, was awaiting trial when, under the cover of darkness and dressed in all-black, I dropped a leaflet at every door in his building and every post box on his street. 'Warning: alleged paedophile William Charles Lucan-Roberts lives at ---,' my photocopied letter read. 'He is accused of raping and molesting dozens of pupils at Sydney Boys High School and will appear at Downing Centre Local Court on Thursday.' The following day - and less than 24 hours before his trial was due to begin - he was found dead in the backyard swimming pool of a friend's house. 'I felt it was better I go...' he wrote in his two-line suicide note. Did I feel a hint of guilt that my act of vigilantism may have been the final straw that made him end his life? No, not one bit. Quite the opposite: I was ecstatic. And I still am to this day. It was exactly the result I wanted. I remember like it was yesterday the rush of relief that washed over me, knowing his alleged victims could rest easy in the knowledge that he was gone. That's the thing about paedophiles: they never stop. They never, ever stop. So I wish they would all kill themselves. I seriously wish that. Some people say: 'It's terrible when anybody dies.' To them, I say: 'No. When it comes to people who sexually assault children, they don't deserve to live. They've given up their right to live in society.' And I am glad that I've helped at least one make a swift exit. I carried out similar letter-writing campaigns against more than a dozen other suspected or convicted paedophiles in Sydney's eastern suburbs. But I have never had confirmation that my efforts yielded the same result. You may wonder why I am so driven to hound those who hurt children. Well, when I was a child, a friend at school told me her father was 'doing things' to her. She didn't say he was beating her, just that he was doing 'something'. And, of course, at that age, I had no idea what she was talking about. I was the only friend she had ever invited around to her house: it was filthy. She slept on newspapers. Grimy dishes were piled high in the sink. Her dad was a drunken old creep and she lived alone with him. She told me that every night she had to run him a bath and make him a hot chocolate. Then one day she said, 'I'm going to poison him.' At first, I didn't believe her. It was just childish words spoken in anger. But I'll never forget the day the principal came into our classroom with a solemn look on her face and asked to speak to my friend. Her father was dead. She was so happy afterwards. That's why I campaigned for an Australian version of 'Megan's Law' in the U.S. The law, which forces authorities to make public the addresses of registered sex offenders, was brought in after the rape and murder of seven-year-old Megan Kanka. Her neighbour, convicted sex offender Jesse Timmendequas, had lured her into his house before he disposed of her body in a nearby park. No such law exists in Australia, although Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has previously called for a national child sex offender registry. Australian parents should be allowed to know if the person living on their street is a paedophile. Critics say they will just be pushed out and have to live somewhere else. Good. Keep pushing them out until they live in a shed in Timbuktu for all I care. Or even better: keep harassing them until they kill themselves. They're not normal. I see them as evil. It's pure evil to want to harm a child. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-08

In her debut as Leader of the Opposition during Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), Kemi Badenoch didn’t hold back as she confronted Sir Keir Starmer on a range of topics, including past Labour comments about Donald Trump, UK defence spending, and inheritance tax policies affecting family farms. As the newly elected Conservative Party leader, Badenoch committed to a “constructive opposition,” aiming to bring direct questions to the forefront. Her exchanges set a starkly different tone from her predecessor, Rishi Sunak, as she challenged Starmer’s stance with pointed remarks and criticism. Moving to the national defense agenda, Badenoch urged Starmer to commit to a 2.5% target in defense spending, to which he responded affirmatively. However, Badenoch challenged him on what she labeled a “cruel family-farms tax,” referring to the £1 million inheritance tax relief cap, which she argued could harm small-scale farming operations. Starmer countered that the changes would not impact most farmers, though Badenoch continued to express doubts. The debate over foreign policy continued as Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey questioned Starmer on how he would handle potential differences with Trump on Ukraine and NATO. Starmer emphasized Parliament’s united support for Ukraine and expressed optimism about collaborating with Trump. Badenoch’s no-nonsense questioning highlighted her intent to hold the Labour government accountable and prompted Starmer to defend Labour’s budget priorities. Badenoch mocked Starmer’s detailed responses, quipping, “Discuss, discuss, discuss, chat, chat, chat – he has no plans whatsoever for building on the special relationship.” She then attacked the Labour budget as a “copy and paste of Bidenomics” and asked if Starmer aimed to follow in President Joe Biden’s footsteps as a “one-term leader.” Badenoch’s direct and challenging style brought fresh energy to her first PMQs, contrasting with Sunak’s previously measured approach. Her strategic lines of questioning kept Starmer on the defensive and won her applause from Conservative backbenchers, setting the stage for what could be a notably contentious period in British politics. Based on a report by BBC | X 2024-11-08

With Donald Trump reclaiming the presidency after a decisive victory, special counsel Jack Smith is reportedly exploring how best to conclude two federal cases against the president-elect. Sources familiar with the discussions, who wished to remain anonymous due to the sensitive nature of the deliberations, indicated that Smith may submit a comprehensive report of his findings to Attorney General Merrick Garland, allowing the Department of Justice (DOJ) to close these cases before Trump is sworn in. The federal cases in question involve accusations of mishandling classified documents after Trump’s departure from the White House and alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. While these cases could theoretically continue until Inauguration Day, Smith is considering pausing them in light of Trump’s renewed political standing. Meanwhile, in New York, Trump’s legal team plans to request a delay in his sentencing for 34 felony counts related to falsifying business records, charges that stem from hush money payments to an adult-film actress. The potential winding down of these cases has raised significant questions about the influence of political shifts on ongoing legal proceedings. If Jack Smith’s report is completed and submitted, it could detail the findings of the two federal probes, which Garland has previously suggested he would release publicly should they reach his office. A Trump campaign spokesperson, Steven Cheung, argued that the former president’s electoral success is a public mandate against what they describe as a politicized justice system, saying, “It is now abundantly clear that Americans want an immediate end to the weaponization of our justice system, so we can, as President Trump said in his historic speech last night, unify our country and work together for the betterment of our nation.” Smith also faces a complex legal challenge involving U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon’s decision to dismiss the classified documents case in Florida. Cannon, a Trump appointee, ruled that Smith’s appointment as special counsel was unlawful, a decision that defied longstanding legal precedents. If Cannon’s ruling stands, it could jeopardize future special counsels and pose risks to federal prosecutors or other officials serving in temporary roles. The DOJ has expressed concern that this decision could set a precedent with implications beyond Trump’s case. Outside the federal cases, Trump faces additional legal battles in Georgia. Fulton County District Attorney Fani T. Willis filed charges in 2023 against Trump and several associates related to alleged election interference. That case hit a roadblock when Willis faced allegations of an inappropriate romantic relationship with an external lawyer involved in the prosecution, leading to a temporary pause in the proceedings. Trump and his co-defendants subsequently appealed Judge Scott McAfee’s refusal to remove Willis and her team from the case. Oral arguments on this matter are scheduled for December 5, with a decision expected by March, after which an appeal to Georgia’s Supreme Court may follow. With Trump on the verge of assuming office once more, the legal landscape surrounding him is complex, involving federal, state, and procedural questions. How these cases evolve in the coming months could set critical precedents, shaping the boundaries of political influence on the judiciary and the scope of accountability for public officials at the highest level. Based on a report by WP 2024-11-08

Donald Trump's election victory has reintroduced a climate change skeptic into the White House, raising serious concerns about the future of U.S. climate policy and the global push to mitigate human-driven climate change. Trump’s win positions him to reverse many of the green policies established by his predecessor, potentially undermining worldwide efforts to control rising temperatures. Throughout his campaign, Trump revived his notorious "drill, baby, drill" slogan, framing U.S. oil and gas reserves as valuable “liquid gold.” In his victory speech, he emphasized the wealth beneath American soil, signaling his intent to expand fossil fuel production. According to experts, a second Trump term could significantly hinder the United States’ transition to green energy, casting doubt on whether key climate targets can be reached. The effects of his election victory could be felt almost immediately, even before his inauguration in January. U.S. negotiators, who play an influential role in international climate agreements, may face reduced authority and leverage at the upcoming COP29 climate summit, set to begin on November 11 in Azerbaijan. With a more hesitant U.S. stance on climate diplomacy, global efforts to reduce reliance on fossil fuels could falter, creating an opening for other major emitters, like China and India, to decelerate their own climate commitments. "With Trump's win, we now face, at best, a repeat of his last term's climate inaction—a four-year pause we simply can't afford in this critical decade," stated Johan Rockstrom, a climate scientist and director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. "With a climate skeptic back in the White House, the pressure on the world, and especially on EU leadership, to act will intensify enormously." Trump’s first term set a precedent, as he withdrew the United States from the landmark Paris Agreement, a decision President Joe Biden later reversed. Trump's renewed vow to withdraw again from the agreement means the world’s second-largest emitter could back out of the global accord once more, undoing progress the Biden administration had worked to restore. Officially, withdrawing from the Paris Agreement requires a year-long process, which would keep the U.S. technically in the accord until 2026—though likely only in name rather than active participation. Laurence Tubiana, one of the architects of the Paris Agreement, commented on the impact of Trump’s return to the White House, calling it a challenge not only for the United States but for the entire global community. “It’s worse than 2016. And not only in the United States,” Tubiana told AFP. “It will take an unprecedented mobilization so that the shock of the American decision does not impact other countries that have become reluctant to accelerate action.” The U.S., under the Paris Agreement, had pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by half by 2030, using 2005 levels as a baseline. As of 2023, emissions had already dropped by 18 percent, according to a report from the Rhodium Group. However, an analysis from Carbon Brief suggests that if Trump follows through on his plans, his return to office could add an estimated four billion metric tons of CO₂-equivalent emissions by 2030. This amount would be comparable to the combined annual emissions of the European Union and Japan, representing a setback that could prove challenging for the global community to offset. As the world continues to grapple with the realities of climate change, the consequences of a shift in U.S. policy away from emissions reduction and climate diplomacy are poised to affect both current and future generations. For many environmental advocates and climate scientists, Trump's re-election represents a critical moment that could either renew or hinder the global resolve to fight climate change at this pivotal time. Based on a report by AP 2024-11-08

Nearly a month ago, Kamala Harris appeared on *The View* for what was expected to be a favorable interview to connect with the American public. But the conversation quickly veered off course when she was asked what she would have done differently from President Joe Biden. Her answer, "Not a thing comes to mind," turned into a Republican attack ad and highlighted the difficulties her campaign faced in securing a victory over Donald Trump on Tuesday. Harris’s campaign tried to frame the race as a referendum on Trump, leaning into her background as a prosecutor to critique the former president. She also aimed to balance a positive, forward-looking message with warnings about Trump’s potential return to power. However, as the election drew closer, her strategy shifted to a direct confrontation, labeling Trump a “fascist” and calling him “unhinged and unstable” in response to former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly’s account of Trump’s alarming remarks about Adolf Hitler. This pivot, though intended to energize the base, may have ultimately backfired. Republican pollster Frank Luntz observed, "Kamala Harris lost this election when she pivoted to focus almost exclusively on attacking Donald Trump." Her attempt to emphasize the dangers of a Trump presidency while also providing a hopeful vision for the future left some voters uncertain about her own platform and her approach to pressing issues like economic anxiety and immigration. In the end, Harris’s close alignment with Biden and a campaign strategy that wavered between optimism and confrontation may have eroded her standing with voters. As Democrats look ahead, her loss underscores the complexities of maintaining party unity while pushing for change—especially when burdened with an incumbent's legacy. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-08

Two protesters aligned with the climate activist group Just Stop Oil took aim at the US embassy in London, in a pointed response to Donald Trump’s recent election victory. Early this morning, at around 9:20 a.m., the activists sprayed orange paint across the embassy’s walls and labeled Trump a “fake populist,” drawing attention to their concerns over what they see as corporate control in politics. Just Stop Oil, a group with a history of high-profile demonstrations, has shown a pattern of disrupting notable public spaces to spread its climate-related messages. In September, three of its members were charged with criminal damage following a protest where soup was thrown at two Van Gogh paintings in the National Gallery. With actions like these, the group continues to draw attention to its cause, highlighting the perceived link between corporate interests, environmental degradation, and political disillusionment. This latest protest at the US embassy reflects their ongoing campaign to challenge political decisions that they believe favor fossil fuel interests over environmental and societal health, a stance they argue is manipulated by corporate wealth and power. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-08

It is now “virtually certain” that 2024 will be recorded as the world’s hottest year, marked by extreme heatwaves, deadly storms, and significant climate disruptions, according to recent projections by the European climate service. Global average temperatures are on track to exceed pre-industrial levels by more than 1.5°C, making this year the first to breach this pivotal threshold. The main driver behind this historic warming is human-induced climate change, with additional contributions from natural events like the El Niño weather pattern. Scientists see this milestone as a clear signal to address climate action at the upcoming UN climate conference, COP29, in Azerbaijan. "This latest record sends another stark warning to governments at COP29 of the urgent need for action to limit any further warming," cautioned Liz Bentley, chief executive of the Royal Meteorological Society. Global temperatures have risen so sharply in the first 10 months of the year that only an extraordinarily steep decline in November and December could prevent this new record from being set. Current data from the European Copernicus Climate Change Service suggests that 2024 will close with temperatures at least 1.55°C above pre-industrial levels. The period between 1850 and 1900, known as the “pre-industrial” era, serves as a benchmark for assessing the influence of human activities on the climate. This year’s temperatures are poised to eclipse the previous record of 1.48°C, set just last year, signaling an accelerating trend in global warming. "This marks a new milestone in global temperature records," said Samantha Burgess, deputy director of Copernicus. The United Nations recently warned that, based on current policies, global temperatures could rise by more than 3°C by the end of this century, underscoring the urgency of enacting meaningful climate policies. The trends seen in 2024 also raise questions about the future. "We will watch with interest what happens going into 2025 and beyond," commented Ed Hawkins, professor of climate science at the University of Reading. With greenhouse gases in the atmosphere continuing to increase rapidly, scientists caution that breaking temperature records could become a regular occurrence if significant changes are not made. "The warmer temperatures [are making] storms more intense, heatwaves hotter and heavy rainfall more extreme, with clearly seen consequences for people all around the world," explained Prof. Hawkins. He emphasized that stabilizing global temperatures through achieving net zero emissions is the only way to mitigate the increasing economic and human costs of these escalating climate disasters. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-08

In a significant shakeup, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz announced on Wednesday that his three-party ruling coalition had collapsed, setting the stage for a potential snap election within months. Scholz declared he would dismiss Finance Minister Christian Lindner, a move that effectively ousts the fiscally conservative Free Democratic Party (FDP) from the coalition, which also includes Scholz’s own Social Democratic Party (SPD) and the Green Party. The decision to fire Lindner stems from irreconcilable disputes within the coalition over budgetary policies and economic reform strategies. Scholz revealed that he would seek a confidence vote on January 15, a pivotal move that could lead to early elections as soon as March if he fails to secure the necessary parliamentary support. The disintegration of the coalition follows former U.S. President Donald Trump’s surprise victory in the recent American election, a result that has deeply unsettled German political leaders who rely on American defense support and worry about the potential impact of Trump’s tariff policies on Germany’s export-dependent economy. Scholz acknowledged the gravity of the moment in an address to the German public. “Dear fellow citizens, I would have liked to have spared you this difficult decision, especially in times like these, when uncertainty is growing,” he stated, emphasizing that the internal conflicts within the coalition had become insurmountable. One of the primary sources of discord was the FDP’s insistence on strict fiscal discipline and tax cuts. Lindner, as finance minister, staunchly opposed the SPD and Green Party’s calls for increased social spending and economic stimulus measures aimed at bolstering German industry. Scholz voiced frustration over Lindner’s intransigence, stating, “All too often, Minister Lindner has blocked laws in an inappropriate manner. Too often he has engaged in petty party-political tactics. Too often he has broken my trust.” Scholz further explained that he had requested Lindner’s support in relaxing spending regulations to facilitate more aid for Ukraine, a request Lindner rejected on the grounds that it would “violate my oath of office.” Lindner, for his part, criticized Scholz’s economic policies, accusing him of neglecting the need for economic revitalization. “Olaf Scholz has long failed to recognize the need for a new economic awakening in our country,” Lindner argued in a statement. He went on to assert that Scholz had consistently downplayed the economic concerns of German citizens, suggesting that the government’s current direction was inadequate for addressing the nation’s economic challenges. As Germany heads toward a likely snap election, the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) appears poised to take advantage of the current political disarray. Polls show the CDU enjoying a strong lead, positioning it as a probable successor should Scholz’s coalition formally collapse. Over recent years, the CDU has shifted further to the right on migration issues while advocating for stronger military support for Ukraine, signaling a potential shift in both domestic and foreign policy should they assume power. The collapse of Scholz’s coalition and the upcoming confidence vote mark a critical juncture for Germany, as political uncertainty grows against the backdrop of global instability. Based on a report by Politico 2024-11-08

Mike Amesbury, the Member of Parliament formerly affiliated with the Labour Party, is facing a charge of common assault following an incident last month in Frodsham, Cheshire. Amesbury, who now serves as the independent MP for Runcorn and Helsby, was suspended from the Labour Party pending the outcome of the legal proceedings. Amesbury himself addressed the situation briefly, expressing regret for the incident but withholding further comments due to the ongoing nature of the case. "I have today been summonsed to court to face a charge of common assault following an incident in Frodsham last month, which was deeply regrettable," he stated. "I am continuing to cooperate with police, and given this is an ongoing case, I cannot comment further." Since the incident, Labour suspended Amesbury from the party, resulting in his current position as an independent MP for the Runcorn and Helsby constituency. The suspension underscores the party's stance on legal matters involving its members, emphasizing accountability and due process. Amesbury's upcoming court appearance is expected to bring more clarity to the situation as both legal representatives and Amesbury himself prepare to address the charge formally in court. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-11-08

Roz Adams, a former worker at the Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC), has been awarded £69,000 in compensation after a tribunal ruled she was unfairly dismissed due to her gender-critical views. In May, the tribunal concluded that Adams had suffered harassment and discrimination leading to her constructive dismissal by the ERCC. The tribunal highlighted that there was "ample evidence" of bias from the former ERCC chief executive, Mridul Wadhwa, who, according to the ruling, perceived Adams as transphobic. This perception was cited as the basis for a “completely spurious and mishandled disciplinary process,” which ultimately led to Adams’s departure. Wadhwa, a trans woman, resigned from her position in September. Adams's situation drew comparisons to the works of Franz Kafka, with the tribunal describing the internal disciplinary proceedings she endured as “reminiscent” of Kafka's narratives about bureaucratic absurdities. Adams had questioned the policy allowing trans female counsellors to work with female survivors of sexual violence, which reportedly triggered the disciplinary actions against her. As part of her compensation, the tribunal awarded Adams £68,989.71—nearly twice what was initially expected—as a redress for discrimination, unfair dismissal, and the emotional toll she endured. Additionally, the ERCC has been instructed to issue a public apology on its website and begin referring clients to Beira’s Place, a support center dedicated to helping female survivors of sexual violence. This facility, established by author JK Rowling, is where Adams currently works after leaving the ERCC. In his ruling, Judge Ian McFatridge noted that Adams “was not transphobic” and that her actions did not constitute bullying or harassment. He described it as “extraordinary” that the ERCC had hesitated to refer cases to Beira’s Place, given the tribunal’s findings and the ERCC’s commitment to supporting survivors of sexual violence. Expressing gratitude to her supporters, Adams stated that the compensation would allow her time to “rest” after the ordeal. She also expressed hope that ERCC, Rape Crisis Scotland, and the Scottish government would undergo “meaningful change” in response to her case. “My priority remains that all victim-survivors of sexual violence can make a genuinely informed choice about the service they seek and have confidence in who will support them,” Adams said, calling for clearer definitions and transparency from these organizations. She specifically urged them to adopt a clear definition of “woman” in the context of their services. Adams also remarked on the progress of reconciliation, noting that ERCC representatives had recently visited Beira’s Place for a “productive” meeting. “While I do not underestimate the harms and hurt felt by many, or the enormity of the task, I hope this suggests seedlings of change and the start of bridges being built,” Adams shared, emphasizing the need for “space and support to step back, rethink, and repair.” In a public statement, the ERCC board acknowledged its mishandling of Adams’s case and extended an apology. “We are committed to balancing the views, needs, and wants of all our service users, staff, and volunteers,” the board stated, admitting that “during the employment tribunal with Roz Adams, we did not act in the right way.” They clarified that Adams’s actions stemmed from a desire to support service users rather than any form of transphobia. “We should have listened more to Roz’s concerns and never pursued disciplinary action, and for that, we are sorry,” the board concluded, noting that they have already implemented changes based on the tribunal’s findings and the recommendations of Rape Crisis Scotland. Based on a report by The Guardian 2024-11-08

Shortly after Donald Trump secured a second presidential term, a Telegram account linked to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) shared a video threatening his life. Bisimchi Media, an account associated with the IRGC on the platform, posted a disturbing video depicting Trump in the crosshairs of a sniper and appearing to spit up blood. This ominous message is just the latest in a string of warnings from Iran’s IRGC, a military force that reports directly to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. "The video ends by showing an injured Trump with the text “we will finish the job”." Trump has been a central target of the IRGC since he ordered a 2020 airstrike that killed Soleimani near Baghdad International Airport. The assassination, justified by Trump as a “decisive defensive action to protect U.S. personnel abroad,” was a historic moment that heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran. In retaliation, Khamenei has released videos that simulate assassination scenarios targeting Trump, and the Iranian government has vowed revenge on all U.S. officials connected to the decision to kill Soleimani. The U.S. government recently informed Trump’s team of continued Iranian threats against him. This warning has led to requests for enhanced security measures around the former president, including military air support and increased protective restrictions at his residences. The Biden administration condemned any plot on Trump’s life as an “act of war,” underscoring the high stakes and persistent security risks surrounding Trump as he re-enters the political spotlight. Based on a report by The Gazette 2024-11-08

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced a plan to introduce legislation that would ban children under 16 from using social media platforms, a measure aimed at protecting the mental health of young Australians. Albanese stated on Thursday that the government would hold social media companies responsible for enforcing the restriction, while children and their parents would not face penalties if they were found to be in violation. “Social media is doing harm to our kids, and I’m calling time on it,” Albanese declared, adding, “I want parents to be able to say: ‘Sorry, mate, it’s against the law.’” Prime Minister Albanese disclosed that the cabinet had agreed on 16 as the minimum age for social media use. This threshold is stricter than the 14-year-old age limit proposed by South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas. Albanese has scheduled a national cabinet meeting with premiers and chief ministers to discuss a unified age restriction, with legislation anticipated next year. Albanese emphasized that concerns over youth social media use have become the “number one discussion” among parents. He acknowledged that the policy may not be flawless, comparing it to existing underage drinking laws that, while not foolproof, provide a protective framework. “We don’t pretend that you can get a 100 per cent outcome here,” he remarked, arguing that the ban is a worthwhile pursuit even if some young people manage to circumvent it. Communications Minister Michelle Rowland described the proposed ban as “world-leading,” highlighting that no other country has enacted similar regulations. If implemented, Australia would pioneer this type of social media restriction, which reflects the government’s commitment to tackling the complexities of youth mental health in the digital age. Based on a report by Sydney Herald 2024-11-08

Donald Trump's return to political prominence is already putting a strain on the longstanding “special relationship” between the US and the UK, as his views on Britain’s new Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, reveal ideological differences. According to sources familiar with Trump’s private conversations, he has described Starmer as “very left-wing,” which signals an emerging rift that could challenge the traditionally close ties between the two nations. Donald Trump Jr tells @danriversitv exclusively that the US-UK special relationship is 'certainly not' off to a 'great start' if Trump becomes president, following controversy over the Labour Party sending volunteers to the US to help the Harris campaign Historically, the “special relationship,” a term coined by Winston Churchill, has withstood political differences between leaders of the two nations. For example, former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair famously supported Republican President George W. Bush’s post-9/11 military response, despite their differing political orientations. However, the situation between Trump and Starmer could prove different, with early signs suggesting the relationship may be characterized by levels of tension rather than unity. For Starmer, who campaigned on promises to resist populism, aligning with Trump could present challenges both domestically and internationally. Nevertheless, Starmer’s administration has publicly expressed willingness to work with Trump’s government. The prime minister quickly offered his congratulations following Trump’s victory, and Starmer’s spokesperson cited recent communication with Trump’s team. Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy, despite their previous criticisms of Trump, began reaching out to the new US administration before the UK election. Their efforts included contact with Trump’s running mate, JD Vance. Starmer also personally called Trump following an incident in July, and they reportedly shared a constructive dinner in New York, after which Trump told insiders they were “friends.” In the UK’s Parliament, the tensions were evident. During a recent session, new Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch highlighted the irony of Labour’s prior criticisms of Trump. She remarked, “I’m very sure that President Trump will soon be calling to thank him for sending all of those North London Labour activists to campaign for his opponent.” Trump, in his usual style, reflected on his relationship with Starmer: “I have to be nice, right?” he said. “But I actually think he’s very nice, I think. He ran a great race. He did very well. It’s very early, but he’s popular and I’ll be seeing him.” Based on a report by Bloomberg | X 2024-11-08

Off topic troll post removed Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible

unattributed image with unattributed claims removed along with replies and an off topic post @beautifulthailand99

On election night, the US Space Force planned to launch an unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile, testing the nation’s nuclear deterrent at a time when tensions with Russia and the Middle East are high. This missile test, scheduled years in advance, is intended to affirm the United States’ preparedness in maintaining its nuclear forces. According to Air Force Global Strike Command, the launch aims to "demonstrate the readiness of US nuclear forces and provide confidence in the lethality and effectiveness of the nation’s nuclear deterrent." Although the test was set to coincide with Election Day, officials stressed that the timing was purely coincidental. As per an agency statement to the California-based Lompoc Record, “The election had nothing to do with its scheduling.” Launches of this kind are usually held in early November, with last year’s test taking place on November 1. The launch was scheduled for shortly after 11 p.m. PST from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The LGM-30G Minuteman III ICBM serves as the land-based component of the United States’ nuclear arsenal, with around 400 of these missiles on standby across the country, according to the Air Force. In line with established international protocols, the Hague Code of Conduct and Russia had been notified of the test in advance. This test comes on the heels of Russia’s recent large-scale nuclear exercises. Just a week ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin directed a massive nuclear drill simulating the deployment of Moscow’s own ballistic missile systems. The exercise stirred unease reminiscent of the Cold War era, though Putin assured the world that Russia’s nuclear arsenal would only be deployed under “extremely exceptional measures,” emphasizing that his country is not seeking a “new arms race.” However, Putin also issued a warning directed at the United States and NATO, stating that Russia would consider using nuclear force if the country faced an attack by a non-nuclear power that is supported by a nuclear-armed state. This declaration seemed to address the United States and NATO allies directly, particularly those that continue to support Ukraine, where conflict has persisted since Russia’s 2023 invasion. As geopolitical tensions escalate, the United States' Minuteman III test serves as a reminder of the ongoing reliance on nuclear deterrence in a world where diplomatic stability is increasingly fragile. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-07

German police have apprehended eight suspected members of a far-right militant group, accused of plotting to overthrow government authority in Saxony and other parts of eastern Germany. Prosecutors disclosed Tuesday that the group, identified as the Sächsische Separatisten, or Saxonian Separatists, held racist, antisemitic, and apocalyptic views. The group reportedly consists of around 15-20 individuals, including minors and adolescents, all unified by their disdain for Germany’s liberal democratic structure. The public prosecutor’s office noted, “Its members are united in a profound rejection of the liberal democratic order and believe that Germany is nearing ‘collapse.’” Authorities allege that the Saxonian Separatists were planning to establish a regime inspired by National Socialism in parts of eastern Germany, with a blueprint for “governmental and societal structures” that would emulate elements of the Nazi era. Authorities revealed chilling plans for ethnic cleansing, noting that “unwanted groups of people are supposed to be removed from the area by means of ethnic cleansing.” This extreme objective has led to widespread alarm, sparking one of the largest security operations against far-right extremism in recent years. The eight men were detained in separate locations across Saxony, with the alleged ringleader arrested in Poland. Over 450 police officers and special forces took part in a coordinated sweep of 20 properties in connection with the arrests, searching for evidence of the group’s activities and intentions. The prosecutor’s office reported that since the group’s inception in 2020, members have been continuously preparing for what they believe to be an inevitable and violent regime change. The suspects, including those arrested, reportedly took part in paramilitary training, practicing urban warfare tactics, weapons handling, and other combative skills in full combat gear. The group also acquired military-grade equipment, including camouflage fatigues, combat helmets, gas masks, and bulletproof vests, further underscoring their commitment to a militant agenda. Authorities have targeted several additional suspects linked to the group, though these individuals have not been detained. The operation is the latest in a series of German crackdowns on far-right factions intent on destabilizing the government. This is not the first time German authorities have uncovered such plots. In 2022, a far-right group known as the Reichsbürger was accused of planning to storm the German parliament in Berlin, with the goal of arresting lawmakers and installing a new regime. Reports indicated that this group had hoped to negotiate a post-coup arrangement with Russia. For years, German government and security officials have raised alarms about the mounting threat from far-right extremists who seek to dismantle the country’s democratic foundations. These recent arrests serve as yet another indication of the ongoing danger posed by extremist factions in Germany and the need for vigilant counterterrorism efforts. Based on a report by NBC 2024-11-07

Elon Musk recently took a jab at Jennifer Lopez, questioning her credibility after she voiced her opposition to Donald Trump in the upcoming presidential election. Musk, known for his controversial opinions, shared his thoughts while discussing political endorsements with Joe Rogan on "The Joe Rogan Experience" podcast. The conversation followed Lopez’s emotional speech at a Las Vegas rally supporting Vice President Kamala Harris, where she urged voters to choose a candidate other than Trump. During the discussion, Musk brought up Lopez’s past relationship with Sean “Diddy” Combs, who faces serious legal allegations. Lopez dated Combs from 1999 to 2001, a period that included a high-profile Times Square club shooting in which Lopez was questioned but later released without charges. Musk questioned why Lopez was now warning people against Trump but remained silent about her former boyfriend, Diddy, who faces multiple accusations. “J.Lo was like his ex-girlfriend, and it’s like now deciding she’s warning people against Trump,” Musk stated on the podcast. “How many people did she warn against Diddy, right? Oh zero, okay. Maybe we shouldn’t trust her opinion.” Rogan added to Musk's point, questioning Harris’ reliance on celebrity endorsements, many of whom have past social or business connections to Diddy. "It’s peculiar that so many who frequented his gatherings are now outspoken supporters of Harris," Rogan commented, casting doubt on the motives behind these endorsements. He suggested that people in the entertainment industry may have known about Diddy’s alleged misconduct but turned a blind eye, adding, “Clearly, he was doing it for his own jollies too; there was something sick about it.” Musk further claimed, “People in the music entertainment industry had to know that Diddy was like abusing, you know, kids basically, and yet they still fed him kids. Like where’s the accountability? They had to know.” After the interview, Rogan went on to endorse Trump for the 2024 election, an endorsement he had held off on until now. The podcast host recently spoke with Trump himself in an October 25 interview. The comments by Musk and Rogan contrast with Lopez’s recent public statements on the campaign trail. During her rally appearance, Lopez defended Puerto Rico in response to a comedian’s insult of the U.S. territory, describing it as “a floating island of garbage.” She also conveyed her vision for a future that does not include Trump as president, sharing, “I believe in the power of women. I believe that women have the power to make the difference in this election. I believe in the power of Latinos. I believe in the power of our community. I believe in the power of all our votes.” Lopez’s relationship with Diddy has come under renewed scrutiny since his recent legal troubles surfaced. The rapper is currently being held at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center awaiting trial on multiple charges, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation for prostitution. Diddy has pleaded not guilty to these accusations, which include an alleged sexual assault of a 13-year-old girl on the same night he was seen in a public altercation with Lopez. The nature of their past relationship, especially considering these allegations, raises questions for some about the extent of her knowledge of his alleged actions. As Diddy’s trial approaches, Lopez has remained silent about her ex’s current legal situation. The media spotlight continues to focus on Lopez’s public endorsements and her call to action for Latino and female voters, leaving many to wonder about the complexities of her personal history with the music mogul. Diddy, facing grave charges, will remain in custody until his trial, set to begin on May 5, 2025. The exchange between Musk, Rogan, and Lopez highlights the intersection of celebrity influence, political endorsements, and public opinion. While Musk and Rogan criticize her for not speaking out against Diddy, Lopez maintains her position, urging her supporters to vote for a candidate who reflects her vision for the country’s future. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-07